Sitaare Zameen Par director RS Prasanna fires back in remake debate: Adaptation is an art in itself
After the lukewarm reception of Laal Singh Chaddha, fans have been eagerly awaiting Aamir Khan's next movie. Now, with Sitaare Zameen Par set to hit theatres soon, the actor is making his much-anticipated return to the big screen. Amid speculation that the upcoming film is a Hindi adaptation of a Spanish original, director RS Prasanna addressed the topic of remakes in an interview with LiveMint.
When asked about his views on remakes, Prasanna offered his perspective: 'As a director, I'm always looking for a story. Sometimes I write it myself, and sometimes I remake it myself. Kalyana Samayal Saadham is a story I wrote, and I adapted it into Hindi as Shubh Mangal Saavdhan—my own film. If there's an opportunity to tell a story again in another culture or in a different language where the original hasn't been seen, and if the material excites the director, then they naturally want to tell the story in a new format or context.
Why did I adapt my Tamil film into Hindi? Because Kalyana was a very universal story that could transcend cultures. Since it was in Tamil, a lot of Tamil people saw it, but the Hindi audience didn't. It took us almost a year to rewrite and adapt it.'
Last week, Aamir Khan defended doing remakes, citing films like Ghajini and Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak. He said remakes offer a fresh canvas and he will continue doing them if the story excites him. 'It's my choice to do it. If you don't want to watch, that's your choice,' he added.
After Aamir Khan's comments, Sitaare Zameen Par director RS Prasanna echoed similar sentiments during the conversation.
He said, 'Adaptation is an art in itself.'
'To adapt a movie and do justice to it in a different language and culture, much of it gets lost in translation. You have to stay true to the spirit of the original while also changing things around and conceptualising it for the new culture. These are very interesting challenges for a director like me. I enjoy it. Telling a story is what's important. The source can be me, another writer, a book, a play... What matters to me is that it's a story I'm excited to take to the audience. That's what drives me,' he said.
Without delving into the debate surrounding the film's origins, Prasanna shared, 'In this case, we got the opportunity to platform 10 neurodivergent actors—and many more. The thought behind it was so beautiful. We wanted to tell this story in theatres, where you could bring your whole family. That's what I want for Sitaare Zameen Par – to get people into theatres and give them a chance. It's a quintessential Aamir film, with its connection to Taare Zameen Par.'
Whether an official adaptation or not, Sitaare Zameen Par aims to move beyond the neurotypical gaze. With ten neurodivergent actors, the film promises a nuanced and refreshing portrayal of individuals with autism and Down syndrome.
Prasanna revealed that around 2,500 individuals with special needs auditioned for the Aamir Khan film. 'We auditioned around 2,500 people. What we were looking for was the spark of acting. We narrowed it down to about 100, from which we made our final picks. They underwent both acting and basketball workshops. It became like a community; everyone was living together. Their parents were always with them.'
He also shared that the team brought in a specialised doctor to help communicate with the neurodivergent actors and better understand their needs throughout the process.
'They absolutely loved talking and performing,' Prasanna said, referring to Aroush Datta, Gopi Krishnan Varma, Vedant Sharmaa, Naman Misra, Rishi Shahani, Rishabh Jain, Ashish Pendse, Samvit Desai, Simran Mangeshkar, and Aayush Bhansali, who are all making their acting debut with the film.
Interestingly, none of them knew which film they were auditioning for.
So, how did they react upon learning they had landed roles in an Aamir Khan film? 'We revealed it to them only after they were selected,' Prasanna shared. 'They went ecstatic!'
The film also features Genelia D'Souza in the female lead role.
Was she the first choice for the part? Director RS Prasanna revealed, 'It was actually Aamir who suggested her. We were discussing casting while I was outlining the character, and he said, 'What about Genelia?' I immediately jumped on the idea. Genelia is a fantastic actor. Recently, her reels were amazing, and I found a wonderful, positive energy in her—that was exactly what the film needed.'
Sitaare Zameen Par is scheduled to release on 20 June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
32 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Saif Ali Khan, Kareena Kapoor Khan meet Karisma Kapoor after death of former husband Sunjay Kapur
Sunjay J Kapur, Chairman of Sona Comstar and the former husband of Bollywood actor Karisma Kapoor, died of a heart attack in the UK on June 12. He was 53. Sunjay, an industrialist, and Karisma, a leading Hindi film actress of the time, were married in 2003. The couple became parents to daughter Samaira in 2005 and son Kiaan in 2011. The couple had a troubled marriage. In 2014, Karisma and Sunjay filed for divorce through mutual consent but later withdrew it over disagreements over financial settlements and the custody of their children. An acrimonious legal battle ensued. In her divorce plea, Karisma accused Sunjay of domestic abuse. Their divorce was finalised in 2016. The same year, Karisma Kapoor filed a domestic violence case against Sunjay and his mother, as well as a dowry harassment case. After the separation, Sunjay married Priya Sachdev. Karishma Kapoor's sister Kareena Kapoor Khan, her husband Saif Ali Khan, and close friend Malaika Arora arrived at her residence late on Thursday night to provide emotional support. Sunjay Kapur was the chairman and non-executive director of automotive tech company Sona Comstar. In a statement, the company said, 'It is with profound sorrow that we announce the untimely passing of Mr. Sunjay J. Kapur, Chairman and Non-Executive Director of Sona Comstar, following a sudden heart attack in England, UK, on 12th June 2025, at the age of 53.'
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Silent fall of single-screen theatres in Andhra
The narrow lane outside Navarang Theatre in Vijayawada's Governorpet was once abuzz with taxis and autorickshaws that brought an excited audience. On billboards, large posters caught the movie cast in the thick of action and drama, and in the air, hung faint snippets of dialogues and music wafting out from the hall. Opened in 1964, Navarang Theatre was a cultural landmark, where rickshaw pullers and taxi drivers took pride in watching Hindi and English movies alongside the city's elite. Blockbusters ran for months, with word of mouth doing its magic. Today, however, silence has shrouded the theatre, its empty seats and faded walls a stark contrast to the housefulls in its heyday. Navarang Theatre is one of the last few independently run single screens in Andhra Pradesh. Most of its contemporaries, including the State's first theatre Maruthi Talkies, Vijaya Talkies, Sri Durga Mahal, Mohan Das, all in Vijayawada, have shuttered, while many others have either leased out their theatres or rented them out as real estate properties. The decline began decades ago, when televisions became commonplace in households. Then came the internet revolution, the smartphone penetration and, finally, the proliferation of OTTs. These, along with an 'unreasonable' revenue-sharing model between distributors and exhibitors seem to have finally broken the back of this once-prosperous industry. Rolling with the punches For Navarang Theatre proprietor R.V. Bhupal Prasad, its 'passion' that keeps him in the business. His family used to own 13 theatres, including Saraswati Talkies, Saraswati Picture Palace, Leela Mahal and Navarang, across the State. Leela Mahal, which opened in Vijayawada in 1944, was the first theatre in the Andhra region of the Madras Presidency to screen English and Hindi movies. Today, he agonises over which movie to screen. 'It is exhausting; we don't know which movie will strike a chord with the audience. Sometimes, even a big-starrer tanks at the box office, and sometimes, a small movie makes waves,' he says. In a 2021 research paper titled Amplification as Pandemic Effect: Single Screens in the Telugu Country, authors S.V. Srinivas, a professor of literature and media studies at Azim Premji University, Bengaluru, and Raghav Nanduri say that around 90% of single-screen theatre owners in Andhra Pradesh have leased out their theatres. Dwindling business is one reason why they did it. 'These days, pirated copies reach one's smartphone even before the film's release. Why would anyone want to incur losses? So, they lease the theatre out to those who have the wherewithal to run it. That guarantees a stable income. These days, running a supermarket makes more sense,' says a veteran exhibitor, who sought anonymity. Across A.P. and Telangana, over 600 independently run single screens are haemorrhaging money. Srinivas, one of the authors of the research paper, says that leasing has helped single screens survive. 'Under the lease system, where most lessees are bigshots in the industry, many single screens were renovated and received a multiplex feel. Moreover, re-releases, too, have become the lifeline for many theatres.' However, some in the business feel that small producers find it difficult to get their films released in theatres run by these bigwigs. On expenses, the veteran exhibitor explains that around ₹20,000 a day is needed to run a single screen in a city such as Hyderabad or Visakhapatnam. In smaller cities, it could be around ₹15,000. The power bill comes around ₹2.5 lakh a month and staff salary around ₹1.5 lakh. 'If we get ₹4 lakh a month, we can break even, but we rarely get it.' While Kamal Haasan's 2022 movie Vikram fetched him ₹7 lakh in the first week, the same actor's recent movie Thug Life barely scrapped together ₹7,000, opening to a 6% occupancy rate in his theatre. 'I incurred a loss of ₹3 lakh over the past four months,' he adds. Revenue sharing model While decreasing footfalls, piracy and OTT platforms are problems faced by multiplexes, too, their situation is slightly better, say some single-screen owners. And it is here, in the difference, that the chief concern of exhibitors comes to the fore: the revenue-sharing model. To understand the revenue-sharing model between the exhibitors and distributors, it is important to know how the system of buying-distributing-selling of a film works. 'The concept of exhibitor-distributor existed since the first movie,' says Grandhi Viswanath, who has nine single-screen theatres across the State. His grandfather, G.K. Mangaraju, became the first distributor and exhibitor in the State in 1927, when silent movies gave way to talkies. His distribution office, Poorna Pictures, is the first distribution company in the State. 'Earlier, it was a healthy system. A producer would inform the distributor about a new movie. A distributor would look at the casting, content and production cost and then invest in the movie to buy the rights. There used to be one distributor for an entire region for that particular film. The distributor would have links with a few theatre exhibitors, to whom the print of a film would be handed over. The ticketed revenue was shared on a percentage basis between a distributor and an exhibitor,' he explains. Because only one or two theatres screened a film, it would have a good run. The A. Nageswara Rao-starrer Devadasu ran for 140 days in Vijayawada's Maruthi Theatre, the State's first theatre opened in 1921. Now, however, old established distribution companies have been replaced by 'buyers'. Mr. Srinivas and Nanduri, in their research paper, say: 'These buyers could be anyone with the capital to bid for distribution rights. Typically, buyers would bid competitively, and speculatively, for rights in a single-distribution territory, resulting in substantial gains for producers of big-budget star vehicles.' According to some film exhibitors, the entry of these buyers heralded the downfall of their industry. Mohan (name changed), an exhibitor, says there is a distributor for every district now, and that person ensures that the film is released on all the screens across that district. 'These days every new movie is screened simultaneously on all the screens. When the audience is spread among so many theatres, the chances of a theatre seeing a housefull dwindles; the audience thins out on the second day itself,' he adds. Moreover, these days, the new-age distributors help producers finance big-budgeted films. The distributors collect half the amount the producer requested from theatre owners. If the film fares well, the producers give back the advance amount to distributors, who, in turn, give it back to exhibitors. If the movie is a flop, then exhibitors do not get their money immediately, according to some exhibitors. This has resulted in exhibitors' money getting blocked for a long time. Depending on the locality and the film's potential, the advance may range anywhere from ₹5 lakh to ₹40 lakh. This, in addition to the current revenue-sharing model, has crippled single-screen theatres in the State. 'The distributors decide on the revenue sharing unilaterally. In the first week of the theatrical release of a movie, the distributors either give us a rent or a percentage system, whichever gives them more profit. If the movie is a hit, the distributors give us a rent. If it's a flop, they offer a percentage,' says Mohan. The way forward In May, film exhibitors in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana announced that they were not in a position to continue to screen movies. Mohan says that one of their chief demands is that the ticketed revenue be shared on a percentage basis, like how it is in multiplexes and other States. 'The percentage model can solve some of our problems,' he feels. According to the research paper, single-screen theatres continue to be important for box office collections and contribute up to 60% of ticketed revenue. Despite this stature, no new single-screen theatre has come up in the two Telugu States over the past decade, says the veteran exhibitor. Mr. Grandhi Viswanath feels that along with the overhaul in the revenue sharing system, the government should allow flexible admission rates (ticket prices) as well. Currently, ticket prices in the State are fixed in accordance to the Government Order (G.O. issued on March 7, 2022. In this order, the government had fixed rates for different type of theatres in municipalities and corporations. 'The exhibitors should be given the discretion to decide on the admission rate (ticket price) of a movie, depending on its potential. This will help get more patronage for smaller movies,' he says. Echoing this, Chandrasekhar (name changed), another exhibitor, points out that the exorbitant production costs of a film leads to higher ticket prices. Once a moviegoer spends ₹250 a ticket for a big-budget movie, they may not see another film in a theatre for, say, a month. 'Smaller movies, released after the big-budget movies, often get killed thus. The theatres, too, hence do not see much footfall,' he says, adding that the government should also ensure that a movie is released on the OTT platform eight weeks after the theatrical release. Chandrasekhar says that theatre owners like him never called for a bandh. 'It is unfortunate that we were misinterpreted; we only want to request the government to consider our demands for a percentage system, which will allow us some breathing space. After all, our goals are the same, to bring back audience to the theatres.' What distributors say A distributor in Visakhapatnam, who sought anonymity, says it's the distributor who stands to lose more than an exhibitor when a movie flops. 'The success rate these days is 6%. We invest in a movie and we lose when it flops. The exhibitors do not have anything to lose. They can at least benefit from parking charges. The advance amounts that they have to part with are immediately returned.' To the exhibitors' demand for implementation of a percentage system (for all the weeks), he said this would be disadvantageous for distributors. Responding to the exhibitors' concerns, Telugu Film Chambers of Commerce president Bharath Bhushan says distributors, too, are facing problems. The whole issue stems from a dearth of hits in the industry. 'A flop movie is a death knell for everyone' The Telugu Film Chamber of Commerce has formed a committee of 30 members, comprising distributors, exhibitors and producers, to work out a solution amenable for all. The report is expected soon. Bharath Bhushan says a decision regarding the demands would be taken after a meeting with the stakeholders on June 23 and 24. After A.P. Deputy Chief Minister K. Pawan Kalyan emphasised the need for regulating cinema halls properly across the State and keeping food, beverages prices reasonable, many are hoping for a positive outcome from these meetings.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Thug Life box office Day 8: No growth for Kamal Haasan's film, eyes Rs 45 crore
Kamal Haasan and Silambarasan's recent offering, 'Thug Life', directed by Mani Ratnam, is struggling at the box office with every passing day. The film registered its lowest collection on Thursday with just Rs 1.15 crore nett at the domestic box office. If the film fails to see an incline in numbers during its second weekend, then 'Thug Life' will be one of the worst-performing films this for the opening day, 'Thug Life' has been earning in single digits and seeing a gradual decline. Over the past few days, the film has been clocking in around Rs 1 crore nett in India. According to tracking website, Sacnilk, the gangster drama earned Rs 43.47 crore nett in India at the end of eight Day 8, the film minted Rs 1.15 crore with Rs 95 lakh from the Tamil version. Now, all eyes are on the film's performance during its second weekend in out the day-wise breakup of Thug Life in India:Day 1: Rs 15.5 croreDay 2: Rs 7.15 croreDay 3: Rs 7.75 croreDay 4: Rs 6.5 croreDay 5: Rs 2.3 croreDay 6: Rs 1.8 croreDay 7: Rs 1.22 croreDay 8: Rs 1.15 croreTotal: Rs 43.37 croreadvertisementFor a film that boasts some of the biggest names in the Indian film industry, the numbers are dangerously low. Trade experts predict that the film is heading towards a disaster with no positive signs of an increase in numbers in its second week.'Thug Life' marked the reunion of Mani Ratnam and Kamal Haasan after 38 years since 'Nayakan'. The gangster drama also featured Silambarasan, Trisha Krishnan, Abhirami, Ashok Selvan, Aishwarya Lekshmi, Sanjana Krishnamoorthy, Joju George and Nasser, among others. 'Thug Life' released in theatres on June 5 amid massive anticipation. The film has been receiving negative reviews ever since its InTrending Reel
