Powering Progress: Jitendra Singh Charts India's Green Future
Recounting the country's journey from being a cautious participant to a climate frontrunner, Dr Singh credited initiatives such as Mission LiFE, the International Solar Alliance, and the Net Zero 2070 goal.
You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
In a landmark address, Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Science and Technology, Dr Jitendra Singh, outlined an ambitious roadmap for India's clean energy future. Emphasising innovation and sustainability, Dr Singh asserted that a robust battery ecosystem and low carbon technologies are pivotal for India's ascent from the recently achieved 4th largest economy to the 3rd position globally, while also aligning with the nation's Net Zero 2070 commitment.
The remarks came during Battery Summit 2025, held under the theme "Addressing Challenges, Driving Innovation and Scaling Solutions," where key stakeholders from government, industry, and academia convened to chart India's clean energy transition.
Dr Singh underscored the critical need to harness unexplored resources and push the boundaries of technological advancement. "Innovation in low carbon sectors and exploration of untapped reserves will not only drive economic value but also significantly reduce our carbon footprint," said Dr Singh.
A key highlight of the summit was the launch of the Battery Aadhaar Initiative under the Department of Science and Technology (DST). Described by Dr Singh as a "game changer", Battery Aadhaar aims to digitally tag every battery pack with a unique identity, enhancing traceability, safety, lifecycle management, and recycling efficiency.
"Battery Aadhaar will facilitate predictive maintenance, curb counterfeiting, and ensure end-to-end battery traceability. It's a cornerstone for India's emerging battery intelligence ecosystem," he declared.
The initiative integrates seamlessly with Battery Management Systems (BMS), AI-powered diagnostics, and national EV databases, enabling real-time monitoring of thermal events, charge cycles, and overall performance—paving the way for a resilient and circular battery economy.
Dr Singh also spotlighted the recent discovery of Lithium reserves in Jammu & Kashmir, which he termed as a "strategic resource" for India's clean energy ambitions. He called for intensified efforts to harness such natural assets in line with Net Zero targets. "These reserves will play a vital role in reducing our dependency on imports and accelerating the transition to electric mobility," he noted.
Highlighting progress in clean tech, the Minister praised government-backed programs like the PLI Scheme for Advanced Chemistry Cells, PM-eDrive, and FAME, as well as the MAHA-EV Mission under the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF).
Recounting the country's journey from being a cautious participant to a climate frontrunner, Dr Singh credited initiatives such as Mission LiFE, the International Solar Alliance, and the Net Zero 2070 goal.
In terms of innovation, Dr Singh shared that India has moved from 81st to 39th in the Global Innovation Index, and now boasts over 1.7 lakh startups, making it the third-largest startup ecosystem worldwide. The DST's budget saw a 926% increase, a testament to the government's focus on science and technology.
The Minister stressed the importance of private participation, citing that 60% of NRF funding will come from the private sector. Strategic missions like the National Quantum Mission, AI Mission, and National Supercomputing Mission were highlighted as future growth engines.
"Our focus must be on indigenising technology, boosting domestic manufacturing, and creating a collaborative innovation ecosystem," Dr Singh urged.
The summit witnessed participation from leading figures including Prof Abhay Karandikar (DST), Asher Lessels (UNEP), Dr Anita Gupta (DST), and Madhav Pai (WRI India), reinforcing a shared commitment to a sustainable and innovation-driven future.
Dr Singh also lauded WRI India and its Battery360 Alliance, as well as support from UNEP, NITI Aayog, and the Global Environment Facility (GEF), emphasising that such collaborations are vital to ensuring India's leadership in clean energy transformation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
35 minutes ago
- The Verge
Here's what's inside Meta's experimental new smart glasses
Meta has revealed more information about Aria Gen 2, its experimental smart glasses designed to serve as a test platform for research about augmented reality, AI, and robotics. The glasses pack several improvements into their lightweight frame that could one day translate into consumer products, including an improved eye-tracking system that can track gaze per eye, detect blinks, and estimate the center of pupils. 'These advanced signals enable a deeper understanding of the wearer's visual attention and intentions, unlocking new possibilities for human-computer interaction,' Meta writes. Meta initially announced Aria Gen 2 in February, saying they will 'pave the way for future innovations that will shape the next computing platform.' They build upon Meta's first iteration of the glasses in 2020, which were similarly available for researchers only. Along with an improved eye-tracking system, Aria Gen 2 comes with four computer vision cameras that Meta says enable 3D hand and object tracking. Meta says researchers can use this information to enable highly precise tasks like 'dexterous robot hand manipulation.' The glasses also have a photoplethysmography sensor built into the nosepad, which allows the device to estimate a wearer's heart rate, along with a contact microphone that Meta says provides better audio in loud environments. There's a new ambient light sensor as well, allowing the glasses to differentiate between indoor and outdoor lighting. The Aria Gen 2 glasses include folding arms for the first time, weigh around 75 grams, and come in eight different sizes. Meta plans on opening applications for researchers to work with Aria Gen 2 later this year. The initiative builds on the successful development of Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses, a form factor it aims to expand with its Orion augmented-reality glasses, a rumored partnership with Oakley, and a high-end pair of 'Hypernova' glasses with a built-in screen.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Hardware, Software, Meet Wetware: A Computer With 800,000 Human Neurons
The Cortical Labs CL1 biological computer with human brain cells. The world's first 'code-deployable' biological computer is now for sale. The Cortical Labs CL1 costs $35,000 and has 800,000 human brain cells living and growing in a nutrient solution on a silicon chip. Computer scientists can deploy computer code directly to these neurons, which have been integrated into a 'biOS' or Biological Intelligence Operating System with what the company says is a mixture of hard silicon and soft tissue. The goal, according to the companies' founder? Smarter AI that drops some of the A and adds more of the I. Maybe, eventually, smarter brains than the ones we currently walk around with. 'The only machine or the only thing that we know of that actually has true intelligence is the brain,' founder and CEO Hon Weng Chong told me when I interviewed him five years ago, while he was still using mice neurons. 'So we said, let's start with the basic building structure, the building blocks being neurons, and let's build our way up and maybe we'll get there along the way.' Our human brains have neurons connected together in hierarchies, and from that emerges intelligence and consciousness, he adds. This approach is similar to neuromorphic computing architectures, which attempt to mimic biological brains with silicon-based hardware, but of course different in that neuromorphic chips do not typically use actual living brain cells. Cortical Labs, based in Australia, says scientists can solve today's most difficult problems with their biological computers, which they say are self-programming and infinitely flexible. A key difference between biological computers and silicon-based chips, of course, is that biological computers last even less time. The neurons that ship with your CL1 will live for 'up to six months,' at which point you'll likely have to invest in a refresh or refurbishment which provides new neurons for continued compute. And yes, biological computers need food and water and nutrients, all of which are supplied onboard via a life-support system the keeps them at optimum temperature. Plus, it filters out waste byproducts of living human cells: the kind of work kidneys might do in a full living organism. A Cortical Labs chip under a high-powered electron microscope. You can see tight connections between ... More neurons and the silicon substrate, the company says. In some ways the CL1 is more like a space ship than a computer, because it's a self-contained life support system that requires few external inputs. A key difference: the need for external power. From the outside, though, you treat the CL1 as a typical computer. You can plug in USB devices, cameras, even actuators if you want your CL1 to control a physical system. (Which, frankly, human neurons are typically pretty good at.) And there's a touchscreen so you can see system status or view live data. Five years ago, Cortical Lab's then-CTO Andy Kitchen told me they were deploying systems with tens of thousands of neurons to hundreds of thousands of neurons, but that their roadmap included 'scaling that up to millions of neurons." Now Cortical Labs sees their biological computers growing to hundreds of millions of cells, and with different technologies, billion or trillion-cell levels. However, there's not a direct one-to-one equivalent with neuromorphic neurons in a silicon-based system, he added. Biological neurons are much more powerful, he says. Interestingly, communicating with physical human neurons in a biological computer is vastly different than writing computer code to an artificial computer. 'The premier way would be to describe your task somehow, probably through some sort of very high-level language, and then we would turn that into a stimulus sequence which would shape biological behavior to fit your specification,' Kitchen told me. Part of the difference is how to encode and communicate the problem, and part of the difference is that the CL1 neurons, like the ones in your brain right now, have some plasticity: they can essentially reprogram themselves for different tasks. Essentially, the neurons learn how to solve your problem, just like you learn how to do new things. You won't likely see CL1 systems in general use anytime soon: currently, the targeted customers are in medical fields like drug discovery and disease modeling, says IEEE Spectrum. There's the added value that scientists can perform experiments on a little synthetic brain as well. If all of this seems on the edge of creepy, or even right over, that's likely because it is. CL1 says they don't do any animal testing, although they did start with mouse neurons, and they say that the human brain cells in their biological computers are lab-grown. But clearly the first human neurons came from somewhere. Cortical Labs says customers have to get 'ethical approval' to general cell lines, and require buyers to have proper facilities to maintain the biological chips. What exactly that means, however, is unclear. Soon we may see physical system in the world, like humanoid robots, with partially organic components to their brains.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Why Trump has struggled to get Xi on the phone to talk trade
For months, President Donald Trump has suggested his personal relationship with China's Xi Jinping will be what unlocks the world's most consequential trade dispute. Yet he couldn't get Xi on the telephone for weeks. The long period of silence between the leaders will — at least in the White House's telling — come to an end this week. A string of US officials have all but confirmed a call between Trump and Xi is imminent and could occur as early as Thursday, even though Beijing remains tight-lipped. 'I am afraid we don't have comments for you right now,' a spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington said in response to questions about the forthcoming conversation. The discrepancy in how each side was talking — or not talking — about the call ahead of time only underscored the widening gulf between the world's two largest economies. Each side seems convinced the call could fall through at any moment. And it's not only fights over tariffs, critical minerals, jet engine parts or computer chips that have caused a rift. It's also a matter of the two leaders' vastly different styles. While Trump is eager to apply his dealmaking tactics directly with Xi, his model of leader-to-leader haggling is entirely at odds with how Chinese officials approach global negotiations. Deeply wary of Trump's unpredictability and track record of putting foreign leaders in awkward or embarrassing situations, Chinese officials had put off a phone call, according to people familiar, even as Trump stated on multiple occasions this spring that he expected to speak with Xi soon. His Oval Office ambushes of Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa caught the attention of officials in China, those people added, and officials wanted to avoid anything similar, even in a private conversation. Former Trump and Biden administration officials describe meetings and calls with Xi as heavily scripted. Little is left to chance, they said, and even the small items – like timing and translation – are heavily negotiated among staff ahead of time. When President Joe Biden met Xi outside San Francisco two years ago, details as minute as the type of flowers sitting on the table between the two men were subject to delicate and intense discussions between the two sides, officials said at the time. On phone calls with US presidents, Xi typically reads directly from prepared talking points that are often verbatim of what he's said in previous conversations, the former officials said. When Xi briefly put down his script to offer off-the-cuff reminiscences during his final meeting last year with Biden – a man he'd known for more than a decade – US officials regarded it as a major show of respect. The stilted format makes it nearly impossible to delve into specifics that haven't been agreed to ahead of time. Any actual negotiation on trade deals or joint statements often happens among staff weeks or months ahead of time. That is not how Trump prefers to operate. As his press secretary said this week, his is a 'top-down approach,' where policy discussions originate from the Resolute Desk. 'He's very much involved in literally every policy discussion and decision that takes place,' Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday when questioned about a reduction in the size of Trump's National Security Council. That has been especially true on China, according to officials. Trump regards securing a new agreement with Beijing both as a critical component of his broader trade agenda and as a necessary follow-up from his first term, when trade deals with China got derailed during the Covid-19 pandemic. Trump views his relationship with Xi through a personal lens, harkening back to their interactions during his first term. It only took 76 days after Trump's 2017 swearing-in for Xi to fly to Mar-a-Lago, where he was served a 'beautiful' piece of chocolate cake and serenaded in Mandarin by Trump's granddaughter. Xi has proven far more difficult to reach in Trump's second term – and he's shown no similar rush to pay a visit to Florida, frustrating the US president. The last time Trump is known to have spoken with Xi was on January 17, days ahead of his second inauguration. 'It is my expectation that we will solve many problems together, and starting immediately,' Trump said afterward. But the problem-solving did not start immediately. Instead, the relationship between the two countries quickly worsened after Trump applied stiff new tariffs that eventually rose to 145%. China retaliated, creating a tit-for-tat trade war that has expanded over the course of Trump's five months in office. Talks last month in Geneva, which were intended to alleviate tensions, at first appeared to yield some progress – both sides vowed to lower some of the tariffs. But weeks later, the US accused China of reneging on an agreement to ease restrictions of certain critical minerals used to produce magnets. And instead of improving, the trade war has expanded into a battle over supply chains, which both countries see as essential to their respective national security needs. Trump has expanded punitive measures toward China to include revoking visas for Chinese students studying at American universities and restricting the export of certain software used to design advanced semiconductors. The worsening tensions emphasized the need for the two leaders to speak directly. 'The trade teams on both sides have determined that this needed to be elevated to the top,' a senior White House official said of the impending call. Trump is expected to bring up the pace at which China is exporting critical minerals – he believes Beijing is intentionally moving slower than promised during the Geneva talks, that official said. Another official said they expected Trump to do some level-setting: Trump has said publicly that China will suffer from the lack of a trade deal, a belief held by many administration officials, which in their view gives them leverage in talks with the superpower. 'I'm confident that when President Trump and Party Chairman Xi have a call that this will be ironed out,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said over the weekend. For his part, Trump seemed to be mulling the looming conversation in the wee hours this week. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' Trump wrote on Truth Social at 2:17 a.m. on Wednesday.
