Starmer seeking to quell revolt over welfare reform plan
Downing Street insiders said talks were taking place with Labour MPs about the legislation after 126 of them publicly backed a move to block the legislation.
The first vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to take place on Tuesday and a concerted effort has been launched by ministers to win round potential rebels.
A No 10 source said: 'The broken welfare system is failing the most vulnerable and holding too many people back.
'It's fair and responsible to fix it. There is broad consensus across the party on this.'
The source insisted the reforms were 'underpinned by… Labour values'.
They said: 'Delivering fundamental change is not easy, and we all want to get it right, so of course we're talking to colleagues about the Bill and the changes it will bring, we want to start delivering this together on Tuesday.'
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and the Government were 'ongoing' as six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks.
The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed.
The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards.
North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names.
The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126.
The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit.
The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year.
Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes.
But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains.
One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months.
'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country.
'It's not very grown-up.'
They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.'
The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published.
Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street.
Asked about attacks on Mr McSweeney, trade minister Douglas Alexander said: 'I'm much less interested in the gossip about SW1 than whether this legislation works on the streets, in the towns, in the communities right across the country.'
He said it was 'for the Prime Minister to make his judgments' about who works in Downing Street but the fact is that team delivered us an historic victory only last July, against expectations'.
Mr Alexander said: 'The task of government is hard, there are always going to be people with strong opinions on all sides of an issue like welfare reform.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Angela Rayner pays tribute to veterans as Newsnight airs Nuked Blood special
A Newsnight report on the Nuked Blood Scandal led to questions in Parliament as Angela Rayner paid tribute to veterans Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has paid tribute to survivors of Britain's nuclear weapons experiments after Newsnight featured their story for the first time. Veterans Brian Unthank, 87, and John Morris, also 87, appeared on a special edition of the BBC's flagship political programme alongside veteran's son Steve Purse, 51, and Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham. Mr Burnham told presenter Victoria Derbyshire that serving politicians "should be embarrassed" and "risk being complicit" if they do not act to end the injustice of a seven-decade cover-up off biological monitoring of troops who were deliberately exposed to radiation. Brian and John, who have more than 100 cancers between them, told how the results of the monitoring had subsequently been removed from their medical files, denying them war pensions and answers about the illnesses which have blighted their families. "It's heartbreaking to listen to. Why, after all these years, should they have to sit here and plead for the basic truth about what happened to them?" asked Mr Burnham. "It goes to the hart of the British state. They can blame the police for for Hillsborough, the NHS for infected blood, the Post Office for the Horizon scandal. here, what has happened is that at the heart of Whitehall, British policy was basically a preordained, systematic, brutal policy to put tens of thousands of British servicemen in the line of radiation without their knowledge, without their consent, without personal protective equipment, and then they conducted secret tests on them and denied it for decades." The programme was followed yesterday by questions in Parliament, with Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs demanding ministers take action to deliver compensation and apologies. * You can watch the programme HERE Salford MP Rebecca Long-Bailey told Prime Minister's Questions: "Last night, Newsnight covered the Daily Mirror's 3-year investigation into the Nuked Blood Scandal, in which thousands of troops had their blood and urine monitored, even chest x-rays, during nuclear weapons tests but the results were with from their medical records, and their suffering denied for decades. As a fierce supporter of these men and their families, who she's met with me, will the Right Honourable lady agree... that time is of the essence, and these elderly veterans deserve answers, justice, and an apology?" Angela Rayner, who was deputising for Keir Starmer, replied: "I commend her on the campaigning she's done on this issue, and I have met with some of those affected and I know the strength of feeling on this and I've heard their deeply personal testimony and experiences. "I pay tribute to all of the nuclear test veterans and their enduring contribution to our nation's security, especially during Armed Forces Week, and we're looking into unresolved questions regarding their medical records... as a priority." Tewkesbury MP Cameron Thomas told the Commons: "In 1957, my constituent Ronald Clark was among 22,000 UK personnel exposed to nuclear testing on Christmas Island. These veterans and their descendants have suffered various cancers, crippling illnesses, and deformities, but the MoD has never accepted liability. Noting the Deputy Prime Minister's response to her honourable friend, it doesn't quite go far enough. Time is running out. Will she meet with me, my constituent and these veterans to determine appropriate compensation?" Ms Rayner replied that "the Minister for Veterans will be happy to meet with him and the veterans to discuss this issue". A records review was ordered in November after a million people saw a devastating BBC documentary on the scandal. But despite two meetings with Veterans Minister Al Carns, and more than 19,000 documents examined already, the review has no budget, no deadline, and no results. The Mirror's investigation has uncovered thousands of pages of evidence about blood and urine tests, testing data, and the names of servicemen ordered to take part in the experiments, on a secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment. They were classified as state secrets, with officials refusing access to veterans, relatives, and even lawyers. That database, along with misleading statements given to courts and Parliament, is now the subject of a police complaint. A £5bn civil lawsuit is also underway. An anti-scandal law promised by Keir Starmer is expected to include "a huge carve-out" for matters of military and national security, which would enable public officials in those areas to lie without any criminal sanction.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband rejects plans for £25bn energy cable to Sahara solar farms
Ed Miliband has turned down a scheme to import solar and wind power from Morocco via a 2,500-mile long subsea cables. The Xlinks scheme, overseen by Sir Dave Lewis, the former Tesco chief, would see high-voltage direct current power imported from North Africa through cables running along the coasts of Spain, Portugal and France, and coming ashore in Torridge, Devon. The scheme was expected to provide electricity for 9m homes and cut carbon emissions from the UK power sector by around 10pc – while also bringing down energy bills through a reduction in wholesale costs. However, the Energy Secretary is understood to have refused to back the £25bn project, which was seeking subsidies from the Government. Xlinks had asked for a contract for difference, which would effectively guarantee a minimum price for its power for up to 25 years. Mr Miliband is understood to instead want to focus on 'homegrown' energy projects. The subsea cables were to be made at a factory in Scotland and the power would have exceeded the output of Hinkley C, the £42bn nuclear power station being built by EDF in Somerset. It is understood that Xlinks is also seeking separate finance via power purchase agreements, where companies contract to buy clean power directly from generators. This means it could still go ahead if there is sufficient private sector interest. However, Mr Miliband's decision is still a significant set-back. Sir Dave told The Telegraph in March that Xlinks could take its project elsewhere if ministers did not back it. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has refused to comment on 'speculation' but made clear that a full statement was expected later today. Xlinks was not able to comment pending the Government statement. Xlinks would see seven solar farms and up to 1,000 wind turbines built across an area of Moroccan desert roughly the size of Greater London. Once completed, the scheme is expected to deliver about 3.6 gigawatts of electricity to the UK's national grid – equating to about 8pc of total power demand. Electricity would delivered to the UK via four large subsea cables laid by a ship owned by Xlinks's sister company, XLCC, which is also building a factory at Hunterston in Scotland to manufacture the 10,000 miles of cable. Such cables, known as interconnectors, already link the UK's power grid to France, Belgium, Norway and the Netherlands, with another link to Denmark under construction. The factory, adjacent to the town's closed nuclear power stations, was granted planning permission last year and awarded a £9m Scottish Enterprise grant towards its £1.4bn cost. Its centrepiece will be a massive 600-foot tower in which the cable will be coated in layers of insulation before being coiled onto giant reels for loading into the cable-laying vessel. Xlinks has already raised £100m from financial backers thought to include the Abu Dhabi National Energy Company, along with French giant TotalEnergies and British supplier Octopus Energy. Interconnectors are becoming increasingly important in keeping the nation's lights on as the country shifts towards a reliance on intermitted renewable energy. The UK gets up to 20pc of its electricity from France and other neighbors at some times of the year.
Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Spectator
Our benefits system isn't helping people with mental health problems
There are moments in politics when you have to say something people won't want to hear. This is one of them. Our welfare system is in crisis. By 2030, one in every four pounds raised through income tax will be spent on health and disability benefits – more than the entire UK defence budget. In increasingly dangerous and uncertain times, no one could claim that this is sustainable. Drastic action is needed, and after a year in office Labour have finally cobbled together a set of welfare cuts. Sadly, their ham-fisted plan solves nothing. There is growing evidence that what we're doing isn't helping people with their mental health For a start, they barely stem the flow of people onto benefits. Three quarters of a million more people will join the sickness benefits rolls this parliament. And £5 billion in savings sounds good – until you realise the bill is rising to nearly £100 billion. It's a drop in the ocean. What's more, while you don't often find me agreeing with the Labour left, this plan is also deeply unfair. The new assessment framework is so badly thought through that it could have been designed by a random number generator. 77 per cent of people with arthritis could lose their PIP (Personal Independence Payment) entitlement. So could 62 per cent of those with heart disease. Meanwhile, fewer than half of those with anxiety look likely to miss out. Worse still, the mobility element of PIP – the one that allows people with ADHD to qualify for a new car through the Motability scheme – hasn't even been touched. To get the bill down properly, what's needed is a fundamental rethink about which conditions should qualify for long-term financial support, and why? When I first became shadow welfare secretary, one of the statistics that most shocked me was that the majority of new disability claims in this country are now for mental health issues. Most frighteningly, this rise is partly being driven by young people – people who should be in the prime of their lives. Before I entered politics, I campaigned for better mental health care. I fought for parity of esteem between physical and mental health. I have no doubt that reducing the stigma around mental illness in society has saved lives. But at no point during this fight do I think we intended for young people suffering bouts of depression and anxiety to be signed off to a lifetime on benefits. In fact, there is growing evidence that what we're doing isn't helping people with their mental health – it's fuelling isolation, loneliness and dependence. We know that good work brings purpose, structure and connection to someone's life, and a 22-year-old placed on long-term sickness benefits due to anxiety may spend the rest of their working life out of the labour force. That's not just bad for the economy – it's a tragedy for that young person. Of course, people struggle during periods of poor mental health. But do those conditions generate the same kind of practical, day-to-day costs as, say, life in a wheelchair? That's what benefits were designed to support. It's time to say it: we've been getting it wrong on benefits for mental health. Research published by the Centre for Social Justice today shows that by narrowing eligibility – focusing support on those with more severe conditions – we could save nearly £9 billion a year. That's before you even count the enormous economic benefits of someone in their 20s going through life earning and contributing, rather than sitting at home. This isn't about denying anyone's distress. Conditions like anxiety and depression are real. But they're also treatable. Imagine what could be done if even a tiny fraction of that £9 billion were reinvested into mental health services: expanding talking therapies, scaling up social prescribing, and funding the next generation of mental health research. This will cause a fight. People have spent years campaigning for mental health to be treated like physical health, and I was one of them. But if we are going to create a sustainable welfare system, this is a fight we're going to need to have.
