JNU issues eviction notices to 232 final-year students
New Delhi: A total of 232 final-year students of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) have been issued eviction notices and asked to vacate hostel rooms by May 31, triggering concern among students who say the move comes at a time when their thesis submission and final examination are due.
The eviction notices, put up across several hostels in the past week, state that hostel accommodation for PhD students of batches 2017 to 2021, as well as students from Master's, integrated Bachelor's-Master's, Master in Computer Application (MCA), MTech, and BTech programmes ( batches 2020, 2023) nearing completion, will be discontinued by the end of May in line with the university's academic calendar.
"All students concerned are requested to vacate their hostel rooms and clear their No Dues certificates by May 31, 2025....
Failing to do so, mess and hostel facilities will be discontinued from June 1, 2025," read one of the notices dated May 8.
"No extension of stay will be granted by the hostel beyond May 31, 2025 under any circumstances. For any kind of extension request, students must seek prior approval from the Inter-Hall Administration (IHA) office," another hostel circular issued on May 13 said. Non-compliance will be met with action as per university rules, it said.
The timing of the eviction notice, students said, had left many in a difficult position. "I belong to the 2018 batch of the integrated MA-PhD programme. We are typically allowed six years to complete our PhD, which means my submission deadline should be in 2026. Even after that, the rules allow a further extension of four semesters if approved. I submitted my MPhil in 2023, so my PhD tenure began after that. Despite this, I've received an eviction notice.
During COVID, the university was closed for nearly two years. Shouldn't that be factored in? And it's not like there's a space crunch. Barak hostel was recently opened, and there is ample accommodation. Why should outstation students like me be forced to pay rent outside while continuing our research?" said a student, requesting anonymity.
A Master's student pointed to another problem. "Earlier, students were given an extension of up to a month to prepare for the JNU entrance and UGC-NET/JRF.
Now that JNUEE has been discontinued, the administration is saying such extensions won't be granted. But UGC-NET is next month, and we're being asked to vacate right before that. It's completely unreasonable."
Responding to the students' concerns, the dean of students' welfare, professor Manuradha Chaudhary, said the notices were in line with the university policy. "The hostel stay is linked to the academic calendar, and once a student's final semester ends, their hostel tenure ends too.
Students can continue their academic work if they are within the maximum period allowed, but the hostel cannot accommodate them beyond this point.
We also need to make space for new admissions," she told TOI.
Chaudhary added that in a few cases, one-month extensions have been granted as a special consideration for students preparing for entrance or fellowship exams. "We have considered some requests for extension under special circumstances for a one-month extension till June 30," she said.
According to university officials, the eviction is part of the annual hostel turnover process to make space for incoming students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Simone Inzaghi signs to coach Saudi club Al-Hilal after leaving Inter Milan
Simone Inzaghi took over as head coach of Al-Hilal on Wednesday (June 4, 2025), a day after leaving Inter Milan and two weeks before the Saudi Arabian club's first game at the Club World Cup. Inzaghi signed a two-year deal after Al-Hilal lured him with an offer of reportedly more than 20 million euros ($23 million) per season. 'The Italian genius is here,' the Saudi club said in a social media post. Inter was routed 5-0 by Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League final last Saturday, marking the most lopsided defeat in the 70-year history of major European finals. The 49-year-old Inzaghi coached Inter to the Serie A title last year and was also in charge when the Nerazzurri lost the 2023 Champions League title to Manchester City. He was at Inter for four years. Al-Hilal opens its Club World Cup campaign against Real Madrid on June 18 at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Missing for nine years, where is JNU student Najeeb Ahmed?
On October 15, 2016, Najeeb Ahmed, a first-year student at Jawaharlal Nehru University, went missing. The 27-year-old, an MSc student at the School of Biotechnology, had allegedly gotten into a scuffle with some ABVP members before this. Nine years on, there is still no sign of him. At the time, Najeeb's mother had moved court, which later directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take over the case. In 2018, unable to make headway and finding no further evidence, the CBI filed a closure report. On June 5 this year, Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court is likely to decide whether it will accept or decline the report. The case had sparked massive protests outside the JNU Vice-Chancellor's office in 2016; various student wings blamed the V-C for allegedly not acting decisively in the matter. In the years since, Najeeb's mother, Fatima Naees, has made fervent appeals to find her son. The Delhi Police had filed an FIR under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code (kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine person) and had also announced a reward of Rs 50,000 for any information on the student. Along with this, they had identified nine people as suspects. In November 2016, dissatisfied with the efforts of the police, Naees decided to approach the Delhi High Court with a habeas corpus writ petition seeking his production. Claiming that the police's efforts were 'slow, misdirected and subjective', she had prayed for a court-monitored SIT (Special Investigation Team) to take over the case from the Delhi Police. As part of its probe, the police had sent wireless messages to the SSPs of all districts in the country on the day Najeeb went missing. They had also uploaded his details on ZIPNET, a tool for inter-state police coordination, especially to track missing persons. It also sent four teams along various routes, including Delhi-Agra, Delhi-Bulandshahr, Ghaziabad, Moradabad and Rampur in search of him. CCTV footage from Metro stations was also examined. On December 19 and 20 that year, 560 police officers also searched 1,019 acres of the JNU campus — including academic blocks, hostel complexes, water tanks and septic tanks. All these attempts eventually turned out to be futile. Six months later, on May 16, 2017, the High Court passed the case to the CBI. The CBI's investigation could also not reach a conclusion. On October 16, 2017, the Delhi High Court pulled up the central agency, stating that it wasn't showing the intent to find Najeeb. The High Court had also directed a forensic laboratory in Chandigarh to examine the mobile phones of the nine suspects. On May 11, 2018, the CBI had told the court that it found no evidence that there was any crime committed against Najeeb based on the findings of the lab. Three months later, the agency told the High Court that it had decided to file a closure report in the case since it had probed all angles and had still found nothing against the suspects. Of the nine phones sent to the lab in Chandigarh, two could not be analysed since they were not in a working condition. On April 2019, a Delhi court directed the CBI to give copies of all statements and documents related to the closure report to Najeeb's mother within two weeks. Naees had filed a protest petition against the CBI's closure report. The CBI's investigation involved questioning 26 persons, including JNU officials, staff, friends, and colleagues. It also involved examining mortuaries in 12 cities, along with scrutinising railway records for a year. As per the 8th status report filed by the central probe agency, Interpol was also roped in to help find Najeeb. The reward for finding him was also raised to Rs 10 lakh. Senior Advocate Colin Gonsalves, who represented Naees in the High Court, had argued that the CBI wasted a lot of time in tracing Najeeb. 'The one thing they should have done is custodial interrogation of the accused persons. Najeeb was getting threats a day before he disappeared. The fact that they failed to do this shows a complete mockery of the system,' he told The Indian Express. In an order dated October 8, 2018, Delhi High Court Justice S Muralidhar had said: 'In the present case, however, this court did accept the plea of the petitioner at the first instance and directed the investigation to be undertaken by the CBI. This court is, however, for reasons discussed hereafter, not persuaded that the CBI is tardy and slow in the investigation or that it has not taken steps that are required to be taken in the matter.' Recently, the CBI told Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Jyoti Maheshwari that they couldn't record the statement of the doctor at Safdarjung Hospital, where Najeeb was allegedly rushed after being injured in the scuffle, because no document pertaining to his visit existed. The CBI also alleged that he went back to the hostel without getting a medico-legal case report prepared. Meanwhile, in an order dated April 7, 2025, the court referred to Najeeb as 'deceased' instead of 'injured'. A few days later, they called it an 'inadvertent error' in a submission in court. Till date, no one knows where Najeeb is.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
‘Fake' certicate for job: Surat court rejects anticipatory bail application of dismissed cop
An anticipatory bail application of a dismissed police officer, who had allegedly obtained a fake caste certificate to land a job, was on Wednesday rejected by the Surat District Court. The officer served as the Assistant Commissioner of Police in the Surat city police before his services were terminated. B M Chaudhary was dismissed from service as per an order by the state home department, dated May 20. A week later, on May 25, he was booked under Section 12(1)(A), 12(1)(B) of the Gujarat Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2018. Chaudhary then filed an anticipatory bail application with Surat District Court of 14th Additional Session Judge B M Govani a few days ago. The order passed by the court on Wednesday stated: 'Investigating Officer is hereby directed to strictly comply with the provisions of Section 35(2) of BNSS (the arrest of a person without a warrant when a complaint, credible information, or reasonable suspicion exists that they are involved in a non-cognizable offense) and the ratio laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Arneshkumar Vs. State of Bihar in their true letter and spirit.' As per the details of the case, Chaduhary's late father Motiram Chaudhary had allegedly obtained a fake ST certificate, issued to him on July 19, 1990. Chaudhary then allegedly landed a job using the certificate. He was recruited as a sub-inspector in 1990, and later was promoted to the posts of a police inspector and then an assistant commissioner of police. Chaudhary had been posted as the ACP, K division, Surat city police, since 2022. The case was filed against Chaudhary based on a letter by Praveen Parghi, president of Adijati Vikas Trust, Godhra, on October 7 last year. Parghi claimed that Chaudhary had used a fake ST certificate to get his job and promotions. The State Vigilance Department ordered the Gujarat Police's vigilance cell to launch a probe. According to the FIR, the commission had written to Chaudhary '15 times' in 2024 seeking documents, but he delayed the process, seeking more time. The State Vigilance Department subsequently ordered registration of an offence against him, it stated. Additional Public Prosecutor Dighant Tevar said, 'The accused police officer had obtained a tribal certificate to get a job in the police department. The investigation agency had reminded him 15 times to appear for statements, but he failed to turn up.' Defence lawyer M A Patel did not respond to calls till the press time.
