logo
A weaponized AI chatbot is flooding city councils with climate misinformation

A weaponized AI chatbot is flooding city councils with climate misinformation

Ilustration by Ata Ojani.
Keep climate a national priority — donate today
Goal: $150k
$141k
One morning in October of 2024, Fredericton city councillor Margo Sheppard received an email with the subject line: 'The Real Policy Crisis: Prioritizing 'Nature' Over People.' It was polished — almost algorithmically smooth — and it calmly urged her to reconsider Fredericton's net-zero policies.
Over the next month, a flood of similar emails followed, all aimed at getting Fredericton to abandon global climate targets. Sheppard is used to emails from organizations on all kinds of issues, but not this many, not on this issue — and not so well crafted. She grew suspicious.
'If we're getting them in Fredericton,' Sheppard thought, 'councillors all across the country must be getting them too.'
She was right. Thousands of councillors in more than 500 municipalities have received these emails, according to KICLEI, the group behind them, whose name mimics the international environmental network ICLEI. Screenshots of KICLEI's internal database show the email addresses of local officials nationwide.
An investigation by Canada's National Observer has now traced the digital infrastructure behind KICLEI's campaign: a custom AI chatbot designed to express fears about United Nations control using moderate, civic language — messaging that is now shaping real decisions in town halls across Canada.
At least 14 municipal halls have received KICLEI presentations, with Thorold, Ont., already voting to withdraw from Canada's flagship municipal net-zero scheme, Partners for Climate Protection. This month, Lethbridge, Alberta, voted to cut its governmental emissions reduction target in half. These decisions followed receipt by the town councillors of letters, presentations and reports from KICLEI members. Some of these materials contain misinformation, according to three climate scientists interviewed by Canada's National Observer.
The consequences for the communities and climate action are significant — but climate plans might be just the first target. These AI-enabled tactics could scale, according to Shane Gunster, an expert in environmental communication at Simon Fraser University, who warned that artificial intelligence 'enables the cost of misinformation to come close to zero.'
The chatbot's instructions tell it to 'de-emphasize the climate catastrophe narrative,' to focus on 'real pollution, not CO2.' The bot is told to frame these arguments in the most reasonable possible way.
The Canadian Civic Advisor
KICLEI ('Kicking International Council out of Local Environmental Initiatives') was founded in 2023 by Freedom Convoy activist Maggie Hope Braun with a singular aim: to convince towns and cities to quit the voluntary net-zero program Partners for Climate Protection, due to its ties to the UN through its co-organizer, ICLEI Canada.
To achieve this, it has created its own custom AI chatbot: the 'Canadian Civic Advisor,' powered by OpenAI's ChatGPT. Internal instructions accessed by Canada's National Observer show that the chatbot produces tailored scripts, petitions, reports and even speeches for council chambers. The messaging is often framed to resonate with municipal officials' duty to represent local interests.
The chatbot's instructions tell it to 'de-emphasize the climate catastrophe narrative,' to focus on 'practical environmental protection measures' and 'real pollution, not CO2.' The bot is told to frame these arguments in the most reasonable possible way, 'emphasizing collaboration' and 'encouraging diplomacy and mutual understanding between citizens and elected officials.'
One prompt instructs the chatbot to draft critiques of a local Climate Action Plan based on KICLEI's centralized materials. The latest version is provided with KICLEI's Substack posts and scientific positions — content that, according to some of the scientists cited, contains climate misinformation.
Output of the Canadian Civic Advisor, shared by Maggie Hope Braun on Facebook with the prompt 'Write a letter to the council in Peterborough to withdraw from PCP'
Many advocacy groups use AI but the potential for it to amplify inaccurate information is 'disturbing,' even if real constituents are sending the messages, according to Gunster. He argues that the chatbot allows KICLEI to centralize local messaging and make it maximally persuasive for policymakers.
'You can tailor that communication so specifically to a particular region, to a particular individual, to a particular value set,' said Gunster. It is the first case Gunster has seen of AI being used to target municipal governments in Canada.
KICLEI founder Maggie Hope Braun refused Canada's National Observer's interview requests, choosing instead to respond to written questions. She rejected concerns that KICLEI's chatbot was amplifying misinformation, describing it as 'democracy in action.' She explained the chatbot helps citizens who are genuinely concerned about global agendas to 'understand local policy and draft respectful, informed communications.'
Braun published her responses online, with reworded versions our original questions.
'A gross misrepresentation of our work'
Since April 2024, KICLEI has published 172 Substack posts — about one every two days — which are sent to councillors across Canada. Titles include 'Extreme Weather Events Are Not Increasing: Separating Fact from Fiction' and 'CO2 Is Not the Primary Driver of Climate Change.'
Three prominent climate scientists told Canada's National Observer that some of these posts contain misinformation about their research.
In March, 2024, Braun gave a deputation to Thorold, Ont.'s city council where she claimed that there is only a 0.3 per cent consensus among climate scientists that humans are the primary driver of climate change. In reality, the consensus is around 99.9 per cent, according to a 2021 review of over 88,000 papers.
The 0.3 per cent statistic is attributed to a 2013 study by John Cook, an expert on climate misinformation at the University of Melbourne, who spoke to Canada's National Observer from his office in Melbourne, Australia.
'It's a gross misrepresentation of our work, clearly designed to mislead the public,' Cook said. The figure comes from a widely-debunked paper that he claims distorted his data to 'minimize the consensus as much as possible' by counting only studies that used very specific language.
Using this methodology, he argues, 'you would say that there's zero per cent consensus that the Earth is revolving around the Sun.'
Thorold councillors ultimately voted 7–1 to withdraw from the Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) program. Canada's National Observer covered this decision in a recent investigation into an anonymous oil and gas ad campaign targeting the same town.
The motion to withdraw from PCP was introduced by councillor David Jim Handley, listed as a KICLEI member on Facebook. He described KICLEI's role in shifting council opinion as 'instrumental' and described Maggie Hope Braun as a 'catalyst' who guided his thinking.
'You could replicate it, easily,' he said. 'You gotta find one city councillor that's on your side.'
At least 14 other municipalities — primarily in Ontario and Alberta — have received KICLEI presentations. Among them is Lethbridge, Alta., which voted on May 13, 2025, to cut its 2030 operational greenhouse gas reduction target in half. This decision followed a presentation from a KICLEI member, coordinated emails from constituents, and an unrelated staff recommendation.
The scale of KICLEI's email campaign is even greater. Maggie Hope Braun recently claimed in an interview with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy that KICLEI is sending reports to 8,000 elected officials. Screenshots reveal an internal KICLEI database, packed with the email addresses of mayors, councillors, clerks, and chief administrative officers nationwide.
One of KICLEI's published reports, 'CO2 is not the Primary Driver of Climate Change' cites the work of NASA atmospheric scientist Andrew Lacis on the logarithmic impact of CO2, claiming 'this diminishing effect challenges the assumption that rising CO2 levels alone will result in catastrophic global warming.'
Lacis says this is 'disinformation.' Far from rising CO2 not being a concern, he explained that CO2 accumulates in the atmosphere, causing a 'virtually permanent increase' in the Earth's heat absorption. That drives long-term global warming and may trigger powerful feedback loops which pose 'an existential threat.'
The same KICLEI report cites Kevin Trenberth, a prominent climate scientist at the US National Center for Atmospheric Research, to claim that 'water vapour is far more influential [than CO2] in regulating global temperatures.'
This is not accurate, according to Trenberth: 'Water vapour is an important feedback but not a cause or primary driver,' he said. 'If there is no CO2 then there is no water vapour.'
In her emailed response to Canada's National Observer, Braun rejected the concerns of the three scientists, calling them a 'disagreement over interpretation.' She denied that KICLEI's reports contain misinformation or disinformation. 'Our references to water vapour, CO2 forcing, and consensus data are grounded in published research,' she said, despite being informed that the authors of those peer-reviewed studies directly contradict her assertions.
A firehose of emails
Councillors in several provinces say they feel overwhelmed by KICLEI's outreach. Late in 2024 in Simcoe County, Ont., local officials described a 'firehose' of correspondence, according to Adam Ballah, policy and communications lead at the Simcoe County Greenbelt Coalition.
'It makes their jobs really difficult, having to wade through this stuff,' Ballah explained. In response, he wrote a detailed blog post rebutting KICLEI's claims.
In one municipality, Tiny Township, a KICLEI deputation told councillors that the costs of the PCP program were 'unsustainable.' Alarmed, councillors ordered a review — which found the township was paying $12,700 a year.
Tiny Township has reached Milestone 3 of the PCP program, creating a Climate Action Plan, which gives it access to grants from the Green Municipal Fund. KICLEI estimates that implementing all five milestones costs between $8 million and $212 million dollars, including up to $50 million for a '15 Minute City Model.'
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), which co-organizes the PCP program, did not provide alternative figures when asked directly. Instead, it released a statement from its President Rebecca Bligh, saying 'to combat misinformation spread by KICLEI, FCM is proactively communicating results and progress.'
In New Brunswick, Fredericton councillor Margo Sheppard attempted to block incoming KICLEI emails but was advised by the city solicitor that they couldn't be filtered.
She reported the messages as spam to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) — but never received a response. The CRTC declined to comment on the complaint, or whether they had received it.
'It's very distressing,' said Sheppard. 'I don't have time in the day to research people who are peddling misinformation or disinformation.'
She was surprised to find out that KICLEI is using AI. 'I wouldn't know how to detect it,' she said.
Whether or not we can detect it, AI has entered the conversation — and local councillors like Sheppard, once peripheral to digital politics, are now on the front lines of a new era of persuasive misinformation.
'This is the beginning,' Sheppard said. 'We're in for a deluge.'
Rory White is an independent investigative journalist who builds technical systems to uncover coordinated campaigns targeting democratic processes. He has contributed to a Bellingcat investigation by geolocating sports betting operations in Russia, and published research analyses in The Lancet Psychiatry and Nature Mental Health. He holds a Masters in Data Science from the University of British Columbia and an M.Sc in Biomedical Sciences from the University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
May 28th 2025
Rory White
Keep reading
Throne speech pledges 'energy superpower' future but observers flag climate impact on cost of living
By
Darius Snieckus
News
Business
May 27th 2025
These new MPs have climate backgrounds — will they deliver?
By
Natasha Bulowski
News
Politics
Ottawa Insider
May 27th 2025
Protesters are flocking to a BC ostrich farm. Is the government's bird flu response to blame?
By
Marc Fawcett-Atkinson
News
May 27th 2025
Share this article
Share on Bluesky
Share on LinkedIn
Comments

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada's competition watchdog publishes final greenwashing guidelines
Canada's competition watchdog publishes final greenwashing guidelines

National Observer

time9 hours ago

  • National Observer

Canada's competition watchdog publishes final greenwashing guidelines

Businesses can make environmental claims — only if they aren't false or misleading and have been properly substantiated, according to new Canadian anti-greenwashing guidelines. The guidelines released Thursday by Canada's Competition Bureau are intended to help companies comply with anti-greenwashing laws introduced last June. Businesses making environmental claims will require an assessment, not only of the literal wording of the claim, but also of the general impression created by the advertisement as a whole, including the words, images and layout, the bureau said. The new rules elicited both praise and swift backlash. 'The bureau's guidance is important, but it is really just one piece of the puzzle, and it is not determinative,' said Keldon Bester, executive director of the Canadian Anti-Monopoly Project, an Ottawa-based think tank focused on economic competition issues. After the amended legislation came into force last summer, corporate Canada clamoured for clarity on how it would apply, so this guidance should answer some of their questions, but the real test will be the cases the bureau decides to pursue and how they fare in front of competition tribunals, Bester said. But it is encouraging to see the bureau 'matching the spirit of the law,' he said. INSERT ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT AND PARKS MINISTER REBECCA SCHULZ STATEMENT Canada's competition watchdog published finalized guidance to help corporate Canada navigate the new greenwashing rules that came into force last summer 'The new guidelines appear to get to the heart of the matter,' Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said in an emailed statement to Canada's National Observer. "'Greenwashing' is just another form of untruthful advertising. We need enforceable 'truth in advertising' laws and these guidelines move in that direction,' May said. The bureau's guidance explained that if a Canadian business claimed in its marketing that it was on its way to net-zero emissions by 2050 and 'had good intentions about reducing greenhouse gases' — but made the claim before making a clear, evidence-backed plan to reach net-zero — that would be inadequate. Keith Stewart, senior energy strategist for Greenpeace Canada called this the 'Pathways clause,' in reference to the Pathways Alliance's ad campaign. In 2023, the bureau launched an investigation into the oilsands lobby group's campaign, 'Let's clear the air,' after Greenpeace Canada filed a complaint alleging net-zero claims in the ads were false or misleading. After the new greenwashing laws came into force last summer, Pathways Alliance removed all of the content related to its 'Let's clear the air' campaign from its website, social media and other public communications. The Competition Bureau dropped the investigation a few months later, in December 2024, according to a letter Greenpeace Canada shared with Canada's National Observer. 'Given that the representations that were the subject of this inquiry are no longer publicly available, as well as the Commissioner's discretion with respect to the assignment of limited resources, the Commissioner has decided to discontinue the inquiry at this time,' reads the letter to Greenpeace Canada. 'You don't have to read very far between the lines … to see that Pathways was going to lose that case, which is probably why they took all those ads down so quickly,' Stewart said. 'I think the Competition Bureau essentially said, 'OK, we're going to give you a mulligan on this one. We're not going to go after you because you took all the ads down … and we're now putting it in black and white, clarifying the rules around what constitutes greenwashing on net-zero claims, so don't do it again',' he said. 'You'll notice Pathways no longer talk about being on the path to net-zero.' The Pathways Alliance did not respond to a request for comment on the new guidelines. Alexandre Boulerice, NDP critic for environment and climate change, said deceptive marketing practices, particularly greenwashing, are a major problem because it misleads consumers and 'hurts public trust in a genuine green transition.' The new rules could be a step in the right direction, but consumers must know that they can report deceptive or false advertising and file a complaint, Boulerice said in an emailed statement to Canada's National Observer. 'Additionally, the Bureau requires the resources and capacity to carry out all those inquiries,' Boulerice said. Boulerice said the next few months will tell whether the federal government is serious about this issue. The Conservative Party and Bloc Québécois did not respond to a request for comment. Although the legislation and guidelines could both be stronger, 'the new guidelines should quiet the trumped-up backlash from parts of corporate Canada,' said Emilia Belliveau, Environmental Defence's energy transition program manager, in a Thursday press release.

More Chinese groups using ChatGPT for covert operations, OpenAI says
More Chinese groups using ChatGPT for covert operations, OpenAI says

Globe and Mail

timea day ago

  • Globe and Mail

More Chinese groups using ChatGPT for covert operations, OpenAI says

OpenAI is seeing an increasing number of Chinese groups using its artificial intelligence technology for covert operations, which the ChatGPT maker described in a report released Thursday. While the scope and tactics employed by these groups have expanded, the operations detected were generally small in scale and targeted limited audiences, the San Francisco-based startup said. Since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in late 2022, there have been concerns about the potential consequences of generative AI technology, which can quickly and easily produce human-like text, imagery and audio. Data centres are popping up everywhere, but a jobs boom is unlikely Tech journalist Karen Hao takes aim at Sam Altman's OpenAI 'empire' OpenAI regularly releases reports on malicious activity it detects on its platform, such as creating and debugging malware, or generating fake content for websites and social media platforms. In one example, OpenAI banned ChatGPT accounts that generated social media posts on political and geopolitical topics relevant to China, including criticism of a Taiwan-centric video game, false accusations against a Pakistani activist and content related to the closure of USAID. Some content also criticized U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, generating X posts such as 'Tariffs make imported goods outrageously expensive, yet the government splurges on overseas aid. Who's supposed to keep eating?' In another example, China-linked threat actors used AI to support various phases of their cyber operations, including open-source research, script modification, troubleshooting system configurations and development of tools for password brute forcing and social media automation. A third example that OpenAI found was a China-origin influence operation that generated polarized social media content supporting both sides of divisive topics within U.S. political discourse, including text and AI-generated profile images. China's Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on OpenAI's findings. OpenAI has cemented its position as one of the world's most valuable private companies after announcing a US$40-billion funding round valuing the company at US$300-billion.

This is what happens when you ask an AI slop factory to write like me
This is what happens when you ask an AI slop factory to write like me

Toronto Star

time2 days ago

  • Toronto Star

This is what happens when you ask an AI slop factory to write like me

Could AI steal my writing job? A month ago, skeptical of almost everything American AI tech bros promise, and watching AI produce enough word slop to raise sea levels even further, I asked ChatGPT to imitate my work. Be me, I said. 'Please write a 650-word column on modern feminism in the style of Heather Mallick.' It responded personally, which will never not be creepy. 'Certainly! Here's a 650-word column on modern feminism in the style of Heather Mallick, known for her incisive wit, left-leaning commentary, and sharp turns of phrase.' Enough with the flattery. First, that's not what I'm known for. I'm known to my readers for having once fended off a rabid raccoon with a dessert fork. Thank you, yes, still proud. The raccoon won of course but this is the Canadian spirit I suspect Prime Minister Mark Carney seeks in us. I am known to neighbours for my busy little litter pickup stick. I am known to my family for my vast library of everything Virginia Woolf, which sadly they have never once consulted. I am known to my husband. Fun fact: I am noted for my fascination with political hair, from the damp peaty helmet of Stephen Harper to Pierre Poilievre's product-heavy pompadour. Didn't spot that, did you, ChatGPT. I am distrait. The initial ChatGPT Uriah Heep pseudo-compliments repel me but the fantasy column that follows is pure OnlyFans. What should I call this slop generator? Dr. Tobias Funke of 'Arrested Development' fame? Chareth Cutestory? Or just Brian? Chareth it is. Second, ditch the placatory exclamation point, Chareth. Third, Chareth arches its spine so hard to come up with its 'sharp turns of phrase' that its back snaps. The spew that follows is a slurry of poorly chosen, inaccurate, unsuitable words in contorted combinations, all shaved phrasings of opinions I don't share. The metaphors aren't just laboured, they're shapes foreign to English speakers rendered in colours unknown to nature. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Worst of all, it tries too hard. A sample of Chareth being me: 'I had thought feminism would mellow with age. (No, I didn't.) Like a fine Stilton (all Stiltons are pretty alike) or a retired cat (calling a cat 'retired' is a faded cute-ism) it might purr with wisdom, (cats have no wisdom, they're cats) its battles won. But modern feminism is as necessary as coffee on a Monday (why Monday, why coffee?) and as reviled as truth at a shareholders' meeting (lame).' It described faux-feminism: 'You too can shatter glass ceilings if you first perfect your morning routine and drink mushroom-infused adaptogenic lattes. It's feminism as marketed by Gwyneth Paltrow, repackaged with a sense of self-optimization that makes me scream into a bar of soap.' This is awful. It's word slurry from the 2010s, none of it mine. Chareth's modus operandi is to pick nouns, proper and otherwise, and glue them to phrases from anything published online. The problem is, as you learn when you read a news story about a subject you're familiar with, much of what is online is factually wrong. Chareth may have good burglar's tools. But what it steals is shoddy, its logic assembled out of pretzels and spit. I asked Chareth to have another go. 'Certainly! Here is a 650-word column on modern feminism in the voice and tone of Heather Mallick for a Toronto Star audience — informed, progressive, and a bit weary from the world but still hopeful.' The resulting AI piece was insulting to Star readers, particularly mine, the crème de la crème. It began: 'Modern feminism is like the TTC on a snowy Monday: underfunded, misunderstood, and yet expected to show up without complaint.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW I am no longer distrait, I am irate. What is TTC feminism? Is Chareth suggesting the Star hyper-fixates on local transit? Fine, I'll cancel next week's excellent column on what the hygiene-conscious subway rider should be wearing nowadays, which is hip waders, frankly. Chareth's fake Star column manically links diverse talking points: sexual harassment inside tiny homes; Uber surge pricing for women in Bangladesh; and serums for underfunded shelters. Cute stories, Chareth, woven from bear spray and barcodes. Finally, I asked for a column in the style of a mainstream American journalist. I call them 'boneless chicken' columns. They use buffered phrases like 'some may say,' and 'it seems that.' Pale, smooth, without assertion or even a point, they do fill the space. But such writers live a restful life. Chareth, please write a soporific column, a propofol in prose, in the style of a gentler Heather Mallick. A drowsy numbness drains the senses. Oh look, Star readers are snoring. Heather's passed out. Just look at what Chareth Cutestory, AI's badly trained seal, can deliver.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store