
State DOT refuses to sign off on $10 land sale that could modernize Long Island's busiest LIRR line
The state Department of Transportation seems ready to run out the clock on a $10 deal to help electrify Long Island's busiest LIRR line, Suffolk officials charged Monday.
Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine called out the DOT for stonewalling an infrastructure project he said would clean up both the delay-ridden commute and the environment — all over a pending purchase between Suffolk and the Metropolitan Transportation Agency.
If DOT does not sign off on the agreement by June 30, the contract will become void, according to Suffolk officials.
Advertisement
6 Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine called out the state Department of Transportation for refusing to approve a $10 land deal that would help electrify the Long Island Railroad's busiest line.
Brandon Cruz / NY Post
6 A map of the Lawrence Aviation Industries Site.
Department of Environmental Conservation
'This should have been done, this whole line should be electrical,' Romaine, a, Republican, told The Post from Port Jefferson. 'This is the best land deal the MTA will ever make — which isn't exactly known for its fiscal responsibility.'
Advertisement
Romaine said the agency is ready to move forward with the project, but did not specify how much the project would cost.
The vacant land, nearly 50 acres that was once part of the Lawrence Aviation Superfund site, is currently controlled by the Suffolk County Landbank.
Landbank officials offered to sell it to the MTA last year for just $10 so the agency can begin building infrastructure to electrify the unreliable diesel-fueled, double-decker trains that still run through the Port Jefferson line — a LIRR route that 30% of all riders live along.
6 Romaine and other Suffolk County officials at an event for the symbolic cutting of red tape for the land sale.
Brandon Cruz / NY Post
Advertisement
6 The state DOT has until June 30 to approve the deal.
Stefano Giovannini
It's also the busiest branch on Long Island, according to MTA data.
But the DOT balked at blessing the project, citing the need to complete an easement process as well as floating other potential options for the property, Suffolk officials charged.
Stephen Canzoneri, DOT spokesperson representing Long Island, confirmed the agency 'is in the process of delivering a free property easement' to 'facilitate MTA's property acquisition,' and said the process will take several months.
Advertisement
6 The 50-acre plot of land is owned by the Suffolk County Landbank.
Department of Environmental Conservation
6 The Lawrence Aviation Superfund site seen in 2014.
Department of Environmental Conservation
Even state Assemblywoman Rebecca Kassay, a Democrat, offered to personally pay the $10 fee to get the deal done — but said she was told the state still wouldn't allow the sale.
Romaine has even called on Gov. Kathy Hochul to step in. He argued DOT's stalling tactics go against Hochul's own green goals.
'Governor Hochul supports any effort to advance meaningful transportation investments in the region and will work with all stakeholders to resolve the complicated land use issues impacting this potential project,' Kara Cumoletti, a spokesperson for the governor, told The Post.
The MTA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
14 minutes ago
- Forbes
Tesla Stock Drops 12% As Trump-Musk Relationship Appears To Unravel
Shares of Tesla dropped by 12% on Thursday as the relationship between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's appeared to unravel, with Musk launching attacks at the president on X and Trump suggesting to reporters at the White House criticism of his signature bill from the world's wealthiest person amounts to 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Tesla's stock fell 12.3% to around $291.18 as of just before 3 p.m. EDT on Thursday, with losses accelerating following Trump's comment. Through more than a dozen posts on X since Tuesday, Musk has referred to Trump's policy bill as 'massive, outrageous' and 'pork-filled,' while adding, 'shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' Musk's latest criticism of the bill Thursday targeted Trump for the first time, as Musk wrote 'wise words' in response to a tweet from Trump in 2013, in which Trump said, 'I cannot believe the Republicans are extending the debt ceiling—I am a Republican & I am embarrassed!' Trump responded to Musk's recent attacks, suggesting Thursday he and Musk 'had a great relationship,' but 'I don't know if we will anymore.' $17.2 billion. That's how much was cut from Musk's fortune amid Tesla's stock slide, bringing his net worth below $400 billion to $398 billion, according to Forbes' estimates. Tesla's stock jumped 22% in May, which came as Musk said he would leave the White House and committed to serving as Tesla's chief executive for the next five years. Trump has called on Republican senators to approve his policy bill by a July 4 deadline set by Senate leadership. A stock slide for Tesla also comes as sales for the automaker declined in the U.K., Germany, Italy and China in May. Tesla's sales dropped more than 45% in the U.K., despite sales across the industry increasing by 28%. Tesla will launch a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, in June, featuring some 20 self-driving Model Y vehicles. The service's debut in Austin follows criticism about Tesla's self-driving software and Musk's failure to disclose detailed safety and technical data about Tesla's technology. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened several investigations into Tesla's Autopilot feature over nearly a decade, including recent probes into whether Tesla's Full-Self Driving software is linked to two deaths. Musk has repeatedly said the software allows for 'full autonomy' while in a vehicle, though he has said an active driver is still required. Musk's attacks on Trump's policy bill follow his monthslong stint in the White House leading the Department of Government Efficiency. Trump and Musk have said Musk's departure happened on good terms, and that Musk would continue to be present as a Trump adviser. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump 'already knows' Musk's stance on his bill, saying 'it doesn't change the president's opinion.' Tesla's stock declined in recent months as Musk appeared to increasingly focus on his role with the Trump administration, with some analysts criticizing him for spending '110%' of his time as head of the DOGE rather than leading Tesla. After Tesla's first-quarter earnings report in April, Musk signaled he would be 'allocating far more of my time' to Tesla, though he had yet to commit to exiting his government role.


USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump and Musk's bromance ends after personal attacks over criticism of tax bill
Trump and Musk's bromance ends after personal attacks over criticism of tax bill 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on June 5. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' Show Caption Hide Caption 'Kill the bill': Musk urges lawmakers to stop Trump's tax cut bill Elon Musk blasted President Trump's new tax bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' urging millions of followers to lobby lawmakers to 'kill the bill.' WASHINGTON – So much for the overnight White House stays, the rides on Air Force One and the glowing mutual praise. An all-out feud erupted between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, ending their onetime alliance after Trump hit back at the mounting criticism the world's richest man has leveled against the president's signature tax and policy bill. Trump said on June 5 he was "very disappointed" with Musk and signaled his close relationship with the former top White House adviser was over as he publicly addressed Musk's efforts to kill his so-called "big, beautiful bill." "Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "I don't know if we will anymore." Musk quickly fired back, saying Trump wouldn't have won a second term were it not for the quarter of a million dollars in campaign cash he pumped into his 2024 campaign. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk said in a post on X, the social media company he owns. "Such gratitude." Trump's remarks came in response to a question from a reporter as he sat next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a bilateral meeting. "I'm very disappointed with Elon. I helped Elon a lot," Trump said during a lengthy answer. For days, Trump had remained silent as Musk called Trump's reconciliation bill "a disgusting abomination" and later urged his social media followers to lobby their representatives to "kill the bill." Musk has objected to the deficit implications of the legislation ‒ fiscal concerns that the White House rejects. The bill, which cleared the House last month with only Republican support, looks to cement Trump's domestic agenda by extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts, implementing new tax breaks for tipped wages and overtime, overhauling Medicaid and food stamps, beefing up border security and significantly increasing military spending. Trump wants Senate approval by July 4. Trump said he'd "always liked Elon" and noted Musk's criticism hadn't been directed at him but rather the bill. "I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill, because the bill is incredible," Trump said. Trump later accused Musk of opposing the legislation because it would end a $7,500 consumer tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles, a policy of former President Joe Biden that has benefited electric car companies like Musk's Tesla. "I'm vey disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than anybody sitting here," Trump said. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to cut the EV mandate." 'Whatever,' Musk tells Trump More: Trump overpowers Musk's attacks on mega tax bill with blizzard of orders Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, was quick to respond. "Whatever," he said on X. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." Musk added: "In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!" He also disputed Trump's assertion that Musk was kept abreast of the bill's details. "False," Musk said. "This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" Trump: 'I think he misses the place' Musk left the White House last week after leading the government-slashing Department of Government Efficiency during the first four months of Trump's second term. Although Musk first voiced criticism of Trump's bill before his exit, Trump had seemed to smooth things over when he welcomed him to the Oval Office for a friendly send-off news conference on May 30. Yet the gap between Musk and the White House had started to widen. Musk, before his White House departure, asked for his special government employee status to be extended beyond 130 days to allow him to continue to lead DOGE, but the White House declined, a source told USA TODAY. Last weekend, Musk expressed disappointment after Trump withdrew his nominee for administrator of NASA, Jared Isaacman, a billionaire commercial astronaut with close ties to Musk. Then came Musk's attacks on Trump's legislation, jeopardizing the fate of legislation that carries out Trump's domestic agenda. Musk's criticism has given Republican senators the courage to voice their own fiscal concerns with the bill's price tag. "I'll be honest," Trump said of Musk. "I think he misses the place. I think he got out there, and, all of a sudden, he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office." Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. (This story has been updated to add new information.)
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump budget bill would kill subsidies that made home solar mainstream
By Nichola Groom (Reuters) -A last-minute tweak to the Republican budget bill passed by Congress last month would immediately end subsidies for solar leasing companies that help make rooftop systems affordable to homeowners, likely leading to a massive drop in the pace of installations, according to industry representatives. President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," now being taken up by the Republican-controlled Senate, would eliminate a 30% tax credit for solar leasing companies that charge homeowners a monthly fee for panels - one of numerous cuts directed at clean energy subsidies passed by former President Joe Biden. That provision, inserted shortly before the bill passed the House of Representatives on May 22, risks stifling a sector that buys American-made equipment, employs thousands of people and relieves strain on the grid, according to industry backers. "That's one of the harsher components of the one big, beautiful bill currently," said Gabe Rubio, a principal in the business incentives and tax credits practice at professional services firm BDO. Tax credits for homeowners who own their own rooftop systems would also be eliminated. The changes could result in as much as 40% less residential solar capacity being installed over the next five years, according to energy research firm Wood Mackenzie. Solar companies are lobbying the Senate to make changes to the bill before it becomes law. "America's home solar and storage industry is a powerful economic growth engine," Sunrun CEO Mary Powell said in a statement. "Senate Republicans now have an opportunity to advance the administration's energy independence agenda by amending this bill to keep American energy prices low and create well-paying U.S. manufacturing jobs." Trump campaigned on a promise to repeal the clean energy tax credits in Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, arguing they are expensive, unnecessary and harmful to business. Republican backers of the bill say the subsidy cuts would free up billions of dollars for other priorities. More than 5 million U.S. homes have solar panels, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. LAST MINUTE CHANGE An earlier version of the bill had protected the credit for leased solar systems, but fiscal hawks including Representative Chip Roy of Texas have said publicly that they pressed for deeper cuts to clean energy credits at the eleventh hour. Roy's office did not respond to a request for comment. Solar leasing was pioneered two decades ago by companies including Sunrun and SolarCity, which is now owned by Elon Musk's company Tesla, and quickly became the primary way home solar panels were financed. Under the model, solar installers partner with financiers that own the rooftop panels and offset their federal tax bills by claiming the credit. Homeowners either pay a monthly fixed fee to lease the equipment or pay for the electricity the system generates under a power purchase agreement (PPA). In what some analysts have said could be a loophole, the House bill directly references leased systems but does not mention PPAs. About 44% of residential systems sold today are under such arrangements, according to EnergySage, an online solar marketplace. Solar installers say undermining the subsidies could have a ripple effect on U.S. manufacturers that supply them. Freedom Forever, a top privately-held installer based in Temecula, California, said in two years it has gone from using no U.S.-made equipment to now sourcing 85% of it from American facilities. That is thanks to another IRA subsidy that provides bonus 10% tax credits for using American-made equipment. "The administration wants to bring manufacturing back to the United States, and that's what our industry has been doing for the last two to three years," Freedom Forever CEO Brett Bouchy said.