logo
Anti-corruption watchdog boss Paul Brereton's defence links spark concerns

Anti-corruption watchdog boss Paul Brereton's defence links spark concerns

The federal anti-corruption commissioner's ongoing role in the Army Reserves has drawn a fresh round of criticism amid concerns he continues to regularly attend military functions in full uniform, including camouflage.
While the NACC investigates allegations of corruption in the Australian Defence Force, its head, Paul Brereton, holds the rank of major general in the Army Reserve and has attended at least seven functions in uniform since being appointed the inaugural commissioner of the federal watchdog.
A NACC spokesperson told the ABC Mr Brereton's decision to occasionally wear military dress "out of hours" is appropriate and "does not compromise" the commissioner's ability to expose misconduct in defence.
While there's no suggestion of wrongdoing on Mr Brereton's part, crossbench senators and members of parliament say details of his attendance at military functions have strengthened their concerns about his ability to manage perceptions of conflict-of-interest issues involving the ADF.
Photo shows
A close shot of Brereton, who is sitting in the offices of the new national anti--corruption commission
The head of the National Anti-Corruption Commission continues to hold senior roles in the Army Reserves six months after a misconduct finding was made against him.
"Confidence in the commissioner's capacity to fulfil his function in the NACC would be enhanced, in my view, if Commissioner Brereton fully retired from his roles in defence," Independent MP Helen Haines said.
NACC officials told a budget estimates hearing last month that Mr Brereton's position in the reserves was honorary, "not in the command structure", and "akin to an emeritus professor". But several questions — such as whether he was continuing to wear uniform or had access to military facilities — were taken on notice.
Transparency expert Geoffrey Watson SC has told the ABC even symbolic ties such as wearing uniform can raise perception concerns, particularly in roles involving oversight.
In March,
"The commissioner has appropriately remained involved in decision making and deliberations where the matter does not involve the interests of an individual or unit with whom he has or has had a close association," a NACC spokesperson said at the time.
Brereton's military ties spark impartiality questions
Photos publicly posted on the official Facebook pages of the NSW regiments of which Mr Brereton is aligned, have prompted several crossbenchers to ramp up their calls for the commissioner to step aside from his defence positions.
On August 18, 2024, Mr Brereton was pictured wearing what is known as "cams" or camouflage uniform while delivering a presentation at the 2024 Regimental Weekend in the nation's capital. The rank of major general is visible on his arm and the screen behind him indicates the seminar is about generating war fighting capabilities.
In photos posted to the Royal New South Wales Regiment Facebook page on March 1 of this year, Mr Brereton was pictured as a guest of honour at a dinner in Sydney wearing what is known as "senior mess dress" according to the Army Dress Manual.
Paul Brereton pictured at an event in March 2025.
(
Supplied: Facebook
)
Another photo posted on the 23rd August 2024, seen by the ABC, showed Mr Brereton wearing the same uniform alongside the NSW Governor Margaret Beazley in Canberra.
Both events marked the Royal New South Wales Regiment's involvement in Sudan in 1885. Mr Brereton remains an honorary colonel in this unit.
On November 27, 2024, Mr Brereton appeared in the same dress uniform delivering a speech during the dinner at the Battalion Ball and Leadership weekend in Canberra.
The previous year, on November 30, 2023, Mr Brereton was pictured wearing what is known as "pollies" or polyester 'general duty dress', in which he is seen putting new rank slides on an officer's shoulder. The army's official dress manual says this uniform is "more appropriate in the office environment" and "not to be worn" during ceremonial events or representational appointments.
At different events in September 2023 and August 2023, Mr Brereton was also photographed as a special guest at army reserves events. The NACC came into effect in July of that year.
Brereton appears in polyester general duty dress putting new rank slides on an officer.
(
Supplied: Facebook
)
A NACC spokesperson confirmed Mr Brereton continues to participate in events as an honorary colonel commandant of the Royal New South Wales Regiment and University of New South Wales Regiment.
"He occasionally, on weekends or holidays or out-of-hours, visits and participates in ceremonial and regimental activities in that capacity, and appropriately wears uniform when doing so in accordance with that ceremonial function," the spokesperson said.
The spokesperson said the role doesn't compromise the commissioner's full-time commitment to the NACC, nor his ability to investigate and expose misconduct in defence impartially and independently.
Mr Brereton, a former NSW Supreme Court Judge, was a major general in the reserves when he was appointed by the inspector general of the ADF to inquire into allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan between 2005 and 2016.
His report published in 2020 that found credible information that war crimes had occurred was a landmark decision and prompted the establishment of an office of special investigations to examine specific alleged crimes.
Calls intensify for Brereton to step aside from Reserves
In October last year, Mr Brereton was found by NACC inspector Gail Furness to have mishandled a conflict of interest by failing to fully recuse himself from deliberations on whether to investigate six officials implicated in the unlawful Robodebt scheme, despite disclosing a close connection to one of those involved.
The watchdog inspector subsequently examined the NACC's handling of the referral and its decision not to pursue an investigation into the public servants.
Paul Brereton at an event in November 2024.
(
Supplied: Facebook
)
While the inspector found no evidence of deliberate misconduct by Mr Brereton, it noted that, although he had delegated the final decision, his involvement in the discussions remained "comprehensive."
Following this review, the NACC has since opted to investigate the six individuals initially referred to the body, reversing its earlier decision.
Asked how Mr Brereton handles any issues related to his service in the Army Reserve, a NACC spokesperson said if any perceived or actual conflicts arise relating to "an individual or unit with whom he has served or had a close association … he declares the conflict, delegates the matter to a deputy commissioner, and does not participate in deliberations".
Senators David Pocock, Jacqui Lambie and David Shoebridge – already unhappy with the way the government set up the NACC, choosing not to hold public hearings except in extraordinary circumstances – have ramped up their criticisms of Mr Brereton.
"On that broader issue of the credibility of the NACC, a lot has to change and I think that's got to start with some leadership at the top," Senator Pocock said.
Independent Senator David Pocock says it's time for Paul Brereton to go.
(
Australian Story: Matt Roberts
)
Senator Lambie said the situation was unsatisfactory and a blight on the government.
"Paul Brereton is running around in uniform — not just in mess dress but camouflage uniform," she said. "He's playing major general and he's playing in charge of the NACC — this is absolutely ridiculous. The Labor party knew this from day one."
Documents released under a freedom of information request reveal Mr Brereton spoke for 30 minutes on the first day of a two-day Defence Integrity Conference at the Australian Defence Force Academy on November 12 last year.
Paul Brereton at an event in September 2023.
(
Supplied: Facebook
)
Budget estimates also heard Mr Brereton took two days of annual leave to give a talk at an ADF facility in the Blue Mountains earlier this year with the watchdog's CEO taking questions on notice about whether Mr Brereton wore a defence uniform to that event.
Integrity expert Geoffrey Watson told the ABC Mr Brereton should not have anything to do with probes regarding allegations of corruption in the Department of Defence.
"It's time for Mr Brereton to address the obvious. He should resign from the military and stand aside from any investigation involving defence," he said.
Geoffrey Watson says Paul Brereton must "address the obvious" and "step aside".
(
ABC News: Sissy Reyes
)
Broader debate over NACC credibility continues
As the watchdog nears its second birthday on July 1, NACC representatives told a Senate estimates hearing that none of the seven inquiries it had completed by the commission — nor the 33 ongoing investigations — have been deemed worthy of a public hearing.
Greens Senator David Shoebridge sought clarification from the integrity watchdog at the March budget estimates session about why none had reached that threshold:
"So there are 40. Zero out of 40 were found to have exceptional circumstances?" he asked.
To which Philip Reed, NACC chief executive, responded: "That's correct."
Independent crossbenchers have previously told the ABC they will push to make the integrity watchdog more transparent and hold more public hearings in the event of a hung parliament after the May 3 election.
They contend the Albanese government was elected on the promise of delivering a transparent anti-corruption body with teeth and instead created a body that operates almost entirely in secret.
With the federal poll due on May 3, independent crossbenchers have told the ABC they will push whoever forms government to unwind legislation so that the body is compelled to hold more public hearings.
"We are likely not to see any public hearings. We need to undo that. We need to listen to our community and our experts and I think that's a job for the next parliament," Senator Pocock said.
Paul Brereton at an event in September 2023.
(
Supplied: Facebook
)
The Department of Defence refused to answer the ABC's questions about Mr Brereton's involvement in the reserves, saying: "the personal information of an ADF member can only be released with the consent of the individual".
They are yet to confirm whether he continues to have access to army messes or had taken an oath of service that requires obedience with orders and directions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tasmania politics in turmoil
Tasmania politics in turmoil

ABC News

time5 hours ago

  • ABC News

Tasmania politics in turmoil

Samantha Donovan: And staying in Tasmania, the political situation there remains unclear this evening after the parliament passed a motion of no confidence in the Liberal Premier, Jeremy Rockliff, yesterday. The motion was brought forward by the Labor opposition leader, Dean Winter, who'd raised concerns about Mr Rockliff's management of the economy and infrastructure and his plans to sell off state assets. Plenty of Tasmanians rang in to ABC Radio today with their thoughts on the situation. Opinion: This is not in the interests of the people of Tasmania. Opinion: Yes, I certainly do. What an election. I like that way. It's my choice. It's not their choice who does what. I'd want to change the government. Opinion: I think they've been disgraceful. Opinion: I'd like to see a change of government, but I'd like to see the stadium continue. Opinion: The amount of money that would be swallowed up in a stadium would fund our health, our decrepit health system for months. That's it, money gone. Opinion: If we go to an election, the one thing I'd really say is I hope the Premier is not part of that election. He was the one that had the no confidence vote against them. He should have the dignity to resign. Opinion: My vote would support the candidate who doesn't support the stadium. I feel we've got far greater pressing needs at the moment. I've been on the public housing list for two years and there's over 5,000 people waiting and it's growing daily. Samantha Donovan: For the latest on the political situation in Tasmania, I spoke to the ABC's state political reporter, Adam Langenberg. Adam, is another election in Tasmania now inevitable? Adam Langenberg: Not inevitable, Sam, but everyone in the political sphere here says it's the most likely scenario. People I've been speaking to today say, you know, 75 or 80% likelihood that we head to an election. Of course, there are other scenarios that can play out. The governor can ask another Liberal MP to try and form government. That's something that the party room has not backed in. They say they'll back Jeremy Rockliff to the hilt and it's either an election or the governor tries to ask Labor to form minority government. That's something the Greens here have said they're open to working with Labor, but Labor leader Dean Winter, who moved this no confidence motion, he says under no circumstances will Labor govern with the Greens. So, it's a standoff and means that everyone thinks the most likely scenario is that election, which won't be called until at least Tuesday, if it does happen. Samantha Donovan: Adam, why is Tuesday the significant day? Adam Langenberg: Well, that's because Tasmanian Parliament needs to be recalled so a supply bill can be passed. The Tasmanian Parliament was in the middle of debating the budget, which hasn't passed. It means the Tasmanian public servants won't be paid after August. What that means is if there's going to be an election, there won't be a supply bill passed until well after that. So, there needed to be a mechanism to get them paid in the short term and that's what the supply bill is. And then after that, the Premier will go to the governor and ask for an early election. Samantha Donovan: Do you think the Labor leader, Dean Winter, fully appreciated what he was setting off with this no confidence motion? Adam Langenberg: That he didn't is an argument that's been prosecuted by the Liberals all week. They say they were just trying to change the Liberal leader and that's not something that they would tolerate. But Labor insists they meant what they did. They knew there were lots of scenarios. Maybe their preferred one might have been for Jeremy Rockliff just to have resigned. Well, they say they knew when they moved this motion, the consequences of it, and that it could mean that we head to an election and they were OK with that. Dean Winter has said repeatedly that he can't sit idly by and let Premier Jeremy Rockliff ruin the state. That's his argument. That debt and deficit are heading the wrong way in Tasmania, that the government can't manage major infrastructure projects, that it's going to sell off government businesses and the state can't afford it. So, Dean Winter says he knew full well what he was doing and now it's up to Tasmanians. Samantha Donovan: Adam, if there is another election, do you think Tasmanian voters are going to punish Labor for sending them back to the polls? Adam Langenberg: Well, Dean Winter's got five weeks or six weeks, depending on how long things take to get underway, to convince Tasmanians that it was the fault of the Premier that we're heading here. This is an argument that he's been making already, that the Premier didn't have the supply and confidence agreements he needed to be able to govern and Labor was just doing what any good opposition should do and holding the government to account. That's an argument he's going to have to make to try and win over Tasmanians. Now, we know that some of the party's biggest vote winners, historically, might not contest this time around. Rebecca White in Lyons has already gone to the federal parliament. It looks like Speaker Michelle O'Byrne in Bass might not contest the election. There's two big vote winners for Labor out of the picture, if that eventuates. So they've got their work cut out for them in growing from 10 seats that they hold currently, let alone getting to the 18 required for majority government. But, yeah, a big task in selling to Tasmanians exactly why they've done what they've done. That's something that's sort of got lost in the noise of the last two days because it's just truly remarkable to see a Premier ousted in the way that he has been. Samantha Donovan: The backers and fans of the long-awaited Tassie AFL club are worried it might fold because of this economic turmoil, even before it really gets off the ground. What's the worst-case political scenario for the Tassie Devils club? Adam Langenberg: I think the club will be hoping that there isn't a minority situation where the only way that one of the major parties can form government is in a coalition with an anti-stadium group of independents or the Greens. Because the first thing on their list when they're looking to form government will be, please don't build a stadium in Hobart. That's a reality that the club is really, really concerned about. Now, Labor have already said that they will not drop the stadium and not drop their support for the club going forward. And the Liberals have said the same thing. But in the harsh reality of post-election, when you need to trade to form power, what happens? And that's a real concern for football fans and the football club. And only time will tell exactly how that works out. Samantha Donovan: Adam Langenberg is the ABC's state political reporter in Tasmania.

Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial: Erin Patterson two faces claim
Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial: Erin Patterson two faces claim

Herald Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Herald Sun

Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial: Erin Patterson two faces claim

Mushroom cook Erin Patterson had 'two faces' and was pretending to love her in-laws before she allegedly murdered them with a deadly beef wellington meal, a prosecutor has claimed. The mother of two has spent every day this week testifying in her own triple-murder trial and on Friday faced another grilling by Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC. Ms Patterson is standing trial in Morwell, accused of murdering her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail Patterson, both 70, along with Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. The prosecution alleges she served them individual beef wellingtons she had deliberately laced with lethal death cap mushrooms at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. Heather's husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, 71, was the only guest to survive. Ms Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, claiming she may have accidentally added foraged mushrooms into the meal along with dried mushrooms she purchased from an Asian grocer. Under cross-examination, Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson did not love Don and Gail, pointing to expletive-laden messages to her Facebook friends where she described them as a 'lost cause' and 'wanted nothing to do with them'. Dr Rogers asked: 'In fact, you had two faces: a public face of appearing to have a good relationship with Don and Gail … agree or disagree?' Ms Patterson replied: 'Are you asking me to agree if I had two faces?' When pressed again, she said: 'I had a good relationship with Don and Gail.' Dr Rogers asked: 'I suggest that your private face was the one you showed in your Facebook Messenger use, correct or incorrect?' She replied: 'Incorrect.' Ms Patterson also disagreed that she was angry they took their son Simon's side amid a child support dispute in December 2022. 'They did love me and I did love them. I do love them,' she told the Supreme Court. Dr Rogers put to Ms Patterson that if she 'had loved them' she would have immediately notified the authorities when she realised on August 1 there was 'possibility' foraged mushrooms were in a container with the dried mushrooms from the Asian grocer. 'Well I didn't … I had been told that people were getting treatment for possible death cap mushroom poisoning, so that was already happening,' she said. She confirmed she 'did not tell anybody' about that possibility. The court heard Ms Patterson invited the guests and Simon to lunch after a church service on July 16, with Simon testifying that she said to him she had some 'important medical news' to share and had invited everyone 'to discuss that topic'. 'No, that's not what I said to him,' Ms Patterson replied. 'That wasn't the purpose of the lunch or the purpose of the invitations.' Dr Rogers took her to the text she sent Simon after he pulled out of the lunch on July 28. 'That's really disappointing. I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch for tomorrow which has been exhausting in light of the issues I'm facing … I may not be able to host a lunch like this again for some time,' she wrote. After a series of rapid-fire questions, Ms Patterson said she did tell Simon she wanted to discuss some 'medical stuff', but she denied that she wanted advice and that it was the purpose of the lunch. The jury has previously heard she misled her guests when she told them she may need treatment for cancer, but she testified on Friday she was 'confronting' medical issues, since she was planning to have gastric bypass surgery. Ms Patterson denied she prepared a poisoned beef wellington for Simon 'just in case' he turned up at the lunch. 'And when he didn't show up for lunch … you threw it in your rubbish bin,' Dr Rogers said. 'I did put the pastry and mushrooms in the rubbish bin,' she replied. Dr Rogers also asked Ms Patterson why she invited the Wilkinsons to lunch. 'I really liked them and I wanted to have a stronger relationship with them,' she said. Dr Rogers suggested she invited them because she thought it would make it more likely that Don, Gail and Simon would come, but she denied that was the reason. Later, Ms Patterson was asked about records that showed a map about death caps – on citizen science website iNaturalist – was accessed on May 28, 2022, on a computer in her house. 'I don't have a specific memory of this day or this internet search, but my evidence is it's possible, because I remember at some point wanting to find out if death cap mushrooms grow in South Gippsland and finding out that they do not,' she said. Ms Patterson told the jury on Wednesday she found out mushrooms growing on her property were 'probably toxic to dogs' and she wanted to see if death caps grew in the area. The trial, before Justice Christopher Beale, continues.

Indigenous, climate advocates put heat on Woodside
Indigenous, climate advocates put heat on Woodside

The Advertiser

time8 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Indigenous, climate advocates put heat on Woodside

A bid to compel the government to consider a heritage application to protect Indigenous rock art is going to court as three environmental activists declare they "successfully hoaxed" Woodside. The preliminary hearing follows Environment Minister Murray Watt's interim approval of Woodside's North West Shelf extension until 2070, a controversial gas project in Western Australia. The call has flared tensions, with environmental and Indigenous groups arguing it will slow efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions and have a ruinous effect on nearby ancient petroglyphs. Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper said she was thrilled the case against the newly appointed environment minister was moving forward without further delays. "It's rude to have someone waiting for such a long time," the Save our Songlines co-founder said outside the Federal Court in Sydney. The court determined Ms Cooper's case would be heard in the week of July 14. Senator Watt attached heritage and air quality conditions to the approval and those are yet to be formally agreed to by the Australian energy giant. Ms Cooper said the North West Shelf and other industrial developments at Woodside's Burrup Hub posed risks to the rock art - concerns and evidence laid out in full in a cultural heritage assessment the minister is yet to consider. The Burrup Peninsula, in WA's Pilbara region and known as Murujuga to traditional owners, contains some of the world's largest and oldest collection of petroglyphs. The "section 10" heritage application was originally lodged in early 2022. "I am furious that the minister would make a decision to lock in ongoing and irreversible damage to my country before addressing my application," Ms Cooper said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the conditions attached to the pending approval of the North West Shelf extension would address concerns about the rock art. "The local Aboriginal corporation there, I've met with them in the past, they're very supportive of industry," he told ABC radio on Friday. "They want to make sure there's protection, but they support those jobs and that economic activity." In a separate case, three protesters were fined $10,000 each after targeting a Woodside annual general meeting with stench gas and flares. Disrupt Burrup Hub's Gerard Mazza, Jesse Noakes and Tahlia Stolarski pleaded guilty to charges laid over their protest at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre in April 2023. "Today we were fined for attempting to create false belief — in other words, we pranked Woodside," Ms Stolarski told supporters outside Perth District Court after the verdict. "We are guilty of pulling off a highly successful hoax. "One day, perhaps Woodside and the WA government will be pulled before a court like this one (and) be charged with much more serious crimes, and their victims will be future generations and all life on earth." A bid to compel the government to consider a heritage application to protect Indigenous rock art is going to court as three environmental activists declare they "successfully hoaxed" Woodside. The preliminary hearing follows Environment Minister Murray Watt's interim approval of Woodside's North West Shelf extension until 2070, a controversial gas project in Western Australia. The call has flared tensions, with environmental and Indigenous groups arguing it will slow efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions and have a ruinous effect on nearby ancient petroglyphs. Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper said she was thrilled the case against the newly appointed environment minister was moving forward without further delays. "It's rude to have someone waiting for such a long time," the Save our Songlines co-founder said outside the Federal Court in Sydney. The court determined Ms Cooper's case would be heard in the week of July 14. Senator Watt attached heritage and air quality conditions to the approval and those are yet to be formally agreed to by the Australian energy giant. Ms Cooper said the North West Shelf and other industrial developments at Woodside's Burrup Hub posed risks to the rock art - concerns and evidence laid out in full in a cultural heritage assessment the minister is yet to consider. The Burrup Peninsula, in WA's Pilbara region and known as Murujuga to traditional owners, contains some of the world's largest and oldest collection of petroglyphs. The "section 10" heritage application was originally lodged in early 2022. "I am furious that the minister would make a decision to lock in ongoing and irreversible damage to my country before addressing my application," Ms Cooper said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the conditions attached to the pending approval of the North West Shelf extension would address concerns about the rock art. "The local Aboriginal corporation there, I've met with them in the past, they're very supportive of industry," he told ABC radio on Friday. "They want to make sure there's protection, but they support those jobs and that economic activity." In a separate case, three protesters were fined $10,000 each after targeting a Woodside annual general meeting with stench gas and flares. Disrupt Burrup Hub's Gerard Mazza, Jesse Noakes and Tahlia Stolarski pleaded guilty to charges laid over their protest at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre in April 2023. "Today we were fined for attempting to create false belief — in other words, we pranked Woodside," Ms Stolarski told supporters outside Perth District Court after the verdict. "We are guilty of pulling off a highly successful hoax. "One day, perhaps Woodside and the WA government will be pulled before a court like this one (and) be charged with much more serious crimes, and their victims will be future generations and all life on earth." A bid to compel the government to consider a heritage application to protect Indigenous rock art is going to court as three environmental activists declare they "successfully hoaxed" Woodside. The preliminary hearing follows Environment Minister Murray Watt's interim approval of Woodside's North West Shelf extension until 2070, a controversial gas project in Western Australia. The call has flared tensions, with environmental and Indigenous groups arguing it will slow efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions and have a ruinous effect on nearby ancient petroglyphs. Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper said she was thrilled the case against the newly appointed environment minister was moving forward without further delays. "It's rude to have someone waiting for such a long time," the Save our Songlines co-founder said outside the Federal Court in Sydney. The court determined Ms Cooper's case would be heard in the week of July 14. Senator Watt attached heritage and air quality conditions to the approval and those are yet to be formally agreed to by the Australian energy giant. Ms Cooper said the North West Shelf and other industrial developments at Woodside's Burrup Hub posed risks to the rock art - concerns and evidence laid out in full in a cultural heritage assessment the minister is yet to consider. The Burrup Peninsula, in WA's Pilbara region and known as Murujuga to traditional owners, contains some of the world's largest and oldest collection of petroglyphs. The "section 10" heritage application was originally lodged in early 2022. "I am furious that the minister would make a decision to lock in ongoing and irreversible damage to my country before addressing my application," Ms Cooper said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the conditions attached to the pending approval of the North West Shelf extension would address concerns about the rock art. "The local Aboriginal corporation there, I've met with them in the past, they're very supportive of industry," he told ABC radio on Friday. "They want to make sure there's protection, but they support those jobs and that economic activity." In a separate case, three protesters were fined $10,000 each after targeting a Woodside annual general meeting with stench gas and flares. Disrupt Burrup Hub's Gerard Mazza, Jesse Noakes and Tahlia Stolarski pleaded guilty to charges laid over their protest at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre in April 2023. "Today we were fined for attempting to create false belief — in other words, we pranked Woodside," Ms Stolarski told supporters outside Perth District Court after the verdict. "We are guilty of pulling off a highly successful hoax. "One day, perhaps Woodside and the WA government will be pulled before a court like this one (and) be charged with much more serious crimes, and their victims will be future generations and all life on earth." A bid to compel the government to consider a heritage application to protect Indigenous rock art is going to court as three environmental activists declare they "successfully hoaxed" Woodside. The preliminary hearing follows Environment Minister Murray Watt's interim approval of Woodside's North West Shelf extension until 2070, a controversial gas project in Western Australia. The call has flared tensions, with environmental and Indigenous groups arguing it will slow efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions and have a ruinous effect on nearby ancient petroglyphs. Mardathoonera woman Raelene Cooper said she was thrilled the case against the newly appointed environment minister was moving forward without further delays. "It's rude to have someone waiting for such a long time," the Save our Songlines co-founder said outside the Federal Court in Sydney. The court determined Ms Cooper's case would be heard in the week of July 14. Senator Watt attached heritage and air quality conditions to the approval and those are yet to be formally agreed to by the Australian energy giant. Ms Cooper said the North West Shelf and other industrial developments at Woodside's Burrup Hub posed risks to the rock art - concerns and evidence laid out in full in a cultural heritage assessment the minister is yet to consider. The Burrup Peninsula, in WA's Pilbara region and known as Murujuga to traditional owners, contains some of the world's largest and oldest collection of petroglyphs. The "section 10" heritage application was originally lodged in early 2022. "I am furious that the minister would make a decision to lock in ongoing and irreversible damage to my country before addressing my application," Ms Cooper said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the conditions attached to the pending approval of the North West Shelf extension would address concerns about the rock art. "The local Aboriginal corporation there, I've met with them in the past, they're very supportive of industry," he told ABC radio on Friday. "They want to make sure there's protection, but they support those jobs and that economic activity." In a separate case, three protesters were fined $10,000 each after targeting a Woodside annual general meeting with stench gas and flares. Disrupt Burrup Hub's Gerard Mazza, Jesse Noakes and Tahlia Stolarski pleaded guilty to charges laid over their protest at the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre in April 2023. "Today we were fined for attempting to create false belief — in other words, we pranked Woodside," Ms Stolarski told supporters outside Perth District Court after the verdict. "We are guilty of pulling off a highly successful hoax. "One day, perhaps Woodside and the WA government will be pulled before a court like this one (and) be charged with much more serious crimes, and their victims will be future generations and all life on earth."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store