The Pentagon Is Getting $150 Billion From the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
The bill, if passed by the Senate, would add an estimated $2.3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade. It would appropriate an additional $150 billion to the Defense Department's already-bloated $848 billion budget, bringing the agency's account to nearly $1 trillion in FY 2026. The additional appropriations in the bill from the Committee on Armed Services, which oversees Pentagon spending, span 37 pages, 16 sections, and 232 items.
In the air, over $500 million will go to Air Force exercises in the Pacific, a rather expensive way to saber-rattle with China. Nearly $1 billion will be allocated to "accelerate" production of the FA/XX aircraft and the F-47, which Trump touted as the "Next Generation Air Dominance" platform that will be "the most advanced, capable, and lethal aircraft ever built." But investing this much in another manned aircraft seems anachronistic while appropriating more than $10 billion for unmanned aerial weapons systems such as General Atomics' YFQ-42A and Anduril's YFQ-44A, autonomous one-way attack systems, unmanned surface and underwater weapons systems, and other artificial intelligence and autonomous capabilities.
At sea, the federal government will allocate more than $5 billion to the American shipbuilding industrial base, which the Jones Act has hollowed out. This century-old law requires all ships transporting goods between U.S. ports to be American-built, American-owned, and crewed by U.S. citizens. The bill also appropriates a combined $16 billion for a Virginia-class submarine, two guided missile destroyers, a San Antonio–class Amphibious Transport Dock, and another amphibious assault ship. (The Navy already has 23, 75, 13, and 12 of these, respectively.) About $3 billion will be given to the Defense Department to purchase T-AO oilers to help fuel the Navy's fleet of roughly 280 ships.
The Pentagon has failed each of the seven audits it has submitted to the department's inspector general since it began doing so in 2017—more than 25 years after Congress passed a law requiring agencies to investigate their own finances, Reason's Joe Lancaster explains. While the bill has not yet been signed into law, the Senate is unlikely to alter military appropriations significantly.
Giving the Pentagon even more money while it can't account for its expenditures does not make the country safer; it rewards incompetence and waste.
The post The Pentagon Is Getting $150 Billion From the 'Big Beautiful Bill' appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US-Mexico border wall to be painted black to stop climbers
The entire US-Mexico border wall will be painted black to make it hotter and harder to climb, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has said, crediting the idea to President Donald Trump. While domestic detentions and deportations have been the primary focus of the current immigration crackdown, Trump's policy bill passed earlier this summer also allocated $46m (£34m) for additional wall construction. About a half mile (0.8km) of wall is going up each day along the nearly 2,000 mile (3,218km) border, according to Noem. The number of border crossings has plummeted in recent months, and the Trump administration says sweeping arrests and detentions are acting as a deterrent to illegal migration. Speaking to reporters along a section of the border in New Mexico, Noem said on Tuesday that the black paint was "specifically at the request of the president". "[He] understands that in the hot temperatures down here, when something is painted black it gets even warmer and it will make it even harder for people to climb," she added. Border Patrol officials also say that black paint will help prevent the wall from rusting. Additionally, Noem said the administration is planning to install more "waterborne infrastructure" along the Rio Grande, which makes up more than half of the border between the two countries. While Noem did not provide any more details on those projects, Texas authorities have previously installed floating barriers - large orange buoys - and fortified riverbank fencing guarded by state troopers, local police officers and the Texas National Guard along parts of the river. Crossings and detentions of undocumented immigrants have plummeted since Trump returned to the office, with record lows of approximately 4,600 in July and 6,000 in June - a 92% year-on-year reduction. During the Biden administration, detentions sometimes spiked to averages of 6,000 per day. Earlier in August, Noem said that a total of 1.6m undocumented immigrants have left the US during the first 200 days of the Trump administration, although she did not specify how many have been deported and how many left on their own. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier in August that a total of 300,000 undocumented immigrants had been detained in the interior of the US since January. While the administration continues to say it is prioritising those with criminal histories, immigration advocates have warned that many with no criminal charges or only minor infractions have been caught up in the sweeps. White House officials also contend that increased border security and mass deportations have been deterrents, saying they are the primary reason for plummeting figures at the US-Mexico border. US strikes deportation deals with Honduras and Uganda US offers up to $50k bonus for would-be ICE deportation officers Watch: US builds new wall at Mexico border
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas county cuts over 100 polling sites as Trump attacks mail-in voting nationally
Officials in a large North Texas county decided this week to cut more than 100 Election Day polling sites and reduce the number of early voting locations, amid growing concern about GOP efforts to limit voting access ahead of next year's midterm elections. The 3-2 vote on Tuesday by commissioners in Tarrant County, which includes Fort Worth, came one day after President Donald Trump vowed to end the use of mail-in ballots. The president lacks the unilateral power to decide how individual states run elections, but his declaration speaks to long-brewing and unfounded claims by some conservatives that the country's electoral system is insecure and vulnerable to widespread fraud. Trump has repeatedly and falsely asserted that he won the 2020 presidential election instead of Joe Biden. Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare, who heads up the commissioners court, has also raised numerous questions about the security of local elections, helping to launch an electoral integrity unit in the county after he became judge in 2022. As of last summer, however, the unit had received fewer than 100 allegations of voter fraud. He and fellow Republican commissioners also cut funding to provide free bus rides to the polls for low-income residents. 'I don't believe it's the county government's responsibility to try to get more people out to the polls,' O'Hare said at the time. And commissioners prohibited outside organizations from registering voters inside county buildings after Tarrant County GOP leaders raised concerns about what they said were left-leaning groups holding registration drives. (ProPublica and The Texas Tribune have previously written about O'Hare's political influence in North Texas.) On Tuesday, O'Hare voted with the two Republican commissioners on the court to reduce the number of polling sites in the county to 216, down from 331 in 2023. The decision also cut down the number of early voting sites. County officials said the move was to save money, as they historically see low voter turnout in nonpresidential elections. Throughout the meeting, O'Hare repeatedly emphasized that the cuts were intended to make the election more efficient. He argued that both the switch to county-wide voting in 2019, which allows voters to cast a ballot at any polling site in the county, and the expected low turnout made the cuts appropriate. "I would venture to guess 99% of the public cannot name a single thing on (the 2025 ballot),' he said during the meeting. Fewer voting sites means fewer voters, Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, told the Report. 'If you move a polling place farther away from someone's house, then they're less likely to vote because you've increased the cost of voting,' said Rottinghaus, who has studied poll placement and its impact on turnout. 'The cost can be your time. It can be your gas.' The county's move falls in line with a national trend that generally sees Republican-led states and localities 'restrain and restrict' how voting operates — often in the name of discouraging illegal voting or, in Tarrant County's recent case, cutting costs, Rottinghaus said. This could look like reducing voting locations or shortening early voting hours, he said. Texas has led multiple efforts to make going to the polls more difficult, he said, such as making mail-in ballots harder to obtain and requiring photo IDs when casting a ballot. No single law dramatically impacts voter turnout, Rottinghaus said, rather, it's the collective of ever-changing policies that can discourage people from voting. 'The more you move around how voting occurs, like the hours and the locations, the harder it is for voters to understand exactly what they're supposed to do and when,' he said. 'A confused voter is usually a nonvoter.' This is not the first time Tarrant County has been at the forefront of changing political headwinds. Earlier this summer, the commissioners, led by O'Hare, voted along party lines to redraw the county precincts; such changes usually happen after the decennial census rather than in the middle of the decade. O'Hare admitted the goal of the redrawn maps was to favor Republican candidates. 'This is about Republican versus Democrat, period,' O'Hare told Dallas television station WFAA ahead of the commissioners' June 3 vote. 'If it passes with one of the maps that I would want to see pass, it's a very strong likelihood that we will have three Republicans on the Commissioners Court.' In July, Gov. Greg Abbott added redistricting to the agenda of a special legislative session — a step he was apparently reluctant to take until he received a call from Trump to discuss the issue, the Tribune reported. The proposal has sparked a national fight over the redrawing of congressional maps. On Wednesday, the GOP-led Texas House took an initial vote adopting a new map designed to increase the number of Republican seats in the U.S. Congress. Abbott has also fanned concerns about allegations of illegal voting, last year announcing the removal of more than 1 million ineligible voters from the state's rolls, including more than 6,500 potential noncitizens. An investigation by ProPublica, the Tribune and Votebeat, however, found that the number of alleged noncitizens the governor cited was likely inflated and, in some cases, wrong. Concerns about the cuts More than three dozen speakers at Tuesday's meeting denounced the move to cut polling sites and early voting locations, with some raising concerns that it amounted to the suppression of Black, Hispanic and college-age voters. Several speakers called the cuts a more extreme version of O'Hare's failed effort to remove eight early voting locations at colleges last year. Only one person spoke in favor of the reductions. Sabrina Ball, who opposed reducing the polling sites, said she has worked as an election judge in Republican Commissioner Manny Ramirez's district in northwest Tarrant County. She said she's seen firsthand people working hard to find the time to get to a polling location and vote. 'You're not saving money. You're sacrificing democracy to save a buck,' she said. The two Democratic commissioners, Roderick Miles Jr. and Alisa Simmons, voted against the changes after unsuccessfully trying to delay the decision. 'Everybody deserves the right to have a place that they are comfortable with and familiar with to go and to cast their vote,' said Miles, who represents predominantly Black neighborhoods that saw a reduction in voting locations. He later added, 'To dismantle or take those rights away from us that we worked hard to get is unacceptable at any level.' Simmons said it was inappropriate to reduce voting locations as Tarrant County's population grows. She pointed out that the Republican members of the Commissioners Court used that growth as a reason to redistrict the county's precincts midcycle this year — a change that would significantly increase the chances of a GOP candidate defeating her in 2026. A Texas law passed in May reduces the county's minimum Election Day voting locations to 212 — rolling back a 2023 requirement of 347. Tarrant County Election Administrator Clinton Ludwig said the sites meet the state's new 'bare minimum,' with 'a little bit of wiggle room' in case certain planned locations fall through. He told commissioners that the initially proposed cuts aimed to save about $1 million. He said he based the reductions on voter turnout in 2023, which saw about 12.5% registered voters cast ballots, he said. Locations' accessibility and ability to securely store voting information were also considered, Ludwig said. He said that no commissioner had any influence on the list and that no partisan analysis was taken into account. Ludwig and O'Hare's office did not immediately respond to requests to comment following the vote. O'Hare has also not responded to ProPublica and the Tribune's previous reporting about him, declining multiple interview requests and refusing to answer questions, though a spokesperson sent the newsrooms a list of eight of his major accomplishments, including cutting county spending and lowering local property tax rates. Rottinghaus said some counties 'yo-yo' year to year in the number of polling places they have. Elections such as November's typically have fewer locations than presidential and midterm ones, he said. Still, Tarrant County's reduction seems 'aggressive,' he said. Once the number of polling places goes down, it usually stays down, Rottinghaus said. 'You're going to generally see that same number continue for at least the near term,' he said. Though he ultimately voted to reduce polling locations, Ramirez pushed back on the initial list of cuts to early voting sites, some of which he said were established and popular with voters. Ramirez said the county must balance access and efficiency. Commissioners then added back nine early voting locations. O'Hare was the lone vote against that move, saying some of those sites had historically low turnout. 'The formula for where you put these voting sites has to be scientific,' Ramirez told the Report ahead of the vote. 'It should be population-based and proximity to additional site-based.' Several Fort Worth City Council members urged their constituents to speak against the effort in the lead-up to the vote. Council member Carlos Flores, who represents parts of northwest Fort Worth, issued a statement against the vote, saying fewer sites negatively impact diverse communities. In a statement to the Report, he added that limited polling locations and inconvenient voting procedures contribute to low turnout. Mia Hall, who represents southwest Fort Worth, sent a news release to her district on Monday, decrying the proposed cuts in parts of her district that are predominantly Black or Hispanic. 'These communities have long fought for equitable access to the ballot box, and removing their polling locations is simply unacceptable,' Hall wrote. 'While I understand the pressures of state regulations and budgetary constraints, disenfranchising entire communities is not an acceptable response.' Drew Shaw is a government accountability reporter for the Fort Worth Report. Contact him at Disclosure: The University of Houston has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year's lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of 'CNN NewsNight'; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: The U.S. tech-sell off extends to its second day — but don't let it ruin your summer
If you have any U.S. technology stocks in your portfolio (and let's face it, who doesn't?), you might want to look away. For the second day in a row, tech stocks dragged markets lower, with the Nasdaq Composite slipping 0.67%. Juggernauts such as Apple, Amazon and Alphabet were more meh-nificent than magnificent, falling more than 1%. Palantir — the standout S&P 500 stock, having more than doubled so far this year — spent its sixth consecutive day in the red and lost its place among a ranking of the 20 most valuable U.S. companies. While Palantir's slide was partly triggered by a report from short seller Andrew Left's Citron Research, which called the company "detached from fundamentals and analysis," there was no single trigger for the broader pullback. Investors could have been spooked by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's caution about an AI bubble forming, although some analysts dispute that assertion. "In our view the tech bull cycle will be well intact at least for another 2-3 years," said Wall Street tech bull Dan Ives. Or it could be something benign, like traders locking in profits. "Tech stocks," said Carol Schleif, chief market strategist at BMO Private Wealth, "have had an incredibly strong run – with some up over 80% since the early April lows." Summer, after all, is far from over. Some investors might have just wanted to cash out for another round of margaritas. Fed officials divided over inflation and employment worries. Central bank governors generally agreed there were risks on both sides. But a couple — breaking from the majority — saw the labor market woes as more pressing, according to minutes of the Fed's July meeting. Trump likely to pick Kevin Hasset as next Fed Chair. The director of the National Economic Council firmly led the pack, according to a CNBC Fed Survey. However, respondents think the president "should" pick former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh. No new solar or wind power projects, Trump says. Renewable energy projects will no longer receive approval, Trump posted Wednesday on Truth Social. His comment comes after the administration already tightened federal permitting last month. Fourth day of losses for the S&P 500. Investors continued selling off technology stocks on Wednesday, with Palantir having its sixth straight losing day. The U.K.'s FTSE 100 closed at another high despite inflation in July coming in hotter than expected. [PRO] The Fed is expected to cut just as markets trade at highs. This is what tends to happen when both factors coincide, according to Goldman Sachs research. Trump has snapped up more than $100 million in bonds since taking office U.S. President Donald Trump has been on a multimillion-dollar bond-buying spree since taking office in January, investing in debt issued by local authorities, gas districts and major American corporations. Across 33 pages of filings with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, or OGE, dated Aug. 12, the president outlined 690 transactions that have taken place since he took office. The documents were made public on Tuesday.
