Delhi HC orders protection to Madhya Pradesh journalist facing threat from police
New Delhi, The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted protection to a Madhya Pradesh-based journalist who claimed there was threat to his life by the Bhind superintendent of police after he was allegedly beaten in his office.
Justice Ravinder Dudeja directed the Delhi Police to give protection to Amarkant Singh Chouhan, a resident of Madhya Pradesh and Bhind Bureau Chief of Swaraj Express news channel, for two months.
"In the meantime, they can approach the high court concerned ," the court said.
The court disposed of the plea, asking the petitioner's counsel to furnish the details of the police station where the journalist is staying in Delhi. It also said that Chouhan's number be shared with the beat officer and Station House Officer.
The plea, however, was opposed by the Delhi Police counsel.
Earlier this month, three journalists from Bhind district had alleged that they were beaten or manhandled inside the office of superintendent of police, an allegation denied by the officer.
Pritam Singh Rajawat who runs a YouTube channel, Shashikant Goyal who runs a news portal, and Amarkant Singh Chouhan, who also works for a news channel alleged in a complaint submitted to the district collector that they were assaulted on May 1.
Chouhan, 55, approached the Delhi High Court claiming that he came to Delhi fleeing violence by the police in Bhind and is unable to return to Madhya Pradesh due to threat to his life and personal liberty.
His counsel said he was constrained to approach the Delhi High Court as he was unable to approach the Madhya Pradesh High Court due to the extenuating circumstances.
"The petitioner inter alios had been recently reporting about the illegal sand mining activities in the Chambal River that are carried out by the sand mafia in connivance with the local police. Displeased with the same, on May 1, 2025, SP Asit Yadav had inter alios 'invited' the petitioner to have tea with him in his chambers and had physically assaulted and battered the petitioner," the petition said.
The plea claimed that besides Chouhan, and another journalist Shashikant Goyal, more than half a dozen other scribes were also present in the superintendent of police's chamber and all had been stripped down to their undergarments before being physically assaulted.
The petitioner alleged that faced with continuous harassment at the hands of Bhind police, Goyal and Chauhan came to Delhi on May 19 to file a complaint with the Press Council of India and the National Human Rights Commission.
The plea said there is threat to his and his family's life if the petitioner returns to his hometown in Bhind and urged the court to extend them protection.
He prayed the court to protect his right to life and personal liberty and also to protect the freedom of speech and expression and the right to carry out profession under Article 19 of the Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
J&K LG sacks 3 UT staff for terror links
NEW DELHI/SRINAGAR: J&K LG Tuesday dismissed three J&K govt employees after they were found to be transporting arms, explosives and narcotics to and arranging logistical support for operatives of LeT and Hizb to carry out terror attacks in the UT. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This takes the total dismissals ordered by Sinha under Article 311(2)(c) of Constitution, since he took office, to over 75. All three govt employees sacked in the latest round - Malik Ishfaq Naseer, a constable; Ajaz Ahmed, a teacher in school dept; and Waseem Ahmad Khan, a junior assistant in GMC, Srinagar - are currently in jail on terror charges. Naseer was recruited as a constable in J&K Police in 2007. His brother Malik Asif Naseer, a Pakistan-trained terrorist of LeT, was killed by forces in 2018. Malik, however, continued his terror activities, using his cover as a constable to avoid suspicion. His LeT link was exposed in Sept 2021 when cops found him to be helping LeT drop arms, explosives & narcotics, guided by GPS, at pre-shared coordinates facilitated by him to his Pakistani handlers. Ahmed was recruited as a teacher in 2011 but led a double life as a terror associate of Hizb in Poonch region. He was helping the outfit in smuggling arms and ammunition. Khan's terror links with Hizb were exposed with his arrest in Aug 2018. Sources said he was one of the conspirators behind killing of journalist Shujaat Bukhari in June 2018.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
SC: No contempt if Parliament and state legislature simply make laws
The Supreme Court has said that any law enacted by Parliament or a state legislature 'subsequent' to a court order cannot be held an act of contempt, and the enactment would have the 'force of law' unless declared 'null and void' by a Constitutional Court. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and S C Sharma said this in a May 15 order disposing of a 2012 contempt plea alleging that the Chhattisgarh government failed to comply with the SC's directions to stop support to vigilante groups like Salwa Judum and arming tribals in the name of special police officers (SPO) in the fight against Maoists. The contempt plea contended that even after the SC on July 5, 2011 ordered winding up of Salwa Judum's activities, the Chhattisgarh government in September that year legislated the Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Armed Police Force Act, 2011, which authorised an auxiliary armed force to assist security forces in dealing with Maoist violence and legalised existing SPOs by inducting them as members. The contempt plea — as well as the main petition on which the SC's 2011 order had come — were filed by former Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar, author Ramachandra Guha and former Andhra Pradesh Tribal Affairs Secretary E A S Sharma. 'The passing of an enactment subsequent to the order of this Court by the legislature of the State of Chhattisgarh cannot, in our view, be said to be an act of contempt of the order passed by this Court…', the bench said. 'Every State Legislature has plenary powers to pass an enactment and so long as the said enactment has not been declared to be ultra vires the Constitution or, in any way, null and void by a Constitutional Court, the said enactment would have the force of law.' The bench said that under the Constitution, the judiciary is vested with the power to resolve interpretive doubts and disputes about the validity or otherwise of an enacted law by the Parliament or any state legislature. 'However, the interpretative power of a Constitutional Court does not contemplate a situation of declaring exercise of legislative functions and passing of an enactment as an instance of a contempt of a Court,' it added. The bench sought to remind that 'central to the legislative function is the power of the legislative organ to enact as well as amend laws' and 'any law made by the Parliament or a State Legislature cannot be held to be an act of contempt of a Court, including this Court, for simply making the law.' 'A legislature has, inter alia, the powers to pass a law, to remove the basis of a judgment or in the alternative, validate a law which has been struck down by a Constitutional Court by amending or varying it so as to give effect to the judgment of a Constitutional Court which has struck down a portion of an enactment or for that matter the entire enactment,' it said. 'This is the core of the doctrine of separation of powers and must always be acknowledged in a constitutional democracy such as ours,' it said.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC restrains NHAI from collecting fee in two toll plazas
Madurai: Madras high court on Tuesday restrained the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) from collecting toll fees in two toll plazas situated on the Madurai-Tuticorin national highway stretch, after taking into account the fact that the road was not maintained properly and saplings were not planted on both sides of the road. A division bench of justice S M Subramaniam and justice A D Maria Clete passed the order while disposing of a public interest litigation filed by V Balakrishnan, a retired Tangedco assistant executive engineer from Tuticorin district. The petitioner stated that the contract for the Madurai-Tuticorin highway was awarded in 2006 and the highway stretch was put to use in 2011. He stated that as per the contract, the contractor was to plant trees on both sides and on the centre median; however, the work was carried out partially. The contractor collected tolls from two toll plazas from the date of usage of the roads. But the contractor failed to maintain the road, and many portions of the road were not motorable due to lack of proper maintenance. He stated that NHAI remained a silent spectator of all the lapses and irregularities committed by the contractor without initiating any kind of action to fulfil the terms and conditions of the contract. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like ¿Cómo obtener un segundo ingreso invirtiendo $100 en AES CFD? PentyMedia Más información Undo Sensing the seriousness, the agreement was terminated in 2023. It is also seen from the RTI reply that about 563.83 crore are recoverable from the contractor for his failure to plant roadside avenues and maintain the roads. The petitioner stated that after taking over the road, NHAI continued to collect the tolls previously collected by the contractor. The action of the NHAI is totally baseless and illogical because it has not spent any money towards the construction of the road. The estimated project cost was 920 crore. However, the contractor collected 932.44 crore, without spending 563.83 crore towards maintenance and plantations. He stated that NHAI miserably and deliberately failed to take timely action against the contractor and allowed the contractor to continue with his violation and irregularity for more than 10 years, thereby causing a loss of 563.83 crore, besides causing inconvenience and suffering to the road users. The right to proper road connectivity is the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. Road maintenance is the statutory duty of the authorities, and they ought to have followed it strictly. Hence, the petitioner moved court seeking a direction to the NHAI authorities to initiate action against the contractor and to plant saplings on both sides of the road and the centre median on the highway.
