
World leaders urged to step up for overexploited oceans
World leaders arrive in the French Riviera on Sunday ahead a high-level summit on
ocean conservation
, as nations face pressure to adopt tougher stances on
overfishing
, pollution and
marine protection
.
The United Nations has sounded the alarm over an oceans "emergency" and leaders gathering in Nice will be called to commit money and stronger protections for the seas.
The
UN Ocean Conference
, starting Monday, seeks to turn a corner as nations feud over
deep-sea mining
, plastic litter and exploitative fishing, against a backdrop of wider geopolitical tensions.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Linda Kozlowski, 67, Shows Off Her Perfect Figure In A New Photo
Today's NYC
Undo
"We have a duty to mobilise, because the science is clear and the facts are there," said French President Emmanuel Macron in Monaco on Sunday, where he attended a pre-conference event on ocean finance.
Some 60 heads of state and government are expected in Nice, including Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and his Argentine counterpart Javier Milei.
Live Events
"The planet can no longer tolerate broken promises," said Lula on Sunday.
"Either we act, or the planet is in danger."
'No excuses'
Later Sunday, Macron was to arrive in Nice from Monaco and tour the conference venue, made to look like the cavernous belly of a whale.
In the evening, he was to host leaders for a dinner of Mediterranean fish.
France has deployed 5,000 police to Nice for the five-day summit where scientists, business leaders and environmental activists were also to attend in big numbers.
A strong turnout was expected from
Pacific Island nations
, whose delegations will urge financial aid to combat the rising seas, marine trash and plunder of fish stocks.
The United States under President Donald Trump -- whose recent push to fast-track seabed mining in international waters sparked global outrage -- was not expected to send a delegation.
Conservationists have warned the summit -- which will not produce a legally binding agreement -- risks being a talkfest unless leaders come up with concrete proposals to restore marine health.
On Saturday, Macron said France would restrict bottom trawling -- a destructive fishing method that indiscriminately scrapes the ocean floor -- in some of its marine protected areas.
Britain also said it would announce plans looking to extend a ban on bottom trawling to more than half of protected English seas.
Environmental groups said such steps were good but do not go far enough.
Pay up
Nations will also face calls to cough up the missing finance to protect 30 percent of the world's oceans by 2030, a target agreed by nearly 200 countries in 2022.
"We've created this sort of myth that governments don't have money for ocean conservation," Brian O'Donnell, director of Campaign for Nature, told reporters.
"There is money. There is not political will," he said.
So far, only around eight percent of oceans are designated marine conservation zones and even less are considered truly protected.
Greenpeace says at this rate, it could take another 82 years to reach the 30 percent goal.
In a boost this week, Samoa declared 30 percent of its national waters under protection with the creation of nine new marine parks.
Conservationists hope others at the summit follow suit.
"All eyes should be on the many Pacific leaders attending.... Their ambition and dedication to ocean protection can serve as inspiration to all countries," said Kevin Chand from the nonprofit group Pristine Seas.
Another summit priority will be inching towards the numbers required to ratify a global treaty on harmful
fishing subsidies
, and another on protecting the high seas beyond national control.
France is also spearheading a push in Nice to build support for a moratorium on deep-sea mining ahead of a closely-watched meeting of the International Seabed Authority in July.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
'We are ready': Iran's veiled warning on reports of Israel preparing strike; Middle-East flare-up likely?
Iran 'ready' after reports claim Israel prepraing to attack. After Israel reportedly informed US officials that they stand prepared to attack and conduct operations, Iran made a cryptic post on X that said, "WE ARE READY." According to CBS News, US expects possible Iranian retaliation against American installations in Iraq. This concern prompted Wednesday's advisory for Americans to evacuate the region, with the State Department directing non-emergency government staff to depart Iraq citing "heightened regional tensions. " — IRIran_official (@IRIran_official) In another post, Islamic Republic of Iran wrote, "The United States Government has no authority, or business, dictating Iranian foreign policy. That era ended in 1979!" The post also featured a video of their Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei walking around tagged as 'Winner' in contrast to US Presidents, including Donald Trump , under the cateogry 'Losers'. Trump's Middle East representative Steve Witkoff maintains plans to engage with Iran in a sixth round of nuclear programme discussions in the forthcoming days. During a Les Miserables performance at the Kennedy Center on Thursday, Trump addressed the withdrawal of US military personnel from certain Middle Eastern countries, citing safety concerns. Trump emphasised Iran's prohibition from acquiring nuclear weapons. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "They (US military personnel) are being moved out (of some countries of the Middle East) because it could be a dangerous place and we will see what have given notice to move out," he stated. These statements follow unsuccessful negotiations with Iran. "They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. They can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that," he declared. Following unsuccessful nuclear discussions and increasing tensions with Iran, the US State Department and military announced Wednesday the withdrawal of non-essential personnel from Middle Eastern operations, according to The Times of Israel. A State Department representative told The Times of Israel: "President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad. In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies. Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our Mission in Iraq." The department extended departure authorisation to non-essential staff and family members in Bahrain and Kuwait, offering them the choice to leave, The Times of Israel reported.


Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran Warns of Retaliation to UN Watchdog's Nuclear Censure
(Bloomberg) -- Iran warned it will retaliate following a decision by the United Nations atomic watchdog to censure the Islamic Republic over its nuclear program, deepening a crisis that's also drawn in the US and Israel. The International Atomic Energy Agency's board of governors approved a resolution in Vienna on Thursday that deemed Iran in non-compliance of its international obligations, setting up a potential referral to the UN Security Council for a renewal of sanctions. Iran will 'consider appropriate responses, including initiating the process of withdrawing from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,' Iran's ambassador to UN, Saeid Iravani, said ahead of the vote, according to the state-run IRNA news agency. The breakdown in nuclear diplomacy comes alongside a corresponding rise in regional tensions. The US ordered some staff to depart its embassy in Baghdad and authorized families of military service members to leave the region, officials said, while US President Donald Trump said he's growing less confident about the prospects for a successful deal to impose new limits on Iran's nuclear program. Iran warned it could hit US military assets in the Middle East if the talks collapse and the Islamic Republic is attacked. Oil prices rose the most since October on the mounting tensions, before paring gains on Thursday. Negotiations between Iran and the Trump administration have stalled over whether or not Tehran's engineers will retain their right to enrich uranium. The US and Israel have publicly insisted Iran can't possess that key technology — critical for producing the fuel needed for nuclear reactors and bombs. 'A comprehensive deal is likely contingent on the US allowing Iran to retain some domestic enrichment capacity,' analysts at the Eurasia Group wrote in a note this week. Iran has previously offered to end its ramp up of highly-enriched uranium in exchange for sanctions relief, after producing a record volume over the last quarter. That material could quickly be turned into the fuel for the equivalent of 10 bombs, should Iran's leadership take the political decision pursue weapons. The IAEA's vote was highly divided, with 19 in favor — led by the US and European nations — and three against, including China and Russia. There were 11 abstentions. Russian diplomats, who have been asked by the Trump administration to facilitate a diplomatic solution with Iran, cautioned that passing the IAEA vote of censure carries significant risks. 'The adoption of the presented resolution will significantly reduce the chances' of a diplomatic resolution, wrote Moscow's IAEA envoy Mikhail Ulyanov in a statement. Instead, 'such an escalation will have the most negative consequences both for the IAEA and for the entire non-proliferation regime.' More stories like this are available on


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
China to kill AUKUS without firing a bullet? Trump's ‘America First' stand behind review of nuclear submarine deal with Australia
President Donald Trump has launched a Pentagon-led review of the 2021 AUKUS pact, which brings together Australia , the United Kingdom, and the United States in a multi-decade effort to counterbalance China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. This deal was signed under the Biden Administration , a commitment to give its allies the missing military edge in the form of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia. This review marks the first serious reappraisal of the deal since its 2021 announcement and is being undertaken to find the perfect strategy to tackle China's military posturing in the Pacific and South China Sea. Also Read: Trump's US losing its tourist destination sheen, Australia joins growing list of friendly nations dropping America from travel itineraries by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dad-Approved Ways to Celebrate Father's Day in Costa Mesa - Travel Costa Mesa Travel Costa Mesa Read More Undo Officials say the review is to ensure the project aligns with Trump's 'America First' agenda and addresses concerns over resource limits in the US Navy . With the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) modernising rapidly and operating multiple nuclear submarines as well as aircraft carriers, the US forces are getting stretched. Live Events A defense official confirmed that the review will examine America's readiness, allied contributions, and the US industrial base. Why is Trump having second thoughts? Trump's team, led by Undersecretary Elbridge Colby, has questioned the submarine component, known as Pillar I, while supporting broader cooperation in intelligence and advanced technologies. Colby warned that US nuclear submarine capacity may not be sufficient to both supply Australia and meet American needs in a hypothetical conflict on other fronts, such as around Taiwan. This review is normal for a new administration (Trump) to evaluate key defense agreements. Canberra has already committed around A$4 billion toward US production and $500 million upfront. But the review stresses that the US must hit production targets, about 2.33 submarines per year, before transferring vessels. The Australian Government forecast suggests that this submarine program could cost a staggering US$235 billion over 30 years. Trump's approach also uses AUKUS to pressure Australia to increase defence spending significantly, from 2% of GDP to roughly 3.5%. Australia's Deputy PM Richard Marles said that AUKUS will stay on track. He called the review 'natural and understandable,' given the change in US leadership. He stressed that Australia has a 'plan' and 'is sticking to it.' The Chinese reaction China maintained its opposition to the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal as the Trump Administration reviewed it to align with its " America First " agenda. Beijing had earlier labeled the deal as driven by 'Cold War thinking' and accused the US, UK, and Australia of embarking on a 'path of error and danger.' Also Read: Trump threatens broader troop deployment if ICE protests and riots spread After the news that the US is reviewing AUKUS, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a briefing on Thursday, June 12, 'China has made clear more than once its position on the so-called trilateral security partnership between the U.S., U.K., and Australia, designed to advance cooperation on nuclear submarines and other cutting-edge military technologies." What is AUKUS and what was it meant to serve? The AUKUS pact, short for Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, is a strategic security partnership announced in 2021. Its purpose is to strengthen military capabilities among these three countries and deter threats in the Indo-Pacific region, especially amid China's growing influence. The deal, estimated to cost US$239 billion (or A$368 billion) over three decades, is structured around two main pillars. Pillar I: Nuclear Submarines Pillar I will focus on providing Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines, marking a big leap forward from its current fleet of diesel-electric vessels. Only five countries, the US, Russia, China, France, the UK, and India operate nuclear-powered submarines. Australia will build a nuclear submarine base that will be operational by 2027 just off Perth, for $1.7 billion. US and UK submarines will begin short-term rotational deployments to Western Australia by 2027. These deployments are meant to familiarise Australia with nuclear-powered technology and operations. From 2032, Australia will purchase at least three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US, with the option to buy two more if needed. The long-term vision is to create a new generation of nuclear-powered submarines, SSN-AUKUS. The UK and Australia will jointly design these submarines using British blueprints, but with integrated US technology. They will be constructed in both countries and serve both navies. With this part of the plan, the Australian government officials hope to strengthen deterrence, build Australia's domestic defence industry, and deepen military interoperability among the three nations. Pillar II: Advanced Capabilities and Intelligence Sharing This part includes collaboration on artificial intelligence, undersea robotics, long-range hypersonic missiles, quantum technologies, cyber operations, and electronic warfare systems. The arrangement expands on decades of deep intelligence sharing between the US and UK, now extended to Australia. It is designed to give the allies an edge in emerging technologies that are crucial for modern warfare. Together, both pillars of AUKUS aim to reshape the Indo-Pacific security landscape and establish a long-term technological and strategic alignment framework between the three partner countries. What lies ahead for Australia? The Pentagon review is expected to wrap up within 30 days; however, no timeline is given. Its outcome could reshape AUKUS or prompt negotiations over defence spending and industrial commitments. Australia may also consider a fall-back plan if the submarine deal is delayed or altered, though Marles has ruled out mid-course changes. London reiterates AUKUS's strategic value but supports revisiting its terms. For Australia, the review brings uncertainty over its biggest defence project. AUKUS's future role in Indo-Pacific security could be in doubt if the review leads to cancellation or delay.