logo
Opinion: As Trump Basks In Fordow Afterglow, Kremlin Has A Counterpoint

Opinion: As Trump Basks In Fordow Afterglow, Kremlin Has A Counterpoint

News1822-06-2025
Last Updated:
Russians believe Trump will scramble for peace in a hurry to hog credit for stopping Israel-Iran war. But Iran will invest all its energies to get past nuclear line in minimum time
When bombs drop on the nuclear kitchens of the Ayatollah Khameini regime in Iran, billions rejoice. Some openly, some (especially the fast-transforming Sunni Arab powers) privately. Iran is a ruthlessly violent regime which has killed and targeted thousands of its own women for merely refusing to wear the hijab; runs terror proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis; and is widely seen as the biggest destabilising force in the Middle East. It has richly earned its comeuppance.
But then the man who ordered the early morning bombings on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear facilities is one who believes that jumping into every global conflict and claiming credit for solving those has earned him about five undelivered Nobel Peace Prizes so far.
It is true that American B-2 stealth bombers have dropped six GBU-57, the deepest bunker-busting bomb in the world. Developed in the early 2000s, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) weighs 13,600 kg, is 6 meters long, has a diameter of about 80 cm, and contains nearly 2,500 kg of explosives. It can target structures up to 60 metres under the ground.
The B-2 bombers flew non-stop for around 37 hours from its base in Missouri, US, refuelling several times mid-air. The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) acknowledged the strikes. But it has downplayed these as superficial. No nuclear contamination detected after US strikes, it said.
No changes in background radiation were detected in Saudi Arabia or other Gulf Arab states, the Saudi Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission (NRRC) confirmed.
Russia, Iran's steadfast ally, remains unimpressed by the airstrikes. Russian news agencies mocked Trump through its X handle.
'Force far greater than what was witnessed tonight," boasted Trump — the man who thinks he deserves FIVE Nobel Peace Prizes," Sputnik posted.
But sources close to the Kremlin break down the US airstrikes more technically. Since Russia is Iran's biggest backer and has helped set up its nuclear infrastructure, there could be bias in its analysis. But it is nevertheless worth considering because beyond Trump's narcissistic boasts and the democratic world's confirmation bias to believe Iran's Ayatollah regime's nuke toys are finished, there could be a reality check.
Six GBU-57 bombs (some now say 12) pounded Iran's Fordow nuclear plant. They rely on mass, not firepower. Imagine 30,000 pounds of tungsten, delayed fuses, inertial guidance, and geological stress sequencing.
But Fordow was built for this, the Russians say.
It is designed to counter the MOP. Hence the curved tunnels, offset caverns, anti-penetration strata, and layered redundancy across ventilation. Fordow apparently has C2 and IR-6 centrifuge chambers. A single hit does not affect much, but two strikes can open up a tunnel mouth.
To truly destroy the core, you would need tight sequencing, vector convergence, telemetry confirmation, and real-time damage layering, says the source close to the Kremlin. That apparently didn't happen. At most, the American bombs sealed an entrance, he argues. Iran has so far reported no core disruption, no enrichment halt, and no internal collapse.
Russians estimate that to drop six GBU-57 bombs, three B-2 stealth bombers together or two conducting multiple flyovers deep in contested airspace flew in without strike escort in one of the most monitored radar corridors on earth. If Fordow was gone, you would see craters, electromagnetic rupture, emergency airlifts, seismographs lighting up, and infrared flares beneath the mountain, they say.
Tomahawk missiles on Natanz and Esfahan add nothing, they claim. Cruise missiles are subsonic, non-penetrative, and designed for surface-level disruption. 'You don't decapitate nuclear infrastructure with Tomahawk Block IV missiles. You flick switches. You scorch perimeters," the source says. 'A thousand-pound warhead does not cut into fuel halls or disrupt cascade chambers beneath 20 meters of hardened casing."
This was bravado by Trump aimed at placating pro-Israel pressure groups, Russians believe. Apparently Jewish groups in the US have been long pressing Washington to join the war.
'As of now, there is no synthetic aperture radar (SAR) confirmation. No crater clustering. No multispectral flash analysis. No underground fire signature. No battle damage assessment (BDA) loop," says the Russian source.
The Russians believe Trump will now scramble for peace in a hurry to hog credit for stopping the Israel-Iran war. But Iran will invest all its energies to get past the nuclear line in the minimum time now. And Russia is likely to help it.
The last quip is particularly acerbic: 'If the centrifuge of Fordow still spins tomorrow, Washington just pulled off the most expensive influence op in bunker-busting history, only to watch Tehran climb the escalation ladder unscathed."
top videos
View all
Although Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Trump and America, he would not be pleased if the airstrikes serve only as Trump's headline and photo-op and makes Iran even more determined to procure the Bomb.
Abhijit Majumder is a senior journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
First Published:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

USAID didn't fund voter turnout in India: US embassy's data contradicts Trump
USAID didn't fund voter turnout in India: US embassy's data contradicts Trump

First Post

time4 minutes ago

  • First Post

USAID didn't fund voter turnout in India: US embassy's data contradicts Trump

The data released by the US embassy has shown that no funds were granted for voter turnout-related activity in India. Earlier this year, US President Donald Trump had claimed that the USAID had spent $21 million to increase voter turnout in India. Donald Trump speaks to members of the media at Manhattan Supreme Court amid his hush money trial, in New York, US, May 7, 2024. (Photo: Curtis Means/Pool via Reuters) The US Embassy in India has contradicted President Donald Trump's claim about election-related funding in India. The data provided by the US embassy, and shared by the Union government in the parliament, shows that USAID did not provide any funds for any election-related activity in India. There was no entry of $21 million in the list of India-related grants. Earlier in February, Trump had claimed that USAID had given $21 million to increase voter turnout in Indian elections. The basis of the claim was a post on X by the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) that said it had cancelled '$21M for voter turnout in India' among a host of other grants. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD US taxpayer dollars were going to be spent on the following items, all which have been cancelled: - $10M for "Mozambique voluntary medical male circumcision" - $9.7M for UC Berkeley to develop "a cohort of Cambodian youth with enterprise driven skills" - $2.3M for "strengthening… — Department of Government Efficiency (@DOGE) February 15, 2025 Trump had alleged that the previous Democratic Party's administration had interfered in Indian elections. He also questioned the basis of providing funds to a foreign country's elections and used it as a talking point in his campaign to dismantle government grants, departments, and programmes, including the USAID. '$21 million going to my friend Prime Minister Modi in India for voter turnout. We are giving $21 million for voter turnout in India. What about us? I want voter turnout too," said Trump on one occasion. US embassy contradicts Trump's claim After Doge on February 16 claimed that it had revoked grants for Indian elections, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) reached out to the US embassy and requested to urgently furnish details of expenditure incurred on all USAID-assisted or funded projects in India over the last 10 years other than those being implemented under the seven run in partnership with the government, the government told the parliament in response to the question of CPI-M MP John Brittas. The answer, signed by Kirti Vardhan Singh, the Minister of State for External Affairs, said that the US embassy replied with the information on July 2. In its response, the US embassy provided the list of all funds provided by the USAID, Singh told the parliament. The list —see below— did not have any election-related grants. The US embassy further said that USAID would cease operations in India on August 15, as per Singh's answer. What did Trump say about Indian elections? Based on the Doge's claim, Trump said that the previous administration were trying to get someone other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi elected with their interventions in Indian elections. On one occasion, Trump said, 'Twenty-one million dollars in voter turnout — why do we need to spend 21 million for voter turnout in India? I guess they were trying to get somebody else elected. We have got to tell the Indian Government because when we hear that Russia spent about $2,000 in our country, it was a big deal. They took some internet ads for $2,000. This is a total breakthrough.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On another occasion, Trump also called it a 'kickback scheme'.

"Stay Loyal To Trump": JD Vance Warns Elon Musk Against Forming New Party
"Stay Loyal To Trump": JD Vance Warns Elon Musk Against Forming New Party

NDTV

time22 minutes ago

  • NDTV

"Stay Loyal To Trump": JD Vance Warns Elon Musk Against Forming New Party

Washington: US Vice President JD Vance has cautioned President Donald Trump's former "first buddy", Elon Musk, against forming a new political party, saying he will be able to wield greater influence by working within the Republican Party. The advice came amid reports claiming the Tesla and SpaceX CEO has tanked his plans of starting the America Party to focus on his companies. Per a report by the Wall Street Journal, Musk has not officially ruled out the idea, though, and may change his mind later. "My advice to Elon would be to try to fix the Republican Party. Try to push it in your own way. Disagree with me all you want, disagree with the president of the United States, but don't pretend that you can make a big difference with a third party," the American VP said in an interview with Fox News. "I think Elon would make a much bigger difference if he stayed loyal to President Trump's Republican Party, and if he had disagreements, express those disagreements from the inside as opposed from the outside,' he added. Vance said he believes it would be a "huge mistake" for Elon to go forward with a third party, as after supporting Trump in the Presidential elections, he's perceived by the far left as on the side of the American right. "You believe in law and order, you believe in closed borders, you believe in economic growth and prosperity, you believe in making things in the United States of America. The idea that Elon is ever going to go back to being sort of in the middle, where Democrats and Republicans both like him, that's just not going to happen. He is perceived as being on the American right," he added. World's richest person Musk had announced his plans to launch the America Party in July, soon after Trump signed into law a sprawling domestic policy bill that the tech mogul has slammed over estimates that it will balloon the deficit. Taking to X, Trump had claimed that his new party would give people their 'freedom' back in response to criticism about the two-party system. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' he wrote.

Thailand's Caution Rings True As Pakistan Bets On China's Unproven Hangor-Class Submarines
Thailand's Caution Rings True As Pakistan Bets On China's Unproven Hangor-Class Submarines

India.com

time34 minutes ago

  • India.com

Thailand's Caution Rings True As Pakistan Bets On China's Unproven Hangor-Class Submarines

China recently handed over the third of eight new Hangor-class submarines to Pakistan, bolstering Islamabad's naval strength as Beijing expands its footprint in the Indian Ocean, a region India considers its strategic backyard. The submarine was launched in Wuhan, Hubei province, state-run Global Times reported. The second vessel was delivered in March. Pakistan has also received four modern Chinese frigates in recent years, alongside Beijing's development of the Gwadar port on the Arabian Sea. Pakistan's Deputy Chief of Naval Staff Vice Admiral Abdul Samad said the Hangor-class submarines, equipped with advanced sensors and weaponry, would help maintain 'regional power equilibrium' and ensure maritime security. Heavy Reliance on Chinese Arms China supplied more than 81% of Pakistan's arms in the past five years, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Key purchases include the Rizwan spy ship, over 600 VT-4 battle tanks, and 36 J-10CE fighter jets, which Pakistan has already used in conflicts with India. Also Read: Dangerous Escalation? Why Russia Abruptly Quit 1987 Nuclear Pact With U.S. After Trump's Submarine Threat Capabilities of the Hangor-Class Chinese experts describe the Hangor-class as a stealthy platform with long endurance, high mobility, and powerful underwater combat capabilities. The Hangor-class submarines, an export variant of the People's Liberation Army-Navy's (PLA-N) Type 039B Yuan-class submarines, are a product of the agreement signed during President Xi Jinping's visit to Islamabad in April 2015. This new attack submarine built by China's Wuchang Shipyard at Wuhan is the PNS/M Shushuk, the second of the eight Hangor class SSK being built by China and Pakistan for the Pakistan Navy. This is a joint partnership between the China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation and the… — Eurasia Naval Insight (@EurasiaNaval) July 1, 2025 Transfer of Technology and Local Construction Under this agreement, Pakistan contracted with China for eight submarines, four of which were to be built in China, and the remaining four were to be constructed by Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works Ltd (KS&EW) under the Transfer of Technology (ToT) arrangement. Weaknesses Against India's ASW Capabilities However, the Hangor-class submarines, built by China for Pakistan, face potential weaknesses against Indian anti-submarine warfare (ASW) capabilities, particularly in areas such as underwater endurance and stealth, due to their reliance on older technology compared to some Indian submarine platforms. Also Read: Pakistan's Big Bet On CPEC-II: Why India Is Alarmed And Islamabad Risks Paying A Heavy Price Delays and Combat Management System Issues Pakistan's reliance on China for technology and construction makes the program susceptible to shifts in China's strategic priorities. The Hangor-class submarines have experienced delays in delivery due to issues with the combat management system (CMS). While the initial plan was to deliver the first four submarines between 2022 and 2023, only one has been launched for sea trials, and none have been commissioned to date. The CMS, crucial for coordinating sensors and weapons, has encountered integration challenges and potential incompatibilities with Pakistan's existing systems. Engine Troubles: German Withdrawal and Chinese Alternatives Germany's refusal to provide Rolls-Royce MTU396 diesel engines initially delayed the project, forcing Pakistan to use Chinese-made CHD620 engines. The construction of the eight submarines was significantly impacted by these issues, leading to a revised schedule. Thailand also had to abandon the purchase of these submarines due to the unavailability of German engines. Thailand's Submarine Dilemma In 2017, the initial contract to buy the S26T Yuan-class submarine with German-origin MTU-396 diesel engines was framed between China and Thailand. However, Germany's withdrawal from the agreement, citing policy restrictions on using its engines, triggered complications. Beijing suggested a domestically manufactured replacement, providing reverse-engineered CHD620 engines from China's state-owned submarine manufacturer. The CHD620 engine is a Chinese-produced version of the German MTU396 engine, manufactured under license. However, Thailand rejected the Chinese-made engine, allegedly due to concerns about its quality. However, new reports suggest that the Thai Defence Ministry has decided to reverse its earlier decision and 'agree in principle' to proceed with the S26T purchase. The submarine will now be delivered with an 'unproven' Chinese-made engine despite the Thai government's previous reservations about it. Adding to Bangkok's woes, the first of the submarines is not expected to be delivered by 2027. Regional Challenges with Chinese Submarines Across the region, navies that have acquired Chinese submarines — such as Bangladesh's refurbished Ming-class and Myanmar's older designs — have faced maintenance and performance challenges. The engine is not just a piece of machinery — it is the lifeline of a submarine. If this is compromised, then a sword of uncertainty hangs over its performance in a combat scenario, always threatening its effectiveness. Risks for Pakistan Pakistan is risking its maritime security by augmenting its submarine fleet with unproven technology from a vendor whose weapon systems failed completely against Indian missiles and air defence systems, as seen during Operation Sindoor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store