logo
WA state leaders react to executive order limiting transgender athletes

WA state leaders react to executive order limiting transgender athletes

Yahoo08-02-2025

The Brief
Washington Democrats are reaffirming their commitment to protecting trans people, following the President's action restricting their involvement in school sports.
State lawmakers are considering taking action of their own.
OLYMPIA, Wash. - State leaders are reaffirming their commitment to transgender people following President Donald Trump's executive order this week trying to restrict their participation in school sports.
What they're saying
State Superintendent Chris Reykdal said the president's executive order barring transgender athletes from women's and girls' sports attempts to "override the authority of states and local school districts"
"The president's order directly contradicts state law, including the Washington Law Against discrimination, and our laws prohibiting discrimination in our public schools," Reykdal said in a statement Thursday. "Our state law prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity, and we will not back down from that."
On Friday, the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction said it was finalizing guidance for school districts "in response to this unlawful order."
At a press conference Friday about challenging another transgender-related executive order, Attorney General Nick Brown (D) said his office has been closely reviewing all of the president's actions and is weighing action on the trans athletes executive order.
"There are so many things that the president is doing that are illegal, alarming," he said. "We will work in collaboration with our other states to see if it's appropriate for Washington state to take action. Again, there may be some things that he does that I don't like that are legal, and we'll just make that analysis as we go."
The other side
Washington lawmakers are considering taking action of their own.
With the president's order, the NCAA following suit, and other restrictions proposed across the country, State Representative Mike Volz (R-Spokane) is highlighting his "Defending Equity in Interscholastic Sports Act."
House Bill 1699 would allow schools to prohibit "biologically male students" from competing in women's sports, and establish a process to verify an athlete's sex.
Volz acknowledged the bill would have a "big, uphill fight" in the House, but said the legislation is about fairness.
"It's not some sort of anti-trans, or attack on the trans community. They have rights like everybody else," he said. "I just think the women's space should be protected and safeguarded."
House Speaker Laurie Jinkins (D-Tacoma) did not specifically comment on Volz's bill when asked. Though she said, "any bill that violates our state's robust anti-discrimination laws has no home here."
On Tuesday, the Democratic speaker and other legislative leaders reaffirmed their commitment to supporting the transgender community.
"Washington will remain, and that the House and Senate Democrats will remain, a place that will look to protect trans people-transgender people and transgender youth and youth who have questions about their gender identity," she said at a weekly media availability.
Democrats argued Washington has some of the strongest protections for transgender people as a result of legislation passed during the president's first term.
"Now it is about making sure that if there are any loopholes in those laws, we're closing them," said State Senator Manka Dhingra (D-Redmond). "Making sure we're reminding people that in this Washington, we will be protecting every vulnerable Washingtonian. That means our communities of color, our immigrants, our refugees. And our trans folk."
The Source
Information in this story is from Albert James, a television reporter covering state government as part of the Murrow News Fellowship program – a collaborative effort between news outlets statewide and Washington State University.
Washington Senate passes changes to parental rights in education
Japan Airlines plane clips tail of Delta plane at Sea-Tac Airport
Judge blocks DOGE access to sensitive Treasury Department payment system records
Man sentenced to 20 years for grooming, taking WA girl to Michigan home
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily Fox Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump warns would-be protestors on Army's 250th Birthday celebration of 'heavy force'
Trump warns would-be protestors on Army's 250th Birthday celebration of 'heavy force'

USA Today

time32 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump warns would-be protestors on Army's 250th Birthday celebration of 'heavy force'

Trump warns would-be protestors on Army's 250th Birthday celebration of 'heavy force' Nationwide "No Kings" protests against Trump are scheduled for June 14 but not in D.C., the site of a 250th birthday celebration for the U.S. Army Show Caption Hide Caption Trump warns military parade protesters will be met with 'big force' President Donald Trump warned people against protesting in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. President Donald Trump is warning any would-be protestors who are planning to interrupt the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration in Washington D.C., this weekend that they'll be "met with very big force". The June 14 event, which coincides with Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day, is set to feature thousands of police officers and security measures including metal detectors, anti-scale fencing, concrete barriers and drones overhead surveilling the crowd. It also comes as Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom are locked in a standoff over the use of the National Guard and U.S. military to help quell protests that have sprung up against the sweeps that ICE is carrying out at the president's direction in various Los Angeles neighborhoods. 'This is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force,' Trump said in the Oval Office on June 10. Billed as the U.S. Army's 250th birthday parade, the event in the nation's capital will feature Army equipment, musical performances and thousands of soldiers in uniforms from past and present. Fireworks are scheduled to close out the festivities. Trump's remarks come as his critics prepare their own 'No Kings National Day of Defiance" — or "No Kings" protests — that are set to take place at more than 1,800 sites nationwide. Indivisible, a progressive group, alongside a coalition of partner organizations, said it's holding the events to counter Trump's plans to 'hijack' the Army's legacy to 'celebrate himself.' There will be no planned "No Kings" protests scheduled for Washington D.C. Organizers said they intentionally avoided having a protest in the capital to avoid being cast as 'anti-veteran.' The largest protest is instead scheduled to take place at noon ET in Philadelphia, where the Second Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. 'We made that choice to not feed into any narrative that Trump might want," said Indivisible Co-founder Ezra Levin. " That we're counter protesting him directly or give him the opportunity to crack down on protesters." Last month, Trump said God had willed his participation in the "big big celebration." Trump, who lost the 2020 election, would have missed the event had he been elected to a consecutive second term. During his current term, Trump is also expected to preside over the FIFA World Cup in 2026, which the United States will cohost with Canada and Mexico, as well as the Summer Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028. 'I'm glad I missed that second term. Now look what I have,' Trump said. 'I have everything. Amazing the way things work out. God did that.' Contributing: Sarah D. Wire

Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: The states paying less than that
Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: The states paying less than that

The Hill

time33 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bill could make federal minimum wage $15: The states paying less than that

(NEXSTAR) — Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has introduced legislation that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour as early as next year, replacing the current rate of $7.25 an hour. For the states that already have minimum wage rates at or above $15 an hour, the change likely won't be as significant. In 2025 alone, more than 20 states saw an increase in their minimum wage. With the exception of the District of Columbia, where the current minimum wage is $17.50, the state of Washington has the highest minimum hourly rate of $16.66. In three states — Delaware, Illinois, and Rhode Island — the statewide minimum hourly rate has reached $15 for the first time. Effective July 1, Oregon will also have crossed that threshold. California, Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York also continue to offer above $15 an hour. The interactive map shows where the minimum wage is and isn't rising this year, and the current hourly rate. (The exception is Florida, where a minimum wage hike is expected in September.) It's worth noting that some cities and counties within the states mentioned above have higher rates than the statewide wage, and some industries may have higher (or in the case of tipped workers, lower) hourly pay. There are five states — Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, and South Carolina — that do not have a minimum wage. In Georgia and Wyoming, the minimum wage is $5.15. Employers in these states that are covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act must pay the federal minimum wage of $7.25, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. It's unclear, as of Tuesday. Hawley's bill, which also calls for an automatic rate increase to match inflation over time, does have bipartisan support. Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) cosponsored it. The GOP-controlled House and Senate, though, have also been focused on Trump's priority legislation. President Donald Trump previously referred to the current rate of $7.25 an hour as a 'low number' in December, but the White House declined to comment on Hawley's proposed legislation to The Hill.

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15
Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri proposed a bill Tuesday that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, his latest move to frame himself as a new kind of pro-worker Republican. Hawley's legislation is not in any danger of actually becoming law — his fellow Republicans hold a majority in the Senate and have been blocking minimum wage increases for years. But the proposal aligns him with a core Democratic demand and further separates Hawley from the traditional anti-union, free-market wing of the GOP when it comes to labor policy. 'Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford anything,' Hawley told HuffPost. 'Right now, the federal minimum wage, if you index it for inflation, or relative to inflation, it's the lowest level since the 1940s.' The federal minimum is just $7.25 per hour and hasn't been raised in more than 15 years, by far the longest such stretch since it was created during the Great Depression. It prevails in the 21 states that currently don't mandate a higher one, many of them clustered in the South. Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford Josh Hawley of Missouri (R) Hawley's bill, co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont, would raise the wage floor to $15, then tie it to an inflation index so that it goes up with the cost of living — a common feature in more progressive legislation. Such a hike would force increases in all but the mostly blue states where the wage floor has already been raised above that level. Hawley did not pretend that his proposal stands much chance of becoming law. 'I will try to move it. I mean, I'd love to get a vote on it,' he said. The proposal puts Hawley far ahead of other Republicans, but still behind Democrats on the issue. Most Democratic lawmakers are now pushing for a $17 minimum wage, arguing that $15 — the rallying cry of the Fight for $15 labor campaign, which began in the fast food industry in 2012 — has become inadequate as a living wage due to inflation. Although he supports a more aggressive raise, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) seemed pleased to see Hawley separate himself from other Republicans on the issue. 'I think every Democrat, last month, voted to raise the minimum wage to $17, and I'll look forward to working with Sen. Hawley,' Sanders told HuffPost on Tuesday, referencing an April vote on an amendment to a symbolic budget resolution. The amendment failed by a vote of 47 to 52 with every Republican except Hawley voting no. Hawley said that if the Republican Party wants to brand itself as the party of working people — which it does, according to statements from President Donald Trump and other leaders — then Republicans need to back policies that benefit the working class. 'This is what President Trump ran on. I mean, if we're going to be a working party, we have to do something for working people, and working people haven't gotten a raise in years,' Hawley said. Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. Hawley is not the first Republican to back a minimum wage increase. Back in 2021, Sen. Tom Cotton (Ark.) and then-Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) proposed a boost from $7.25 to $10. But the bill included an immigration measure that would have mandated nationwide use of e-Verify to crack down on undocumented workers, a poison pill for Democrats that isn't part of Hawley's legislation. Earlier this year, Hawley released a policy platform dubbed a 'Pro-Worker Framework.' It included some pro-labor reforms typically associated with Democrats, like putting limits on mandatory 'captive audience' meetings, in which employers pressure workers not to form unions. Then, in March, he joined Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) in proposing a bill that would speed up the process for workers to secure their first union contracts, the sort of legislation a typical Republican wouldn't go near. As with Vice-President J.D. Vance, Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. But when it comes to maybe moving legislation, lawmakers like Sanders like the idea of having a Republican to work with. 'It would be great if we could get some other Republicans,' the Vermont senator said. '$7.25 federal minimum wage is a national disgrace. We've got to raise it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store