
"US military aggression is flagrant violation of international law": Iran's Permanent Mission to UN
The communication holds both the US and Israel fully responsible for what it terms blatant violations of international law, warning of serious consequences for their actions.
Iran's envoy warned that the strike undermines the credibility of the global non-proliferation regime and poses a threat to the legal framework governing civilian nuclear energy.
'Such blatant acts of aggression and violations committed by a non-NPT party, the Israeli regime, which possesses undeclared, unsafeguarded nuclear capabilities, maintains a stockpile of nuclear weapons, and has a notorious record of attacking peaceful nuclear facilities across the region and further perpetrated by the United States, the only Member State ever to have used nuclear weapons in war, massacring millions of civilians in two single strikes during World War II, and which has now openly targeted Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities that have remained under the full verification and continuous monitoring of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' the letter reads.
Tehran in its letter further said that the United States' military aggression against sovereignty and territorial integrity constitutes a 'manifest' and 'flagrant' violation of international law and the 'peremptory' international norms enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations.
'Undoubtedly, the United States' military aggression against sovereignty and territorial integrity constitutes a manifest and flagrant violation of international law and the peremptory international norms enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, which categorically prohibit the threat or use of force against the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political independence of any Member State (Article 2(4) of the UN Charter). The US's armed attack against Iran's peaceful sites and facilities also violates the Statute of the Agency, IAEA General Conference Resolutions, and Security Council Resolutions 487 (1981) and 2231 (2015) and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT),' it added.
https://x.com/Iran_UN/status/1936667567759724547
'In light of the grave and far-reaching consequences of the United States' savage and criminal actions for international peace and security, the Islamic Republic of Iran urgently requests the Security Council to convene an emergency meeting without delay to address this blatant and unlawful act of aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms, and to take all necessary measures under its Charter-mandated responsibilities that the perpetrator of such heinous crimes is held fully accountable and does not go unpunished,' the letter further reads.
A Foreign Ministry spokesman of Oman also expressed deep concern over the escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict following US strikes and called for immediate and comprehensive de-escalation.
Earlier, Iran's mission to the UN demanded an urgent meeting of the Security Council following US' attacks on its nuclear facilities. The mission described the US bombing as a 'blatant and illegal aggression' and demanded it be condemned in the strongest possible terms.
The United States' military aggression against sovereignty and territorial integrity constitutes a manifest and flagrant violation of international law and the peremptory international norms enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations.
The Embassy of Iran in India shared a statement issued by AEOI confirming that early on Sunday morning, Iran's nuclear sites were 'subjected to savage aggression--an act in violation of international laws, particularly the NPT.'
'This action, which violates international regulations, unfortunately took place under the indifference--and even complicity--of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),' it said.
'This action, which violates international regulations, unfortunately took place under the indifference--and even complicity--of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),' it said.
'Following attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran - including Fordow - the IAEA can confirm that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported as of this time,' the international nuclear energy agency said in a social media post.
Earlier in the day, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the United States for launching airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, calling it a serious violation of international law, the UN Charter and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
The top Iranian diplomat accused the US, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), of 'lawless and criminal behaviour' by targeting what he described as peaceful nuclear installations. (ANI)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
a few seconds ago
- Time of India
Ex-Pentagon Official Calls Asim Munir ‘Osama in a Suit', Urges U.S. to Drop Pakistan as Major Ally
/ Aug 12, 2025, 12:48PM IST Former Pentagon official Michael Rubin has launched a scathing attack on Pakistan's army chief, General Asim Munir, labelling him 'Osama bin Laden in a suit' after a series of explosive anti-India remarks in the United States. Munir allegedly warned that if Pakistan collapsed, it would take 'half the world' with it, and threatened to destroy any Indian dam with ten missiles. Rubin condemned the comments as unacceptable on American soil, urging Washington to revoke Pakistan's major non-NATO ally status, impose a visa ban on Munir, and consider designating Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism. He also warned that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal could fall into rogue hands, calling for the international community to manage the country's decline and even secure its nuclear weapons through military action if necessary. Watch
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
a few seconds ago
- First Post
Iran signals complex talks ahead of first IAEA visit since July suspension
The IAEA visit is the first since President Masoud Pezeshkian halted collaboration on July 3 this year read more Iran has signalled that upcoming discussions with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will be 'technical' and 'complicated,' as the UN nuclear watchdog makes its first visit since Tehran suspended cooperation last month. The foreign ministry confirmed the trip follows the June conflict triggered by Israeli strikes, which led to a complete break in ties. Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said a meeting with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi may be arranged during the visit, though the outcome remains uncertain, Al Jazeera reports. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD First visit since July suspension The IAEA visit is the first since President Masoud Pezeshkian halted collaboration on July 3, after a 12-day war with Israel that also saw US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in support of Israel. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said IAEA Deputy Director General Massimo Aparo has concluded meetings in Tehran with officials from the foreign ministry and the agency's local office. Discussions focused on how the two sides will interact going forward, but no details were disclosed. The IAEA has yet to comment and the trip will not include access to nuclear sites. Relations have been strained since the IAEA's board declared on June 12 that Iran breached its non-proliferation obligations — a day before the Israeli strikes. Baghaei accused the agency of failing to adequately condemn the attacks on Iranian facilities, which he said were under 24-hour monitoring. Araghchi has previously indicated that any future cooperation will require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, potentially further restricting inspector access. Implications for nuclear oversight Analysts warn that the decision to redefine cooperation could limit monitoring of Iran's uranium enrichment program, which is operating at levels close to weapons-grade. While Iran has occasionally allowed partial inspections during past negotiations with Western powers, the resumption of nuclear talks with Washington remains uncertain. Both US intelligence agencies and the IAEA assess that Iran ended its organized nuclear weapons program in 2003. Although enrichment has reached 60 per cent, it remains below the 90 per cent threshold required for weapons-grade material. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
As BJP flies solo in Bodo Council polls, calls for its NDA partner, former ally to unite may complicate matters
With campaigning for the coming Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) elections in Assam heating up, the BJP has thrown itself headlong into the contest without an alliance with its NDA partner United People's Party Liberal (UPPL). This has opened the door for Bodo groups to call for rival regional parties UPPL and the Bodo People's Front (BPF), a former BJP ally, to join hands to safeguard Bodo rights. The 46-member BTC, in which 40 members are elected, has been led by the UPPL's Pramod Boro since 2020 with the BJP's support after a dramatic turn of events. Boro dethroned the BPF's Hagrama Mohilary who had held the Bodoland Council since its first election in 2005. The BJP had been the BPF's ally at the state level since 2016 and registered its best showing in 2020, winning nine seats as the BPF emerged as the single-largest party with 17 seats. However, the party lent its support to the UPPL that won 12 seats. The newly formed alliance, supported by one elected member from the regional Gana Suraksha Party, formed the council. The alliance continued in the 2021 Assembly elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls too, breaking the BPF's dominance in Bodo politics. The BTC is an autonomous self-governing body under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, a special provision that allows for greater political autonomy and decentralised governance in certain tribal areas of the Northeast. The BTC was formed in 2003 and has jurisdiction over the Bodo-inhabited districts of Kokrajhar, Udalguri, Baksa, Chirang and Tamulpur that collectively form the Bodoland Territorial Region (BTR). The BTR is home to several communities apart from the Bodos, including Bengali Muslims, Assamese, Adivasis, Koch-Rajbongshis, Rabhas, Garos, and Nepalis. While the official demographic details of the non-Bodo and Bodo populations are not available, it is estimated that the non-Bodo communities account for nearly 70% of the region's population. Since the UPPL's rise, there have been attempts to get the two Bodo parties to form a united front, something that Bodo organisations are now pushing, led by the All Bodo Students' Union and the Bodo Sahitya Sabha ahead of the BTC elections that are expected to be held in September. This was announced by leaders of a set of Bodo organisations last week, who said they had sent letters to both Boro and Mohilary and were hoping for a 'positive response' by August 12. Claiming they do not want 'divisions' within the community, Bodo Sahitya Sabha general secretary Nilakanta Goyary said, 'The peace we have in the BTC region today, we never want it to be damaged. The BTC region is always called 'Bodo bhoomi' and we want it to remain Bodo bhoomi.' While different leaders in both regional parties say they are in favour of a united front in principle, neither side seems ready to take a decisive step towards an alliance, with Mohilary and Boro continuing to take swipes at each other. The BPF has already announced an initial list of 22 candidates and Mohilary has repeatedly stated he intends for his party to contest all 40 seats. However, leaders of both parties told The Indian Express that discussions on this matter were on the table. While this is underway, the BJP is campaigning with all guns blazing, led by Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, who has been addressing continuous political meetings in the region since August 2. Statements by Sarma and Assam BJP chief Dilip Saikia foregrounding the question of equal land rights to all communities living in the BTC region — where there are restrictions on land ownership and transfers under the Sixth Schedule and Assam's regulations for protected tribal belts and blocks — have caused discontent among Bodo leaders and organisations. In particular, a repeated refrain by Sarma that 'there cannot be second-class citizens in the BTC' and a statement by Saikia seemingly questioning why other 'indigenous' communities of Assam were prevented from buying land in the BTC have touched a raw nerve. However, UPPL general secretary Raju Narzary, who has lashed out against these comments and asked the BJP to 'clarify' who it was referring to as 'second-class citizens,' claimed that the push for a united front was not linked to the current campaign. 'We are positive about the question of unification of regional parties, it is something that we have been talking about for the last year and a half. But it has been halted in the past for various reasons. This push is not directed against any party but for the future of the BTC and about permanent peace and stability in the region. The BTR is a very small region with a population of only around 3.5 million and within it, the Bodos are an even smaller population. If there is only one political party from among the Bodos, it will be a more forceful and powerful voice and will be able to realise different divisions. The talks are still unofficially happening,' he told The Indian Express. BPF vice-president Emmanuel Moshahary accused the BJP of engaging in divisive politics in an attempt to capture non-Bodo votes. 'They are trying to attract the non-Bodos … The region is under constitutional protections, and they are saying that others are second-class citizens. We are not operating under a separate Constitution and we have to remember the level of deprivation that was here,' he said.