logo
In SC, the caregivers may see half of what Medicaid pays for home care. A bill would change that.

In SC, the caregivers may see half of what Medicaid pays for home care. A bill would change that.

Yahoo04-04-2025
Lisa Lee, a home health care worker in Camden, came to the Statehouse on Tuesday, April 1, 2025, to advocate for a bill that would raise wages for herself and other workers. (Photo by Skylar Laird/SC Daily Gazette)
COLUMBIA — For every hour Lisa Lee works caring for people in their homes, her employer receives $25 per hour. In 10 years of work, she has never gotten more than $15 per hour.
Lee's employer, like all home health providers in the state, gets funding through Medicaid reimbursements for home care waivers. Under state law, providers have no requirement to pay care workers more than the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour.
The portion of the reimbursement that doesn't go to workers is set aside for administrative costs. That often means roughly half of what taxpayers provide for services goes toward bureaucracy instead of the caregiver, and that's not right, said Maria Reyes, South Carolina's organizing director for the National Domestic Workers Alliance.
The low wages are causing health care workers to flee the field for higher-paying jobs, at a time when South Carolina's aging population needs more caregivers, not less. To stem the exodus, the state should limit how much providers can take from the workers doing the job, she said.
A bill introduced in the Statehouse last week would require providers to pass on at least 70% of their reimbursement rate to care workers. That's $17.50 per hour at the current rate of $25 per hour.
Home health workers are tasked with doing whatever a person needs on a daily basis, such as bathing them, giving them medication or helping them move around the house.
Beyond that, health workers are often a friend and source of comfort for their clients, Reyes said.
'You're not just washing someone. You're not just feeding someone. You're not just giving meds,' she said. 'You're that person's person while you're there.'
In 2023, the median wage for home health care workers in the state was $13.62 per hour, according to PHI, a national nonprofit that promotes care for the elderly and people with disabilities. For a person working 40 hours a week, that would equate to a yearly salary of about $28,300 per year.
There have been times when Lee, who lives and works in Camden, has had to choose between asking her boss for an advance to pay for gas or walking to her clients' houses because she couldn't afford to fill up her car's tank, she said.
'I shouldn't have to ask my boss for help,' Lee said, adding she should be able to pay for it herself.
Trying to make some more money, she took on more clients. But the more people she cared for, the less time she had to spend with each of them. She can't afford to take sick days or vacation, since her job offered no paid time off, she said.
'These are the sacrifices I make because I love what I do,' said Lee, who declined to name her employer. 'But home health care workers are neglecting their own needs.'
Sen. Darrell Jackson, the bill's sponsor, credits a home health care worker with keeping his father alive for an extra several years two decades ago while he was in hospice at home. Knowing his father was getting the care he needed took some stress off Jackson and his family, he said.
But with low pay driving people out of the profession and into other work, not everyone gets that chance, said the Hopkins Democrat. That was why he sponsored the bill, which has yet to receive a committee hearing. He's also pushing for a clause in the state budget that has the same effect.
'When you look at their average pay, it is pretty ridiculous,' Jackson said.
Families who can't find a home health care worker often have to take on the responsibilities of round-the-clock care themselves, sometimes at great personal sacrifice, said Reyes, who lives in Columbia.
Her father qualified for a home health worker under Medicaid in 2022 as his health declined from congestive heart failure, but no local agencies had enough workers to help him, she said. Instead, her niece quit her job and moved from North Carolina, and her brother retired early to take care of him, Reyes said.
'The whole point of us applying for the waiver was for us to get a break, for us to have someone directly for my dad,' Reyes said. 'Unfortunately, we never got the chance.'
Her father died while still on a waiting list for a worker. As of last July, nearly 20,000 people were on a waiting list to receive a waiver, according to the state's Medicaid agency.
As the state's population ages, the number of people looking for at-home care is expected to grow. In the next decade, the state is projected to need nearly 11,000 more home health care workers than it already has, which is more than any other health care job, according to the state Department of Employment and Workforce.
How many people can get services depends on whether the state has the money to reimburse providers for their care. The House's initial spending plan includes $5 million to increase the number of slots available for Home and Community-Based Services waivers, which pay for home health care workers to take care of people.
Getting more people the help they need is great, Reyes said. But increasing the number of people eligible for a home health care worker without taking steps to improve pay and conditions for the workers will likely only make the problem worse, she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Even in states that fought Obamacare, Trump's new law poses health consequences
Even in states that fought Obamacare, Trump's new law poses health consequences

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Even in states that fought Obamacare, Trump's new law poses health consequences

GOP lawmakers in the 10 states that refused the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion for over a decade have argued their conservative approach to growing government programs would pay off in the long run. Instead, the Republican-passed budget law that includes many of President Donald Trump's priorities will pose at least as big a burden on patients and hospitals in the expansion holdout states as in the 40 states that have extended Medicaid coverage to more low-income adults, hospital executives and other officials warn. For instance, Georgia, with a population of just over 11 million, will see as many people lose insurance coverage sold through ACA marketplaces as will California, with more than triple the population, according to estimates by KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. The new law imposes additional paperwork requirements on Obamacare enrollees, slashes the time they have each year to sign up, and cuts funding for navigators who help them shop for plans. Those changes, all of which will erode enrollment, are expected to have far more impact in states like Florida and Texas than in California because a higher proportion of residents in non-expansion states are enrolled in ACA plans. The budget law, which Republicans called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' will cause sweeping changes to health care across the country as it trims federal spending on Medicaid by more than $1 trillion over the next decade. The program covers more than 71 million people with low incomes and disabilities. Ten million people will lose coverage over the next decade due to the law, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Many of its provisions are focused on the 40 states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA, which added millions more low-income adults to the rolls. But the consequences are not confined to those states. A proposal from conservatives to cut more generous federal payments for people added to Medicaid by the ACA expansion didn't make it into the law. 'Politicians in non-expansion states should be furious about that,' said Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. The number of people losing coverage could accelerate in non-expansion states if enhanced federal subsidies for Obamacare plans expire at the end of the year, driving up premiums as early as January and adding to the rolls of uninsured. KFF estimates as many as 2.2 million people could become uninsured just in Florida, a state where lawmakers refused to expand Medicaid and, partly as a result, now leads the nation in ACA enrollment. For people like Francoise Cham of Miami, who has Obamacare coverage, the Republican policy changes could be life-altering. Before she had insurance, the 62-year-old single mom said she would donate blood just to get her cholesterol checked. Once a year, she'd splurge for a wellness exam at Planned Parenthood. She expects to make about $28,000 this year and currently pays about $100 a month for an ACA plan to cover herself and her daughter, and even that strains her budget. Cham choked up describing the 'safety net' that health insurance has afforded her — and at the prospect of being unable to afford coverage if premiums spike at the end of the year. 'Obamacare has been my lifesaver,' she said. If the enhanced ACA subsidies aren't extended, 'everyone will be hit hard,' said Cindy Mann, a health policy expert with Manatt Health, a consulting and legal firm, and a former deputy administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 'But a state that hasn't expanded Medicaid will have marketplace people enrolling at lower income levels,' she said. 'So, a greater share of residents are reliant on the marketplace.' Though GOP lawmakers may try to cut Medicaid even more this year, for now the states that expanded Medicaid largely appear to have made a smart decision, while states that haven't are facing similar financial pressures without any upside, said health policy experts and hospital industry observers. KFF Health News reached out to the governors of the 10 states that have not fully expanded Medicaid to see if the budget legislation made them regret that decision or made them more open to expansion. Spokespeople for Republican Gov. Henry McMaster of South Carolina and Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia did not indicate whether their states are considering Medicaid expansion. Brandon Charochak, a spokesperson for McMaster's office, said South Carolina's Medicaid program focuses on 'low-income children and families and disabled individuals,' adding, 'The state's Medicaid program does not anticipate a large impact on the agency's Medicaid population.' Enrollment in ACA marketplace plans nationwide has more than doubled since 2020 to 24.3 million. If enhanced subsidies expire, premiums for Obamacare coverage would rise by more than 75% on average, according to an analysis by KFF. Some insurers are already signaling they plan to charge more. The CBO estimates that allowing enhanced subsidies to expire will increase the number of people without health insurance by 4.2 million by 2034, compared with a permanent extension. That would come on top of the coverage losses caused by Trump's budget law. 'That is problematic and scary for us,' said Eric Boley, president of the Wyoming Hospital Association. He said his state, which did not expand Medicaid, has a relatively small population and hasn't been the most attractive for insurance providers — few companies currently offer plans on the ACA exchange — and he worried any increase in the uninsured rate would 'collapse the insurance market.' As the uninsured rate rises in non-expansion states and the budget law's Medicaid cuts loom, lawmakers say state funds will not backfill the loss of federal dollars, including in states that have refused to expand Medicaid. Those states got slightly favorable treatment under the law, but it's not enough, said Grace Hoge, press secretary for Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat who favors Medicaid expansion but who has been rebuffed by GOP state legislators. 'Kansans' ability to access affordable healthcare will be harmed,' Hoge said in an email. 'Kansas, nor our rural hospitals, will not be able to make up for these cuts.' For hospital leaders in other states that have refused full Medicaid expansion, the budget law poses another test by limiting financing arrangements states leveraged to make higher Medicaid payments to doctors and hospitals. Beginning in 2028, the law will reduce those payments by 10 percentage points each year until they are closer to what Medicare pays. Richard Roberson, president of the Mississippi Hospital Association, said the state's use of what's called directed payments in 2023 helped raise its Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals and other health institutions from $500 million a year to $1.5 billion a year. He said higher rates helped Mississippi's rural hospitals stay open. 'That payment program has just been a lifeline,' Roberson said. The budget law includes a $50 billion fund intended to insulate rural hospitals and clinics from its changes to Medicaid and the ACA. But a KFF analysis found it would offset only about one-third of the cuts to Medicaid in rural areas. Trump encouraged Florida, Tennessee, and Texas to continue refusing Medicaid expansion in his first term, when his administration gave them an unusual 10-year extension for financing programs known as uncompensated care pools, which generate billions of dollars to pay hospitals for treating the uninsured, said Allison Orris, director of Medicaid policy for the left-leaning think tank Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 'Those were very clearly a decision from the first Trump administration to say, 'You get a lot of money for an uncompensated care pool instead of expanding Medicaid,'' she said. Those funds are not affected by Trump's new tax-and-spending law. But they do not help patients the way insurance coverage would, Orris said. 'This is paying hospitals, but it's not giving people health care,' she said. 'It's not giving people prevention.' States such as Florida, Georgia, and Mississippi have not only turned down the additional federal funding that Medicaid expansion brings, but most of the remaining non-expansion states spend less than the national average per Medicaid enrollee, provide fewer or less generous benefits, and cover fewer categories of low-income Americans. Mary Mayhew, president of the Florida Hospital Association, said the state's Medicaid program does not adequately cover children, older people, and people with disabilities because reimbursement rates are too low. 'Children don't have timely access to dentists,' she said. 'Expectant moms don't have access nearby to an OB-GYN. We've had labor and delivery units close in Florida.' She said the law will cost states more in the long run. 'The health care outcomes for the individuals we serve will deteriorate,' Mayhew said. 'That's going to lead to higher cost, more spending, more dependency on the emergency department.' KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism.

Health care staffing crisis hits New York rural counties
Health care staffing crisis hits New York rural counties

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Health care staffing crisis hits New York rural counties

Good morning and welcome to the Weekly New York Health Care newsletter, where we keep you posted on what's coming up this week in health care news, and offer a look back at the important news from last week. Beat Memo Rural New York counties are facing 'alarming' shortages of primary care doctors, pediatricians, obstetricians and other health care professionals — and those workforce challenges will likely be exacerbated by looming federal funding cuts, according to a report released Thursday by state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli. The comptroller's office reviewed the health care workforce in 16 rural counties across the state, finding practitioner shortages in every field, including dentistry and mental health, POLITICO's Katelyn Cordero reports. The report noted that ten of the 16 counties are federally designated as 'primary care health professional shortage areas,' meaning that the rate of primary care providers per capita is below state and national averages. 'Having access to health care is an essential quality of life issue and helps people live healthier lives,' DiNapoli, a Democrat, said in a statement. 'Addressing gaps in the rural healthcare workforce to alleviate current shortages and plan for future demand will not only positively impact the health of people living in less populated areas of New York, but could also create new jobs and bolster our rural economies,' he said. The report found that, on average, in the rural counties examined, there are four primary care physicians per 10,000 people. That's far below the state ratio of 8.1 per 10,000 and the national ratio of 8.4. Mental health was a particular concern highlighted in the report, with all 16 counties facing shortages of mental health practitioners. The ratio of mental health practitioners per capita in those counties is less than half of the state ratio. Recommendations to address shortages included in the report: The report comes at a time of great uncertainty for New York's health care industry, as the Trump administration implements Medicaid cuts that were part of the recently enacted GOP megabill, which many experts anticipate will disproportionately impact rural parts of the state with fewer providers. The package also included a $50 billion federal Rural Hospital Transformation Program, but it's unclear how much of the money will be allocated to New York. One day after the report was released, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced a $300 million investment towards expanding access to health care statewide. The funding was awarded through the Statewide Health Care Facility Transformation Program, which will be allocated towards 50 projects that expand access to primary, inpatient, behavioral and long-term care. 'This targeted investment will help ensure that every New Yorker — regardless of ZIP code — can access safe, high-quality health care,' Hochul said in a statement. 'By supporting providers that serve vulnerable and underserved populations, we're strengthening the foundation of our health care system and building a healthier future for all.' IN OTHER NEWS: — The new CEO of Public Partnerships LLC, Miki Kapoor is speaking out for the first time since taking the helm of the company in recent weeks in an op-ed published in the Times Union. Kapoor bashed advocates and fiscal intermediaries that previously ran the state's consumer-directed personal assistance program for 'exploiting a vulnerable population for political or personal gain.' PPL, he claimed, 'did not create the problems that have plagued CDPAP for years.' 'We were brought in to fix them,' he wrote. According to Kapoor, PPL has paid $1.8 billion to 230,000 personal assistants who work for more than 200,000 consumers that completely the transition to the program's new administrative system. He noted that they've rooted out inflated administrative fees from previous fiscal intermediaries that ran the program, and did away with a system of 'fragmented oversight.' 'Let's not pretend challenges don't exist in transitions of this scale,' Kapoor wrote. 'But to suggest this rollout was not a good one, or that it has reduced care for New Yorkers, is simply untrue.' — Breaking Ground is stationing outreach workers inside the emergency room at New York-Presbyterian's Lower Manhattan Hospital five days a week to connect unsheltered homeless patients to services. It is an expansion of a program that launched in January 2024 at New York-Presbyterian's Columbia University Irving Medical Center. In the first year, Breaking Ground staff placed 50 people into transitional or permanent housing and made 184 referrals for needed items and connections to care, according to the organization. MAKING ROUNDS: — Melody Goodman was named dean of the NYU School of Global Public Health, effective immediately. She has served as the school's interim dean since March 2024 and a faculty member since 2017. GOT TIPS? Send story ideas and feedback to Maya Kaufman at mkaufman@ and Katelyn Cordero at kcordero@ Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. What you may have missed — The state Department of Health adopted a series of changes last week to loosen the regulatory review requirements for major health care projects, POLITICO Pro's Maya Kaufman reported. Gov. Kathy Hochul had directed the department in 2024 to streamline the process by increasing the financial thresholds that trigger a detailed review, citing a need to 'alleviate strain on both providers and the State.' Odds and Ends NOW WE KNOW — Boar's Head plans to reopen troubled deli meat plant, but r eports of sanitation problems persist. TODAY'S TIP — What to do when you make contact with poison ivy. STUDY THIS — A Yale study finds that a mobile app designed to deliver suicide-specific therapy reduced suicidal behavior among high-risk patients. WHAT WE'RE READING — After years of anger directed at CDC shooting manifests worst fears. (New York Times) — Claiming to fight waste, the Trump administration slashes potentially cost-saving research. (STAT) — Patient seeking care at NIH hospital detained by ICE. (Washington Post) Around POLITICO — Everything we know about the fatal shooting near CDC headquarters, via Sophie Gardner. — Lauren Gardner: Industry frets Kennedy's mRNA decisions will curb cancer breakthroughs. — MAHA gets frustrated with Kennedy ahead of new policy report, Marcia Brown and Lauren Gardner report. MISSED A ROUNDUP? Get caught up on the New York Health Care Newsletter.

Trump's dangerous health care policies will be on the ballot in 2026
Trump's dangerous health care policies will be on the ballot in 2026

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump's dangerous health care policies will be on the ballot in 2026

Six months into Trump's second term, is there any issue where Democrats have traction? 'The only issues on which voters prefer congressional Democrats to Republicans,' a Wall Street Journal poll recently found, 'are health care and vaccine policy.' That fits with a late July Fox News poll that found 53 percent disapproval for Trump's call for increased work requirements for Medicaid as part of the tax and spending bill passed by Republicans in Congress. The bill eliminated more than $1 trillion from funding for Medicaid, creating an alarming threat to hospitals in small towns and rural areas. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 12 million poor and working-class people are at risk of losing Medicaid coverage and insurance plans now available under the Affordable Care Act. The cost of drugs for all seniors on Medicare is also expected to rise, due to Republican cuts to subsidies. Americans are 'seeing health care stripped away from them,' said North Carolina's Roy Cooper (D), the popular former governor in a state with a lot of small towns and rural areas. Cooper plans to make high prices a prime message in his campaign, with a strong focus on health care, in the race for the Senate seat being vacated by Republican Sen. Thom Tillis. Messages about declining access to health care now appear on billboard signs paid for by the Democratic National Committee. They stand near rural hospitals and nursing homes in six states that voted for Trump. 'UNDER TRUMP'S WATCH [this hospital] IS CUTTING MEDICAL SERVICES,' warn the DNC billboards. Forty-five percent of those hospitals already operate at a loss, according to the head of the National Rural Health Association. In Congress, Democrats are coming to realize the power of messages on Trump's cuts to health care protection. Senate Democratic Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) wrote to Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy Jr. last month to call for him to declare a 'Public Health Emergency' to deal with the nation's 'largest measles outbreak in 33 years.' 'It is incredibly troubling that these tragic deaths due to measles … are being met with an inadequate public health response,' Schumer wrote. He called out Kennedy for having 'laid off disease experts, cancelled National Institutes of Health research into vaccine hesitancy, fired scientist from the nation's top immunization panel and stripped over $11 billion in federal public health grants — including $550 million from Texas during the peak of its outbreak.' Kennedy ignored Schumer. He went in the other direction, attacking doctors as profiting from giving vaccines. Kennedy told podcaster Tucker Carlson that doctors have 'perverse incentives' to give vaccines to children, with '50 percent of revenues to most pediatricians [coming] from vaccines.' When reporters asked HHS for proof of that slanderous claim against the nation's pediatricians, they had no factual response. Dr. David Higgins of the University of Colorado told The New York Times that Kennedy's claim went beyond insulting. It was 'dangerous' because it led parents to doubt the need for vaccines. 'If we were motivated by profit, we'd make more money treating the complications of preventable diseases than by preventing them in the first place,' said Dr. Higgins. Kennedy, meanwhile, has fired over 10,000 HHS employees. Recently, he dismissed an entire federal vaccine advisory panel. This is the same man who continues to promote the long-debunked link between vaccines and autism. Kennedy's approach to health care as a matter of politics instead of science is a perfect fit in the Trump administration. Earlier this year, the White House had falsely claimed that $68 million in American money was, in Trump's words, 'being sent to Gaza to buy condoms for Hamas,' where terrorists used the condoms 'as a method of making bombs.' The International Medical Corps reported that it received a $68 million grant that was used to keep two field hospitals open in war-torn Gaza. None of the money was used for condoms. Similarly, a stunningly false Trump administration health care claim came from the Office of Management and Budget. Testifying before the Senate in June, Russell Vought, OMB's director, said that more than $9 million being cut under the president's tax and spending bill came out of a program being used to 'advise Russian doctors on how to perform abortions and gender analysis.' In fact, he was referring to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief program, started under President George W. Bush. 'The claim was false,' the Times reported, 'and it nearly derailed bipartisan support for a program credited with saving 26 million lives.' Democrats have struggled to find effective messaging to counter Trump's populist appeal in the first six months of his second term. Sixty-three percent of voters have an unfavorable view of the Democrats. That is the very bottom of the barrel in the last 35 years of polling on the party's favorability, according to The Wall Street Journal. And it comes despite the Epstein scandal, despite Trump's failed promises to stop wars and despite the Journal poll finding that most voters disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation, economy and tariffs. But the breakdown in national health care is starting to break through. I was a young reporter in Washington when attention to AIDS rocketed following the death of actor Rock Hudson. Since then, more than 700,000 Americans have died of AIDS — a disproportionate number of them Black. Government inaction exacerbated the suffering. How can America repeat that failure?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store