Stocks to watch: Vedanta, Reliance Industries, IEX, NBCC India among shares in focus today
The International Business recorded strong growth in the high teens in constant currency terms, while consolidated revenue increased in the low twenties year-on-year.
Reliance Retail has revealed a strategic minority investment in FACEGYM, a UK-based company known globally for its innovation in facial fitness and skincare.
Bajaj Finance recorded a 25% year-on-year rise in its assets under management (AUM), reaching around ₹ 4.41 lakh crore as of June 30.
The pharma company is in the spotlight after BC Investments IV, backed by Bain Capital, initiated a block deal to offload a 2.4% stake valued at approximately ₹ 551 crore.
The Indian Energy Exchange (IEX) reported a 15% year-on-year growth in electricity trading volumes in the first quarter of FY26, with total volumes touching 32,382 million units (MU).
State-run Bank of Baroda (BoB) posted an 11% year-on-year increase in its global business, reaching ₹ 26.43 lakh crore for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to ₹ 23.87 lakh crore in the same period last year.
NBCC has received fresh orders worth around ₹ 65.73 crore. The contracts involve providing project management consultancy (PMC) services for various building projects, including external works at the Energy Institute in Bengaluru.
RBL Bank posted an 11% year-on-year increase in total deposits, reaching ₹ 1.12 lakh crore for the quarter ending June 30, 2025. Compared to the previous quarter, deposits rose by 2%.
The company recorded a 22% year-on-year increase in gross disbursements, reaching ₹ 14,640 crore in the first quarter of FY26.
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Rude and confusing': US employee shares frustrations over disorganised work culture at Indian company
A Reddit post has triggered widespread discussion after a user shared his confusing and frustrating experience of working remotely for an India-based company while living in the United States. In a post titled "Indian company in US – rude and confusing", user @Mediocre-Magazine-30 described a month-long ordeal marked by poor leadership, excessive micromanagement, and what he felt were significant cultural differences in workplace communication. A US employee shared frustrations about confusing leadership and micromanagement at an Indian company.(Representational image/Pixabay) (Also read: Indian employee in US asked to 'stop speaking in meetings' because of accent: 'I felt insulted') 'So I've taken this job with a company based in India. I live in the US. My job is to get the company going in America,' he wrote. 'I report to the US CEO (I think) but it seems I have like five bosses, all who don't coordinate.' He went on to describe a confusing work structure and a lack of training. 'It's been a month and so far the job is super confusing with either no direction or way over-the-top micromanagement.' No training, constant calls, and unprofessional behaviour The user mentioned being assigned a cold call campaign, with mandatory check-ins at 8 am and 4:30 pm every weekday. 'In general there is no training, and the lead guy sitting in India today was very rude and acted like I haven't been doing anything,' he said. 'He also complained and ambushed me about other irrelevant topics such as why I haven't dug into the CRM — there is nothing to do on it yet.' He concluded by expressing anxiety over possibly being fired soon, adding, 'Maybe I need to work harder, but today was just unreal where this Indian guy turned on me and was so disrespectful.' Check out the post here: Online users weigh in The post received several comments from users who related to the situation or offered advice. One commenter wrote, 'Buddy, these are people who expect you to be like a servant. You can't reason with them.' Another urged calmness, suggesting: 'Just say that it would be nice to have a productive conversation. If not, take a break and continue later.' Others pointed to systemic issues in Indian corporate environments. 'It's quite common — no coordination, micromanagement, lack of clarity, ego issues, and sudden blame games,' one said. Another advised, 'Please find a new job. Not worth it. They'll probably bring in one of their own anyway.' (Also read: US company demands Indian employee keep camera on during work hours. His response) An Indian manager chimed in to say, 'Your manager seems like an idiot. Just leave. Value culture more.' Another said: 'Look for a new job.'
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Delhi Rent Control Act anachronistic legislation: Delhi HC
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High court has called the Delhi Rent Control Act an "anachronistic piece of legislation" the "egregious" misuse of which has forced property owners into desperate circumstances as well-off tenants "unjustly occupy premises for decades on-end". Justice Anup Jairam Bhambani was hearing petitions against the 2013 orders of the additional rent controller (ARC) that dismissed eviction petitions of the UK and Dubai-based owners of a property in Sadar Bazar and ruled in favour of tenants. "This court is compelled to record that while manning the Rent Control Roster it has found that cases abound where very well-off tenants enjoying financial prosperity persist in unjustly occupying premises for decades on-end, paying pittance for rent, while in the process their landlords are forced into impecunious and desperate circumstances, resulting from egregious misuse of an anachronistic piece of legislation, namely the Delhi Rent Control Act," the court said. The high court, as a result, allowed the petitioners to evict the tenants. The petitioners sought the eviction of the premises on the ground that they run two restaurants in London and require the space for expanding the business in India. The ARC had denied the eviction, noting that the petitioners were settled-in and were running their businesses in London and Dubai, and did not require the premises for their "subsistence or survival", and that their bona fide requirement did not amount to being an "actual need". It also said the premises were too small to run a sit-in restaurant from. The high court set aside the eviction order and said "the financial wellbeing of a landlord, or the financial ill-health of a tenant, were not relevant considerations while deciding an eviction petition under section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act". The court further said whether the petitioners were able to run a full-fledged, sit-down restaurant or a smaller food takeaway vend was entirely their prerogative.
Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
1 engineer, many jobs and a hiring reckoning for tech
Over this week, both Reddit and X were on fire over an Indian engineer named Soham Parekh. On Wednesday Suhail Doshi, a San Francisco-based founder associated with the Y Combinator accelerator startup community, posted a tweet about the engineer, with a word of caution. 'He works at 3-4 startups at the same time and has been preying on YC companies. Beware,' Suhail Doshi posted, adding a screenshot of the person's resume. Within a few hours, his X blew up with other startup founders posting that they had hired or fired Sohan Parekh. At least five founders accused the engineer of moonlighting – or job stacking, a practice of working multiple full-time remote jobs concurrently. Representational Image As tweets tumbled one after the other, many founders revealed they had met the engineer online and were impressed in the interview before they hired him. 'He did so incredibly well in interviews, must have a lot of training,' wrote Flo Crivello, another founder based in San Francisco, adding that the lesson they learnt from this was to always run backdoor checks and spend more time scrolling Twitter. 'He has been doing this for years and works at more than four startups at any given time,' wrote Nicolai Ouporov posting an email from the engineer. 'We realized pretty quickly that he was working at multiple companies and let him go,' wrote New York-based Matthew Parkhurst, joking that hiring Soham seems to be the new rite of passage for startups in San Francisco. Another founder wrote how they had interviewed Parekh in a WeWork and then saw him giving an interview to another startup in the same coworking space. Gerry Tan, president and CEO of YCombinator, posted a meme of Scooby Doo catching a thief. 'The startup guild of YC is a necessary invention to help founders be more successful that they would be alone,' he joked. As the controversy tumbled into a meme, a fake Parekh account blossomed on X and people started to joke about hiring the engineer. And urban legends started doing the rounds -- such as one that suggested that Parekh had several software mules working for him. This is another scam in a list of scams that the Silicon Valley has gone through, but what it tells us is that there is a lack of good quality engineers to hire. Startups in the Valley often end up hiring remote workers – living in other cities or across the world (for instance, it isn't clear where Parekh is based). This and the fact that coding can now be done with AI, has made it possible for smart engineers to take up multiple jobs. There is even a Reddit sub r/overemployed which supports jobstacking and moonlighting. You can potentially have multiple jobs, say no to meeting online or in real life and get multiple salaries. Some startup founders even appreciated the hustle that came with moonlighting this way. What the controversy also shows us is that we're increasingly working with people we haven't met and might not meet in real life. I have worked for and hired remotely on projects. Many a times, it was a few years before I met the people in person. Sometimes, even when you're in the same city, country or state, you end up working on Zoom or Microsoft Teams. With sophisticated video and interactive apps, working remotely with each other is easier. However, as AI-generated fake profiles proliferate, we have also become susceptible to scams. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find out if someone whose profile you saw on LinkedIn is real or not. And I'm not talking about them lying about their credentials. I'm talking about completely synthetic profiles with AI-generated photographs. LinkedIn's transparency report mentioned that in 2024, more than 70 million fake accounts were identified and removed during the registration process. There are high chances today that someone you are friends with online is a synthetic digital persona. With audio-video generation, it has become easier to develop a fake persona, complete with videos and even real-time interaction on Zoom. As these scams become increasingly sophisticated, we will see more of them happening around us – to our friends or our colleagues. But as is the nature of Silicon Valley, the problem of synthetic digital scams has given rise to another industry. Startups are building cryptographically-signed blockchain for digital identity – to protect our identity from being stolen and abused in digital spaces. Next time you give an interview, the startup founder will probably ask you to give a block-chained verifiable digital identity to prove that you're you and that you're real in the video interview. Meanwhile, sit back and enjoy Sohamgate play out on social media. Shweta Taneja is an author and journalist based in the Bay Area.
