Museum of Ice Cream at the Domain is closing its doors
The Museum of Ice Cream, which began in New York as an interactive pop-up that kickstarted the "Instagram Museum" trend, opened a location at the Domain in Austin in the summer of 2021. Located at the Domain next door to North Italia and across from True Food Kitchen, Austinites could access five treats and 12 interactive exhibits for a little over $20 per person.
According to its website, the museum is closing its doors at the conclusion of its lease, but is looking for a new location in central Austin.
"After an incredible four-year run, Museum of Ice Cream at The Domain will be closing its doors at the conclusion of our lease," the museum's website reads. "This was our first museum to open after COVID, and it has become a true Austin staple—thanks to YOU! ... While this marks the end of our time at The Domain, it's not goodbye forever. We're on the hunt for a new home in central Austin and hope to welcome you back in the future!"
The Museum of Ice Cream filed a WARN notice last week, announcing that it would lay off 38 employees, with their final day being July 10.
The museum has not responded to requests for comment about the museum's closing or the layoffs.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Museum of Ice Cream to close its Domain location this summer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Entrepreneur
40 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
What Top Founders Know About Domains That Most Entrepreneurs Miss
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. As a founder who has invested $1 million in a domain, I can speak from experience: when a savvy founder or top-tier venture capitalist enters a boardroom, they're rarely focused first on hiring engineers or raising a round. Instead, they want to know where the company stands with its domain. Why? Because securing a premium domain is more than just claiming an online address — it demonstrates confidence and vision, like owning a prized parcel of land in digital real estate. And it can add millions of dollars in value to your business over time. The psychology of first impressions in digital real estate Your domain is often the first thing people notice. A clean, memorable .com can be showcased on a pitch deck, business card or LinkedIn profile and instantly signals credibility. It tells investors and customers alike that you mean business. Straightforward web addresses naturally inspire trust. If a domain seems complicated or suspicious, people hesitate before clicking. Compare that with names like or — easy to say, easy to remember — and you'll see how quickly perception forms. This snap judgment colors how your product, pitch and promise are received. In investor conversations, founders with premium domains quietly build credibility. They leverage current domain trends to ensure market relevance and filter out distractions. Business isn't built on half measures, and your domain sets that tone. Related: The Best Domains Are Gone — But Here's How Savvy Founders Still Snag Them The long-term ROI of the right domain You might think a domain is just a name, but the market tells a different story. One-word .coms regularly sell for six or seven figures. Cases like at $30 million or at $35.6 million show the real monetary value a short descriptive domain holds. Investors and founders treat domain acquisition as digital asset appreciation. You could pay $10,000 or $100,000 upfront, but if that domain doubles traffic or improves buyer perception, it more than pays for itself. Consider the math: a $25,000 domain that brings in 50 extra customers the first year, each generating $1,000 in lifetime value, yields five times the investment. Innovative founders integrate domain ROI into their financial models, and VCs recognize this as a sign of strategic thinking. Domains as early proof of seriousness Intent matters in startup culture. Founders who spend significantly on a strong domain before anything else send a clear message: I believe in what I'm building. Investors hear that loud and clear. A founder might have shipped a prototype or done customer interviews, but securing signals a bigger vision. Owning your domain builds identity equity — something marketing teams dream of and investors respect. It shows you're not starting a side hustle but creating a brand with purpose. The competitive edge in a noisy market Companies thrive on recall. A memorable domain name remains essential. If it's easy to say, type or mention without confusion, you've won. Domains cluttered with dashes, merged top-level domains or odd spellings lose trust and memorability. Think versus — the latter may be cheaper, but it sacrifices trust and virality. SEO success often hinges on strong domains because good names attract more clicks, links and shares. And here's the kicker: when a founder says, "The .com was taken, so we went with .co," alarm bells ring. Investors wonder why the .com wasn't secured. Was it the budget? Carelessness? A premium domain supports marketing efforts and ensures your name resonates in headlines and podcasts without hesitation. Domain strategy is part of the startup strategy Domain strategy is integral — more than just buying a name. Top startups approach it with a clear purpose. They define their brand essence — the mission, the vibe — then secure relevant domains early, often before patent filings or hiring engineers. Budgets are set thoughtfully, such as aiming for one-word .coms under $50,000 or two-word .coms under $20,000, whatever fits. Variations are secured to protect brand identity, and domain acquisition is tracked alongside logos, prototypes and pitch decks in the launch checklist. Related: How to Secure a Premium Domain Without Raising Prices or Attracting Competitors What the smartest founders are doing right now Before SEC filings and public announcements, top founders quietly acquire domains. Demo day rumors often stem from domain purchases made months earlier. Leading VCs invest in domain portfolios, offering name equity to founders in their ecosystem, easing brand creation. Accelerators and incubators increasingly require domain plans or provide early-stage grants to secure premium .coms. Founders report feeling more in control once they own their domain. Product decisions anchor, messaging sharpens and investors become more confident. Building a billion-dollar company means treating every element—from hiring to branding—as a strategic priority. Your domain deserves a seat at that table. It's more than digital shelf space; it's brand equity, trustworthiness and a long-term asset. Top founders who think in five-year arcs know the best way to start strong is to secure their domain early. Investors see this and understand you're building on solid ground, not just hope. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Domains As Digital Equity: The Hidden Asset Class In Every Startup Stack
Startups are built on a hundred moving parts. Code. Capital. Team. Vision. But there's one asset every founder owns that often gets overlooked: the name. And more specifically, the domain name. While most founders stay focused on shipping product, refining pitch decks, or debating whether to build in public, the domain quietly shapes how people perceive the company. It sets the tone before anyone reads a line of copy or sees a demo. Some treat it like a detail to figure out later. The smart ones see it for what it is: a long-term asset that builds real value. Your Domain Is the First Impression People say not to judge a book by its cover. But let's be honest, we all do. Your domain is that cover. It's what people see before they click, before they read a single word, before they even decide to care. When you see a brand like or something clicks. They feel polished. Familiar. Legitimate. You trust them before you even know what they do. Compare that to trying to remember a startup called or The friction is subtle but constant. Trust leaks out with every unnecessary letter, hyphen, or suffix. From Cost to Capital: The Math Most Founders Ignore Let's say you're debating whether to spend $50,000 on a domain. That might sound steep. But spread over five years, that's $833 a month. And if it increases your conversion rates or lowers your CAC by even 5–10%, the math changes fast. Here's what a strong domain can do: A $50K domain with a 10% lift in performance on a $200K ad budget pays for itself in a year. Everything after that is upside. The Asymmetry of Attention Attention online is a zero-sum game. You're not just competing against other startups. You're competing with Instagram reels, Slack pings, and breaking news. A clean, memorable domain helps you break through. It's the rare asset that buys you mental real estate. This is why companies like Superhuman, Headspace, and Ramp went the extra mile to secure strong brand assets early. In the long run, the name became part of what made them defensible. Your name is part of the conversion funnel, whether you track it or not. Our Rebrand to We saw this firsthand. For years, we ran the business as And honestly, the name worked. It reflected what we were doing at the time: crowdsourced naming, and helped us build a strong community around that idea. But as the company grew, so did our vision. We were no longer just a crowdsourcing platform. We'd become a full-stack destination for branding, curated domains, AI-powered discovery, visual identity tools, and a marketplace for founders and investors. So we decided to make the shift to Short, timeless, flexible. It gave us space to grow into the brand we were becoming. And almost immediately, we saw the impact: We didn't pivot our core business model. We just made it easier for people to understand who we were, and the domain did the heavy lifting. That said, the rebrand was no walk in the park. We had to migrate years of backlinks, update internal systems, and retrain our messaging across every channel. It worked, but it reminded us just how hard it is to change direction once you're already in motion. You Can Pivot Your Product. But Not Your Name. Founders love to talk about iteration. Pivoting is a badge of honor. But it is not easy to pivot your way into a better domain once you've scaled. By the time your startup is in the press, onboarding users, and running paid ads, your brand starts to stick. And not always in a good way. If you launched with something like because it was available, upgrading to later might not be an option. It may cost a lot more, or no longer on the market at all. The earlier you make the leap, the cheaper and easier it is. Digital Equity That Compounds Many startup assets decay with time. Code becomes legacy. Campaigns expire. Team members churn. But a great domain does the opposite. It compounds. It grows in value. It picks up backlinks. It gets remembered. It becomes part of your identity. And it keeps working in the background, day after day, even when you're not thinking about it. The Hidden Optionality of a Domain Here's something most founders don't realize: a domain is one of the few assets in your startup that retains resale value. If your business fails, the domain can often be sold, sometimes for more than you paid. We've seen founders pick up a name for $10K and resell it for $35K a couple of years later, even if the business didn't pan out. Sometimes the name becomes more valuable just by being live, gaining visibility, backlinks, or a bit of brand equity. Try doing that with your CRM tool or analytics stack. Domains are one of the few startup purchases that can turn into an asset class of their own. What Founders Should Think About A few questions to keep in mind: If the answer is no, it's worth fixing now. Not later. Final Thought Most things in a startup can be copied. Features, pricing, design. They're all temporary advantages. But a great name is hard to replicate. And the right domain gives you something others can't take. It's your first impression. Your home base. The thing people remember long after they forget the details. If you're building for the long haul, treat your domain like it matters, because it does. The companies that win are usually the ones that own their name, their brand, and the space they grow into.
Business Insider
7 days ago
- Business Insider
Sector Spotlight: Demand, backlog expansion drive Q2 results in defense sector
Welcome to the latest edition of 'Sector Spotlight,' where The Fly looks at a new industry every week and highlights its happenings. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. DEFENSE SECTOR NEWS: Booz Allen (BAH) was awarded a $315M contract with a maximum performance period of up to five years to deliver the Advanced Battle Management System Distributed Battle Management Node Phase II Tactical Operations Center-Light prototype for the Department of the Air Force Program Executive Office for Command, Control, Communications, and Battle Management. Booz Allen is partnering with L3Harris Technologies (LHX) for this rapid prototyping effort aimed at enabling Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control. Lockheed Martin was awarded a $999M indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile and Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile production support. This contract provides for lifecycle support for all efforts related to JASSM, LRASM and all their variants in the areas of system upgrades, integration, production, sustainment, management and logistical support. Work will be performed at Orlando, Florida, and is expected to be complete by July 17, 2030. This contract was a sole source acquisition. No funds are being obligated at the time of award. The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center is the contracting activity. EARNINGS RECAP: L3Harris Technologies delivered a beat and raise quarter in Q2, posting a record book to bill ratio. 'We delivered impressive second-quarter results, led by a record book-to-bill of 1.5x, solid organic growth, and year-over-year adjusted segment operating margin expansion for the seventh consecutive quarter. This marks a clear inflection point, with our strongest top-line growth in six quarters and meaningful progress towards our 2026 Financial Framework. Our Trusted Disruptor strategy continues to drive differentiated, mission-critical solutions that meet our customers' evolving needs while creating value for shareholders,' said Christopher Kubasik, Chair and CEO. Kubasik added, 'Defense is entering a generational investment cycle, as U.S. and allied budgets grow rapidly. Demand is accelerating, and our portfolio is aligned with key growth areas – Golden Dome, space, missiles, shipbuilding, autonomy, and resilient communications. With the flexibility of our business-model agnostic approach – able to win as a prime, sub, or merchant supplier – a focused national security portfolio, and competitive momentum from LHX NeXt, we're confident in our path to sustained profitable growth and long-term value creation.' Susquehanna raised the firm's price target on L3Harris to $320 from $300 and maintained a Positive rating on the shares. The firm updated its model following the Q2 results while noting concurrent with earnings, certain 2025 guidance items and 2026 target items were increased. Susquehanna believes the company is well positioned to benefit from domestic defense spending priorities, including Golden Dome, missile capabilities, and resilient communications. Textron (TXT) also beat expectations in the second quarter and maintained its full-year 2025 EPS guidance. 'In the quarter, we saw revenue growth in both our commercial aircraft and helicopter businesses, as well as in Bell's FLRAA program, now known as the MV-75,' said CEO Scott Donnelly. 'At Textron Aviation, operations continued to improve as production ramped.' Susquehanna increased its price target on Textron to $95 from $90 and reiterated a Positive rating on the shares. The firm said 2Q25 results beat estimates with revenue of $3.72bn and EPS of $1.55 and noted the company continues to see broad-based demand across the Aviation portfolio. General Dynamics (GD) noted that Q2 results exceeded their expectations, The company surpassed analyst expectations as well. 'During the first half of the year, each of our four segments achieved growth in revenue and earnings, with margins on a companywide basis expanding 50 basis points over the same period last year,' said Phebe Novakovic, chairman and chief executive officer. 'Our strong cash flow and healthy backlog position us well to have a good second half.' Wolfe Research upgraded General Dynamics to Outperform from Perform with a $360 price target. The firm cited the company's Q2 beat with an improved free cash flow and order outlook for the upgrade. The quarter 'should be the beginning and not the end,' the analyst told investors in a research note. Wolfe sees an additional 14% upside in the shares. Lockheed Martin (LMT), on the other hand, fell short of consensus in Q2, citing the negative impact of pre-tax losses on programs of $1.6B and other charges of $169M. While the company did cut FY25 EPS guidance, it maintained its FY25 revenue outlook. Lockheed Martin chairman, president and CEO Jim Taiclet commented, 'Based in part on this record of performance as well as the promise of several advanced technologies in development, our U.S. and allied customers are asking us to elevate and accelerate many key programs. For example, several allied nations have recently announced additional F-35 purchases, the U.S. Army has awarded more than $1 billion in missile-related contracts so far, and the U.S. Space Force is ordering additional GPS IIIF satellites. At the same time, our ongoing program review process identified new developments that caused us to re-evaluate the financial position on a set of major legacy programs. As a result, we are taking a number of charges this quarter to address these newly identified risks. We remain committed to delivering these critical capabilities that our customers are counting on and are fully focused on the growth inflection we expect as the result of heightened interest and demand for Lockheed Martin's products and technologies.' RBC Capital lowered the firm's price target on Lockheed Martin to $440 from $480 and kept a Sector Perform rating on the shares. Lockheed Martin's Q2 results were 'soft,' with $1.6B of program losses driving a 78% miss in EPS, the analyst noted. The path to free cash flow growth over the next few years is challenged, the firm said. RTX (RTX) beat Q2 expectations, cut its FY25 EPS view and raised its FY25 revenue outlook. 'We continued our momentum in the second quarter with organic sales and profit growth* across all three segments, including 16 percent commercial aftermarket growth,' said RTX chairman and CEO Chris Calio. 'Our backlog grew to $236 billion, up 15 percent versus prior year, and we secured major awards for our geared turbofan engines and integrated air and missile defense capabilities in the quarter.' Morgan Stanley elevated its price target on RTX to $180 from $165 and keeps an Overweight rating on the shares. The firm named the stock its 'Top Pick in Aerospace' after the company reported a Q2 beat. Given its strong underlying fundamentals and demand across its end markets, RTX should be able to narrow the valuation gap to premium peers, the analyst argued. Northrop Grumman (NOC) exceeded street expectations in Q2, noting its EPS included a $1.04 benefit from the training services divestiture completed in the quarter. 'The Northrop Grumman team delivered a strong second quarter, with increased sales and outstanding operating performance,' said Kathy Warden, chair, chief executive officer and president. 'We continue to see growing demand globally for our broad range of product offerings, which resulted in 18% international sales growth in the quarter. With confidence in our team and our ability to deliver for our customers, we are increasing our full-year guidance for segment operating income, EPS and free cash flow.' BTIG boosted the firm's price target on Northrop Grumman to $630 from $575 and backed a Buy rating on the shares following the quarterly results. Northrop Grumman remains one of the best ways to play the growth in international defense spending at the large-cap level, the analyst contended.
