logo
Israeli politician critiques Gaza war's toll on Palestinians, sparks outcry

Israeli politician critiques Gaza war's toll on Palestinians, sparks outcry

Killing babies as a hobby. Expelling a population. Fighting against civilians.
It is some of the harshest language against Israel's wartime conduct in Gaza and it came this week from a prominent Israeli politician, sparking a domestic uproar as the country faces heavy international criticism.
It is not uncommon for politicians to criticise Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war strategy, especially his failure to free all the hostages held by Hamas. What made the comments by centre-left opposition party leader Yair Golan rare and jarring to officials across the political spectrum -- was their focus on the plight of Palestinians.
The ensuing controversy underscored how little the war's toll on Gaza's civilians has figured into the public discourse in Israel in stark contrast to the rest of the world.
Speaking to the Israeli public radio station Reshet Bet, Golan a former general said Israel was becoming a pariah state and cautioned that a sane country doesn't engage in fighting against civilians, doesn't kill babies as a hobby and doesn't set for itself the goals of expelling a population.
After the outcry, he said he was referring to the conduct of Israel's far-right government in his remarks, not of its soldiers.
A rare focus on the plight of Palestinian civilians Golan's words were a shock to the system because, outside of the country's politically marginalised left, criticism focused on Palestinian civilian suffering and deaths has rarely been spoken publicly in Israel.
The reasons for this include: the trauma Israelis still feel over Hamas' deadly attack on October 7, 2023, Jewish citizens' deep faith in the righteousness of the military, dozens of hostages remain in Gaza and soldiers are dying to rescue them.
Criticism of the war has focused overwhelmingly on Netanyahu. His opponents believe his own political motives have dictated war strategy and his failure to reach a deal with Hamas to release all the hostages an accusation he denies.
Part of the Israeli public and media outlets are still trapped in an obsession over the initial shock that started this war, said Ehud Olmert, a former prime minister and fierce critic of the current government. But this is changing and it's just a matter of time.
Public opinion polls show that most Israelis support ending the war in exchange for the release of the remaining 58 hostages held by Hamas, around a third of whom are said to be alive.
Opponents of the war have tended to focus on concerns over the fate of the remaining hostages and the risk of soldier casualties in a campaign that many feel has run its course.
While Olmert disputed Golan's choice of words, he said the essence of his remarks reflects what many people think.
Israelis are still traumatised by Hamas' attack After Hamas' 2023 attack, in which 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage, Israelis rallied behind the military. They saw the war as a just response to the deadliest attack in Israel's history. Many Israelis cannot imagine a future where Hamas remains intact.
Israel's retaliatory war in Gaza has killed more than 53,000 people, mostly women and children, according to local health authorities, whose count doesn't differentiate between combatants and civilians.
The fighting has displaced 90 per cent of the territory's roughly 2 million population, sparked a hunger crisis and obliterated vast swaths of Gaza's urban landscape.
While international media coverage has largely focused on the war in Gaza and its toll on civilians there, in Israel the media still devotes heavy attention to the October 7 attack itself and the hostage crisis. Photos of those still held captive line the streets.
Stories about the plight of Palestinian civilians are less prominent, and largely avoid the harshest images emanating from Gaza. Most outlets repeat the official line that Hamas is solely to blame for the civilian toll.
For many Jewish Israelis, it is hard to fathom that their own children, most of whom must enlist in Israel's military, could be committing the crimes that Golan described.
All that has helped solidify a national narrative that views the war as an existential struggle.
When you fight a war of existence, you don't much think about the suffering of the enemy, said Shmuel Rosner, a senior fellow at the Jewish People Policy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank.
Golan's words have sparked outcry before A former deputy chief of staff of the military, Golan's words have sparked outcry in the past. The most notable occasion was a 2016 speech marking Israel's Holocaust remembrance day, when he compared what he said was an increasingly illiberal atmosphere in Israel to that of Nazi-era Germany.
On October 7, Golan donned his uniform and grabbed a gun to help battle militants during Israel's flailing first response to Hamas' assault. Olmert called him one of Israel's greatest warriors".
Golan is not the first public figure to have made such remarks about Israel's conduct in Gaza.
Former defense minister and military chief of staff Moshe Yaalon accused Israel of ethnic cleansing during a major operation last year. Zehava Galon, a former leader of a dovish political party, highlighted the deaths of thousands of children at a recent protest in Tel Aviv.
But unlike them, Golan has his political future at stake, lending more weight to his words.
Pictures of dead Palestinian children Netanyahu said Golan's words echoed disgraceful antisemitic blood libels. Benny Gantz, an opposition leader, said Golan's remarks were extreme and false and called on him to recant and apologise, which he did not do. Yair Lapid, another opposition leader, said Golan's words were a gift to our enemies.
Rosner said Golan's wording was uncareful and that instead of triggering introspection, they prompted a media debate over Golan himself and the damage his remarks might cause to Israel.
But they could resonate among the steadfast anti-war protest movement, said Alma Beck, an activist who is part of a small contingent of demonstrators who have been holding up pictures of Palestinian children killed in Gaza ever since Israel ended a ceasefire in March. She said the group began as 20 people and has grown to 600, still just a fraction of the thousands attending the broader anti-government protests.
Beck said the protest movement has been receptive to messages that focus on the Palestinian toll, and more signs with that message have been held up by demonstrators in recent weeks. Their main criticism remains that Netanyahu is continuing the war to appease his governing partners and ensure his own political survival.
I think there is a shift. I think people are starting to connect the dots, she said, while noting that the bulk of Israeli society hasn't changed. I hope that it will only grow.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump reacts to Greta Thunberg's ‘kidnapped' claim: ‘Should take anger management classes'
Donald Trump reacts to Greta Thunberg's ‘kidnapped' claim: ‘Should take anger management classes'

Hindustan Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump reacts to Greta Thunberg's ‘kidnapped' claim: ‘Should take anger management classes'

US President Donald Trump suggested that Greta Thunberg should take anger management classes. His remark came in response to a reporter asking Trump for a message for Thunberg, who claimed on Monday that she was kidnapped by the Israeli army on her way to giving aid to Gaza. She, along with other activists aboard the Freedom flotilla, was intercepted by the Israeli military while carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza. The boat named Madleen departed from Sicily in June earlier and had a cargo of formula, flour, rice, diapers, women's sanitary products and more. Greta posted a pre-recorded video on social media saying that she had been kidnapped in international waters by Israeli forces. 'If you see this video, we are being intercepted and kidnapped in international waters by the Israeli occupation forces, or forces that support Israel. I urge all my friends, family and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to release me and the others as soon as possible,' she said. Responding to the reporter on the question about Thunberg's claims of being kidnapped, Trump said, 'She is a strange person. She is a young, angry person, I don't know if it's real anger; it's hard to believe. She's certainly different. I think she has to go to an anger management class, that's my primary recommendation for her.' Further, Trump also reacted by saying that 'I think Israel has enough problems without kidnapping Greta Thunberg' In a statement issued on Monday, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition accused Israel of violating international law. The Israeli foreign ministry responded on X by saying that the activists were safe and unharmed. Calling the freedom flotilla 'a selfie yacht,' they said that it is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. Further, they assured that the passengers were being provided with sandwiches and water. Israel had warned previously that it would take 'whatever measures are necessary' to prevent Madleen from breaking the blockade.

Will the shift in Western opinion on Israel end the assault on Gaza?
Will the shift in Western opinion on Israel end the assault on Gaza?

Scroll.in

time33 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

Will the shift in Western opinion on Israel end the assault on Gaza?

For decades, the West has provided Israel with an impenetrable shield. This backing reached a zenith after the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The aftermath has laid bare the moral bankruptcy of the 'rules-based international order'. The United States, United Kingdom, European Union and others rushed to Israel's defence – not diplomatically, but militarily, politically and rhetorically. This support ranged from arms sales, intelligence-sharing, and diplomatic cover at international forums, to the complicit silence of Western governments even as Israeli bombs flattened schools, hospitals and entire neighbourhoods in the Gaza Strip. The mainstream Western media, for its part, has served less as a watchdog and more as a megaphone for Israeli state propaganda. It has parroted the language of 'self-defence', framing Israel's military campaign as a justified response to terrorism and willfully ignoring both the context of a 75-year colonial occupation and the ongoing subjugation of millions of Palestinians. The repeated use of euphemisms has allowed the West to mask the grotesque reality of what is unfolding in Gaza: not a war against Hamas, but a sustained, systematic assault on an imprisoned civilian population. What the West has refused to acknowledge – until now – is that Israel's conduct is not exceptional, it is consistent. Since October 7, 2023, nearly 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, mostly women and children, have been killed. Entire families have been wiped off the civil registry. Israel has intentionally targeted civilian infrastructure, enforced a medieval siege on food, water and fuel, and repeatedly violated ceasefire agreements, including the one brokered in January. In the West Bank, where there is no Hamas, Israeli forces have accelerated illegal settlement expansion and committed extrajudicial killings with impunity. Israel's policies, which amount to apartheid under international law, are not incidental but integral to its occupation. Now, the mask is slipping. The gut-wrenching images emerging every day from Gaza – the charred remains of children, mass graves in hospitals, starving infants clinging to life – can no longer be explained away as unfortunate collateral damage. The once unshakeable Western consensus around Israel is beginning to crack and global public opinion, particularly in the West, is shifting. This shift is not just rhetorical. Prominent voices, once unwavering in their defence of Israel, are reconsidering their positions. British journalist Piers Morgan, long seen as a vocal supporter of Israel's actions, has publicly acknowledged the mass suffering in Gaza and questioned the proportionality and morality of Israel's campaign. In an era of dogged polarisation, such reversals are not insignificant. Even more telling are the recent statements from Western governments that have until now remained staunchly pro-Israel. The United Kingdom, France and Canada – all allies who have previously shielded Israel from accountability – have now expressed that they are 'horrified' by the military escalation in Gaza. They have warned of 'concrete actions' should Israel continue its offensive and block humanitarian aid. They have condemned the 'abhorrent language' of Israeli officials like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has openly advocated for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. Such statements mark an unprecedented diplomatic rebuke of Israeli policy by its closest allies. Perhaps the most damning indictment comes from within Israel itself. Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, hardly a dove by any measure, has labelled the Gaza campaign a war crime. 'Thousands of innocent Palestinians are being killed,' he wrote. 'This is now a private political war. Its immediate result is the transformation of Gaza into a humanitarian disaster area.' When former Israeli leaders speak in such stark terms, the world must take note. The academic community, too, is weighing in with unprecedented clarity. An investigation by Dutch newspaper NRC has revealed that a growing number of leading genocide scholars now believe Israel's actions in Gaza meet the criteria for genocide. Seven internationally recognised Holocaust and genocide experts – from countries including Israel – have stated that Israel's military campaign is genocidal in nature. This is not mere hyperbole but the studied conclusion of those who have spent their lives analysing and preventing such atrocities. For over a year and a half, the Israeli government has repeatedly used weapons supplied by America to break U.S. and international humanitarian law. 54,000 Gazans are dead. Half a million are on the brink of famine. We must pass the Block the Bombs Act and save lives. — Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) June 6, 2025 Public opinion is also shifting. According to the latest polling conducted by the UK-based YouGov in Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, ' public support and sympathy for Israel have reached their lowest ebb in Western Europe'. Overall, only 13%-21% in any of the surveyed countries have a favourable opinion of Israel, in contrast to 63%-70% who have an unfavourable view. On the specific question of Israel's response to Hamas's attack, only 6–16% believed it was proportionate. Most critically, public opinion is shifting in the United States, Israel's most steadfast ally and primary enabler. According to a Pew Research Center poll released in April, over half of American adults now view Israel unfavourably – a dramatic increase of over 10% in just a year. A separate poll by Data for Progress found that 76% of US voters support a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and 51% believe President Donald Trump should demand one. These are not fringe views but reflect a mainstream disillusionment with the narrative that has long dominated Western discourse. Yet, despite the growing condemnation, Israel's campaign shows no signs of slowing. Why? Because the one thing that has not yet changed is bipartisan support from America's political leadership for Israel. On June 4, the US vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire' in Gaza, even as all other members of the council voted in favour. The US's fifth such veto must be seen in light of former State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller – the face of the United States's faithful endorsement of Israel under former president Joe Biden – admitting in an interview that Israeli forces have 'without a doubt' committed war crimes in Gaza. As long as the United States continues to fund, arm, and politically shield Israel, Tel Aviv will proceed with impunity. The time for condemnations is over. Expressions of horror and sorrow do not feed the hungry, heal the wounded or bring back the dead. Western allies, especially the US, UK and EU, must act. That means an immediate end to arms sales to Israel, the imposition of sanctions, the enforcement of international law and an unequivocal demand for a permanent ceasefire. It means lifting the siege on Gaza and committing resources to rebuild what has been destroyed. If they fail to act now, Western governments will forever bear the stain of complicity. History will remember not just what Israel has done, but who enabled it.

Miguel Uribe in critical condition; gun used for attacking Colombian presidential candidate traced to US purchase
Miguel Uribe in critical condition; gun used for attacking Colombian presidential candidate traced to US purchase

Mint

time37 minutes ago

  • Mint

Miguel Uribe in critical condition; gun used for attacking Colombian presidential candidate traced to US purchase

Colombia's left-wing president claimed on Monday that the security assigned to a presidential candidate, now critically wounded, had been 'oddly scaled back' ahead of the shooting—raising concerns of a possible conspiracy. Conservative senator and presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe, 39, was shot twice in the head at close range by a 15-year-old suspected assassin while campaigning in Bogotá on Saturday. The attack has rocked the country, triggering widespread speculation about those responsible. Authorities suspect the teenager was a contract killer but acknowledge that the identity and motive of whoever ordered the hit remain unclear, AFP reported. According to police chief Carlos Triana, the Glock pistol he is alleged to have used was purchased legally in the US state of Arizona in 2020. With Uribe fighting for his life in the hospital, Petro did little Monday to lower the political temperature. The president took to social media to accuse some opponents of politicising the tragedy. He also claimed that the number of bodyguards assigned to Uribe had been 'strangely reduced' from seven to three on the day of the attack while calling for a full investigation. Petro said he was the subject of a bounty taken up by "dark forces" and neo-nazis, and was the target of an "extraction" plot pitched to Israeli foreign intelligence agency Mossad. The head of Colombia's National Protection Unit, which is charged with protecting public figures, said three agents and four police officers protected Uribe on the day he was shot. Augusto Rodriguez admitted 'there were fewer people than there should have been' at the time of the attack because some had been working long hours the previous day. Colombian lawmakers are typically assigned seven bodyguards and a motorcade consisting of two armoured vehicles, AFP reported citing government officials. Rodriguez—a trusted ally of President Petro and a former M-19 guerrilla—asserted that a police officer was in charge of coordinating security for the candidates. Over 20 formal requests to enhance Uribe's security had been ignored. At the same time, Miguel Uribe's lawyer filed a criminal complaint against Rodriguez, alleging that over 20 formal requests to enhance Uribe's security had been ignored. The number of bodyguards assigned to Uribe had been 'strangely reduced' from seven to three on the day of the attack. Key Takeaways The attack on Miguel Uribe raises serious concerns about political safety and security measures in Colombia. Investigations are necessary to determine the motives and individuals behind the assassination attempt. The link between gun purchases in the US and violence in Colombia highlights ongoing issues related to gun control and international arms trafficking.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store