
Judge gives ex-officer nearly 3 years in Breonna Taylor raid, rebuffs DOJ call for no prison time
Brett Hankison, who fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone, was the only officer on the scene charged in the Black woman's death in 2020. He is the first person sentenced to prison in the case that rocked the city of Louisville and spawned weeks of street protests over police brutality five years ago.
U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings sentenced Hankison at a hearing Monday afternoon in which she said no prison time 'is not appropriate' for Hankison. She also said she was 'startled' that there weren't more people injured in the raid.
She sentenced him to 33 months in prison as well as three years of supervised probation. Hankison will not report directly to prison. Jennings said the Bureau of Prisons will determine where and when he starts his sentence.
Jennings expressed disappointment with federal prosecutors' sentencing memo filed last week, saying the Justice Department treated Hankison's actions as 'an inconsequential crime,' and said the memo was 'incongruous and inappropriate.'
Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who helped Taylor's family secure a $12 million wrongful death settlement against the city of Louisville and was present Mondya, had called the Justice Department recommendation 'an insult to the life of Breonna Taylor and a blatant betrayal of the jury's decision.'
He said Monday afternoon that he had hoped Hankison would get more time. But, he said: 'We are grateful that he is at least going to prison and has to think for those 3 years about Breonna Taylor and that her life mattered.'
And afterward, before a crowd gathered outside the courthouse, Crump yelled: 'Say Her name.' The crowd yelled back: 'Breonna Taylor!'
Hankison fired his weapon the night of the March 2020 botched drug raid, his shot flying through the walls of Taylor's apartment into a neighboring apartment without hitting or injuring anyone.
The 26-year-old's death, along with the May 2020 police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, sparked racial injustice protests nationwide that year.
Last week, the U.S. Justice Department recommended no prison time for Hankison, in an abrupt about-face by federal prosecutors that has angered critics after the department spent years prosecuting the former detective.
The Justice Department, which has changed leadership under President Donald Trump since Hankison's conviction, said in a sentencing memo last week that 'there is no need for a prison sentence to protect the public' from Hankison. Federal prosecutors suggested time already served, which amounts to one day, and three years of supervised probation.
Prosecutors at his previous federal trials aggressively pursued a conviction against Hankison, 49, arguing that he blindly fired 10 shots into Taylor's windows without identifying a target. Taylor was shot in her hallway by two other officers after her boyfriend fired from inside the apartment, striking an officer in the leg. Neither of the other officers was charged in state or federal court after prosecutors deemed they were justified in returning fire into the apartment. Louisville police used a drug warrant to enter the apartment, but found no drugs or cash inside.
A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison in 2023, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022.
In their recent sentencing memo, federal prosecutors wrote that though Hankison's 'response in these fraught circumstances was unreasonable given the benefit of hindsight, that unreasonable response did not kill or wound Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend, her neighbors, defendant's fellow officers, or anyone else.'
On Monday, the Louisville Metro Police Department arrested four people in front of the courthouse who it said were 'creating confrontation, kicking vehicles, or otherwise creating an unsafe environment.' Authorities didn't list the charges those arrested would face.
'We understand this case caused pain and damaged trust between our department and the community,' a police statement said. 'We particularly respect and value the 1st Amendment. However, what we saw today in front of the courthouse in the street was not safe, acceptable or legal.'
A U.S. Probation Office presentencing report had said Hankison should face a range of 135 to 168 months imprisonment on the excessive force conviction, according to the memo. But federal prosecutors said multiple factors — including that Hankison's two other trials ended with no convictions — should greatly reduce the potential punishment.
The memorandum was submitted by Harmeet Dhillon, chief of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division and a Trump political appointee who in May moved to cancel settlements with Louisville and Minneapolis that had called for overhauling their police departments.
In the Taylor case, three other ex-Louisville police officers have been charged with crafting a falsified warrant, but have not gone to trial. None were at the scene when Taylor was shot.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
20 minutes ago
- Washington Post
He traveled to Italy to master this dying art. Now he's brought it back to Brooklyn.
Opinion | This is why the media should not replay viral videos of black men being killed June 10, 2020


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
This woman claims Air Canada discriminated against her in a case of ‘flying while Black.' Now her human rights complaint could set a precedent
Months after a knee surgery, June Francis booked a business-class flight from Vancouver for a conference in Toronto, the first leg of a work trip that would also include the U.S. and Peru. Having waited in the 'exceptionally long line' at check-in for business passengers, the 62-year-old Jamaican Canadian said she approached the economy area and attempted to ask an Air Canada staffer for help, out of concern about standing too long on her replaced knees. But what happened next would lead to a complaint that is believed to be the first case of 'flying while Black' that reaches a full hearing before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. According to the claim by Francis, an international business professor at Simon Fraser University, the following verbal exchange ensued between her and the Air Canada check-in agent on March 1, 2018, at Vancouver International Airport. 'I have a question. I am a business class passenger and the lineup is really long,' Francis said, as she quotes in her complaint. 'What is your advice to me …' 'Don't ask me,' the ticket agent cut her off and yelled. 'Just get in the line,' added the agent before tending to other passengers in what Francis described as 'a kind and caring manner.' Embarrassed and humiliated, Francis said she believed the Air Canada employee treated her differently because she was Black, and asked the agent to give her name or identifying number so she could report her 'outrageous' behaviour to management. When the agent refused, Francis took out her cellphone to photograph her. She said in her claim that was the only way of identifying the agent to a superior. For that, Francis later had her boarding pass taken away and was told by a customer service manager — accompanied by an airport security guard — that she would not be allowed on the flight unless she deleted the agent's photos. Feeling threatened, Francis complied. On Monday, more than seven years after the encounter — which the airline said was due to Francis's unruly behaviour — July 28 the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal will hear her discrimination case against Air Canada. At issue is whether Canada's Human Rights Act trumps the Montreal Convention, an international treaty that governs airline liability for international flights but does not provide for damages of any kind for discrimination. Francis and her counsel, Sujit Choudhry and Mani Kakkar, declined the Star's interview request, but issued a statement. 'This is a test case about Flying While Black in international air travel,' the statement said. 'It is also a crucial test case for the effectiveness of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It will decide if airlines can ever be liable to pay damages for discrimination for international flights.' Air Canada told the Star it is contesting Francis's allegations of discrimination and declined further comment. However, in its submissions to the tribunal, Air Canada said Francis ignored and refused instructions by its staff, and acted in 'an unruly manner,' escalating the situation 'unnecessarily.' 'A primary role and paramount objective of Air Canada's employees working a flight, including its check-in agents, is to ensure safety and security with respect to the ultimate boarding of passengers and the atmosphere in the cabin of the aircraft,' the airline said in a response to the tribunal. In her complaint, Francis said both the Air Canada supervisor and the security guard ignored her complaint of mistreatment and the reason for photographing the check-in agent. 'It became clear that both of these people were not interested in taking Dr. Francis's complaint seriously and had made their decision that Dr. Francis was at fault,' the claim said. 'The supervisor went so far as to say she could see the problem was because clearly Dr. Francis did not take direction.' According to the claim, Francis then asked which law was being broken by taking a picture in a public space, and the supervisor said she had a right to have it deleted because of the possibility of social media getting a hold of the image. Francis subsequently wrote to Air Canada and received a response that she said did not address the issues or indicate an investigation was undertaken. She said the airline did not contact her for her account of the event, nor did it contact a Caucasian passenger, who witnessed the interaction, tried to intervene and left his business card for reference. ('The supervisor changed her demeanour and behaved with a respectful manner toward this white male which she had not demonstrated in her behaviour toward Dr. Francis,' the complainant alleged.) In seeking damages in the amount of $40,000, Francis also requests Air Canada institute sensitivity training and training in unconscious bias, anti-racism and anti-sexism, as well conducting an audit of its services to ensure it treats racialized passengers with respect and sensitivity. In its defence, Air Canada said the check-in line agent requested the assistance of the manager because she was faced with a passenger who was 'demanding and unwilling and refusing to follow instructions' in an unusually busy check-in area. It said both the agent and the manager were of Asian descent. In its submission, the airline flagged the complainant's resumé, which included being the special adviser to Simon Fraser University's president on anti-racism, director of the university's Institute for Diaspora Research & Engagement, co-founder of its Black Caucus, and board chair of the Hogan's Alley Society, a group with the mandate to advance the economic and cultural well-being of people of African descent. 'There will be no evidence to support let alone prove 'anti-Black racism,' 'conscious and unconscious bias,' and 'systemic and institutional and structural racial discrimination,' ' Air Canada said in its defence. 'These allegations of the Complaint are disproportionate and untethered to the factual circumstances and serve to fit the agenda of the Complainant, whose career is focused on promoting these issues.' Air Canada also argued that the tribunal cannot award damages because a claim against an air carrier is governed by the Montreal Convention, which is a standard liability regime for death and injury, damage or loss of baggage and flight delay in international travel. Given Francis's itinerary, her journey was deemed international, said the airline. However, Choudhry, lawyer for Francis, argued in her submissions that Canada's Human Rights Act is a quasi-constitutional statute and must trump the Montreal Convention, which should be deemed unconstitutional if it denies the tribunal the power to award damages to victims of discrimination. 'Every person has a right to be free from discrimination in international travel,' said Francis's statement to the Star. 'For Canada's diasporas, international air travel is not a luxury. They must travel for family, economic and cultural reasons. They should be secure in the knowledge that if airlines discriminate against them, they have the right to damages.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Darren Walker's new book is still hopeful despite growing inequality as he leaves Ford Foundation
NEW YORK (AP) — Darren Walker needed to be convinced of his new book's relevance. The outgoing Ford Foundation president feared that 'The Idea of America,' set to publish in September just before he leaves the nonprofit, risked feeling disjointed. In more than eight dozen selected texts dating back to 2013, he reflects on everything from his path as a Black, gay child from rural Texas into the halls of premiere American philanthropies to his solutions for reversing the deepening inequality of our 'new Gilded Age.' 'To be clear, not everything I said and wrote over the last 12 years is worthy of publication,' Walker said. A point of great regret, he said, is that he finds American democracy weaker now than when he started. Younger generations lack access to the same 'mobility escalator' that he rode from poverty. And he described President Donald Trump's administration's first six months as 'disorienting' for a sector he successfully pushed to adopt more ambitious and just funding practices. Despite that bleak picture, Walker embraces the characterization of his upcoming collection as patriotic. 'My own journey in America leaves me no option but to be hopeful because I have lived in a country that believed in me,' he said. Walker recently discussed his tenure and the book's call for shared values with the Associated Press inside his Ford Foundation office — where an enlarged picture of a Black child taken by Malian portrait photographer Seydou Keïta still hangs, one of many underrepresented artists' works that populated the headquarters under his leadership. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity. Q: Upon becoming Ford Foundation's president, you suggested that 'our most important job is to work ourselves out of a job' — a 2013 statement you include in the book. How would you grade your efforts? A: The past 12 years have been both exhilarating and exhausting. Exhilarating because there's never been a more exciting time to be in philanthropy. And exhausting because the political, socioeconomic dynamics of the last 12 years are very worrisome for our future. Philanthropy can play a role in helping to strengthen our democracy. But philanthropy can't save America. I would probably give myself a B or a B-. I don't think where we are as a nation after 12 years is where any country would want to be that had its eye on the future and the strength of our democracy. Q: Is there anything you would do differently? A: In 2013 and those early speeches, I identified growing inequality as a challenge to the strength of our democracy. And a part of that manifestation of growing inequality was a growing sense of disaffection — from our politics, our institutions, our economy. For the first time, a decade or so ago, we had clear evidence that working class white households were increasingly downwardly mobile economically. And the implications for that are deep and profound for our politics and our democracy. We started a program on increasing our investments in rural America, acknowledging some of the challenges, for example, of the trends around the impacts of the opioid epidemic on those communities. I underestimated the depth and the collective sense of being left behind. Even though I think I was correct in diagnosing the problem, I think the strategy to respond was not focused enough on this population. Q: Many people credit you for using Ford Foundation's endowment to increase grantmaking during the pandemic. Is that sort of creativity needed now with the new strains faced by the philanthropic sector? A: One of the disappointments I have with philanthropy is that we don't take enough risk. We don't innovate given the potential to use our capital to provide solutions. I do think that, in the coming years, foundations are going to be challenged to step up and lean in in ways that we haven't since the pandemic. The 5% payout is treated as a ceiling by a lot of foundations and, in fact, it's a floor. During these times when there's so much accumulated wealth sitting in our endowments, the public rightly is asking questions about just how much of that we are using and towards what end. Q: Where do you derive this sense of 'radical hope' at the end of your book? A: As a poor kid in rural Texas, I was given the license to dream. In fact, I was encouraged to dream and to believe that it will be possible for me to overcome the circumstances into which I was born. I've lived on both sides of the line of inequality. And I feel incredibly fortunate. But I'm also sobered by the gap between the privileged and the poor and the working-class people in America. It has widened during my lifetime and that is something I worry a lot about. But I'm hopeful because I think about my ancestors who were Black, enslaved, poor. African Americans, Black people, Black Americans have been hopeful for 400 years and have been patriots in believing in the possibility that this country would realize its aspirations for equality and justice. That has been our North Star. Q: Heather Gerken, the dean of Yale's law school, was recently named as your successor. Why is it important to have a leader with a legal background and an expertise in democracy? A: She is the perfect leader for Ford because she understands that at the center of our work must be a belief in democracy and democratic institutions and processes. She is also a bridge builder. She is a coalition builder. She's bold and courageous. I'm just thrilled about her taking the helm of the Ford Foundation. It is a signal from the Ford Foundation Board of Trustees that we are going to double down on our investment and our commitment to strengthening, protecting and promoting democracy. Q: Youtold AP last year that, when you exited this building for the last time, you'd only be looking forward. What does 'forward' mean to you now? A: I have resolved that I don't want to be a president or a CEO. I don't need to be a president of CEO. I think leaders can become nostalgic and hold onto their own history. Now there's no doubt, I know, that my obituary is going to say, 'Darren Walker, the president of the Ford Foundation.' That's the most important job I'll ever have. But hopefully I'll be able to add some more important work to that. ___