Morrisey formally requests WV's food stamp program no longer pay for soda
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey announced in a video message on Tuesday, May 20, 2025, that he has formally asked the federal government to disallow the state's SNAP program from paying for soda. (West Virginia Office of Gov. Patrick Morrisey video screenshot)
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey has formally asked the federal government to disallow the state's food assistance program from paying for soda. Morrisey submitted a request for a waiver to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to make the change, the governor announced in a video message Tuesday.
'For a long time I've talked about the fact that SNAP — the N should stand for nutrition,' Morrisey said. 'Well, now it's going to, even more than you've seen in the past. We're promoting healthy bundles. That's fresh produce and lean meat, and good opportunities for some hot foods for West Virginians for some products that you've never been able to have before.'
Morrisey first announced the SNAP proposal during an event in March with federal Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has promoted the idea of states prohibiting SNAP from covering soda.
The SNAP changes are part of a statewide health initiative Morrisey called the 'Four Pillars of a Healthy West Virginia.' Other pillars included prohibiting the sale of certain food dyes in the state, and the 'Mountaineer Mile,' challenge to walk at least a mile a day.
Legislation similar to the SNAP change was introduced during the 2025 regular session, but went nowhere. House Bill 2350 would have required the state to submit a SNAP waiver so that the program could disallow coverage of soda and candy. Opponents of the bill expressed concerns it would hurt local grocery stores, particularly near the state border, by causing SNAP recipients to use their assistance to buy the sweets in stores across state lines.
One in six West Virginians, or approximately 277,000 residents, rely on the SNAP program for food assistance, according to the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. The program is paid for by the federal government's Department of Agriculture and administered through the state.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
State health officials urge kids, pregnant women to get COVID-19 vaccine despite federal pullback
Wisconsin's state health department still recommends the COVID-19 vaccine, despite discord at the federal level after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said it would no longer be recommended for children and pregnant women. "The recent changes in (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidance were not made based on new data, evidence or scientific or medical studies, nor was the guidance issued following normal processes," a June 4 news release from the state health department said. Kennedy, a vocal vaccine critic, announced May 27 in a video on X that the CDC would no longer recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women. He did not cite new evidence in doing so. CDC guidance published days later still recommended COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children if their parents and doctors agree, but said the vaccines are no longer recommended during pregnancy. Children can contract COVID-19 like any other person, but are less likely to become seriously ill from the virus than adults, though they can still spread it to more vulnerable individuals. Pregnant women, however, are more likely to become seriously ill, which can lead to preterm birth and other problems. Experts say vaccination during pregnancy can safeguard infants after birth because babies depend on maternal antibodies for early immunity. Federal vaccine recommendations matter not just because the public pays attention to them, but because it can affect which vaccines insurers decide to cover, said Patrick Remington, emeritus professor at UW-Madison's School of Medicine and Public Health. Given the recommendation from the state, Remington said he's hopeful companies that insure people in Wisconsin will continue covering the COVID-19 vaccine despite the change in federal recommendations. Wisconsin's Medicaid program will continue to cover the vaccine, according to the news release. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which sets recommendations for vaccines in the U.S., is not scheduled to meet until later in June. The group is discussing whether to narrow its recommendation about who should receive COVID-19 booster shots. There's room for healthy debate about the benefits and risks of the COVID-19 vaccine for certain groups of people, Remington said, because it's part of how science works. But he said that debate should take place among the members of the advisory committee, who are independent medical experts. For Kennedy to bring his personal beliefs about vaccines into his recommendations is unfortunate, Remington said. "When you see disagreement between the federal government's recommendations and what experts, like at (the state health department) say, sometimes the public throws up their hands and says, 'If they can't agree, I don't believe anything,'" he said. If someone is confused about the differing recommendations and wants advice on their particular situation, Remington suggested talking with a doctor, who'll be able to consider their personal circumstances when it comes to future doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Less than one in five Wisconsinites have received at least one dose of the most current COVID-19 vaccine, according to data from the state health department. Nearly half of those who have are adults 65 and older. More: COVID, conspiracy theories and a billboard campaign: Grace Schara's hospital death finally sees trial More: How were Milwaukee-area health departments using COVID-era grants cut by the Trump administration? Madeline Heim covers health and the environment for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Contact her at 920-996-7266 or mheim@ This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Wisconsin health department still recommends COVID-19 vaccine
Scientific American
8 hours ago
- Scientific American
Inside the Collapse of the America's Overdose Prevention Program
At an addiction conference in Nashville, Tenn., in late April, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., spoke about his own experience with drug use. 'Addiction is a source of misery. It's also a symptom of misery,' he said. Kennedy's very personal speech, however, ignored recent federal budget cuts and staffing reductions that could undo national drug programs' recent progress in reversing overdoses and treating substance use. Several experts in the crowd, including Caleb Banta-Green, a research professor at the University of Washington, who studies addiction, furiously spoke up during Kennedy's speech. Banta-Green interrupted, shouting 'Believe science!' before being removed from the venue. (The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to a request for comment for this article.) 'I had to stand up and say something,' says Banta-Green, who has spent his career working with people who use drugs and was a senior science adviser at the Office of National Drug Control Policy during the Obama administration. 'The general public needs to understand what is being dismantled and the very real impact it's going to have on them and their loved ones.' On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The Trump administration has defunded public health programs and made plans to consolidate or eliminate the systems that track their outcomes, making it difficult to monitor the deadly consequences of substance use, Banta-Green says. For instance, staff cuts to the Overdose Data to Action program and the Opioid Overdose Prevention and Surveillance program will hamper former tracking efforts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and at local and state health departments' prevention programs. A recently fired policy analyst at the overdose prevention division at the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control— who wishes to remain anonymous, citing fear of retaliation—tells Scientific American that she used to provide policy support to teams at health departments in 49 states and shared public overdose data and information to Congress. She is a veteran who should have had protected employment status, but she lost her job during federal cuts in February. 'No one else is doing surveillance and data collection and prevention like the CDC was,' she says. 'There's so much that's been cut.' (When approached for an interview by Scientific American, a CDC spokesperson said, 'Honestly, the new administration has changed how things normally work' and did not make anyone available for questions.) What Gets Measured Gets Managed Provisional data suggest that deaths from drug use declined by almost 25 percent in 2024, though overdoses remain the leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 44. Cuts to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health will make it difficult to measure similar statistics in the future. Because substance use is highly stigmatized, Banta-Green says it's important to have diverse, localized and timely data from multiple agencies to accurately capture the need for services—and the ways they're actually used. 'You can't design public health or policy responses if you don't know the scale of the need,' he says. Overdose trends vary by region—for example, usage of the synthetic opioid fentanyl appeared earlier on the East Coast than the West—so national averages can obscure critical local patterns. These regional differences can offer important insights into which interventions might be working, Banta-Green says. For instance, important medications such as naloxone rapidly reverse opioid overdoses in emergency situations. But getting people onto long-term medications, including methadone and buprenorphine, which reduce cravings and withdrawal symptoms, can more effectively prevent mortality in both the short and long term. Declining deaths may also mask tragic underlying dynamics. Successful interventions may not be the only cause of a drop in overdoses; it could also be that the people who are most vulnerable to overdose have recently perished and that there are simply fewer remaining at risk. 'It's like a forest fire burning itself out,' Banta-Green says. This underscores the need for the large-scale data collection threatened by the proposed budget and staff cuts at the CDC and National Institutes of Health, says Regina LaBelle, an addiction policy expert at Georgetown University. 'What [the administration is] doing is shortsighted' and doesn't appear to be based 'on the effectiveness or the outcomes of the programs that [it's] cutting,' she says. For example, despite promising to expand naloxone access, the Trump administration's latest budget proposal cuts funding for a critical program that distributes the lifesaving medication to first aid responders. 'A Chance at Redemption' When LaBelle was acting director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy during the Biden administration, she led efforts to expand evidence-based programs that provided clean syringes and tested users' drugs for harmful substances. These strategies are often referred to as 'harm reduction,' which LaBelle describes as 'a way you can meet people where they are and give them the services they need to keep them from dying.' José Martínez, a substance use counselor based in Buffalo, N.Y., says harm-reduction practices helped save his life. When Martínez got his first job as a peer advocate for people using drugs, he was still in a chaotic part of his own addiction and had been sleeping on the street and the subway—and regularly getting into fights—for a decade. The day after he was hired to help provide counseling on hepatitis C, he got into a New York City shelter. As his bruises healed, he learned life skills he was never taught at home. 'For a lot of people, drug use is a coping tool,' he says. 'The drug is rarely the problem. Drug use is really a symptom.' Working with others who understood that many people need help minimizing risks gave Martínez a chance to make progress toward recovery in a way that he says abstinence-only treatment programs couldn't. 'I don't agree that somebody should be sober in order for them to do things different,' he says. Over the past six years working for the National Harm Reduction Coalition, Martínez started a national support network for other peer program workers and community members—people who share their experiences and are a trusted source of education and support for others using drugs. 'There's never no time limit,' he says. 'Everybody works on their own pace.' Though Martínez's program doesn't take federal funding, the Trump administration is cutting similar kinds of peer programs. Martínez says doing this peer work gives many users a sense of purpose and stability—and helps them avoid previous behaviors. The proposed 2026 federal budget will slash the CDC's opioid surveillance programs by $30 million. It also creates a new subdivision called the Administration for a Healthy America that will consolidate the agency's prevention work, along with existing programs at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Agency (SAMHSA), which often coordinates grants for treatment programs. The programs formerly conducted through SAMHSA are also facing cuts of more than $1 billion. Advocates fear this will include a shift toward funding abstinence-only priorities, which, Martínez says, 'will definitely mean that we're going to have more overdoses.' (Some research suggests abstinence-based treatment actually puts people at a higher risk of fatal overdose than those who receive no treatment at all.) 'The general public needs to understand what is being dismantled and the very real impact it's going to have on them and their loved ones.' —Caleb Banta-Green, addiction research professor These cuts could disproportionately affect communities already facing higher overdose rates: Martínez, who is Puerto Rican, notes that U.S. Black, Latino and Indigenous communities have experienced drug overdose death increases in recent years. In many states, overdose deaths in Black and brown communities remain high while white overdose death rates are declining. Looming cuts to Medicaid programs, LaBelle warns, are likely to worsen inequalities in health care access, which tends to make communities of color more vulnerable. In Kentucky, where Governor Andy Beshear recently celebrated a 30 percent decline in overdose deaths, Shreeta Waldon, executive director of the Kentucky Harm Reduction Coalition, says the reality is more nuanced. While national overdose deaths declined in white populations from 2021 to 2023, for example, they continued to rise among people of color. Black and Latino communities often face barriers when accessing health services, many of which have been shaped by predominantly white institutions. Waldon says it's essential for people from diverse backgrounds to participate in policy decisions and necessary to ensure that opioid abatement funds —legal funds used toward treatment and prevention—are distributed fairly. Without adequate federal funding, Waldon predicts treatment programs in Kentucky will become backlogged—potentially pushing more people into crisis situations that lead to emergency services or incarceration rather than to recovery. These financial and political pressures are not only making it harder to find support for people in crisis; they also reduce opportunities to discuss community needs. Waldon says she knows some social workers who now avoid terms such as 'Black woman' or 'marginalized' in grants and public talks out of fear of losing funding. But people currently needing treatment for substance-use disorder are not necessarily aware of the federal funding news—or 'what's about to hit them when they try to go get treatment and they're hit with barriers,' Waldon says. 'That's way more important to me than trying to tailor the way I talk.' Funding and staffing cuts don't just limit resources for the people most in need. They limit the ability to understand where someone is coming from, which undermines efforts to provide meaningful care, Martínez says. Harm reduction is more than the services and physical tools given to community members, he says. It's about the approach. 'When you look at a whole person, you plant the seed of health and dignity,' he says. 'If everybody deserves a chance at redemption, then we've got to rethink how we're approaching things.'
Chicago Tribune
10 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Doctors: The US must concentrate on the unvaccinated to fight measles outbreak
The father of modern vaccines was a microbiologist named Maurice Hilleman, who developed a number of effective vaccines including that for measles. His work probably saved as many lives as that of any scientist in history. When measles resurfaced in the U.S. in the early 2000s, he was asked whether public education about vaccines could avoid the suffering of children with measles again. He answered with brutal honesty, 'No, I think children are once again going to have to suffer this disease in order for us to be aware of how bad it can be.' So far he has been proven correct. Last month, measles cases in the U.S. for 2025 passed 1,000, the highest figure since 2019. Measles is the most communicable disease known to man and although many consider it a trivial disease, three people have died in the ongoing U.S. outbreak — two children and one adult. More than 10% of U.S. cases have required hospitalization, a quarter of whom were children under 5. In our lifetime, few medical interventions have been as effective as measles vaccination. Before a measles vaccine was introduced in the mid-1960s, hundreds of thousands, and in some years millions of cases occurred annually, often resulting in hundreds and sometimes thousands of deaths. As long as U.S. vaccination rates remained above 95%, measles cases remained below 1 per million population: the country had established relative herd immunity (although even a high overall vaccination rate does not guarantee against a limited outbreak in an unvaccinated community.) In the past decade, vaccination rates have dropped to between 92% and 93%, a small decrease, but enough to create pockets of infection. Cases spiked above 2 per million in 2014, 2019, and this year. The direct and immediate challenge for Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is to concentrate on the unvaccinated fraction of the population — where measles spreads. To do this, he must shelve the idea that the measles vaccine plays a role in autism (that study has been debunked many times over) and further, he cannot leave the decision to vaccinate to individual whim, as he has suggested. He must address the reasons parents withhold measles vaccine from their children. The vaccine-hesitant are not limited to one ethnic or social class, or income group. Some are quite affluent, as evidenced by a 2014-2015 Disneyland outbreak among wealthier parkgoers. This year's final episode of the popular television medical drama 'The Pitt' concerns the interplay between the emergency room doctors and an upper middle class anti-vax mother of a teenager with life-threatening measles. Some vaccine-hesitant individuals will eventually accept vaccination for themselves and their children. First and foremost, this demands sensitive face-to-face discussions with parents, along with a nonjudgmental and empathic attitude. Parents of all social strata want the best for their children and many will listen to public health workers with communications expertise or trusted pediatricians and family physicians. Here's what will turn people off: reciting the medical facts in a condescending manner and turning the discussion political. Another relatively unvaccinated group are religious communities. No major religion forbids vaccination, but some religious communities have seen measles outbreaks in the unvaccinated. The current North American outbreak took hold in Mennonite communities in the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Once again, this means sensitive discussions with religious leaders to encourage vaccination in their communities. The final group of concern are foreign entries into the country. Migrants from low- to middle-income countries tend to be under-vaccinated, but their numbers are actually small compared to numbers of international tourists, who may be unvaccinated or inadequately vaccinated (and are not counted in vaccination statistics.) Foreign travelers have been the source of past measles outbreaks in Australia, Europe and North America. Mexico's outbreak is believed to have originated with a traveler returning from Texas. Travel medicine specialists play an important — but underutilized — role in preventing the risk of measles when people travel abroad. Currently, measles is not simply a domestic problem. While the media concentrate on reporting U.S. measles cases, where the current incidence is 3 patients per million population, it is lower than in Europe or Mexico. The situation is most serious in Canada, where the 2025 incidence of measles stands at 50 per million, more than 15 times higher than in the U.S. The vaccination rate in Canada is under 85%, another illustration of the importance of vaccination. There are definite indications the outbreak is slowing nationally and in Texas, the hardest hit state. If we are lucky, the outbreak may soon burn itself out — the pool of most susceptible will be exhausted and the school year is ending. But school will reopen in the fall and we should never depend on luck if there is a better alternative. In this case, vaccination. Memo to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: You are on record as wanting better health for our children. If you are sincere, you must pay attention to Dr. Hilleman's words and put away any personal reservations you have about the measles vaccine. Have the federal and local public health officials in your charge implement vaccine solutions for the unvaccinated — without delay. Dr. Cory Franklin is a retired intensive care physician. Dr. Robert Weinstein is an infectious disease specialist at Rush University Medical Center.
