Longtime AP journalist Paul Shin, who covered South Korea's turbulent modern history, dies at 84
Shin, who spent about a decade mentoring reporters at South Korea's Yonhap news agency after retiring from the AP in 2003, had dealt with various health issues in recent years, including a worsening spinal condition. He died Tuesday morning at his home in Seongnam city, surrounded by his family, said his son, John Shin.
Paul Shin, whose Korean name is Shin Ho-chul, landed his first reporting job in 1965 with the Seoul-based English-language daily, Korea Herald, and later worked as a correspondent for United Press International before joining the AP in 1986.
He covered many of the defining events that shaped post-war South Korea, from the era of harsh military dictatorships through the 1980s, to its dramatic economic ascent, the global spotlight of the 1988 Seoul Olympics and the turbulent cycles of confrontation and reconciliation with its war-divided rival, North Korea.
Shin was also part of a team of AP reporters led by Choe Sang-Hun, Charles J. Hanley, Martha Mendoza and Randy Herschaft who spent several years investigating the 1950 killing of Korean War refugees by U.S. troops in the South Korean village of No Gun Ri . The series won the 2000 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting.
In past interviews with local media, Shin recalled the early challenges of being one of the few international wire reporters in the country, navigating limited access to phones and wireless equipment and racing other reporters to secure telegram lines to file breaking news and claim scoops.
Shin spoke about the challenges of covering the 1973 abduction of pro-democracy dissident Kim Dae-jung, who later became president and won the 2000 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to engage with North Korea. He also recalled the tensions between Washington and Seoul following the 1979 coup by Maj. Gen. Chun Doo-hwan, who ruled South Korea with an iron fist until 1987, when massive protests forced his government to concede and accept free presidential elections.
'Until the mid-1970s, there wasn't much internationally relevant news coming out of South Korea beyond tensions with North Korea, crackdowns on opposition parties, and student protests … This inevitably contributed to a negative international perception of the country,' Shin told Yonhap in 2003. 'The news became more diverse after the late 1980s, thanks to developments like economic growth and hosting the Olympics.'
John Shin remembered his father as a 'very warm and responsible person.'
'He frequently emphasized how important it is to communicate South Korea's reality to the world and often expressed hope that younger generations of journalists would continue that role, especially now with South Korea being viewed through a more global lens,' John Shin said.
Paul Shin is survived by his wife, his son John, his daughter-in-law, and two grandchildren. The family is holding funeral services at Seoul's St. Mary's Hospital through Thursday morning.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Jasmine Crockett proclaims she hates the Heritage Foundation ‘with everything in my body'
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, said that she hates The Heritage Foundation 'with everything in my body' during recent remarks she gave during a panel at the Martha's Vineyard African American Film Festival. 'People don't understand how terrible the Heritage Foundation is when I tell you I hate them with everything in my body,' Crockett said last week during a panel conversation with MSNBC's Al Sharpton and Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass. The conversation was advertised as 'an inspiring fireside chat, where they'll explore the power of joy as a political act, cultural anchor, and driving force behind justice, storytelling, and community transformation.' During Crockett's remarks about hating The Heritage Foundation, Pressley interjected, saying, 'Project 2025, they laid it all out,' appearing to refer to a list of policy recommendations put forth by various conservative organizations, including The Heritage Foundation. Crockett then went out to blast The Heritage Foundation's work. 3 Rep. Jasmine Crockett said she hates The Heritage Foundation 'with everything in my body' while speaking at the Martha's Vineyard African American Film Festival. Getty Images 'So, Heritage Foundation has been around for a very long time,' Crockett said. 'And yes, we became familiar with Project 2025. We probably became familiar a little too late, but nevertheless, other work that they did and other work that they're doing is something that we don't do. One of the things that they do is they constantly are doing polling, but besides doing polling, they do focus groups.' She also voiced her disapproval of heartbeat bill legislation that makes it illegal to have an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. 3 Crockett made comments at the festival that they have laid out Project 2025 into the mainstream. AP The Supreme Court's June 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision ended the recognition that abortion is a constitutional right and gave the states the power to determine what their abortion laws would be. Crockett said The Heritage Foundation is using focus groups to change public opinion. 'But what they did is, they were listening to these focus groups, and they were trying to figure out how can we get people emotionally aroused,' Crockett said. 3 Crockett called out the organization, saying all they do is 'polling' and that the way they operate as a group is similar to that of a car dealership. AP She then said The Heritage Foundation is operating similar to a car dealership. 'And it's just like when you think about when you're going in to buy a car knowing you don't need that car but it smells good, it look good, you get real emotional,' Crockett said. 'And we actually have laws in most states that allow for you to come down from the high and allow you to take that car back. So when we allow ourselves to just get very emotional, then all logic is out the window.'
The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
After uproar, documentary on Hamas 2023 attack will screen at Toronto Film Festival
NEW YORK (AP) — The Toronto International Film Festival will screen a documentary on the 2023 Hamas attack, after all, following an uproar over the film's disinvitation from the upcoming festival. Earlier this week, TIFF withdrew its invitation to the film 'The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue.' The festival said the decision was based in part on legal clearance for footage used in the documentary. Deadline, which first reported the news, said a sticking point was the identification and legal clearance of Hamas militants' own livestreaming of the attack. On Thursday evening, TIFF chief executive Cameron Bailey and 'The Road Between Us' filmmaker Barry Avrich issued a joint statement announcing the film's selection. 'Both TIFF and the filmmakers have heard the pain and frustration expressed by the public and we want to address this together,' said Bailey and Avrich. 'We have worked together to find a resolution to satisfy important safety, legal, and programming concerns.' 'In this case, TIFF's communication around its requirements did not clearly articulate the concerns and roadblocks that arose and for that, we are sorry,' they continued. The film chronicles the story of retired Israeli Gen. Noam Tibon, whose efforts to save his family and others during the Oct. 7, 2023 attack was profiled in a '60 Minutes' segment. After being informed that the film wouldn't screen at the festival, the 'Road Between Us' filmmakers issued a statement claiming TIFF 'censored its own programming by refusing the film.' Bailey disputed that allegation, and pleaded that the situation demanded sensitivity. 'The events of October 7, 2023, and the ongoing suffering in Gaza weigh heavily on us, underscoring the urgent need for compassion amid rising antisemitism and Islamophobia,' Bailey said on Wednesday.
CNN
7 minutes ago
- CNN
As South Korea's population falls, its military is shrinking rapidly. Is that a problem as North Korea ramps up forces?
The writing has been on the wall for a long time: South Korea's birth rate has dropped throughout much of the past decade, spelling trouble for the military as regional threats and global conflicts simmer. Now, a new report has found that the number of South Korean troops declined by 20% in the past six years, in large part because of the dwindling pool of young men – reflecting the shrinking workforce and swelling elderly population in one of the world's most rapidly aging countries. The Defense Ministry report attributed the drop to 'complex factors' including population decline and fewer men wanting to become officers due to 'soldier treatment.' The report didn't elaborate on that treatment but studies and surveys have previously highlighted the military's notoriously harsh conditions. As of July, the military had 450,000 troops, it said – down from 563,000 in 2019. 'If the number of standing army (members) continues to decline, there can be difficulties in securing elite manpower and limits in operating equipment,' warned the report, shared last week by lawmaker Choo Mi-ae. The news comes at a bad time for South Korea, a key Western ally which hosts huge numbers of US troops and has a mutual defense treaty with Washington. Just across the border, neighboring North Korea has sent tens of thousands of soldiers to fight for Russia along the front lines with Ukraine – raising fears that Moscow may share advanced military technology with Pyongyang in exchange, violating international sanctions. Meanwhile, North Korea's ruling Kim family has continued blasting hostile rhetoric, threatening to destroy South Korea with nuclear weapons if attacked and warning that Seoul remains 'the enemy.' However, experts say, that doesn't necessarily mean North Korea's military is better off. The North is facing its own population woes and birth rate decline – and its technology lags far behind the South, which is now hoping to plug the shortfall in military recruits through innovation. 'South Korea is incomparably far ahead of North Korea in terms of conventional weapons,' said Choi Byung-ook, a national security professor at Sangmyung University. 'We have smaller troops now, but I like to say 'small but strong military,' that's what we need to become.' On the surface, North Korea has a few advantages. It's one of the world's most heavily militarized nations, with up to 1.3 million armed forces personnel, according to the CIA World Factbook. That's nearly three times higher than South Korea's troop numbers. Those troops also serve in the military for far longer – an average of 10 years, which allows them to have higher 'unit cohesion (and) knowledge of each other's capabilities,' said Sydney Seiler, senior adviser to the Korea Chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. By contrast, there's 'really not much advanced skills that you can develop' within the year and a half that most South Korean conscripts serve, Seiler said. North Korea's fertility rate – defined as the average number of children born to a woman in her lifetime – is also far higher, at 1.77 in 2025 compared to South Korea's rate of 0.75, UN data shows. The North has been having more babies per year than the South since 2018, said Jooyung Lee, senior economist at the Bank of Korea Economic Research Institute. But the full picture is more complicated, experts told CNN. For one, South Korea has a reserve force of about 3.1 million men. While their training may be basic, it would give them the numbers needed for potential warfare – and that's not including the 28,500 US troops stationed in the country. Pyongyang is also facing its own population problems, with its fertility rate dipping in the last few years after the pandemic. The nation's authoritarian leader, Kim Jong Un, pointed to the problem at a national conference of mothers in 2023, urging them to 'give birth to many children' as a patriotic duty. That could bode ill for a highly isolated nation with an economy that relies on labor-intensive industries like agriculture and mining, said Lee. It's hard to tell how much this has impacted the North Korean military so far. But the fact that Pyongyang has sent tens of thousands of troops to fight for Russia suggests Kim 'doesn't feel concerned about not having enough soldiers on board to do the task of defending the homeland,' Seiler said. Their military has also enlisted more women to fill whatever gaps do exist. This trend began near the turn of the century after a previous dip in fertility, Lee said, with the proportion of female recruits now reaching as high as 20% by some estimates. Many are younger women serving in the military's communications, administrative and anti-aircraft artillery sectors, said Lee, who has interviewed many North Korean refugees who fled the country. Meanwhile, middle-aged and older women have been mobilized to fill gaps in other civilian sectors. By contrast, women are not conscripted in South Korea – a controversial point that has stoked resentment among some young Korean men who argue their mandatory service puts them at a disadvantage in their studies, careers and personal lives. As of 2023, volunteer females accounted for only 3.6% of the entire military, according to the Defense Ministry. Some experts have suggested that conscripting more women could solve South Korea's problem, which the Defense Ministry has not ruled out. But Choi, the national security professor, argued the country needs to move away from the idea of increasing its manpower – and instead focus on advancing its technology and making the troops elite. 'I don't personally agree with opinions that we must have a large number of troops because North Korea does,' he said. 'The size of our troops has decreased and there are not many options to increase it … I think we need to take this crisis as an opportunity as South Korea is in the route of becoming a science technology powerhouse.' On the battlefields of Europe, Ukraine has shown firsthand how an out-manned and out-gunned military can still hold back and inflict painful losses on a much larger opponent by embracing new and affordable technology. Tools like drones and cyber-warfare could help decrease South Korea's reliance on infantry and artillery, Seiler said. AI-assisted and autonomous systems could further boost a shrinking military, said Leif-Eric Easley, a professor of international studies at Ewha Womans University in Seoul. Choi pointed out that South Korea spends far more on defense than the North, and conducts many military drills including with allies like the US – making it better equipped in overall combat readiness. However, Seiler warned, at the end of the day 'you still need people. There's no robots or automation that can replace a trained soldier, airman, marine.' Easley agreed, saying South Korea's military would still face shortages in manpower in the event of war. And a broader challenge remains: how do authorities change cultural attitudes toward the military within South Korea? While people can volunteer to become professional cadres who serve longer terms and train with more advanced weapons, the number of applicants has dropped steadily over the years. High-profile cases of hazing, bullying and harassment within the South Korean military may have contributed to negative perceptions of the force. In recent years, the government has loosened restrictions on conscripts – including allowing them to use cell phones at certain times of the day – and offered a longer civilian service alternative to conscription. But that's not enough, said Choi. 'We need to improve military welfare and fighting spirits as a whole,' he said – adding that supporting the current size of the military will become even harder in the coming decades as the population declines further. 'By 2040s, even maintaining 350,000 troops will be difficult, and that is why we need to establish an optimized manpower structure system … as soon as possible.'
