logo
Trump on Possible Iran Attack—'You Have to Do What You Have to Do'

Trump on Possible Iran Attack—'You Have to Do What You Have to Do'

Newsweek7 hours ago

President Donald Trump suggested that he does not want to pull the United States into a war with Iran but would be prepared to stop the Middle Eastern nation from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Why It Matters
Israel launched attacks against Iran's capital city of Tehran last week in what it called a "preemptive strike" and warned its citizens of retaliatory bombings from Iran.
Military tensions between the two countries have rapidly escalated in the days since; hundreds of people in Iran have died as a result of Israel's attacks on Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure. At least 24 people in Israel have died, and at least 500 were injured in Iran's retaliatory strikes.
What To Know
Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump said, "Maybe we won't have to fight."
"I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and them having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do," he said.
The president said that he planned to meet in the Situation Room on Wednesday afternoon and had "ideas" about what to do regarding Iran.
"I like to make the final decision one second before it's due," Trump said, adding that, "Things change with war."
Earlier in the week, Trump posted on Truth Social that Tehran should "immediately evacuate." On Tuesday, the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem announced that it would close from Wednesday until Friday due to "the current security situation and ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran."
Trump is facing bipartisan pushback on his comments related to Iran as Republicans like Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene oppose putting U.S. troops on the ground. Others, like Senator Lindsey Graham, have called on the president to act now and go "all in" on Iran.
What People Are Saying
President Donald Trump, on Tuesday on Truth Social: "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
CAIR Government Affairs Director Robert McCaw, in a statement to Newsweek: "The American people are tired of being pulled into endless wars they never asked for and that Congress never approved. Senator [Tim] Kaine's resolution is a common-sense step to make sure no president can bypass the Constitution and launch military action without accountability. We urge every senator to support this resolution and put the power to declare war back where it belongs—in the hands of the people's representatives."
Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Wednesday on X (formerly Twitter): "Netanyahu is not the President of the United States. He should not be determining U.S. foreign and military policy. If the people of Israel support his decision to start a war with Iran, that is their business and their war. The United States must not be a part of it."
What Happens Next
As Trump is set to meet in the Situation Room, it is immediately unclear how the night will unfold and if additional strikes between Israel and Iran will continue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My theory for why Trump's agents target Dodger Stadium and Winchell's Donut House
My theory for why Trump's agents target Dodger Stadium and Winchell's Donut House

Los Angeles Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

My theory for why Trump's agents target Dodger Stadium and Winchell's Donut House

Well, we could just cancel baseball. And, to be safe, every doughnut shop in Los Angeles should be closed pending investigation. Some Dodgers fans might be undocumented, which could explain why federal agents were camped near Dodger Stadium on Thursday but denied entry. Or there could be another reason. Roughly a quarter of the players in Major League Baseball are from outside the country. Those foreigners have visas, as I understand it, but these days, the Trump administration has made clear that temporary protected legal status is no guarantee against ejection. Not from a game, but from the country. Has anybody checked Shohei Ohtani's papers lately? Or those of Teoscar Hernández, Kim Hye-seong or Yoshinobu Yamamoto? And what about the doughnuts? It's no secret in Los Angeles that a lot of doughnut shops are run by immigrants. So it can't be a coincidence that, on Wednesday, agents arrested several men at a bus stop near a Winchell's Donut House in Pasadena. State Rep. Judy Chu (D-Monterey Park) posted comments and video on social media. 'As you can see, these ICE agents are pointing guns at innocent individuals, no warrants, no explanations, just fear and intimidation,' Chu wrote, adding that agents 'masked and armed like a militia' constitute an 'absolutely vile' abuse of power. This country is under threat like never before. Immigrants playing baseball, making doughnuts, hustling construction jobs at day laborer sites, changing the diapers of seniors with physical and cognitive disabilities. But for all of that, it can be a little difficult at times to follow the Trump administration's thinking. One day we were told the plan is to make 3,000 arrests a day. Then Trump quickly reversed course, saying raids on farms, hotels and restaurants would be curtailed because he learned in a shocking revelation from employers that 'our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.' Then, almost immediately, the administration is back to going after everyone. I have a hunch as to why that is. First of all, it's worth noting that consistency has long been an issue for the president, so much so that he should be wearing flip-flops at all times. To the Oval Office, to the golf course, to bed. Everywhere. And yet, although we're used to him saying one thing and doing another, I think something else is at play here. Trump has kept some campaign promises but struck out on key vows, and he's not a guy who handles defeat well. Grocery prices were supposed to drop on Day One and a new age of American prosperity was about to begin. How's that going, folks? He was going to end the war in Ukraine before he even took office, and then put an end to the war in the Middle East. Hmmmmmmmm. He was going to usher in a new era of budget accountability with his buddy Elon Musk leading the way. Well, that was a quick and ugly divorce, and Trump's 'big beautiful' budget bill adds $3 trillion to the national debt. We know Trump loves to watch television, so we can only assume that after he threw himself a birthday party with a military parade on Saturday, he had to have caught news clips of millions of Americans marching at 'No Kings Day' rallies across the country, including in red states. Ouch. I'm wondering if Trump saw the same sign I saw at the El Segundo demonstration, which was about a certain wife who hasn't spent much time in the White House: 'If Melania doesn't have to live with him America shouldn't have to either.' Weak men, under duress, flex their muscles. Trump can deport, and so he will. It could ruin the economy, but that won't stop him. Catch a Dodgers game while you can, and stock up on doughnuts.

Trump's new two-week negotiating window sets off scramble to restart stalled Iran talks
Trump's new two-week negotiating window sets off scramble to restart stalled Iran talks

CNN

time36 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump's new two-week negotiating window sets off scramble to restart stalled Iran talks

President Donald Trump's decision to open a two-week negotiating window before deciding on striking Iran sets off an urgent effort to restart talks that had been deadlocked when Israel began its bombing campaign last week. The hope among Trump and his advisers is that Iran — under constant Israeli attack and having suffered losses to its missile arsenal — will relent on its hardline position and agree to terms it had previously rejected, including abandoning its enrichment of uranium, according to US officials. The deferred decision, which came after days of increasingly martial messages from the president suggesting he was preparing to order a strike, also gives Trump more time to weigh the potential consequences — including the chance it could drag the United States into the type of foreign conflict he promised to avoid. But negotiating a diplomatic solution in Trump's condensed timeline appeared to face significant early hurdles. Earlier this week, discussions were underway inside the White House to dispatch Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and Vice President JD Vance to the region for talks with Iran. But as Trump grew wary that diplomatic efforts might succeed, the idea never resulted in scheduled talks, and both Vance and Witkoff remained in Washington as of Thursday. Foreign ministers from Britain, Germany and France are traveling to Geneva on Friday to hold talks with Iranian representatives, and have been briefed on the details of the last deal Witkoff offered to Iran, which Tehran ultimately rejected before the Israeli strikes began. Among US officials, there were not high expectations of success for Friday's meeting in Geneva, one US official said. But a White House official kept the door open to progress. 'This is a meeting between European leaders and Iran. The President supports diplomatic efforts from our allies that could bring Iran closer to taking his deal,' a White House official said. Iran's consistent message to the US since Israel began its strikes a week ago has been they will not engage in further talks with the US until the ongoing Israeli operation ends, two sources familiar with the messages said. The US has so far not pressured Israel to halt its strikes, sources said. And Trump said this week that his message to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been to 'keep going.' So far, Iran has offered no indication it is willing to move off its positions on enrichment, which it views as a red line. And as of Thursday, no official talks between the US and Iran were on the books, US officials said. In putting off a decision, Trump appears to be placing more stock in a diplomatic solution that only a day earlier he appeared to suggest was out of reach. 'I think the president has made it clear he always wants to pursue diplomacy. But believe me, the president is unafraid to use strength if necessary,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday after relaying Trump's new two-week timeline. 'And Iran and the entire world should know that the United States military is the strongest and most lethal fighting force in the world, and we have capabilities that no other country on this planet possesses.' In a string of Situation Room meetings over the course of this week, Trump has quizzed advisers about the likelihood US bunker-buster bombs could entirely eliminate Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordow, and how long such an operation might last, according to people familiar with the conversations. He has insisted repeatedly he wants to avoid taking action that could devolve into a multi-year conflict, something many of his own loyalists — including his onetime top strategist Steve Bannon, with whom the president had lunch Thursday — argue would be unavoidable should he make the decision to go ahead. And while the president has seen the military options, he remains worried about a longer-term war. Any assessments on whether a strike would cause prolonged US engagement are predictive and, by their nature, not entirely satisfactory, one official said. The new, within-two-weeks time frame for talks was not universally welcomed. An Israeli intelligence official expressed dismay that Trump would not make a decision – one way or the other. 'This is not helping,' the official said. Trump will continue to convene top-level intelligence briefings over the coming days, returning to Washington early from a weekend trip to his property in New Jersey to be updated at the White House. He has relied principally on his CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine in meetings to discuss his options, according to people familiar with the matter. But at the center of the diplomatic efforts will be Witkoff, the president's friend and foreign envoy who has led negotiations meant to curb Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Witkoff began direct messaging with his Iranian counterpart, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, earlier this month and the administration has maintained some communications with Iranian officials over the past tense days as Trump weighed a strike. The plan that Witkoff last offered to Tehran would have required Iran to eventually end all uranium enrichment on its soil, and on Thursday the White House said it still views a ban on Iranian uranium enrichment as necessary to a final deal. As the Europeans head into Friday's meeting, they will be 'taking the temperature' on how receptive the Iranians are to finding a diplomatic solution, given their belief that strikes in both directions are not a solution, a European official said. European leaders believe the risks of Iran's nuclear program persist even amid Israel's strikes because Tehran maintains nuclear know-how and may still have clandestine nuclear-related efforts that won't get demolished by military strikes. Meanwhile, most US diplomats who are not in Trump's inner circle at the State Department have not been given specific guidance to offer US allies on the diplomatic efforts, a US official and a European diplomat said. That has led to many frustrating discussions with foreign interlocutors as US diplomats have very few answers to give the allies as they try to determine their diplomatic and military posture in the region, pointing only to Trump's own words. As Trump has weighed his options, Secretary of State Rubio has been close by, also departing early from the Group of 7 summit in Canada along with the commander in chief earlier this week. The top US diplomat spoke on Monday with his French, British and European Union counterparts about efforts to 'encourage a diplomatic path that ensures Iran never develops a nuclear weapon,' according to State Department readouts of the calls. On Wednesday, Rubio 'compared notes' on the matter with the Norwegian foreign minister. Rubio met with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy on Thursday before Lammy departs for the Geneva talks, and the two 'agreed Iran can never develop or acquire a nuclear weapon,' according to the State Department. 'Meeting with Secretary of State Rubio and Special Envoy to the Middle East Witkoff in the White House today, we discussed how Iran must make a deal to avoid a deepening conflict. A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution,' Lammy said in a statement Thursday. US officials, including Witkoff, have also been actively engaged with officials in the region, many of whom have offered their help in mediating a diplomatic path forward. Multiple sources said Iran has responded to messages from third parties, but their responses have not changed.

Trump to make a decision on Iran within two weeks
Trump to make a decision on Iran within two weeks

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump to make a decision on Iran within two weeks

President Donald Trump has set a two-week deadline to decide if the United States will strike Iran. "Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place in the near future, I will make my decision of whether or not to go within the next two weeks," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday, reading a statement from the president to reporters. Leavitt said Trump would prefer a diplomatic solution, but the president — in consultation with the National Security Council — is weighing U.S. military intervention to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to a recent POLITICO report. The U.S. is the only country with the military capacity to destroy Iran's nuclear program. 'Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' Leavitt said. 'All they need is a decision from the supreme leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon, which would of course pose an existential threat not just to Israel, but to the United States and to the entire world.' The comments came at the end of a week of heightened tension in the decades-long conflict between Israel and Iran. As Iran and Israel lobbed rockets at each other, Trump left the Group of Seven conference early and has convened multiple meetings in the Situation Room. The conflict has divided Trump's coalition, driving a rift between an isolationist faction and hawks who have long sought to hobble Iran. Leavitt said Trump has long maintained his position that the U.S. should interfere to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and quoted his comments on the subject from more than a decade ago. 'The president has made it clear he always wants to pursue diplomacy, but believe me, the president is unafraid to use strength as necessary,' Leavitt said. 'And Iran and the entire world should know that the United States military is the strongest and most lethal fighting force in the world, and we have capabilities that no other country on this planet possesses.' Leavitt declined to answer whether the president wanted regime change in Iran, which has been a goal of hawks like Sen. Lindsey Graham and a red line for MAGA isolationists.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store