Lecturers to be consulted on industrial action following ‘derisory' pay offer
Members of the Educational Institute of Scotland University Lecturers' Association (EIS ULA) are taking part in a consultative ballot on whether to accept the proposed offer, and whether they back industrial action.
The ballot will be open for six weeks and will close on August 11.
The EIS ULA, which is open to all university lecturers in Scotland, has called on its members to reject what it called a 'real-terms pay cut' and back industrial action.
It said the offer 'fails to recognise' the contribution made by university lecturers, or make up for years of below-inflation pay rises.
It also called on employers to return to the negotiating table with a 'significantly improved' offer, warning of 'widespread disruption' if industrial action were to take place.
Garry Ross, EIS ULA national officer, said: 'This 1.4% offer is not just disappointing, it is derisory and does not reflect the dedication and expertise of our university lecturers and academic-related members.
'Our members are working harder than ever, delivering world-class education and research, yet their financial security continues to be undermined by employers who appear unwilling to offer a fair deal.
'This offer fails to recognise the essential contributions of our members and does nothing to address the severe impact of rising living costs or the sub-inflationary rises they have experienced over a number of years.'
The union said the offer stood in 'stark contrast' to the 4.14% increase given to further education lecturers, and to pay awards made to NHS workers and other public sector employees across Scotland.
It said this disparity highlighted a 'clear injustice' within higher education, and demonstrated the need for a more equitable approach to staff pay,
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Staffing and operational matters are the responsibility of individual universities.
'The Scottish Government is not directly involved in higher education pay negotiations, but we are absolutely clear that Fair Work must be the guiding principle for all employment-related decisions, and we continue to urge university management and the respective trade unions to reach decisions that ensure employees are treated fairly.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Minister has ‘significant and deep concerns' about Ash Regan's prostitution Bill
A Scottish Government minister has highlighted 'significant and deep concerns' about a new Bill which could quash convictions for those involved in prostitution. Siobhian Brown raised concerns about the move – which is part of legislation put forward by Alba MSP Ash Regan as part of her Bill to criminalise the buying of sex. The community safety minister insisted that quashing convictions was an 'exceptional' measure and 'not a step that can be taken lightly'. While Brown acknowledged Holyrood had passed legislation to quash convictions of those caught up in the Post Office Horizon scandal, she said the cost of this was 'estimated to be £804,000 based on 200 people'. PA Media Community safety minister Siobhian Brown wrote to MSPs on the Criminal Justice Committee setting out the Government's initial view on the Bill (Jane Barlow/PA) She noted that documents submitted as part of Regan's Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill suggested that since 1982 a total of 10,459 women have been convicted of soliciting. With these documents also indicating that Police Scotland 'currently holds 2,773 case records involving 791 individuals', Brown said this 'raises some concerns about the accuracy of the associated costs – around £250,000 – detailed in the Bill's financial memorandum'. Her comments came in a letter to Holyrood's Criminal Justice Committee, which is due to scrutinise the legislation the Alba MSP has put forward. She went on to state there was 'insufficient detail' on how proposals to provide support to those involved in prostitution to help them change their lifestyle 'would work in practice', including how long such measures would be available for and what the costs would be. Regan's member's Bill also sets out to criminalise those buying sex while decriminalising those selling it. Under the proposals, those convicted of buying sex could be fined up to £10,000 if the case was prosecuted in the sheriff courts – with these courts also able to impose jail sentences of up to six months. Brown stressed that while the Scottish Government backed the 'underlying intent of the Bill to challenge men's demand and to tackle commercial sexual exploitation', she added there were still 'significant questions and concerns regarding the measures within the Bill and how they would work in practice, the extent to which they would deliver on the policy intent, and the associated financial implications'. Her comments came after a paper published last week by the Scottish Government said evidence was 'limited' on the impact of these 'challenging demand approaches'. In the wake of that, sex worker safety charity National Ugly Mugs urged MSPs to 'pull the plug' on Regan's 'misguided and dangerous' Bill. Chief executive Lynsey Walton said: 'Sex worker groups, alongside leading NGOs like Amnesty and the World Health Organisation, have long warned that criminalising the purchase of sex only serves to make life more difficult and dangerous for sex workers, while having no impact on trafficking and exploitation. 'We are pleased that the Scottish Government has now accepted that the international evidence backs this up. 'MSPs now need to pull the plug on Ms Regan's misguided and dangerous legislation, and focus on supporting sex workers' rights to work safely and free from stigma.' Regan has been contacted for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Scotland's hefty benefits bill is no badge of honour – it's a mark of shame for SNP
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) HAVING a massive benefits bill is not something to be proud of – it is a sign of a failing society. But for some reason, Scotland's increasing dependence on social security has become the subject of bragging rights for the SNP Government. 2 Scotland's benefits bill is not something to be proud of, writes Chris Musson Credit: Alamy 2 Scotland's dependence on social security is the subject of bragging rights for the SNP Credit: PA It is a policy based on optics, on PR, on quick wins, and on narrow, nationalistic posturing. Pretty much anything apart from society's long-term health. It can be largely summed up by this: SNP chiefs want to show everyone how much more generous and compassionate they are than those dastardly scoundrels at Westminster. Presently, Nats ministers are in their element, due to Labour's civil war over UK Government welfare reforms, which aim to cut £5billion a year from the benefits bill and get more people back into work. Last week, when the SNP weren't claiming the Westminster move would push families into poverty, they were boasting about how much cash is dished out by the Scottish Government on devolved payments. So, a press release trumpeted £6billion handed out by their fledgling agency, Social Security Scotland, in its first years of existence following the devolution of a string of benefits. 'More than £6billion has been paid to help people with cost of living', the announcement said. This cynical wording aimed to make people think these were cost of living payments in the same vein as the cash which came for fuel bills from the UK Government a couple of years ago. It's not, though, this is money paid for standard benefits — now 14 of them — delivered by Scottish Government's Social Security Scotland since 2018. If you think that sounds like a lot, look away now. Because given the amount of benefits now kicking in at the devolved agency, with its 4,200 staff and £321million running costs, it is set to spend £7.7billion next year alone — and £9.5billion a year by 2030. Find out what's really going on Register now for our free weekly politics newsletter for an insightful and irreverent look at the (sometimes excruciating) world of Scottish Politics. Every Thursday our hotshot politics team goes behind the headlines to bring you a rundown of key events - plus insights and gossip from the corridors of power, including a 'Plonker' and 'Star' of the Week. Sign up now and make sure you don't miss a beat. The politicians would hate that. SIGN UP FOR FREE NOW Most of this is for Scottish versions of Westminster payments, but extra benefits paid out by Scotland under devolution total £1.3billion a year, rising to a future £2.1billion. At Westminster, those reforms by Labour aim to cut reliance on Personal Independence Payments and get people — who can — back into work. At Holyrood, the Scottish version of PIP — Adult Disability Payment — is costing £3.6billion a year, and forecast to hit £5.4billion by 2030. This includes the thousands of adults now getting ADP for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder — many claimants having been farmed by money-making websites who take a slice after helping people with applications. So, while Westminster tried to scale back on welfare, Holyrood is scaling up. In the words of Social Security Scotland, this is all in the name of 'a human rights based approach' to 'demonstrate dignity, fairness and respect in all our actions'. Well, there's a fine line between compassion and being a walkover, and SNP ministers may well have crossed that threshold already. The Scottish Government seems to be ideologically opposed to paying less in benefits, because in their eyes, benefits are inherently a great thing. And they are especially great when it makes them look more generous than Westminster. But what is the endgame here? Before SNP ministers got powers over welfare, Scotland's disproportionate reliance on social security compared to the rest of Britain was universally regarded as a bad thing. In the early 2010s, levels of disability benefits claimed per person in Scotland were 22 per cent higher than Great Britain as a whole, figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show. This was fuelled by higher rates of people with health problems limiting their daily activities. Scotland had long been dubbed the 'sick man of Europe'. On some measures, we still are. Yet now, maintaining and increasing payments is the overwhelming focus of the devolved government, not actually getting people better and getting them to work. Where is the long-term plan to better the health and wealth of the nation, rather than fostering an increasingly unaffordable reliance on welfare? Sometimes, I'm not sure they're particularly interested. Last year, the SNP defaulted to its usual scornfulness when ex-Labour MSP Des McNulty pointed out in a study for a think-tank that the Scottish Government's new Scottish Child Payment benefit might not be the bees knees after all. His report pointed out — sensibly — that perhaps throwing money at a broad group of people may not work in the long term. That money could be better targeted on the very poorest, he said, and moreover we needed to invest in the 'complex roots of poverty' by helping people back into work, for example. McNulty hit the nail on the head with the mention of 'complex'. Because sorting this out is complicated. It requires serious thought and time. SCOTTISH Tory MSP Alexander Stewart missed his first shadow cabinet meeting after being named social justice spokesman — as he was singing for the Holyrood choir. Stewart was busy doing a solo performance of 'Where I Want To Be' from the musical Chess. And it turned out that where he wanted to be was anywhere but in a meeting with leader Russell Findlay. Elsewhere in parly's final week before its ten-week summer break (yes, really), angry MSPs spent an hour debating the 'menace 'of seagulls. It was left to SNP's Christine Grahame to urge calm, saying the issue must not be styled as 'people versus gulls'. A bit late, given the ferocity of the debate. Throwing £27.15 per child per week at low-income families is simple and comes with bonus political points. Some people will always need help if they are genuinely unable to work due to disability, for example. But a society which becomes increasingly reliant on welfare is failing. Failing to get people into work, failing to get them better if they're ill. Failing to get them motivated, if they can't be bothered to work. Failing to educate and inspire kids for their prospects, and failing to get the economy going and create decent jobs. A big benefits bill is not a badge of honour to be press released. It's a mark of shame. Ministers must show more ambition because at the moment, the ambition seems to be a nation of layabouts.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Expansion boost into Hamilton for female business leaders' initiative
An event taking place in the town's Barncluith Business Centre on Thursday, July 3, from 9.30am to noon. New networking initiative Women Can Grow Community is expanding into Lanarkshire after a successful launch in Glasgow. Offering peer-to-peer support to help female business owners with their strategic growth plans, the programme was set up by business support agency Inspirent and kicked off to great acclaim a number of weeks ago. In the wake of the positive feedback, Inspirent is to break new ground by hosting the first gathering of its type in Hamilton, the event taking place in the town's Barncluith Business Centre on Thursday, July 3, from 9.30am to noon. Inspirent chief executive Liz McCutcheon said: 'Following the successful launch of our Women Can Grow Community, we are delighted to be staging it for the first time in Hamilton. 'We will be bringing another blend of sessions focusing on health, sharpening the mindset, confidence and practical business skills – all important elements for anyone looking to build a business successfully.' Thursday's event will include a session on guided meditation with sound healing by Deborah Cunningham of Flourish with Deborah, while Inspirent's Lorraine Maginnis will deliver a session on addressing the barriers to growth that women have identified and on the back of that will look at building confidence and mindset. Rachel Sharp, also from Inspirent, will lead a Canva-focused practical business skills workshop. Inspirent is a key delivery partner for the Scottish Government and will be administering the £700,000 Ecosystem Fund in the coming months - and earlier this year completed a three-month Holyrood-funded practical support programme, Pathways Women Can Grow, for women business owners. 'All women in business are welcome to attend what we believe is not your average networking club,' added Mrs McCutcheon. 'From start-ups to well established companies, there will be something for everyone. 'Life-changing is a strong phrase but that is exactly what some have been saying about both the Pathways and Community initiatives.' And did you know Lanarkshire Live is on Facebook? Head on over and give us a like and share!
