logo
I disagree with Trump, but we can't afford to ignore him

I disagree with Trump, but we can't afford to ignore him

Yahoo20-02-2025

'I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical a---hole ... or that he's America's Hitler.'
Before you faint, that's not me thinking that, but J D Vance in 2016. The vice president who only this week scolded President Zelensky for 'bad mouthing the president' has a long track record of bad mouthing his own boss.
Yet he still made it to number two in the White House. That says a lot about Donald Trump's style and his propensity to govern in the moment rather than in a more traditional way.
Trump's style seems to be based on a view that presidential power is absolute. He can forgive J D Vance or even Peter Mandelson's comments because they don't really matter.
What really matters to him is one thing, himself. It is important we understand that because it drives and motivates his agenda. The art of a deal is more important than the outcome of it.
Trump's desire to be centre of attention means that anyone who doesn't pay homage at the court of the new king deserves to be condemned.
I believe that his anger at Zelensky is not driven by the rights or wrongs of the war. In my view it is driven by the fact that Zelensky won't be supine to him. The opening salvo of team Trump in trying to stop the war – and claim a Nobel peace prize, it is rumoured – has failed badly.
As soon as Trump refused to let Ukraine or Europe into the room for peace talks he unwittingly risked looking impotent. This is not something he will ever want to look like.
When the president of the United States took any US assistance off the table in advance of the talks – boots on the ground, aid and security guarantees – while at the same time handing Putin everything he wanted, Donald Trump lost nearly all leverage.
The Ukrainians saw little point in engagement and realised that their long-term future lay with Britain and Europe.
This is because true leadership is generous not selfish. The motto of the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst is 'serve to lead' – you put skin in the game to have the right to lead.
And now, within a week, as a result of a self-inflicted diplomatic mess, we see this president reduced to spouting Kremlin talking points and fake news.
It is time for us in Europe to really put our money where our mouths are. To be outraged by Donald Trump but to do nothing about it is to prove Trump's point – that we are all talk.
Next week Sir Keir goes to Washington DC. He will try and be the 'bridge' between Europe and the United States, No 10 claims.
But I hope when he goes, he does actually make it clear to Donald Trump that we reject in the strongest terms his claims about Ukraine. I hope he is clear on tariffs, on Greenland and Nato.
But if Sir Keir is to be listened to he will also need to show that he too has listened to the message from successive Whitehouse administrations that we must take a greater responsibility for our own security. We need to recognise that the USA has asked us to change our priorities for more than a decade.
And we must act on it by pushing defence to the top and making some tough spending decisions elsewhere to fund it. In the Trump Oval office, money talks.
There are many people inside and outside government who fear to say what we really think. They worry about what impact arguing with Donald Trump would have on our special relationship. In fact, I notice many of them are the same people who were afraid to stand up to Putin when I was in the Cabinet.
As one of the United States's closest allies, we don't have to be reckless or aggressive in our messaging to Trump, but we can be honest.
We do speak the same language. There is still more that unites us than divides us.
We should not forget that our special relationship goes a lot deeper than which 'here today , gone tomorrow' politician occupies no 10 or the Oval office.
Trump mark 2 is definitely different from Trump mark 1, but in the end his main policy goals are domestic not foreign. If he can forgive J D Vance he can forgive anyone.
Rt Hon Sir Ben Wallace served as defence secretary
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that it wasn't his decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to the U.S. to face federal charges, saying the 'Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine.' 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said of Abrego Garcia's return in a phone call with NBC News on Saturday. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president added. Trump added that he did not speak with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return, even though the two men spoke about Abrego Garcia during an April meeting in the Oval Office. His remarks came after Abrego Garcia arrived back in the U.S. on Friday and was charged in an indictment alleging he transported people who were not legally in the country. The indictment came amid a protracted legal battle over whether to bring him back from El Salvador that escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. Abrego Garcia's family and lawyers have called him a family man, while Trump and his administration have alleged that he is a member of the gang MS-13. The case drew national attention amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. After Abrego Garcia's deportation, lawyers for the Trump administration said he was deported in an 'administrative error,' as Abrego Garcia had previous legal protection from deportation to El Salvador. Still, the Trump administration did not attempt to bring Abrego Garcia back, even as the Supreme Court ruled that it had to 'facilitate' his return to the U.S. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., had for weeks said that Abrego Garcia was denied due process when he was detained and deported, arguing that he should have been allowed to defend himself from deportation before he was sent to El Salvador. Trump on Saturday called Van Hollen, who went to visit Abrego Garcia in jail in El Salvador in April, a 'loser' for defending the man's right to due process. 'He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear,' the president said about Van Hollen. 'He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser, this guy.' On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia 'was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country.' In a statement Friday, Abrego Garcia's lawyer called Bondi's move 'an abuse of power, not justice.' This article was originally published on

Trump dumps the Federalist Society — and even Republicans are shooketh
Trump dumps the Federalist Society — and even Republicans are shooketh

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump dumps the Federalist Society — and even Republicans are shooketh

In a major about-face, Donald Trump is turning on the conservative powerhouse that built his judicial legacy, the Federalist Society. Yale Law professor Akhil Reed Amar warns that this break with the very group that helped propel him to power marks a dangerous shift. 'He just wants loyalty to himself—thugs and hacks,' Amar says, adding that Federalist Society judges are principled and loyal to the Constitution, not to Trump. 'The Senate needs to play a really important role now—especia

Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud
Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud

Elon Musk has deleted his X post claiming that President Donald Trump's name is mentioned in the Jeffrey Epstein files Musk's claim came after the two men clashed about a new budget bill backed by the president The tech billionaire's decision to take down the post may be a sign of de-escalation in their highly publicized feudElon Musk has taken down his explosive claim that President Donald Trump's name is in the Jeffrey Epstein files — a move which may be a step toward de-escalation in the public feud between the two men. In the since-deleted post, which Musk shared on X on Thursday, June 5, the tech billionaire claimed that Trump appears in the high-profile case files, writing that it was the 'real reason' the files had not been made public. "Have a nice day, DJT!" he added sarcastically. Trump responded to the claim on Friday, June 6, by reposting a statement on Truth Social that was originally written by Epstein's former lawyer, David Schoen, on X. In the statement, Schoen claimed that his client 'had no information to hurt President Trump.' "I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died,' the statement began. 'He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!" Trump's name has previously been publicly linked with Epstein. His name was mentioned in flight logs released earlier this year by Attorney General Pam Bondi a total of seven times. However, the appearance of Trump's name in the flight logs does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing, as many of the individuals named could have been on Epstein's plane for legitimate reasons. The president was friends with the disgraced financier and pedophile for many years, but the two had a falling out in the mid-2000s, Trump told reporters shortly before Epstein died by suicide in 2019. Musk's deleted claim came on the heels of a number of verbal jabs with the president following the release of a controversial new budget bill. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted to X — which he owns — on Tuesday, June 3. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." During an Oval Office press conference on Thursday, June 4, Trump responded to Musk's criticisms. "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anyone sitting here," Trump told reporters. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the [electric vehicle] mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars." Trump also predicted Musk's attacks would get personal after saying he was "very disappointed in Elon." The war of words also came just days after it was announced Musk would be leaving the Trump administration. Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store