Top 10 African countries that lost the most money to EU visa rejections
In 2024, African countries collectively lost tens of millions of euros in non-refundable application fees due to European Union (EU) visa rejections, indicating a growing financial and mobility burden for African travelers.
Business Insider Africa presents African countries that lost the most money to E.U. visa rejections
The ranking is courtesy the LAGO Collective
Nigeria experienced the highest losses, amounting to €4.3 million, followed by Senegal and Côte d'Ivoire.
These losses incurred by African countries from rejected visa applications stem from a broader category of EU-issued visas, including national visas for study, employment, and long-term residence.
Applicants from Africa continue to face some of the highest visa rejection rates globally, often paying high processing fees only to be denied entry, without refund or recourse.
In a previous report, Business Insider Africa estimated that African nations lost roughly €60 million (about $67.5 million) due to Schengen visa rejections alone.
Alarmingly, six of the ten countries with the highest Schengen visa rejection rates globally are in Africa.
Comoros leads with a staggering 61.3% rejection rate, followed by Guinea-Bissau (51%), Ghana (47.5%), Mali (46.1%), Sudan (42.3%), and Senegal (41.2%).
New data from the LAGO Collective, reveals the African countries that incurred the highest estimated financial losses from rejected EU visas in 2024.
VISA
Nigeria tops the list, with €4.3 million lost, followed by Senegal (€2.8 million) and Côte d'Ivoire (€2.2 million).
Beyond restricting movement, these high rejection rates and financial loses have real economic consequences, draining resources from individuals and families who often save extensively to afford these applications.
The growing trend has intensified calls for more transparent, equitable, and accountable visa processes for African nationals.
African countries with most financial loses from rejected E.U visas
The table below ranks the top 10 African countries with the highest estimated financial losses from EU visa rejections in 2024.
Rank Country Estimated Cost of Rejections (€)
1 Nigeria €4.3 million
2 Senegal €2.8 million
3 Côte d'Ivoire €2.2 million
4 Ghana €2.1 million
5 Cameroon €1.7 million
6 Kenya €1.6 million
7 DR Congo €1.5 million
8 Angola €1.1 million
9 South Africa €927.4 thousand
10 Mali €390.2 thousand
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
44 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Insurance Comparison Site Choosi Allegedly Made Millions in Commission Promoting 1 Company
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched proceedings against insurance comparison service Choosi, accusing the company of misleading consumers. According to ASIC, insurer Hannover paid Choosi approximately $61 million in commissions between 2019 and 2024 to exclusively promote its insurance products. The regulator says that during this period, Choosi was responsible for the sale of 4,225 funeral insurance policies and 9,478 life insurance policies—all linked to Hannover. ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said the enforcement action is aimed at protecting consumers trying to find the best insurance deals. One Insurer Behind the Illusion of Choice ASIC claims that since mid-July 2019, Choosi has mostly compared only Hannover-issued policies, with just one exception during the entire timeframe. Hannover, a global insurance provider, operates two Australian entities: one for property and casualty insurance and another for life and health insurance. ASIC says the $61 million in commissions was paid to ensure only Hannover's offerings were promoted on the site. 'We will contend people were led to believe they were making a sensible decision by comparing policies; however, they were denied genuine choice,' Court said in the statement. Although funeral insurance products on Choosi's site appear under three separate brand names, ASIC says all are underwritten by Hannover. Similarly, Choosi compares five life insurance policies that look distinct but are also issued by Hannover—except for a brief period before July 2023 when one additional insurer was included. ASIC says all policies were distributed by Greenstone Financial Services, a company affiliated with Choosi. 'What we're seeing here is the Choosi platform really being used by Hannover as just a platform to distribute its products, with no comparison going on with other insurers at all,' Court said. She added that the promotional campaign had been broad and long-running. 'We know that this was a very widespread advertising campaign by Choosi over many years ... and we know there have been thousands of policies that have been sold,' she said. ASIC criticises the company for presenting misleading information across multiple platforms—including Choosi's website, social media, TV commercials, and advertorials. Between July 1, 2019, and Nov. 30, 2024, Choosi is said to have sold thousands of policies under this arrangement. Court emphasised that if the Federal Court rules in ASIC's favour, 'it will be important for [ASIC] to seek substantial penalties.'
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
ASIC Says Choosi Compared Policies From Just 1 Insurer
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has launched proceedings against insurance comparison service Choosi, accusing the company of misleading consumers. According to ASIC, insurer Hannover paid Choosi approximately $61 million in commissions between 2019 and 2024 to exclusively promote its insurance products. The regulator says that during this period, Choosi was responsible for the sale of 4,225 funeral insurance policies and 9,478 life insurance policies—all linked to Hannover. ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said the enforcement action is aimed at protecting consumers trying to find the best insurance deals. One Insurer Behind the Illusion of Choice ASIC claims that since mid-July 2019, Choosi has mostly compared only Hannover-issued policies, with just one exception during the entire timeframe. Hannover, a global insurance provider, operates two Australian entities: one for property and casualty insurance and another for life and health insurance. ASIC says the $61 million in commissions was paid to ensure only Hannover's offerings were promoted on the site. 'We will contend people were led to believe they were making a sensible decision by comparing policies; however, they were denied genuine choice,' Court said in the statement. Although funeral insurance products on Choosi's site appear under three separate brand names, ASIC says all are underwritten by Hannover. Similarly, Choosi compares five life insurance policies that look distinct but are also issued by Hannover—except for a brief period before July 2023 when one additional insurer was included. ASIC says all policies were distributed by Greenstone Financial Services, a company affiliated with Choosi. 'What we're seeing here is the Choosi platform really being used by Hannover as just a platform to distribute its products, with no comparison going on with other insurers at all,' Court said. She added that the promotional campaign had been broad and long-running. 'We know that this was a very widespread advertising campaign by Choosi over many years ... and we know there have been thousands of policies that have been sold,' she said. ASIC criticises the company for presenting misleading information across multiple platforms—including Choosi's website, social media, TV commercials, and advertorials. Between July 1, 2019, and Nov. 30, 2024, Choosi is said to have sold thousands of policies under this arrangement. Court emphasised that if the Federal Court rules in ASIC's favour, 'it will be important for [ASIC] to seek substantial penalties.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK ‘not ready' for major animal disease outbreak
Britain is not prepared to handle a major outbreak of disease in animals like bird flu, foot and mouth or African swine fever, the government's spending watchdog has warned. The UK would be 'unable to respond effectively' to an animal outbreak, which could cost the UK economy billions in lost livestock and pose a significant risk to human health, according to a new report from the National Audit Office (NAO). The report examines the readiness of the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and has found significant shortcomings in its contingency planning. There is a 'very high risk' of Weybridge, the government's biosecure containment labs responsible for testing animal diseases, being unable to cope with the demands of testing and tracing in the event of a major outbreak, it said, noting that the issue 'has worsened' in recent years. DEFRA rated the likelihood of such a failure at 25 out of 25, the maximum rating that can be given. 'The site is in poor condition, with ageing buildings that need major repair and replacement, and a lack of capacity to carry out research and testing,' the report says. While a £2.8 billion redevelopment programme at Weybridge was now underway, the main new laboratory facilities will not be delivered for another 10 years, it added. Plans for how outbreaks of several major diseases including bird flu, which has already killed more than seven million birds in Britain since 2020, have not been updated in more than a decade. The government came under similar criticism during the Covid inquiry after it was revealed the UK did not have an up-to-date pandemic plan or strategy. The last one was published in 2011 and has not been revised since. The risk of 'exotic' animal diseases entering the country is also rising, partly because only five per cent of live animal imports are being physically checked at the border – far below the target of 100 per cent set by the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), an arm of DEFRA, which was meant to be reached last year. Adding to the concern, around 20 per cent of veterinary positions at APHA are currently unfilled, further weakening the UK's ability to respond swiftly to a crisis. DEFRA also lacks a comprehensive livestock tracing system, which is 'crucial to responding quickly and effectively to contain an outbreak,' the report says. The systems currently in place are 'fragmented' and 'run on outdated legacy systems,' including a cattle tracing platform which was set up in 1998 and has 'significant reliability issues'. During recent outbreaks of H5N1 bird flu, APHA and local authorities had to distribute flyers in areas where the infection was present and send out teams to find farms at risk of contracting the virus, because the government agency did not have a complete list of poultry farms and bird keepers. The government department has also failed to test its response capabilities in any meaningful way, according to the watchdog. Exercises to test outbreak contingency plans have been increasingly 'table-top' exercises – meaning they are conducted online rather than in the field – which would better simulate a real outbreak scenario. As it stands, a major animal disease outbreak would cost the UK economy hundreds of millions, or even billions, of pounds. The NAO cited the 2001 foot and mouth outbreak, which resulted in an estimated £13.8 billion in economic losses. 'A long-term strategy and action plan are urgently needed, to protect national economic resilience as well as food security, human health and rural communities,' said Gareth Davies, head of the NAO. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the parliamentary Committee of Public Accounts, said: 'Despite some good work to identify new threats, Government's preparations for a future major outbreak are being hampered by a lack of capacity, skills and long-term strategy. 'The government's failure to carry out checks on animal imports is also threatening biosecurity at the border. Resilience to a severe outbreak has not been tested in recent years, but the threat remains ever increasing as our livestock become more susceptible to disease. 'Without changes to the current operating system, there is a very real risk that the Government would not be able to respond effectively.' Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
