Challenge to Clonoe ruling is ‘disgraceful', Sinn Fein says
Last month, coroner Mr Justice Michael Humphreys found that the soldiers did not have an honest belief in the necessity of using lethal force.
Four Provisional IRA members – Kevin Barry O'Donnell, 21, Sean O'Farrell, 23, Peter Clancy, 19, and Daniel Vincent, 20 – were shot dead in Clonoe, Co Tyrone, minutes after they had carried out a gun attack on Coalisland RUC station in Co Tyrone in February 1992.
In his ruling, Mr Justice Humphreys said no attempt was made by the SAS soldiers to arrest any of the members of the IRA unit, and the operation was not planned and controlled in a way to minimise to the 'greatest extent possible' the need to use lethal force.
Clonoe update: I'm delighted to confirm that, after I wrote to the Defence Secretary on 12th February urging him to judicially review the NI Coroner's Clonoe verdict of 'unlawful killing' by British soldiers, the MoD will now be taking action. Very welcome news for our veterans. pic.twitter.com/q2yIz4o8sl
— James Cartlidge MP 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 (@jcartlidgemp) March 21, 2025
On Friday, Conservative MP James Cartlidge said he had received confirmation from veterans minister Alistair Carns that the Government would challenge the findings.
Mr Cartlidge had called on the Government to seek a judicial review into the inquest ruling.
In his reply, which the opposition MP shared on X, Mr Carns said the Ministry of Defence has issued a pre-action protocol letter to the coroner which sets out the legal basis for the application for a judicial review.
He said: 'I have also agreed to the MoD funding the Specialist Military Unit veterans' judicial review of the findings, this is expected to run adjacent to MoD's application.
'The veterans involved have been, and continue to be, offered welfare and legal support.'
The minister added: 'As a veteran, I am deeply proud of the members of the armed forces who, along with police officers and members of the security services, sought to protect communities and peace in Northern Ireland during the Troubles and recognise the difficult choices they faced in extremely challenging operations.
'We owe a great deal to them, and I will continue to champion their cause as we deal with Northern Ireland's legacy.'
Mr Cartlidge said he was 'delighted' with the development, adding that it would be welcomed by veterans.
However, Sinn Fein described the move as 'deeply concerning' and 'disgraceful'.
Cathal Mallaghan, the party's MP for Mid Ulster, said: ''This is yet another cynical attempt by the British Government to deny families truth and justice.
'The coroner came to his findings in this case based on the facts. He rightly sent a file to the Public Prosecution Service to take the matter forward.'
Mr Mallaghan said the development highlights concerns over the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR), which was set up by the previous UK government as part of its Legacy Act, but has faced opposition from political parties in Northern Ireland and victims' organisations.
While the Labour Government is repealing parts of the Act, including the offer of conditional immunity for perpetrators of Troubles killings, it has decided to retain the truth recovery commission.
Mr Mallaghan added: 'This case highlights why families have a preference to have inquests and inquiries in their pursuit of justice, as opposed to the ICRIR process, where the British Secretary of State retains a power of veto on what may go into a victim's family report.
'It is essential that our judicial processes are free to carry out their duties independently, free from state interference.
'The British Government must proceed expeditiously to fully 'repeal and replace' the Legacy Act, as it committed to do, including the full reinstatement of all inquests, and all the legacy mechanisms agreed in the Stormont House negotiations, in a human rights-compliant manner.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Indiana education secretary Katie Jenner to lead K-12 Dept. and Higher Ed commission
The Indiana Commission for Higher Education is set to vote for its new leader on Aug. 22, and its top pick is Indiana's Secretary of Education, Katie Jenner. If the vote is approved, Jenner would keep her position as the state-appointed official overseeing Indiana's entire K-12 education system, while simultaneously heading up the higher education commission. In a news release from the higher education commission, Gov. Mike Braun said the move aligns with his 'new vertical structure across state government to streamline operations, increase accountability and transparency, and improve customer service.' He also said having all education under one leader is the "logical next step" that will keep students "top of mind every step of their educational journey." The former higher education commissioner, Chris Lowery, announced in July that he would be stepping down from the role and his official departure will take effect on Oct. 10. He was appointed to the position in 2022 and said during his announcement to step down that a recent 'health scare' is what prompted his decision, according to Indiana Capital Chronicle. Lowery will work with Jenner and other commission members to transition her into the role over the next few weeks. The 14-member board for the commission is all appointed by the governor. Jenner was appointed Indiana's first secretary of education in 2021, after the General Assembly passed a law to change the position from being an elected one to an appointed one. More Higher Ed news: Indiana public colleges cut or merge a fifth of degree programs, more could come She holds a doctorate degree in education from the University of Kentucky and an MBA from Indiana State University. She has also served as Governor Eric Holcomb's Senior Education Advisor, vice president of K-12 initiatives and statewide partnerships for Ivy Tech Community College and was a teacher in Madison Consolidated Schools. The commission said that some of Jenner's key areas of focus moving forward will be: Making higher education more affordable and accessible Increasing educational attainment for all Hoosiers Helping more students earn college credits or credentials of value before graduating Support the implementation of the state's new high school diploma requirements. Ensuring higher education preparation programs are preparing future teachers with evidence-based instructional tools in reading and math. Streamlining higher education degree programs to align with student and industry demand and maximize student outcomes. Jenner's work on streamlining degrees would follow the move of public state colleges and universities already cutting roughly 400 degree programs ahead of a new state law that is meant to 'consolidate' under-enrolled degree programs. Contact IndyStar K-12 education reporter Caroline Beck at 317-618-5807 or CBeck@ Follow her on Twitter (X): @CarolineB_Indy. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Braun chooses Katie Jenner to lead Indiana's Higher Education commission Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Judge denies Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
NEW YORK — A federal judge who presided over the sex trafficking case against financier Jeffrey Epstein has joined two other judges in rejecting the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the decades-long sexual abuse suffered by girls and young women who fell into his orbit. The ruling Wednesday by Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Barring reversal on appeal, Berman's decision forecloses the possibility of grand jury testimony being released now that three judges have reached the same conclusion. A federal judge in Florida declined to release grand jury documents from an investigation there in 2005 and 2007. The rulings are a collective repudiation of the Justice Department's effort to divert attention away from its stated refusal to release a massive trove of records in its possession and make clear that the still-sealed court documents contain none of the answers likely to satisfy the immense public interest in the case. President Donald Trump had called for the release of transcripts amid rumors and criticism about his long-ago involvement with Epstein. During last year's presidential campaign, Trump promised to release files related to Epstein, but he was met with criticism — including from many of his own supporters — when the small number of records released by his Justice Department lacked new revelations. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on Wednesday. Berman said a 'significant and compelling reason' to reject the government's request was that the information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.' He wrote that the government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials 'dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials.' 'The Government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein Files,' Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the Justice Department's refusal to release additional records on its own while simultaneously moving to unseal grand jury transcripts. 'By comparison,' Berman added, 'the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' The Justice Department had informed Berman that the only witness to testify before the Epstein grand jury was an FBI agent who, the judge noted, 'had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay.' The agent testified over two days, on June 18, 2019, and July 2, 2019. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow shown during the June 18 session and a call log shown during the July 2 session, which ended with grand jurors voting to indict Epstein. Both of those will also remain sealed, Berman ruled. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women. She was recently transferred from a prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the Justice Department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, officials in Trump's Republican administration have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, and the House Oversight Committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter to Maxwell's lawyers, Rep. James Comer, the committee chair, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Snubs Greatest Allies With Greeting From Fox News Star
After rolling out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, President Donald Trump did not directly greet European leaders arriving at the White House on Monday. Seven European leaders including British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Secretary General of NATO Mark Rutte, have all flown to Washington to show a united front as Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. A gathering of so many European leaders at the White House at one time with such little notice is unprecedented in recent times. European leaders were greeted by the Chief of Protocol and former Fox News personality Monica Crowley rather than the president as they started arriving at the White House. While Trump did not step out to meet European leaders who hastily flew to town in a showing of support, he did acknowledge that their visit for the summit is a big deal. 'We have never had so many European Leaders here at one time. A great honor for America,' he wrote on Truth Social. The European leaders' last-minute travel to D.C. came as the president met with Zelensky following his summit with Putin last week. Trump did greet Zelensky outside the White House with a warm handshake and smiles when he arrived on the north side of the White House soon after the European leaders. Since meeting with the Russian leader on Friday, Trump has largely shifted his stance to side with Putin. He has said Ukraine could end the war by giving up territory to Russia and ending aspirations to join NATO. The president has also backed off demands for Russia to agree to a ceasefire and his threat of severe consequences if Putin did not agree to a deal after their meeting in Anchorage. Before European leaders joined the high-stakes gathering at the White House, essentially by entering through the back door, they met directly with Zelensky at the Ukrainian Embassy not too far from the White House. The Ukrainian president posted a video on X of him warmly greeting and sitting down with the seven European leaders in Washington ahead of his visit to the White House. 'We must stop the killings, and I thank our partners who are working toward this and ultimately toward a reliable and dignified peace,' he wrote. 'Ukraine is ready for a real truce and for establishing a new security architecture. We need peace,' he added. It is not the first time the president has not greeted the leader of a European ally arriving at the White House. Trump also left Macron to make his way inside alone during the French president's visit in February. However, Trump has also previously met individually with most of the European leaders who flew to Washington for Monday's meeting and greeted them personally outside the White House when they've arrived in the past.
