Queenstown gets best payoff from solar panels
Solar panels now stack up financially for many households in all three of the country's biggest cities, as well as Queenstown.
A new in-depth study by the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (EECA) says plunging panel prices and rising electricity bills have tipped the scales in favour of rooftop solar for many homeowners.
EECA says it is the first New Zealand study to use detailed and high-quality data for both solar supply and residential demand to work out whether - and when - rooftop solar pays off.
"We've now got to that point with those (standard) 5kW systems with a house that's got electric appliances, where you can pretty much say this is going to be a good investment," says EEC spokesperson Gareth Gretton.
"If all the pieces of the puzzle are right for your house, then you don't need to sweat this decision for a year. It's actually a good decision," he says.
"So if you have a north facing roof, it's not flat, it's not shaded. You've got electric appliances in your home, you're able to use some of the electricity during the day and you've got a good price for your solar, it's going to be a good investment."
The study found there were exceptions, such as houses with shaded or flat roofs.
Although many households with rooftop solar do use batteries to store electricity during the day so it can be used later, the study found batteries needed to come down in price before they make sense economically. Sun spots
Of the four cities studied, EECA found Queenstown homeowners stood to gain the most from installing solar panels, followed by Auckland, then Christchurch, then Wellington.
"As a very proud Wellington I do like the emphasize that Wellington came out bottom, not because of our lack of sunshine, but because we tend to have quite low electricity prices relative to some other places," said Gretton.
Proud Aucklanders can be reassured that Auckland came out second for sunshine hours, after Queenstown.
But Gretton said power prices had more impact on the returns than sunshine hours.
Queenstown was top for sunshine hours, then Auckland, Christchurch and Wellington - in that order - but the differences between the three main centres were not huge, he said.
EECA calculated the rate of return on investment households could expect over a year - meaning that if they could borrow money to install rooftop solar at less than that rate of return, they would be making money.
Gretton said a lot of households were seeing about 9 or 10 percent per year from installing rooftop solar panels. Those calculations were for a 5kW, north-facing solar panel system on a roof that had at least a 30 degree tilt, with no battery included.
"There's a pretty wide range of return but it's pretty much never below 6 percent," he said.
"At the very extreme end, and I should stress these number are unusual, but nevertheless they're real, there were returns of up to 14 percent."
Gretton said those returns stacked up well, considering some banks were offering green loans - which can be used to buy solar panels - at zero or one percent interest rates.
With batteries still relatively expensive compared with the panels themselves, Gretton said the study found households could get a better return on investment by using a home's hot water cylinder to store heat when the sun was out, by setting a simple timer. The water could be used when the sun had gone down - a more affordable form of energy storage than a battery. 'Gives flexibility'
Kate Gunthorp has been tracking her family's electricity consumption closely for three years.
A self-described energy nerd and a sustainability professional, she's been eagerly waiting for a solar panel system, which was finally switched on at her Auckland home last week.
She and her husband are hoping to have close to zero power bills most of the time.
Gunthorp says her main goal is giving she and her husband flexibility, for example in case there's a time in the future when they no longer do "big corporate jobs".
"For us, my husband and I both work full time we've got young kids, so to have that flexibility - that's $660 savings a month - to have that flexibility means it's $660 that we don't have to earn."
The family uses a lot of electricity and recently switched their gas hot water for a hot water heat pump.
"We use way less energy now that we are all-electricity than we did when we were electricity plus gas, because the hot water heat pump is so much more efficient," she says. She had also been on an efficiency drive, but they were still high electricity users.
She calls her new system solar "on steroids" - an extra-big array of panels, a battery and the latest smart circuit technology at a total cost of $45,000.
Households that have big electricity bills, like Gunthorp's, stand to gain the most from solar, according to EECA's study.
But in ballpark figures a standard array of panels - with no battery - could cost more like $11,000, Gretton says.
The study found the best returns actually come from a modest sized system.
As for the roof, Gretton says a roof tilt of more than 30 degrees was ideal, but not a major factor - as long as the roof was not flat.
But heavily shaded roofs or roofs that are multi-level or tricky to install might not be worth it, said Gretton.
He said batteries for household use were still relatively expensive compared with similar-sized EV batteries, though EECA expected the prices to fall in the next few years. When that happened, the economics of adding a battery should change, he said.
Gretton said if electricity retailers moved towards pricing structures that charged more for electricity used at peak times, the financial payback from batteries could also improve.
That was because homes with rooftop solar and batteries could store electricity during the day and either use it themselves - saving money at peak times- or sell it to the grid at a higher rate.
Gretton said recent changes by the government to expand the permitted voltage range for electricity networks would ease restrictions on how much electricity rooftop solar owners can sell back to the grid - and improve the payback of panels.
Mike Casey of non-profit Rewiring Aotearoa said with panels now affordable, the next step should be finding ways to offer the financial benefits of solar panels to groups such as renters and the elderly, who could not borrow against their mortgages and/or did not own their homes.
He said the government should find ways to make owning batteries more lucrative, as the Australian government was doing, because having batteries benefited the whole country.
"Every battery you install in a home removes that home from those peak periods and reduces the need to build more poles and wires. That's not really recognised at the moment," said Casey.
Here's how to get the best payoff from solar panels, according to EECA's research. 1. Best location
Of the four cities studied, Queenstown had the best returns, with the most sunlight hours per year and moderate electricity prices.
EECA calculated the financial returns from installing solar panels in Queenstown at about 7-14 percent per year for a north-facing, 5 kW solar array at a 30 degree tilt with no battery storage.
Auckland had the second best returns, with the second-best sunlight hours after Queenstown and higher electricity prices, making solar PV attractive. The rate of return on investment was about 6-12 percent per year.
Christchurch had slightly less sunlight than Auckland and lower electricity prices than in Auckland and Queenstown. The rate of return on investment was about 6-11 per cent per year.
Wellington had the lowest sunshine hours due to a higher number of cloudy days per year and moderate electricity prices
The rate of return on investment was lower than other centres but can still reach 10 per cent for some households. 2. Batteries
The study looked at solar panel costs today, but estimated batteries costs as it expected them to be in a few years time, because EECA expects batteries to get cheaper and it did not want the study to get outdated too quickly.
"Right now today adding a battery to your solar install will not increase your rate of return, it will actually decrease it," said Gretton.
"But we think that's going to change because batteries are coming down in price.
"If you look at the cost of an EV today and how big the battery is in that EV, and you look at the cost of a battery in a box outside your house, the two are a bit out of step. You're getting fantastic value buying an EV today and a battery in a box is not such good value for money."
The other thing that could make batteries more economic is more targeted rates for electricity - charging more at peak times such as cold winter evenings.
Right now electricity bills are rising largely because the fixed monthly lines charges are going up - which is not something that rooftop solar with a battery can help with, so long as the home remains connected to the grid.
"More complex, more cost reflective prices are really good for batteries because batteries are performing a big service to households and the grid when they are feeding electricity in at peak times. So we need more targeted, time of use charges to make the case for batteries," said Gretton.
"It not only saves homeowners with these batteries money because they're not having to buy/import electricity from the grid at these peak times at a higher rate, but they will also be rewarded for putting electricity into the grid at this time."
In the meantime, the study found a straightforward hack in the form of the humble electric hot water cylinder.
"Your straightforward hot water cylinder is actually the lowest cost form of storage you can have right now," said Gretton. "[Solar panels] coupled with your hot water cylinder, either with a device called a diverter or a simple timer will actually give you better returns than a battery right now."
These devices timed the hot water cylinder to heat when the sun is out, storing the hot water for later.
In the future, Gretton said using EV car batteries as storage would solve a lot of problems with reducing strain on the grid.
"Cars have big batteries for relatively low cost compared with stationary batteries," he said.
"The vehicle-to-grid-technology needs to come down in price, and the manufacturers of EVs need to come to party because they need to warrant that is it is okay.
"At the moment the problem is the manufacture is probably going to say, we won't warrant your EV if you do this with it, but the potential of this is absolutely huge. It provides so much short term battery capacity as such comparatively low cost that at a stroke it would really solve our peak demand problems." 3. Face north
"I think most people know that north facing is best and it certainly is," said Gretton.
The study also looked at solar generation from panels facing northwest, and half east and half west.
"Some people are talking about that being a good idea because it purportedly maximises the generation you get in the mornings and evenings, but what we found is over the course of a year you do lose out quite a lot on generation capacity and you really lose out in the winter months... you're never getting the sunlight directly on your panels, whereas with north and northwest you're at least getting it some of the day," he said.
"Basically if you go to northwest, you're dropping down by about ten per cent, if you go east/west you're dropping off about 20 percent (compared with north facing). It is just best to go north, so if you're not going to go north you need to go into any investment knowing what you're losing out on."
"We'd be pushing to north or near-north-oriented and not really advising east/west." 4. Tilt
This one is more minor. EECA took the standard roof as being on a tilt of 30 degrees. "You get a few percentage uplift for 45 degrees and lose a little bit for 15 degrees. But the conclusion there is that your roof is obviously what you've got, so you maybe don't worry about that one so much," said Gretton.
He said installing brackets to mount the panels on a different angle was probably not worth it.
"It obviously costs money to put those brackets in, so you've got to look at the return on investment. Unless your roof is flat or nearly flat, just put them parallel with the roof plane." 5. Right size
This bit is technical, but solar panels produce DC (direct current) electricity and it needs to be converted into AC (alternating current) in order to connect the panels to the grid.
The device that does that is called an inverter.
The study found having slightly more capacity in your panels than in your inverter - called "overpanelling" - generated the best returns.
"What we found is the way to optimise the package is to put in something like 6KW panel capacity and a 5KW inverter. It's basically because those solar panels will only produce 6KW on a sunny day in the middle of the day, so a lot of the time a 6KW DC system will only produce 5 kw or 4KW or on a really cloudy day less again.
"And so because an inverter is a relatively large line item on your system cost, you're actually maximizing the value of the inverter and the whole system by making the inverter run at fill capacity more of the time," said Gretton.
They found it improved the returns by 10 percent to overbuild the panels a little.
Gretton said when people were shopping around, they needed to understand whether what they were being quoted was the capacity of the panels, or the inverter, and what the difference was.
"It's something you should be asking anyone giving you a quote about, because we found it a pretty unambiguously good idea to do this overpanelling thing."
As for the 6kW panels/ 5kW inverter system that features throughout much of the study, Gretton said that was a decent size to be starting with for most households.
"That would be a really good system size to start your thinking with right now, it's a really common size and will probably give good returns for most households." 6. Feeding back to the grid
Selling surplus electricity to the grid on a bright sunny day when you are not home - but other people in your area need electricity - can improve the returns.
But different local electricity networks have different limits on how much households can export.
Government changes to the maximum permitted voltage should help companies ease up on these restrictions, said Gretton.
"This basically gives the networks more headroom to receive this electricity from inverters," he said.
The study found there was a difference in returns between people living in an area with a 5kW limit on exporting electricity from rooftop panels and people living somewhere with a 10kW limit.
Basically, Gretton said, a higher limit meant you can build a slightly bigger system on your roof and generate better returns.
"We've been talking about 5kW as being the standard... but if you have a 5kw export limit in place you get your maximises return with a system that is more like 3-4KW.
"There is an economy of scale with a solar instal. If you look at cost per kilowatt, in ballpark figures it's $2000 per installed KW (so $10,000 in round numbers for 5kW) but as you go to larger systems that per kilowatt cost comes down a bit," he said.
A small note of caution - Gretton said if everyone in your neighbourhood got solar, there was a chance that even with voltage limit increase, particular streets may have limits on how much they can export, making it harder to sell to the grid.
"It's really about looking at what you're using in your home," said Gretton. 7. Shop around
Finally, Gretton said the biggest thing people can do is shop around.
"If you're able to get a really competitive installation price, you're guaranteed to have higher returns. in some ways easiest and best thing you can do is making sure you get a good price, while obviously making sure you get a good install as well."
And: "Look at warranties on performance, ie output and how long it is guaranteed to not break for - you want long warranties on both," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Future of Right to Repair Bill uncertain
By Anneke Smith of RNZ Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson says she's not giving up on her bill that would give consumers the right to get goods repaired. The Consumer Guarantees (Right to Repair) Amendment Bill would compel manufacturers to make repair parts available locally to consumers to extend the lifetime of products and reduce waste. The legislation was sent to Select Committee after passing its first reading in February this year with support from Labour, the Greens, Te Pāti Maori and New Zealand First. It appeared to have enough support to progress into law, but the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee has now recommended, by majority, that the bill not be passed. What the Consumer Guarantees (Right to Repair) Amendment Bill proposes: • Retain requirements for manufacturers to make repair facilities, parts, software, tools and information available to consumers. • Allow consumers to request that goods be repaired, rather than replaced. • Prevent the use of unauthorised repairers and parts from voiding manufacturers' guarantees. Davidson told RNZ New Zealand First appeared to have pulled its support for the legislation. "The reason we got it through first reading is because we had [support from] all of the opposition parties, plus New Zealand First, so we were able to get it to Select Committee, which was fantastic. "We heard from submitters, oral submissions, written submissions, overwhelming support for the bill. At the end of the select committee process, the bill was reported back, and, at least at this stage, the New Zealand First members have voted against progressing the bill." She said she would not give up on the bill, especially when she had adopted changes, including narrowing the goods covered to above $100 in value at the suggestion of government members. "It's a little rough to have done all that deep work to make the bill better but the positive is we have now got incredible improvements that we know government members were in support of because they helped us make them. "So there is massive mandate there for the public to have what they've asked for, which is the right to repair their own goods. " New Zealand First has not responded to RNZ's requests for comment. 'Serious concerns' about process raised in Select Committee report The committee's report on the Right To Repair Bill notes opposition parties had "serious concerns" about the way the committee had conducted its work on the bill. "Opposition members participated in this work in the reasonable expectation that such engagement was aimed at building genuine cross-party agreement," it said. "The result was otherwise. The committee spent significant time, and drew on the resources of Parliamentary Counsel and departmental advisors, to explore and draft changes to resolve the concerns of government members that they then ultimately chose not to support," the report states. "That decision is of course within their rights. But when extensive collaborative work is undertaken with the tacit implication that it might secure support, only for that support to be withheld, the effect is to undermine trust between members. "It also risks the perception that the process was used to keep the committee occupied rather than to improve the bill, at a cost to the public purse." The decision comes as the government rolls back a series of waste-reduction measures. The container-return scheme has been scrapped, plastic bans pared back and product stewardship rules delayed. In December 2024, the government quietly cancelled several waste minimisation initiatives focused on recycling and kerbside food scraps composting. Four out of five planned policies will no longer go ahead, including mandatory kerbside composting and recycling for all urban areas. A planned national Circular Economy & Bioeconomy Strategy was also put on hold.
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
National and Labour deputy leaders go head-to-head on Morning Report
Carmel Sepuloni and Nicola Willis go head-to-head on Morning Report's weekly political panel. Photo: RNZ The National and Labour deputy leaders are set to go head-to-head on Morning Report's weekly political panel. You can listen live above, on our app or on the radio . So far this week, there has been plenty to discuss, including buildings, ferries, and a tit-for-tat on the economy. The government has kept its AA+ credit rating, with ratings agency Fitch praising both National and Labour's emphasis on fiscal responsibility . But on Tuesday, Nicola Willis said the reminder of fiscal responsibility was a "warning shot" to Labour. She accused Labour leader Chris Hipkins of pretending the country's debt servicing costs were not something to worry about, despite the bill reaching almost $9 billion a year. "This kind of fiscal innumeracy is dangerous for New Zealand," she said. "Every New Zealander will pay the price if a Labour-Greens government puts our fiscal reputation at risk." In return, Hipkins scoffed at Willis' assessment, noting Labour had not yet released its full fiscal plan. "Nicola Willis is speculating on what our policy may or may not be. We haven't set out a policy yet," he said. "We've got to see how much more damage she'll do in the next 12 months before we can do that." The government began the week with an announcement it will change the liability settings in the Building Act to a proportionate system, in which parties are only liable for the work they carry out. It is a change from the 'joint and several' system, where liability is shared between all parties, regardless of cost or responsibility. Details on consumer protections, including whether the government will require mandatory professional indemnity insurance or warranties, are still to be worked through ahead of the legislation's introduction. Labour has said it is broadly supportive of the changes, but wants to see more work around those consumer protections so homeowners are not left out of pocket. Also recently in the news has been the money spent on cancelling the Cook Strait ferry contracts . A final $144 million payout to Hyundai Mipo shipyards in South Korea brought the total cost to $671m. Willis cancelled the iReX project shortly after the coalition came into power, saying the budget had blown out. New ferries are not due until 2029, with the Aratere sailing its final journey. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
How does the Reserve Bank set the OCR?
The official cash rate is now set by a monetary policy committee. Photo: RNZ The Reserve Bank will update the official cash rate (OCR) on Wednesday. But have you ever wondered how it goes about making the decision? John McDermott is now executive director of Motu Economic and Public Policy Service but was previously assistant governor and head of economics at the Reserve Bank. He spoke to RNZ this week about how the process works. The OCR is now set by a monetary policy committee, made up of three members of the Reserve Bank's staff - current governor Christian Hawkesby, assistant governor Karen Silk and chief economist Paul Conway. They are joined by external members professor Bob Buckle, economist Carl Hansen and professor Prasanna Gai. McDermott said the way the OCR was set had changed a little with the introduction of the formal committee. It was introduced in 2018, the year before McDermott left the bank. Before that, the Reserve Bank governor was the sole decision maker. Now, the committee aims for a consensus decision but sometimes goes to a vote. But McDermott said the overall approach would be broadly the same. He said there would be three key stages: Looking at what was happening overseas, assessing the situation in New Zealand and thinking about how the decision could be communicated with the right impact. He said the process would usually take about a week. "Staff will have been working on it for a lot longer than that. They'll put together a whole bunch of information on it for the committee to digest." There would normally be two days of "information pooling" meetings, and two days of deliberation meetings, with decision meetings after the deliberation meeting, according to the committee handbook. McDermott said attention would turn first to what was happening in the rest of the world. "What are the key conditions with our trading partners? How's that affecting New Zealand? Probably a lot of detail on the US, a lot of detail on China … probably an equal amount of detail on Australia." He said the committee would then look at financial markets. "Bond markets, equity markets, how does that flow over to New Zealand's access to capital? "It's important to get that setting, once that's established it'll be looking at New Zealand in detail." He said the second day of deliberations would look at recent data. "The minutiae of the data. What's going on with concrete sales or electronic car transactions … hopefully there will be some discussion of what's going on with businesses." He said that would usually involve looking at the results of interviews with various businesses about what they were experiencing. "When you look at the political elements, does that match with what businesses are telling you?" He said the committee would also need to look at banks' willingness to lend and the ability of firms to access capital. "Once you've gone though that it's all about what's happened and what's the environment when we're in. What does that mean for the future? How do you project forward given this is what's happening? What do we expect for inflation output and interest rates …. That will be the core element of the forecasts." He said different members of the committee would bring different experience and judgment, and opinions on what elements should be given more weight. Reserve Bank governor Christian Hawkesby. Photo: "After that process the committee is probably asking the staff, whom they've been leaning on heavily during the week, to not be there. The committee itself will ask what do we think about that, what are the risks? This is what the forecast looks like, this is the decision we think kind of makes sense." He said the committee would consider what the markets would do in response to a decision, and whether they would be shocked by anything that was decided. "What will that do to the prices that matter? And in interest rates, are we going to get the kind of reaction we want? "You should see the results of that in the press conference - this is what we did, this is why we did it ... trying to shape expectations and manage how that is delivered to the country." He said markets had sometimes "got it wrong" and priced in things that the Reserve Bank did not expect to happen. In that case, it would need to clarify the way it saw things. "But by the same token, if you think the financial markets have got it right and you want to validate those expectations you have to be careful not to say something stupid where the markets misunderstand you … you don't want to shock the markets by accident." The handbook said the decision about the appropriate monetary policy settings would be made the morning of the release so that there was less risk of sensitive information being leaked. McDermott said the committee would have to decide which data it needed to pay attention to and what it could set aside as not relevant. If data was volatile, it could sometimes set it aside and decide to come back to it for the next update. Something like a movement in the oil price would have an impact in the short term but then prove immaterial in the medium term. The bank would need to communicate that price increases as a result of something like an oil spike were not going to persist, he said. "With the increase in goods and services tax, prices will go up but they'll go up one time - that's not inflation - so we're going to look through that. But every time the bank or the monetary committee looks through something, it is really important that it explains that it is looking through something." McDermott said the geopolitical environment made rate setting hard at the moment. "There's tariffs that are playing out. What are they doing? Who's paying them? How are they affecting supply chains? Are they going to be the same next week as this week? There's a lot of noise and so you've got to be very disciplined in how you work through that." He said it was also important to be upfront when a judgment was wrong. "It's really important that central banks, when they've made a mistake, just front up and say 'look we made this judgment. We were clear on the judgment we made and it hasn't panned out that way so we're changing how we view things'. I think there's been a reluctance to do that in recent times … and I think that's a shame because it really is important." The Reserve Bank said, when the economic outlook could be at a turning point, the committee might use a "hawks and doves" exercise. "One MPC adviser would play the role of the 'Hawk', presenting all analysis that would support contractionary monetary policy, and then another would play the role of the 'Dove', presenting all analysis that would support expansionary monetary policy. This exercise aims to challenge the status quo and encourage wider deliberations." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
