'Freedom of expression cannot be stretched to hurt sentiments': Kamal Haasan faces court heat; Top quotes
NEW DELHI: The Karnataka high court on Tuesday adjourned the hearing in a petition filed by Raajkamal Films International—producers of the Kamal Haasan-starrer 'Thug Life,' seeking police protection for the film's release in the state.
The film landed in controversy after Kamal Haasan's remark that "Kannada is born out of Tamil."
The hearing, which witnessed strong remarks from Justice M Nagaprasanna, has now been posted for June 10. This came after the court was informed that Kamal Haasan had written to the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC), saying that the film will not release in the state until the ongoing dispute is resolved through dialogue.
Here are the top quotes:
Justice M Nagaprasanna minced no words while addressing the controversy triggered by Haasan's 'Kannada is born out of Tamil' comment. Drawing historical parallels, he asked why Haasan couldn't issue an apology, pointing out that even prominent leaders and film icons had done so in the past. "You (Kamal Haasan) have no right to hurt the sentiments. In this country, Jala (water), Nela (land), and Bhashe (language) are dear to people. What did the people of Karnataka ask for? An apology? There is no apology or an explanation. It is all a circumstance created by Kamal Haasan," the judge told the counsel for the petitioner.
Justice Nagaprasanna invoked the example of C Rajagopalachari, who had made a contentious statement in 1950 but later publicly apologised. He questioned Kamal Haasan's reluctance to take similar responsibility. "Are you a historian, a linguist? On what basis did you speak? If Rajagopalachari could tender a public apology 75 years ago, why can't you (Kamal Haasan)? For your commercial interest, you have approached this court seeking police protection for a situation created by you," he said.
The judge emphasised the emotional and cultural significance of language, particularly Kannada, and cautioned against the misuse of freedom of expression. "Language is a sentiment attached to the land of people. Kannada is a strong language and doesn't wither by such statements. Freedom of expression cannot be stretched to hurt sentiments," he added.
In a pointed comparison, Justice Nagaprasanna recalled how actor Rajinikanth had issued a public apology during the release of Kaala over his remarks on the Cauvery water issue.
Kamal Haasan's clarification
Responding to the backlash, Kamal Haasan sent a letter to the KFCC, clarifying that his remarks were misconstrued and meant as a tribute to Kannada cinema icon Dr Rajkumar's family.
"It pains me that my statement at the Thug Life audio launch – spoken out of genuine affection for the legendary Dr. Rajkumar's family – has been misunderstood and taken out of context," he wrote.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
Haasan asserted his respect for the Kannada language and reiterated his belief in unity through cinema.
"Like Tamil, Kannada has a proud literary and cultural tradition that I have long admired. My bond with Tamil, Kannada, Telugu, Malayalam – and all languages of this land – is abiding and heartfelt."
Haasan further added that cinema speaks a 'universal language' rooted in love and bonding, expressing regret that his colleague Shiva Rajkumar had to face embarrassment due to the controversy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘Ambikapathy': AI-altered ‘Raanjhanaa' climax ‘resurrects' Kundan and massacres his legacy
'The woman sitting next to me. The doctors still hoping to save me. My crazy friend. Another woman, who had dedicated her life to me. My mother. My father. The lanes of Kasi. My body, which had left me. And my heart, with fire still burning within. I could have gotten up. But for whom? I could shout. But for whom? Everything was melting away from me — my love, Zoya, Bindiya, Murari, and the scent of Kasi. Why should I hold on? This fire within me could have either kept me alive or killed me. But why do I need to get back up? Who could once again endure all the pain, fall in love again, and suffer heartbreak? Can someone ask me not to leave? The stone-faced Zoya sitting next to me — even now, I would go back to her if she wished for it. But I won't. I think there's more reason in closing my eyes and embracing the eternal slumber. But one day, I shall return. To play the tabor on the same shores of Ganga, to fly in the same streets of Kasi, and to fall in love with a Zoya again.' It's been 12 years since Kundan Shankar promised to return to Banares, but the unhealed scars of the above monologue still bear witness that he lives tall in the hearts of Hindi and Tamil audiences. When Kundan (played by Dhanush) bid his goodbye, those watching Raanjhanaa (Ambikapathy in Tamil) for the first time couldn't grapple with the idea of the narrator of the story dying (His death came as a shock, unlike the case in films like American Beauty and Sunset Boulevard, also told posthumously by a dead narrator). However, Kundan, to be blunt, was always doomed to die at the end of the film. Kundan had to die so the light he emanated could live. Every time AR Rahman's stirring soundtrack played, we reminisced about a chirpy, naive young man, consumed by a love with splinters, smiling and dancing along the colourful streets of Banares. And now, 12 years since he left us, Kundan has controversially returned to the big screen, becoming fodder for a kitschy attempt at using Artificial Intelligence for an alternate ending that besmirches the very idea of why he existed in the first place. In this version of Ambikapathy, which was released in Tamil Nadu theatres on Friday, Kundan lives. After Zoya (Sonam Kapoor) gently graces his face, the producers shockingly cut away the entire monologue of Kundan and instead intercut flashbacks of Kundan and Zoya to suggest some newfound reciprocation of love from his love interest. He then turns towards her and half-opens his eyes to look at her. Bindiya (Swara Bhaskar) and Murari (Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub) flash a creepy, uncanny valley smile, and then, Kundan wakes up. Forgetting that he has a bullet wound to his abdomen, he gets up from the hospital bed all so casually as if someone called him for breakfast. Eros Media World's announcement of a re-release with an altered AI-generated 'happy' ending has attracted flak from netizens and filmmakers, and rightfully so. A 'heartbroken' Aanand disassociated from the re-release and called it 'a reckless and dystopian experiment' in his chat with PTI. He added that doing so without discussion was 'a gross violation not just of the film, but of the trust of the fans who've carried the film in their hearts for 12 years.' Meanwhile, Eros Media World's CEO Pradeep Dwivedi told PTI that it was 'a creative reimagining, not a replacement, and is consistent with global industry practices, including anniversary editions, alternate cuts, and modernised remasters.' Nevertheless, the news attracted quite a lot of attention, and an afternoon show at a multiplex in Chennai saw a full house today. It had also given rise to fan theories, like whether Kundan would end up with Bindiya. Or if Zoya saves Kundan at the rally, and he gets hospitalised for a less fatal reason. However, the climax presented in theatres confused audiences, who wondered if there was a point in resurrecting Kundan when there was no intention to show how his equations with Zoya and Bindiya would pan out. Firstly, such a climax highlights many inconsistencies in Kundan's arc. Right from the beginning, we are shown how fierce and destructive his all-consuming, fanatic obsession over Zoya can be. His low self-esteem compelled him to self-harm, believing that getting Zoya's sympathy for him could win over her heart as well. Going to the political rally towards the climax, knowing that there were plans to kill him, was also his way of 'slitting wrists' to win over Zoya. Grappling with the guilt of causing Jasjeet Singh's (Abhay Deol) death, he followed Zoya, hoping that doing what she asked him to do could release him of the guilt. And Zoya, consumed by revenge and hatred, had asked him to die for Jasjeet's cause. In Jasjeet's death, Kundan saw what could have happened to him if this were the fate of a man far more privileged. He struggled to live with the fact that his need for revenge gave eternal grief and despair to Zoya. He carried the guilt of how he had also exploited Bindiya's affection towards him. The new climax strips away this exploration of guilt and grief, and reduces its vision to answer just one senseless point — 'Does Kundan get Zoya?' Kundan waking up and sharing a moment with Zoya spills another character inconsistency. In the original version, the moment captured how, in Kundan, Zoya finally saw the man she had always looked for, who she later found in Jasjeet — a man who would do what was right and go to any extent for it. In his quest to win her love, Kundan went to the rally knowing he would die, moments after asking her not to lie about her love for him. Zoya grazing his face was her way of apologising to him, having understood that while he may be the man who caused her so much pain, there was innocence in how devoted he was to her. She had begun to admire his adoration for her. After all, Zoya herself had been grappling with guilt. While she blamed Kundan for Jasjeet's death, she was troubled if it was her plan — to hide his Hindu identity from her family — that took him away from her. If that was for love, it was for hatred that Zoya went to the extent of sacrificing Kundan for Jasjeet's cause. Later, at the press conference, she had to sacrifice her future to bring the Chief Minister down and ensure there was no power struggle within the AICP. All of this played out in the moment she shared with Kundan. Here, the ending changes the meaning of the moment. It spells not guilt or grief, but romance. She is shown to be reminiscing about the moments she shared with Kundan since childhood. But how could that be possible when she had no memory of Kundan at that age? He had meant nothing to her until he became the man who helped thwart her father's plans to get her married off. Also, what does this mean for the future? What happens to Zoya and Kundan's equation? Where does this leave poor Bindiya, who is now reduced to a mere pawn in the story (more so than the original)? With his death, as the monologue had stated in the original, a part of her lived with him till the end, pricking him for how he had treated her. In this version, she's just a victim of a love triangle, which even robs us of that sliver of comfort in knowing Kundan finally saw himself in her devotion. Overall, the AI-altered climax of Ambikapathy is a tasteless, unwarranted rendition that taints the memory of the film. This raises doubts about whether the producers saw Kundan as an ideal hero and not as the flawed man he is — one who had to have a 'happy ending' that somehow even justifies his unrequited obsession over a woman who repeatedly said 'No.' And it's baffling that the makers missed out on using AI more productively, like when Kundan reads poetry from a piece of paper while proposing to Zoya. In the Tamil version, he reads a Tamil poem, but a close-up shows Hindi script written on the paper (Raanjhanaa wasn't shot in Tamil but dubbed as Ambikapathy). Perhaps AI could have helped mask the original with a poem written in Tamil. Regardless, it still puzzles why the perfect climax of the film, in tact with a monologue that perfectly captured the essence of this troubled character's troubled obsession, had to be changed. This isn't an ideal romance story that ended up sour to the dismay of the audience. The new climax is a cop-out that raises a red flag on what Artificial Intelligence can pave the way for in tone-deaf, artistically impaired hands. What's next? Kamal Haasan/Shah Rukh Khan beating cancer in Vaazhve Maayam/Kal Ho Naa Ho? Imagine Devdas not dying in Devdas. To critique this obnoxious trend of misusing AI to sully art, I asked an AI assistant for an appropriate quote: 'The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like humans, but that humans will begin to think like computers,' it said, quoting American journalist Sydney J. Harris.
India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
This flop film's set was built on 50 acres, had 3 superstars, made on budget of Rs 10 crore, earned just Rs..., movie is...
In early 1990s, Indian cinema witnessed an ambitious endeavor that sought to transcend linguistic and regional boundaries. A visionary filmmaker embarked on a project that would feature three of the nation's most celebrated actors, aiming to create a cinematic masterpiece that resonated across the country. This grand vision materialized into a film that, despite its star-studded cast and monumental budget, failed to make a mark at the box office. Which film is this? The film we are talking about is Shanti Kranti (1991), directed, produced, and written by Kannada actor-director V. Ravichandran. This multilingual action-crime drama was simultaneously shot in Kannada, Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi, which was considered a pioneering move at the time. Ravichandran himself played the lead in the Kannada version, while Telugu superstar Nagarjuna headlined the Telugu edition. The Tamil and Hindi versions featured the iconic Rajinikanth in the lead role. Juhi Chawla, Khushbu, and Anant Nag were part of the ensemble cast across all versions. What was the storyline? This film revolves around courageous police officer who sets out to dismantle a dangerous organ transplant mafia. The film's plot centers on the gritty underworld of illegal organ trading, where innocent people are kidnapped and exploited for profit. As officer delves deeper, he uncovers a powerful network of criminals backed by influential figures, making his mission both life-threatening and morally challenging. How was the box office reception and why is Shanti Kranti considered one of the big projects from Regional cinema? With a staggering budget of Rs 10 crore, Shanti Kranti was most expensive Indian film at the time, surpassing the previous record held by Amitabh Bachchan's fantasy drama Ajooba. Lavish sets were constructed, including a 50-acre plot for the climax, and significant investments were made in visual effects and production design. Despite these efforts, the film failed to connect with audiences. Released in September 1991, it garnered Rs 8 crore across all versions, falling short of recovering its production costs. The film's underwhelming performance was attributed to its weak narrative and inability to engage viewers, despite the presence of major stars. The financial failure of Shanti Kranti had severe repercussions for Ravichandran. Having invested his personal savings and resources into the project, he faced significant financial distress. In the aftermath, Ravichandran shifted his focus to directing remakes of successful Tamil and Telugu films, a move that eventually helped him regain his footing in the industry.
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
'She's the brains': Aaron Rodgers opens up on how his sister-in-law helped seal his $13.65M Pittsburgh Steelers deal
Aaron Rodgers reveals the truth behind his one-year deal with the Pittsburgh Steelers (Image via Imagn Images) Aaron Rodgers didn't just take a pay cut this offseason—he let someone unexpected call the shots. The future Hall of Famer surprised fans by crediting his 20-year-old sister-in-law, Mia, for helping shape his one-year deal with the Pittsburgh Steelers. Instead of chasing a massive payday, Rodgers chose purpose over price—and now he's setting his sights on one more Super Bowl run. And yes, Mia might deserve some of the credit if it happens. Aaron Rodgers says his sister-in-law was the unexpected power player Rodgers signed a one-year, $13.65 million contract with Pittsburgh—well below market value for a quarterback of his stature. But during media availability, he joked that he wasn't really the one making the final call. 'I was taking orders from my (new) sister-in-law, Mia,' he said, smiling. 'She's 20 and she's the brains of the family; you just have to ask her.' The remark quickly caught attention, not just for its humor, but for what it revealed about Rodgers' current headspace—calmer, more grounded, and surrounded by a family circle that clearly weighs in. He added, 'No — but that is partially serious for sure,' hinting that Mia's influence wasn't entirely a punchline. Rodgers says he doesn't need the money — he's playing for something bigger in Pittsburgh While other quarterbacks may have chased bigger numbers, Rodgers went in with a different pitch: he wasn't in it for the money. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like You Can Book Maximum Profits in Option Trading with Mr. Gopal Laxman Rekha Strategy ! TradeWise Learn More Undo 'Every team that I talked to, I said, 'Listen, if I play, I'm not going to take a ton of money. I've made a ton of money. I don't need the money,'' he said. It's a veteran move from someone who's already secured his legacy but wants one last chapter to matter—on his terms. That mindset made Pittsburgh the right landing spot: a historic franchise, passionate fanbase, and a team ready for a leader, not just a quarterback. 'I like our chances': Aaron Rodgers believes the Steelers are built to compete for a championship Rodgers didn't just show up in Pittsburgh to ride out his final season—he believes this team has real title potential. 'A lot of guys are battle-strong and have been through some tough stuff,' he said, referencing the roster's resilience. He also praised head coach Mike Tomlin's leadership: 'And with the leadership we've got — and with Mike T. — I like our chances.' That vote of confidence from a seasoned vet signals he's not settling; he's aiming high, and he believes this locker room can get there. Whether Mia actually helped draw up the terms or simply offered emotional support, Rodgers' shoutout made waves for its authenticity. It's a glimpse into his current mindset—humble, lighthearted, and driven by something deeper than stats or contracts. For Steelers fans, it's a sign that their new quarterback is bringing heart as well as skill—and maybe a secret weapon in Mia. And if this season ends with confetti and a trophy, Rodgers just might say, 'Told you she was the brains. ' Also read: Antonio Gates skipped Travis Kelce's TEU—and missed the Taylor Swift moment that had his daughter fuming For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
