British ambassador to leave diplomatic service but remain in Dublin after ‘falling in love with the city'
Mr Johnston said at a garden party at the ambassador's residence to mark King Charles's birthday that they had 'so fallen in love with the city' that they had decided to stay in Dublin permanently.
Advertisement
In his speech, he said: "That's very much what it's felt like for Nicola [his wife] and me in Ireland – that the people we've met have been the highlight of our time here.
"And it's primarily because of the people that we've met that we've taken quite a big decision."
He has served in a number of diplomatic roles prior to his appointment as envoy in Dublin in 2020, including as the UK ambassador to Sweden from 2011 to 2016 and as the deputy permanent representative to Nato from 2016 to 2017.
Mr Johnston says he will be taking up a new, non-diplomatic job in Dublin later this year.
He came to Ireland five years ago during the height of the Covid pandemic and he was at the centre of often very difficult British-Irish relations over the UK's departure from the European Union.
He said he cannot yet disclose what role he will take up later this year as it is 'subject to a UK government approval process'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Hostage: Affairs, asylum seekers, 'Allo 'Allo accents... Netflix's drama is nuts!
Head for the bunkers — nuclear grade hokum incoming! The heart of British democracy is under attack, not from the Russians, nor Islamist extremists, but from an even bigger bunch of loonies... Netflix. The five-part political drama Hostage sees Suranne Jones playing a Labour prime minister who has to save the NHS (hurrah!) while facing down a neo-Fascist French president (boo!) planning to station Euro-troops in England (boo! hiss!). Meanwhile, there's a boatload of African asylum seekers fleeing persecution who need safe haven in the UK — and, gulp, they've all got ebola. And just when you think the stakes couldn't be any higher, masked gunmen only go and kidnap the PM's lovely husband, Dr Alex (Ashley Thomas). He's in South America with a Medecins Sans Frontieres team, giving vaccinations to happy village children and their poor-but-grateful mums, when terrorists take all the doctors prisoner. They shoot a translator dead. At first this appears to be more proof of what rotten rotters they are, but Dr Alex overhears them talking in English, so perhaps they just realised they wouldn't need a translator. With a gun to his head, Dr Alex is forced to record a video message to his wife. She must resign within 24 hours or one of the hostages will be killed. Suranne Jones, who excels at melodrama, does her best to breathe credibility into all this over-egged nonsense. We're so used to seeing her in extreme situations — wreaking vengeance on an unfaithful husband in Doctor Foster, solving murders aboard a submarine in Vigil — that it doesn't seem too delulu when she takes command of a hostage rescue attempt... and then apologises to the Chief of the Defence Staff for failing to let him know what she was doing. Mind you, it's not much of a rescue. British special forces have apparently been reduced to one soldier, a grizzled veteran called Thomas. And he's armed only with a pistol and a telescopic camera that looks as though he ordered it from one of those sales booklets that fall out of the Sunday supplements. He probably bought a nice pair of orthopaedic sandals and a reversible jacket at the same time. If the PM has any chance of getting her husband back, she's going to have to rely on the French military. But President Vivienne Toussaint (Julie Delpy) has her own problems — she's been having an affair with someone she really shouldn't, and now a blackmailer is threatening to release a video of them in bed together. No wonder Vivienne is so spiteful and mean to her family... though it doesn't explain why, when they're alone, they speak English with 'Allo 'Allo accents. If all that stretches your credulity, consider this. It's only in a fictional drama as bonkers as this that Labour can manage to elect a female leader.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Army chiefs spend £120million on mobile missile launchers to bolster Britain's air defences
THE Army is buying more mobile missile launchers to bolster Britain's air defences. The £120million deal will get six Land Ceptor launchers which can each fire up to eight missiles that can targets the size of tennis balls at three times the speed of sound up to 60 miles away. 4 4 4 It comes after recent war games showed Britain would be overwhelmed by a Russian missile and drone blitz. The MoD said the Land Ceptor deal would 'bolster national security' and secure 140 jobs. It is part of a government plan to add two Sky Sabre air defence batteries to the seven already in service. Armed Forces Minister Luke Pollard said it would double the number of Sky Sabre batteries available to deploy abroad. He said: 'We are equipping our armed forces with state-of-the art equipment to help keep us safe. 'Doubling our deployable Sky Sabre capability will strengthen the UK's air defences, protect UK forces abroad, and deter our adversaries.' 'Not a pretty picture' Each battery consists of three Land Ceptor launchers, a Giraffe radar that detects and tracks incoming missiles, and a command and control centre which can guide up to 24 missiles on to 24 separate targets. The Sun revealed that Russian missiles overwhelmed the UK in a war game based on attacks on Ukraine. Defence chiefs simulated the first night of the war to test the UK's air defences. Air Commodore Blythe Crawford said: 'It was not a pretty picture.' Iron Dome Explained: Inside Israel's envy-of-the-world air defence downing 96% of terror rockets The drills suggested bases would be blown to smithereens and £100 million fighter jets could get blitzed before they could hide. Air Cdre Crawford, head of the RAF's Air and Space Warfare Centre, said it showed the UK 'home base' was no longer safe. The drills used a £36 million wargaming system to test the UK's responses to 'hundreds of different types of munitions' attacking from multiple different directions. It exposed multiple vulnerabilities including a chronic shortage of airfields and a lack of hardened shelters for protect and hide jets on the ground. The government sold off scores of airfields and watered-down the RAF 's powers to commandeer civilian runways. The UK has no Iron Dome-style air defence system to protect the home nations from incoming missiles. The Armed Forces rely on RAF Typhoons, which scramble from RAF Lossiemouth, to shoot down incoming drones and cruise missiles. The only British missiles that could intercept Russian ballistic missiles are based onboard the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers. 4 The Sky Sabre system is for short and medium range missile defence. It is designed to intercept aircraft, helicopters and air launched missiles. Air Cdr Crawford warned in April Britain had got lax by standing at the edge of Europe and "feeling as though the rest of the continent stood between us and the enemy". He said: " Ukraine has made us all sit up.' Speaking at London 's Rusi think tank he said that for decades military planners had assumed they were 'safe to operate from the home base because most of the wars we've been fighting have been overseas'. He said: 'We need to reverse that thinking and assume that from here on, we're under threat in the home base now as well.' The drill took place on a simulator known as Gladiator after Russia launched its full scale invasion in 2022. But the results have not been revealed until now. Addressing an Air and Missile Defence Conference at London-based RUSI think tank, Air Cmdr Crawford said: "We loaded night one of Ukraine into that synthetic environment and played it out against the UK and as you can imagine it was not a pretty picture. 'It reinforced the fact that we really need to get after this.' The drills were stopped before bases were hit but it triggered an urgent review of the RAF's resilience. There is a worst case scenario where things we hold dear, parts of the UK, are within range of Russian missiles. Air Chief Marshal Sir Mike Wigston Since then Typhoon jets have practised landing on ice and motorways in Finland – as they would have to do if their bases were under attack. Sweden's Grippen fighter jet and Soviet MiG and Sukhoi jets were designed to land on motorways. They deliberately built their roads to be strong enough – and straight enough – for fighter jets to land. Speaking before the war in Ukraine, former RAF boss Mike Wigston said pilots needed to practise scrambling at zero notice to prepare for a war with Russia. He said RAF Typhoons and F-35B Lightning jets would have to land on motorways, race tracks and car parks if they held proper fleet dispersal drills for the first time since the Cold War. The plans would see squadrons scatter into 'fighting fours' to cut the risk whole fleets could be wiped out in a single strike. Air Chief Marshal Sir Mike Wigston said it was his duty to prepare for a 'worst case scenario'. Speaking in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, where the US Pacific fleet was decimated by a surprise attack in 1941, he said: 'There is a worst case scenario where things we hold dear, parts of the UK, are within range of Russian missiles.' He added: 'It sounds a bit Cold Warry, but there is a pressing requirement to remember how to do it.' RAF pilots practised dispersing to Boscombe Down, in Wiltshire. The former World War Two airfield is used to test prototype aircraft but hasn't been used by an operational squadron for more than 30 years. A defence source said having more airfields made it easier to launch deception plans so that enemies are uncertain where the RAF jets are based. But they warned cost-cutting drives had hamstrung the RAF's military effectiveness.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Military options for Ukraine discussed by US, European national security advisers
Aug 21 (Reuters) - Military chiefs from the United States and a number of European countries on Thursday presented options to their national security advisers for providing security guarantees to Ukraine, officials said. This followed U.S. President Donald Trump's pledge to help protect the country under any deal to end Russia's 3-1/2-year-old war in Ukraine. A Pentagon statement said U.S. and European planners had developed the military options for "appropriate consideration" by allied national security advisers. Reuters was first to report that the military leaders were preparing the options. The chiefs of defense for the United States, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and Ukraine met in Washington, D.C., between Tuesday and Thursday. A source familiar with the matter said U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also serves as Trump's national security adviser, held a conference call on Thursday with his European counterparts to discuss the options. Final details must still be worked out, the source said, but European countries would provide "the lion's share" of any forces involved in security guarantees for Ukraine. That echoed Vice President JD Vance's comment on Wednesday that Europe would need to shoulder "the lion's share" of the costs of the operation. "The planning work continues," said the source, adding that Washington still was "determining the scope of its role." Trump has said he will not deploy U.S. troops in Ukraine but has left the door open to other U.S. military involvement, including air support. One option was sending European forces to Ukraine but putting the United States in charge of their command and control, sources have told Reuters. U.S. air support could come in a variety of ways, including providing more air defense systems to Ukraine and enforcing a no-fly zone with U.S. fighter jets. French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer have both supported troop deployments as part of a coalition of the willing, with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz also signaling openness to his country's participation. The head of Germany's soldiers' union said on Thursday that European NATO leaders must face the reality that tens of thousands of troops would need to be deployed in a Ukraine peace force for the long term. Trump has pressed for a quick end to Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, and Kyiv and its allies have worried he could seek to force an agreement on Russia's terms.
