Escobar: Even citizens on edge because of immigration enforcement
EL PASO, Texas (Border Report) – Four out of five El Paso residents are Hispanic, 22.3 percent were born in another country and 66.4 of the population here speaks a language other than English at home.
That July 24 census data may explain why even U.S. citizens are expressing fear and disgust of being caught up in stepped up immigration enforcement north of the Rio Grande.
'Many times, despite one being a citizen or being in the country legally, there is concern and fear someone is going to accuse us of not being legal,' said U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas. 'Many people are afraid of what could happen if they don't have their documents with them' at all times.
Her comments come as some citizens in a nearby suburb on Wednesday reported they were questioned by federal agents about their immigration status and community groups like Border Network for Human Rights (BNHR) feel the need to put on 'Know your rights' presentations in city neighborhoods.
That is happening as President Trump begins to follow up on his tough rhetoric against illegal immigration with efforts to ramp up deportations. He has freed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from not being able to enforce immigration laws in schools, hospitals and churches and sent troops to the border to help Border Patrol agents keep migrants out.
27 religious groups are suing Trump over refusal to block immigration arrests in houses of worship
The White House maintains it is first going after migrants with criminal records, but activists and Democratic lawmakers doubt that.
'With the end of enforcement priorities, everyone becomes a target. This administration wants to have a blank check to go after anybody that they perceive or believe does not have documents,' said Fernando Garcia, executive director of BNHR.
2 top ICE officials reassigned amid White House's frustrations over immigration arrests
His group's presentations include detailed explanations of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution, which protect anyone present in the U.S. – legally or not – from unreasonable searches and seizures and the right not to incriminate themselves.
'I know many members of the community are afraid right now,' Escobar said during an online briefing with reporters. 'It is important that all persons, undocumented or not, need to know their rights under the constitution and the law.'
She added that a slew of lawsuits from community groups like Las Americas Immigrant and Advocacy Center and local governments like El Paso County will, at least, ensure transparency.
El Paso County joins lawsuit challenging Trump's executive order on removing birthright citizenship
'I am very proud of all the organizations, local and state governments that are suing to prevent egregious overreach we see happening in the Trump administration,' Escobar said. 'What lawsuits do accomplish is the ability to get information to create that transparency for the American taxpayer.'
She was referring to the use of military airplanes to repatriate migrants she says are 'exponentially more expensive' than using commercial flights. She also wants to know how much it will cost to house migrants at the naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Visit the BorderReport.com homepage for the latest exclusive stories and breaking news about issues along the U.S.-Mexico border
'Although members of Congress are not able to get in, I do intend on taking a trip to Guantanamo Bay to provide oversight,' she said at her press briefing. 'It obviously cannot be a surprise inspection.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?
About 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have been sent to Los Angeles as of Tuesday morning, after President Trump bypassed California leaders who said federal forces were not needed to respond to mostly peaceful protests. Here's how the deployment compares to past military activations on domestic soil responding to social unrest. 2021: Attack on the Capitol In 2021, officials in Washington initially requested 340 National Guard members to help respond to planned protests on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, according to the military. As the protests on Jan. 6 against the 2020 presidential election results deteriorated, with a violent mob attacking police officers and the Capitol, the mayor of Washington D.C., Muriel Bowser, requested assistance, and 1,100 D.C. National Guard members were sent. Later that night, the acting defense secretary at the time, Chris Miller, mobilized 6,200 more National Guard members from other states to ensure peace in the days leading up to former President Joseph R. Biden's inauguration. 2020: George Floyd Protests After protests sprung up around the United States in response to the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, National Guard members were deployed to several states. As of June 3, 2020, the National Guard had deployed more than 18,000 members in 28 states to respond to civil unrest related to Mr. Floyd's murder at the request of the states' governors. Another 42,000 National Guard members were activated at the same time for the coronavirus pandemic response. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Newsom Warns Trump May Use Soldiers on Immigration Raids
Gavin Newsom is warning that Donald Trump's use of troops where state and local officials don't want them is actually a test, one the Republican president may seek to replicate across other American towns and cities as part of his mass deportation effort. 'We're getting word that he's looking to operationalize that relationship and advance significantly larger-scale ICE operations in partnership and collaboration with the National Guard,' the Democratic governor said on the podcast Pod Save America. Such a move would likely be illegal for reasons similar to those Newsom has cited in litigation to stop Trump's use of the military in Los Angeles. Legal experts have said that, as with many of Trump's emergency declarations since he took office, there is no legal basis for the Republican's move to take control of the California National Guard. State and city officials have reported that protests against Trump and his immigration raids have been largely peaceful during the day with minor skirmishes at night, while limited to a few parts of a city that spreads over several hundred square miles. With no reported deaths and few injuries—some among journalists shot with plastic rounds by local police —protests have begun spreading across the country. Demonstrations have been held in New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Texas and Washington. Meanwhile, Trump's federalization of 4,000 members of California National Guard and his ordering of 700 active duty Marines to Los Angeles will reportedly cost $134 million for 60 days.
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Militarization of Civil Protest: Napolitano on Trump, LA Protests
Janet Napolitano, former Homeland Security Secretary under the Obama Administration and former Governor of Arizona, weighs in on the Los Angeles protests and the 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 US Marines in the city and what she would have done if the President asked her to deploy these troops. Janet also talks about whether or not what is happening in Los Angeles justifies needing more ICE and Border Patrol agents. She speaks with Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu on the late edition of Bloomberg's "Balance of Power." (Source: Bloomberg)
