SAHRC probes Open Chats Podcast despite clip removal and apology
Image: X
The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has confirmed a probe into comments made by the Open Chats Podcast. The SAHRC says its investigation will continue despite the podcast production team deleting the clip from its full episode, and the apology that has since been issued.
The Commission stated that it has send letters to the respondents and will then determine the best way forward.
"This may include instituting proceedings in the relevant Equality Court as per section 13(3)(b) of the South African Human Rights Commission Act 40 of 2013 (SAHRC Act), read withsection 20 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (Equality Act), 2000," it said.
In the clip, which has gone viral on social media, the hosts make several racist comments, claiming that not only do Coloured families have sexual relationships with each other (incest), but they also suffer mental issues.
"Coloureds apparently chow (have sex with) each other," one of the hosts says.
In response, a co-host says, "I do believe that because Coloureds are crazy.
"The Commission has noted that the hosts, through their lawyers, sought to apologise for their offensive remarks soon after the discussion went viral on social media and the discussion has since been removed from the episode.
"However, the Commission through its Gauteng Provincial Office has opened an own accord investigation and will continue with its investigative process," the SAHRC said.
Meanwhile, MultiChoice has confirmed that it dropped the Open Chats Podcast in July.
"Open Chats' contract with DStv ended on 25 July 2025, as the show was removed to make way for our August content slate. The episode in question was not aired on our platform," the broadcaster said.
[email protected]
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'Open Chats Podcast' apologises for 'reckless and un-African' utterances about coloured community
Open Chats Podcast hosts Mthokozisi Methula and Sinothando Kama have issued an apology for the derogatory remarks they made on their platform about the coloured community. The popular podcast recently came under fire for remarks which promoted damaging stereotypes and sweeping generalisations, sparking outrage and calls for its removal. Political parties — including the ANC, DA, PA and EFF — have condemned the behaviour and reported the matter to the commission. After their initial apology in the form of a statement shared on their social media platforms, the podcasters apologised again in their recent episode. Mthokozisi read an apology on behalf of the podcast, speaking of how they plan to take accountability after going viral 'for all the wrong reasons' following the publishing of episode 128. 'We here at Open Chats Podcast wish to unconditionally and unreservedly apologise for the hurt and the harm we caused to the coloured community and to South Africa at large. We take accountability for our utterances. Our statements in the episode were racist, sexist, unfortunate, irresponsible, reckless and un-African,' he said.
The Herald
9 hours ago
- The Herald
Podcasters push back on tougher rules amid hate speech uproar
The podcasting industry is facing renewed scrutiny after recent high-profile controversies sparked debate about the need for stronger regulation in the sector. Director of member affairs at the South African Podcasters Guild (SAPG) Diego Domingo said the actions of a small minority of creators should not lead to restrictions that compromise free expression. 'We can't negate the right to freedom of speech because less than 1% of podcasters are causing an issue. We advocate strongly for free speech, but within the context of the law,' said Domingo. Several incidents have intensified calls for reform, including recent public outrage over racist remarks about the coloured community on the Open Chats Podcast and television personality Minnie Dlamini's decision to open a defamation case against podcaster MacG. Domingo said many creators believe existing laws on hate speech, defamation and harmful content are sufficient, making podcast-specific regulations unnecessary. Founded to foster community, accountability and growth within the local industry, SAPG has more than 400 registered members. Head of industry relations Paulo Dias said the guild supports creators through training programmes focused on civic engagement, diversity and gender equality. 'SAPG has introduced a formal pledge that members must sign, committing to ethical content creation and rejecting hate speech and discrimination,' said Dias. The guild is active in initiatives such as Podcasthon, the SA Podcast Awards and cross-continental networks and is exploring partnerships with the Press Council and the Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa to establish effective complaint mechanisms. Dias emphasised that while regulation can help address hate speech and misinformation, it must be designed carefully to avoid stifling creativity or disproportionately burdening independent creators. 'Regulation that is overly punitive or vague could deter independent creators and limit the diversity of voices in the space. Larger companies may absorb regulatory costs more easily, but smaller podcasters often lack legal teams or compliance infrastructure,' he said. Dias said the SAPG has begun engaging with policymakers to shape a balanced framework, including contributing to a draft white paper from the department of communications and digital technologies on online safety and digital media services. Chairperson of the parliamentary portfolio committee on communications and digital technologies Khusela Diko told eNCA the drive for updated regulation stems from outdated broadcasting laws, not individual incidents. The long-delayed Audio and Audiovisual Content Services policy aims to modernise broadcasting regulations so digital platforms, including podcasts on services such as YouTube, meet requirements similar to those for traditional broadcasters. Under the Broadcasting Act only community, commercial and public broadcasters are covered, leaving much of the online content space outside its scope. Dias encouraged podcasters to take proactive steps to maintain industry standards. 'We urge more podcasters to join SAPG and sign the pledge to uphold ethical standards. Use the resources on our website for training and guidelines. Balance entertainment with responsibility, especially in sensitive cultural contexts, and engagement with your audience feedback is essential for accountability.' TimesLIVE
TimesLIVE
10 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Podcasters push back on tougher rules amid hate speech uproar
The podcasting industry is facing renewed scrutiny after recent high-profile controversies sparked debate about the need for stronger regulation in the sector. Director of member affairs at the South African Podcasters Guild (SAPG) Diego Domingo said the actions of a small minority of creators should not lead to restrictions that compromise free expression. 'We can't negate the right to freedom of speech because less than 1% of podcasters are causing an issue. We advocate strongly for free speech, but within the context of the law,' said Domingo. Several incidents have intensified calls for reform, including recent public outrage over racist remarks about the coloured community on the Open Chats Podcast and television personality Minnie Dlamini's decision to open a defamation case against podcaster MacG. Domingo said many creators believe existing laws on hate speech, defamation and harmful content are sufficient, making podcast-specific regulations unnecessary. Founded to foster community, accountability and growth within the local industry, SAPG has more than 400 registered members. Head of industry relations Paulo Dias said the guild supports creators through training programmes focused on civic engagement, diversity and gender equality. 'SAPG has introduced a formal pledge that members must sign, committing to ethical content creation and rejecting hate speech and discrimination,' said Dias. The guild is active in initiatives such as Podcasthon, the SA Podcast Awards and cross-continental networks and is exploring partnerships with the Press Council and the Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa to establish effective complaint mechanisms. Dias emphasised that while regulation can help address hate speech and misinformation, it must be designed carefully to avoid stifling creativity or disproportionately burdening independent creators. 'Regulation that is overly punitive or vague could deter independent creators and limit the diversity of voices in the space. Larger companies may absorb regulatory costs more easily, but smaller podcasters often lack legal teams or compliance infrastructure,' he said. Dias said the SAPG has begun engaging with policymakers to shape a balanced framework, including contributing to a draft white paper from the department of communications and digital technologies on online safety and digital media services. Chairperson of the parliamentary portfolio committee on communications and digital technologies Khusela Diko told eNCA the drive for updated regulation stems from outdated broadcasting laws, not individual incidents. The long-delayed Audio and Audiovisual Content Services policy aims to modernise broadcasting regulations so digital platforms, including podcasts on services such as YouTube, meet requirements similar to those for traditional broadcasters. Under the Broadcasting Act only community, commercial and public broadcasters are covered, leaving much of the online content space outside its scope. Dias encouraged podcasters to take proactive steps to maintain industry standards. 'We urge more podcasters to join SAPG and sign the pledge to uphold ethical standards. Use the resources on our website for training and guidelines. Balance entertainment with responsibility, especially in sensitive cultural contexts, and engagement with your audience feedback is essential for accountability.'
