
Venice Architecture Biennale 2025: Ireland presents an elegantly complex take on a richly simple idea
19th Venice Architecture Biennale
, you might be forgiven for wondering why the world isn't saved already. Plant trees! Recycle building materials! Reconnect with the Earth! Make aesthetic gestures in reparation for colonialism! That's us sorted, so.
In truth, a strange atmosphere hangs over the Giardini, and it is an unusual space at the best of times. The individual national pavilions speak of an era when empire still seemed (to some) like a reasonable idea, and often their architecture is a too-obvious giveaway of aspirations to certain kinds of glory.
For every elegant Nordic pavilion, designed by Sverre Fehn and completed in 1962, there's an uber-neoclassical edifice screaming the will to power, Germany, Britain and the United States being cases in point. Taken as a whole, and with a couple of notable exceptions, it's a little like being in a theme park of the ironies of nationalistic pride.
Architecture tends to last longer than governments, although the deleterious effects of the worst examples of both can linger far longer than one would like. This year Britain and the US have softened their edifices, with hanging strands of clay and beads for Britain, and a huge latticed timber porch for the US.
READ MORE
There is a certain degree of uncomfortable satire in the latter, as the presentation, entitled An Architecture of Generosity, is all about a spirit of openness and welcome that doesn't exactly chime with the actions of the current leaders of that country.
One thing is for sure: the apocalypse will be Instagrammable. Germany's pavilion, Stresstest, takes on climate change with input from an extensive list of architects and artists, centring on huge wraparound digital display of hot city images, flanked by a space reflecting back your own body heat, and another shaded with cool trees.
Elsewhere, some pavilions, such as those of Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, proclaim the names of countries that no longer exist. The Israeli pavilion is empty and dark, while the lights are on at the Russian one but no one is home. It is being used as a site for the biennale's education programmes in a much derided 'collaboration agreement' with the Russian Federation.
There are some high points where the presented possibilities might bear future fruit. Canada is showing Picoplanktonics, Living Room Collective's exploration of plankton-infused building blocks that absorb and store carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, Austria offers a solution to the housing crisis, although as its curators, Michael Obrist, Sabine Pollak and Lorenzo Romito, demonstrate, the solution lies in the political will to care for people through social and structural change, rather than through nifty apartment design.
Picoplanktonics at the Canadian pavilion at Venice Architecture Biennale 2025
Hungary is fun, as Márton Pintér, its curator, takes a look at all the other things trained architects end up doing instead of architecture, while also sharing narratives of the steady attrition through compromise that ultimately demolishes their utopian dreams.
The main pavilion in the Giardini is closed for renovation, so the Arsenale houses the bulk of this year's curated exhibition, and bulky it is. From an arch of elephant-dung bricks to bioengineered trees, and from jaunty robots to exhaling rocks, the halls of the vast venue are abuzz, and overstuffed. It is as if Carlo Ratti, the biennale's curator, of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, just couldn't say no. Or perhaps he was high on saying yes. In either case, it just doesn't work, and the overall effect is irritating rather than enlightening.
Visitors interact with the Intelligens. Natural. Artificial. Collective exhibit. Photograph: Andrea Avezzù
Installation view of the Intelligens. Natural. Artificial. Collective exhibit. Photograph: Andrea Avezzù, courtesy La Biennale di Venezia
'To face a burning world, architecture must harness all the intelligence around us,' Ratti, who is an engineer as well as an architect, says. Instead we are surrounded by an impossible cacophony. Entitled 'Intelligens. Natural. Artificial. Collective' it features odes to AI and robots everywhere. One mimics the actions of visitors banging a drum. Another carves at wood alongside a pair of artists from Bhutan in national dress. AI also helpfully summarises the frequently verbose wall texts alongside each installation; it is amusing to see where even AI chokes on the jargon.
Some of the most interesting and most moving pavilions, including Ireland's, are in the adjacent spaces at the Arsenale. A team from Peru explores the man-made reed islands on Lake Titicaca, where human ingenuity thrives only because it has evolved in harmony with nature.
The Lebanese pavilion, The Land Remembers, is quietly devastating, as Edouard Souhaid, Shereen Doummar, Elias Tamer and Lynn Chamoun of
Collective for Architecture Lebanon
look at the impacts of ecocide, following the bombing of their country with white phosphorus by Israeli forces. They also explore the resilience of plants, and their capacity for healing and regrowth.
Then there are the flashy projects that underline so much that is wrong with the world of architecture and design. A space-age gateway to a row of Porsche-designed water bikes by the star architect
Norman Foster
is all aesthetics over old ideas; similarly, the New York practice
Diller Scofidio + Renfro
bizarrely won a Golden Lion for its Canal Cafe. The 'cafe' is part water-purification plant, part espresso bar at a quieter end of the Arsenale; the jury's citation praised it for its 'demonstration of how the city of Venice can be a laboratory to speculate how to live on the water, while offering a contribution to the public space of Venice'.
Again, the only new thing it seems to present is the aestheticisation of something that has been going on in many parts of the world for years. Admittedly, there is a slightly twisted delight in the sight of well-heeled biennale visitors lining up for the delicious frisson of drinking formerly filthy water.
Gateway to Venice's Waterways by Norman Foster with Porsche. Photograph: Marco Zorzanello
Nearby, one of the most moving elements of the Italian pavilion, which explores the country's relationship to the sea, is an old film of children happily and (presumably) safely swimming in Venice's canals.
After all this, Ireland's pavilion, in its now regular space towards the quieter reaches of the Arsenale, comes as a welcome respite. It has been created by a team led by the Cork-based firm
Cotter & Naessens
, whose other projects include Dún Laoghaire's Lexicon Library, Limerick's Grainstore and some exceptionally elegant private housing that makes remarkable use of light. At Venice a timber structure encloses a circular space with a wraparound internal bench. The diameter of the space makes you want to stay, sit and talk.
Inside Assembly, at the Venice Bienalle. Photograph: Cotter & Naessens Architects
Assembly
celebrates Ireland's citizens' assemblies, whichhave come together to debate issues from marriage equality to biodiversity loss. 'Could citizens' assemblies be realised at different scales?' the architects ask, imagining villages, cities and towns with their own social chambers, where people can meet to discuss, disagree and maybe even (whisper it) come up with something new, without resorting to cancellation, rage and online abuse?
The idea is richly simple, although it is also elegantly complex in its execution. Leaning on the idea of architecture as an enabler rather than souped-up saviour, Louise Cotter points out how making civic architecture is (or, rather, should be) about making spaces to gather.
'This,' she says, 'brings it down to the level of community.'
'The need to assemble is fundamental,' Luke Naessens, who curated the pavilion with Cotter, says. 'But the right to assemble is under pressure.'
The pavilion itself was put together from beech wood by Alan Meredith, two trees having fortuitously fallen in a storm at precisely the right time. It is visually completed with a carpet designed by Liam Naessens and created by
Ceadogán Rugmakers
.
Adding a further layer, the whole thing is soundtracked by the composer David Stalling, with ambient noises, including birdsong and the sounds of the making of the pavilion itself at the exterior, and spoken word, including a poem by Michelle Delea, and voices from those who participated in citizens' assemblies inside.
'To start with, people were diffident about coming in because of the carpet,' Cotter says, 'but as it got dirty they lost their inhibitions.'
It's a seemingly throwaway remark that hits at a deeper truth about the way environment can both invite and inhibit. Through their researches, the team explored places where people gather and communicate, from church choirs to cattle marts. 'Originally we had a kind of passageway with seats on either side, but that was a more hierarchical and confrontational space,' Cotter says. 'So it had to be round.'
Size matters, too, as their researches demonstrated a sweet spot of distance that allows for connection and intimacy without intimidation.
Stalling's composition is designed as what he describes as 'an intimate form of musical dialogue'. Together they have got it entirely right, as experience proves that this is a space in which it is lovely to linger and that, in so doing, conversations with strangers ensue.
'Thinking about assembly as a process really inflected our design,' Naessens says. 'While we were working on independent parts we would come together, and something someone else was doing might shift the direction. There's a reflexive element to it.'
Architecture as Trees, Trees as Architecture at the Venice Biennale. Photograph: Marco Zorzanello
The Lebanese pavilion at the Venice Architecture Biennale 2025
Their explorations continually underlined the idea of how much the human element matters. As Cotter remarks, 'buildings like cathedrals or train stations come alive when filled with people, [but] the pandemic completely inverted our sense of what a place of assembly is'. Thinking about this, and about how smartphones have added to the changes in how we meet and interact, a project such as Assembly becomes even more interesting for the quiet ideas it ignites.
Many brilliant solutions to our social woes have been previously proposed in Irish pavilions past, such as the excellent Suburban to SuperRural, curated by
FKL Architects
in 2006; and
Free Market
, put together by Jeffrey Bolhuis, Jo Anne Butler, Miriam Delaney, Tara Kennedy, Laurence Lord and Orla Murphy in 2018.
Each presented cogent and practical ideas, with some inspiring leaps of the imagination to spice things up. In the former, dull suburbs were re-created as biodiverse places in which people, and nature, could thrive; in the latter, the dying market towns of Ireland gained a new lease of life as remarkable places to live and work.
Yet what has changed? The national pavilions at successive Venice architecture biennales are, in the main, supported by their respective governments – in Ireland by funding from
Culture Ireland
and the
Arts Council
. But do governments take notice? Then time passes and things stay the same or, as is the case with the environment, declines.
What if the biennale could do something good? Imagine if we did adopt the social-housing covenants of Austria or build with carbon-dioxide-sucking bricks. 'The biennale does matter,' Naessens says. 'The process of working alongside people from Oman, Morocco – it's valuable. It's random which pavilions are next to each other in the Arsenale, but the conversations that come through are really generative, especially when we're looking at things like climate change, which are global.'
As I leave the Arsenale the crowds are thinning out. A man is tipping out a melancholy version of Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star on a steel drum, as opposite him the mimic robot has given up, and hangs forlornly in space. The queue to ask questions of an AI robot with a surreally smoothed-out face has vanished but, given my chance, I can't think of anything to say. 'Does any of this matter?' I try. 'Ahh, that is a big question,' replies the robot, and leaves it at that.
The
19th Venice International Architecture Exhibition
runs until November 23rd.
Assembly
will tour Ireland, including to Cork Midsummer Festival, in 2026
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Sydney got the Opera House and we had Ardnacrusha. It's time for that kind of ambition again
The imposing cathedral of St Cecilia of Albi sits in the middle of a modest French town in the Languedoc region, towering over everything around it. Built as a fortress against heresy and rebelliousness and as a symbol of episcopal power, it is the largest brick cathedral in the world, with an estimated 25 million bricks used to build it. Constructing such a monumental symbol of authority takes time and immense resources. Albi Cathedral took 200 years to build. It is estimated that the cost of building it would have run to hundreds of millions if not billions of euro in today's money. READ MORE One study suggests that between 1100 and 1250 the building of Gothic churches in the Paris Basin alone consumed on average 21.5 per cent of the regional economy. Luckily Bishop Bernard de Castanet of Albi was able to sell spiritual indulgences to his parishioners which helped to pay for its construction. The great cathedrals of the Middle Ages were built at a time when the Catholic church was the dominant source of power in Europe and long before the nation state had emerged to shape and direct the aspirations of the masses. Many, if not most, of these remarkable buildings have also become cultural icons and house artistic and architectural treasures intended to inspire – and terrify – the parishioners into religious obedience. Nowadays it is impossible to imagine such a project. I'm guessing that present generations lack the patience or naivety to bet their faith and taxes on a project that would take generations to complete, and religious threats are unlikely to have much sway these days. Yet the 20th century saw the completion of magnificent megaprojects, the construction of which was often controversial at the time. One example is the Sydney Opera House. Originally commissioned in 1959, it took 10 years longer to build than originally envisaged and it went over budget by 1,360 per cent. The project was plagued by political interference, changes in government and constant budget scrutiny that ultimately led to lead architect Jørn Utzon's resignation in 1966. He left Australia and never came back to see the project completed. Yet within two years after opening, the Opera House had been paid for, thanks to a lottery that had been set up to fund it. The Sydney Opera House is now a Unesco world heritage site. In comparison to other European countries, Ireland has few modern standout buildings. Our national contribution to world architecture and engineering is modest and associated with colonial grandeur rather than public buildings or large infrastructural projects. There are compelling historical reasons for the impoverished state of Ireland's public infrastructure until independence in 1922, though perhaps the nation's railway network is an exception. One of the first initiatives of the Irish Free State was the construction of the Ardnacrusha hydroelectric scheme in Co Clare, which was completed in 1929. At a projected cost of £5 million (which was about 20 per cent of the national budget in 1925), it was an enormous sum for a post-Civil War state. Critics argued for smaller, less ambitious projects or said the money would be better spent directly on agriculture. Today's megaprojects are more likely to serve functional rather than cultural needs, such as the national children's hospital or MetroLink , a tunnelled metro system that will connect the city centre with the airport and towns of Fingal. (I am a member of the board of Transport Infrastructure Ireland , which is the sponsoring agency for MetroLink.) Many large-scale infrastructure projects have been hugely damaging to the environment, for example the Three Gorges Dam in China. But large-scale projects do not necessarily need to be environmentally destructive. We need to think of supergrids, forests, bog restoration, metro and light railway schemes as megaprojects that are consistent with our climate goals. Nature restoration and climate adaptation, too, are a long-term, expensive endeavours that require government leadership and multigenerational financial commitments. Such megaprojects benefit the public good and the environment, and their economic benefits are spread widely. For this reason, committing to nature restoration, public transport and a renewable energy system is ultimately the hallmark of a mature democracy in the 21st century. The State (or its proxies) will have to plan for the future, acquire land portfolios and shoulder long-term investments that inevitably carry risk. Long-term, large-scale projects require a political vision combined with a strong administrative state to secure the funding to see them through to completion. Megaprojects are complex, expensive, high-risk but ultimately transformational. When MetroLink is ready to take passengers from the early 2030s, there will be no doubt it was worth the long wait. Sadhbh O'Neill is an environmental and climate researcher. She is writing in a personal capacity


Irish Daily Mirror
6 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Israel to pause fighting in three Gaza areas as concerns over hunger surge
The Israeli military said it would pause fighting in three populated areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day and open secure routes for aid delivery to desperate Palestinians. The steps are meant to address a surge in hunger in the territory as Israel faces a wave of international criticism over its conduct in the 21-month war. The military said it would begin a 'tactical pause' in Gaza City, Deir al-Balah and Muwasi, three areas of the territory with large populations, to 'increase the scale of humanitarian aid' entering the territory. The pause would begin every day at 10am to 8pm local time until further notice, beginning from Sunday. The military also said that it carried out aid airdrops into Gaza, which included packages of aid with flour, sugar and canned food. Food experts have warned for months of the risk of famine in Gaza, where Israel has restricted aid because it says Hamas siphons off goods to help bolster its rule. Images emerging from Gaza in recent days of emaciated children have fanned global criticism of Israel, including by close allies, who have called for an end to the war and the humanitarian catastrophe it has spawned. Israel said the new measures were taking place while it continues its offensive against Hamas in other areas. The local pause in fighting came days after ceasefire efforts between Israel and Hamas appeared to be in doubt. On Friday, Israel and the US recalled their negotiating teams, blaming Hamas, and Israel said it was considering 'alternative options' to ceasefire talks with the militant group. After ending the latest ceasefire in March, Israel cut off the entry of food, medicine, fuel and other supplies completely to Gaza for two and a half months, saying it aimed to pressure Hamas to release hostages. Under international pressure, Israel slightly eased the blockade in May. Since then, it has allowed around 4,500 trucks for the UN and other aid groups in to distribute. The average of 69 trucks a day, however, is far below the 500 to 600 trucks a day the UN says are needed for Gaza. The UN says it has been unable to distribute much of the aid because hungry crowds and gangs take most of it from its arriving trucks. As a way to divert aid delivery away from the UN, Israel has backed the US-registered Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which in May opened four centres distributing boxes of food supplies. More than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces since May while trying to get food, mostly near those new aid sites, the UN human rights office says. Israel has railed against the UN throughout the war, saying that its system allowed Hamas to steal aid, without providing evidence. The UN denies that claim and says its delivery mechanism was the best way to bring aid to Palestinians. The military said the new steps were made in co-ordination with the UN and other humanitarian groups. Much of Gaza's population, squeezed by fighting into ever tinier patches of land, now relies on aid. The war began with Hamas's attack on southern Israel on October 7 2023, when militants killed 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostages. Hamas still holds 50 hostages, more than half of them believed to be dead. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 59,700 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry operates under the Hamas government. The UN and other international organisations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.


Irish Times
21-07-2025
- Irish Times
Who answers the phone and says nothing? People under 25
The other day, a recruiter in the United States posted something online that quickly racked up an improbably large number of views. This was no rant about war, strife or US president Donald Trump. It was merely an observation made by a heavy phone user that many workers in their 20s now answer calls without saying 'hello', 'hi' or indeed anything at all. 'I can hear their breathing and the background noise, but they wait for you to say hello first,' said the perplexed recruiter, adding she was talking about pre-arranged calls made at precisely the time the silent breathers had themselves chosen. Also, she was calling from a phone number she had sent them, so they could tell who would be on the line, having just sent an email reminder about the upcoming call. Like others who saw her post, I found this news baffling. I realise a lot of young people find phone use unnerving. I understand this may be because they grew up without a landline in the home, so never got the free phone training from their parents that the rest of us took for granted. I can almost imagine how years of Snapchatting might lead one to feel anxious about a phone call coming out of the blue with no appointment. Almost. But who picks up a call and says nothing? The answer, it seems, is people yet to hit 25. A remarkable 40 per cent of British people aged between 18 and 24 think it is acceptable to answer a phone call without any form of greeting, a UK YouGov poll found last year. Only 27 per cent of those aged between 25 and 34 feel the same way, and support plummets to 14 per cent among those over 45, who I think I can safely say find it weird or just plain rude. Non-greeting is not confined to the United Kingdom or US. 'It's very common,' says Mary Jane Copps, founder of a Canadian communication consultancy called The Phone Lady. One reason for not saying hello, she told me, has nothing to do with phone anxiety and everything to do with the robocalls that have turned so much of modern communication into a joyless cesspit. 'Rather than start the conversation and then discover it is a recorded message or scam, they wait to hear who or what is calling them before they respond.' David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city Listen | 36:51 This chimes with what people told the US recruiter. Depressingly, one person said they had been taught in high school that answering a call with a greeting could allow their voice to be recorded and used for identity fraud, so they always stayed silent until the caller spoke. Another said the rise of artificial-intelligence voice cloning made it natural to avoid answering the phone with a greeting. I sympathise, and have no doubt failed to say anything myself when answering a call from a number I suspect to be spam. Perhaps we all need to think again about using voice recognition as a password for anything crucial, like a bank account. Either way, poor phone manners are a problem in the workplace. Employers now consistently complain about their youngest workers' lack of communication skills. Some say it is one of the reasons newly hired graduates do not last the distance or arrive in the office ill-prepared for the world of work. Poor phone manners are also expensive. Companies pay up to $3,100 (€2,666) a day for training from Mary Jane Copps, who has some astonishing stories about young workers' ideas about phone use. Not long ago, she recalled, a young man in one of her workshops said: 'You know, Mary Jane, if somebody calls me out of the blue, what that says to me is they value their time more than my time, and I am not going to talk to them.' There is one simple solution: hire more old people. Also, teach young people that in the working world, it is not okay to answer a phone with silence, nor shrink from an unscheduled call. On the upside, a young person who knows such simple truths can stand out from the ruck in ways that would have seemed inconceivable just a short while ago. It is such an easy way to excel. Grab it while it lasts. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025