Trump's Proposed 200% Tariffs on European Wine Could Be Disastrous for Restaurants
On Wednesday, Bobby Stuckey got a message that was jarring and succinct. The acclaimed restaurateur and Master Sommelier had an email from the U.S. Wine Trade Alliance with a subject that read: HALT ALL E.U. WINE SHIPMENTS. The organization was telling its members that the risk of President Trump imposing 200 percent tariffs on alcohol from Europe was too high right now for business to operate as usual. Importing wine from overseas this close to the proposed April 2 implementation date could hit with a levy so punitive that they'd be stuck with inventory they couldn't sell. It was an ominous sign for businesses, such as Stuckey's, where European wine is a major revenue driver. If the tariffs went through, it could upend many a restaurant.
'They're taking away a right of mine to run a business the way I want to be able to run the business,' Stuckey says. 'President Trump and his advisors are making a lot of stress for business owners. That's not meant to be political, that's just a fact.'
More from Robb Report
Suspect Arrested in $1.5 Million Theft of Cadillac Escalades
Bugatti Just Made the New Tourbillon Hypercar Even Better
This $10 Million Brooklyn Townhouse Blends Historic Charm with Bleeding-Edge Sustainability
Trump first threatened the 200 percent tariff on all wine and spirits from the E.U. a week ago, when Europe declared it would enact a 50 percent levy on American whiskey starting April 1 (the E.U. announced Thursday it would push that back to mid-April, thus delaying America's potential response), which was a retaliation against Trump tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum.
Regardless of its origins, this international trade standoff has left American restaurants in the crosshairs. In this industry where profit margins are so slim, wine helps keep many places solvent. 'This is a stat from before the pandemic, but the average profitability of an American restaurant is around 6 percent,' Stuckey says. 'It's not uncommon for restaurants in our company to have 30, 35, maybe even 40 percent of its top-line revenue come from spirits and wine.'
Like with Stuckey's hospitality company, at many restaurants around the country, wine—especially selections from abroad—is intrinsic to the experience. 'Bad Idea serves Lao-inspired cuisine and primarily European wine, and those are two elements that set us apart from the restaurant scene in Nashville,' says Bad Idea's owner and wine director Alex Burch. 'Thirty to 40 percent of our ingredients and a much higher percentage of our wine come from outside of the United States. These potential tariffs are horrendous.'
For Chase Sinzer, co-owner of the hit restaurants Claud and Penny on New York's Lower East Side, echoes Burch's sentiments. 'It would impact us greatly because revenue wise, our business is based on wine sales,' Sinzer says. 'We've been lucky enough to amass a network of people who trust us in the wine department, and that's what enables us to be in business.' Sinzer's bistro Claud has amassed a comprehensive wine list with nearly 2,000 selections, and his newer spot—the seafood bar Penny that's directly upstairs from Claud—offers a similarly large list with upwards of 2,000 wines.
'We're buying wine in very complex ways, from a variety of sources—private collections, wholesale distributors, auction houses—we run the gamut of everything available to us because we're looking to offer the best of the guests and tariffs effect every single part of that ecosystem,' Sinzer says. 'What is so integral to these restaurants is a big wine list, and it will be damaged by tariffs because it will damage every part of how we buy wine.'
When first floating the 200 percent tariff, Trump argued it would be a boon for American wine, as drinkers would turn to stateside producers instead of European vintners. But at restaurants like Stuckey's Tavernetta in Denver, only Italian wine and Champagne is served, so just stocking American wine doesn't really fit with the ethos of the place. And besides that, Sinzer doubts that people who prefer wine from abroad will just adjust their preferences accordingly. 'When you want orange juice in the morning, and someone runs out of orange juice because it's more expensive, you don't just consume the same amount of apple juice,' Sinzer says. 'There is no pivot for guests who enjoy wine from Burgundy, the Rhône, or Champagne to switch to domestic sparkling wine or California Cabernet. The idea this is going to incentivize domestic production is a falsehood.'
Great wine is finite. The best bottles that arrive on American shores are the result of importers, sommeliers, wine shop owners, and restaurateurs building relationships with winemakers abroad in order to receive an allocation of a winemaker's yield. With a 200 percent markup on bottles, it would be incredibly difficult to sell those wines in America, so those European vintners will just build relationships with other markets. So even if the tariff turns out to only be temporary, there's no guarantee wine producers will begin shipping to America again.
'Our country will be the biggest loser from this,' Burch says. 'Don't get me wrong, America produces some amazing, world-class wine, but part of the joy of wine is that you can't just recreate the place or history of other regions around the world. The U.S. produces roughly 10 percent of the world's wine. Do we really want to turn the lights off on 90 percent of what the world has to offer?'
Many restaurateurs have told us that they are taking a 'wait and see' approach with these tariffs, hoping its merely saber rattling. Sinzer has been proactive just in case the worst happens. 'We've been buying wine at an increased clip since election day because of the threat of tariffs; we've been filling every nook and cranny we have with wine coming to the States pre-tariff,' he says. 'The people this will hurt most are the ones without the liquidity or storage space to stock up.' But even with the buffer, extended time with a 200 percent wine tariff would be detrimental to Sinzer's businesses and restaurants across America. And worries abound about the potential economic impact.
'Restaurants are the biggest private sector job creator in our country—12 times the size of the airline industry,' Stuckey says. 'Our industry is already so fragile and all of a sudden you add something else that could kill a lot of restaurants? It's just bad math. You're not hurting the Europeans. You're hurting taxpayers and small businesses in United States.'
Best of Robb Report
Why a Heritage Turkey Is the Best Thanksgiving Bird—and How to Get One
9 Stellar West Coast Pinot Noirs to Drink Right Now
The 10 Best Wines to Pair With Steak, From Cabernet to Malbec
Click here to read the full article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

18 minutes ago
Trump administration hit with second lawsuit over restrictions on asylum access
McALLEN, Texas -- Immigration advocates filed a class action lawsuit Wednesday over the Trump administration's use of a proclamation that effectively put an end to being able to seek asylum at ports of entry to the United States. The civil lawsuit was filed in a Southern California federal court by the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, the American Immigration Council, Democracy Forward, and the Center for Constitutional Rights. The lawsuit is asking the court to find the proclamation unlawful, set aside the policy ending asylum at ports of entry and restore access to the asylum process at ports of entry, including for those who had appointments that were canceled when President Donald Trump took office. Unlike a similar lawsuit filed in February in a Washington, D.C., federal court representing people who had already reached U.S. soil and sought asylum after crossing between ports of entry, Wednesday's lawsuit focuses on people who are not on U.S. soil and are seeking asylum at ports of entry. No response was immediately issued by the Department of Homeland Security or Customs and Border Protection, which were both among the defendants listed. Trump's sweeping proclamation issued on his first day in office changed asylum policies, effectively ending asylum at the border. The proclamation said the screening process created by Congress under the Immigration and Nationality Act 'can be wholly ineffective in the border environment' and was 'leading to the unauthorized entry of innumerable illegal aliens into the United States.' Immigrant advocates said that under the proclamation noncitizens seeking asylum at a port of entry are asked to present medical and criminal histories, a requirement for the visa process but not for migrants who are often fleeing from immediate danger. 'Nothing in the INA or any other source of law permits Defendants' actions,' the immigrant advocates wrote in their complaint. Thousands of people who sought asylum through the CBP One app, a system developed under President Joe Biden, had their appointments at ports of entry canceled on Trump's first day in office as part of the proclamation that declared an invasion at the border. 'The Trump administration has taken drastic steps to block access to the asylum process, in flagrant violation of U.S. law,' the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies stated in a news release Wednesday.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House preparing Trump's meetings at G7 summit, which Zelenskyy attends
The White House has confirmed that it is preparing separate bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit, where, in addition to the G7 leaders, the presidents of Brazil, Mexico and Ukraine are expected to attend. Source: White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt during a press briefing in Washington, quoted by Ukrinform Quote from Leavitt: "I can confirm there will be quite a few bilateral meetings between the president [Trump – ed.] and other foreign leaders." Details: Meanwhile, Leavitt did not specify whether a meeting between President Donald Trump and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is planned. Quote from Leavitt: "The White House is still working very hard to finalise that schedule, and we will provide that for you as soon as we have it." Background: The Office of the President of Ukraine hopes to organise a meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit on 15-17 June. Last week, Zelenskyy confirmed that he had received an invitation to the G7 summit. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thin-Skinned Trump Snaps Over Kennedy Center Snub
Donald Trump snapped at a reporter who tried to ask about Kennedy Center actors who were planning to walk out rather than perform for him Wednesday night. He cut off the question, insisting, 'I couldn't care less!' 'Honestly, I couldn't,' Trump continued on the red carpet. 'All I do is run the country well,' he said, before launching into a lengthy list of his self-proclaimed achievements. Les Misérables cast members were offered the option to sit out the show on the night of Trump's attendance, and about a dozen performers were planning to do so, CNN reported last month. It underscores the ongoing conflict between Trump and members of the performing arts center, which he effectively seized control of in February. The president ousted much of the board, replaced them with loyalists, and appointed himself chairman, vowing to eliminate programming he deemed too 'woke,' such as events featuring drag performers. 'There's no inflation. People are happy. People are wealthy. The country is getting back to strength again,' said Trump, who was accompanied on the red carpet by Melania. 'That's what I care about.' In fact, inflation held largely steady in May at 2.4 percent. There are protests across the country as anger over Trump's immigration crackdown grows, especially in Los Angeles, which is contending with a militarized response from the Trump administration that local officials say they did not want or need. The Kennedy Center, meanwhile, has seen subscription sales plummet by more than a third year-on-year in the wake of Trump's takeover. But Trump has insisted his leadership will make the center 'great again.' Richard Grenell, the Trump-appointed president of the Kennedy Center, slammed the potential boycott last month and suggested actors who participated should be publicly identified, telling The New York Times, 'Any performer who isn't professional enough to perform for patrons of all backgrounds, regardless of political affiliation, won't be welcomed.' 'In fact, we think it would be important to out those vapid and intolerant artists to ensure producers know who they shouldn't hire—and that the public knows which shows have political litmus tests to sit in the audience,' he added. Loud boos could be heard from the audience as Trump waved from the presidential box, there were also cheers and a chant of 'USA! USA!' There was applause earlier for several drag queens as they arrived at the event. A group of drag performers had been expected to attend in protest after some attendees gave up their tickets following Trump's shakeup. Vice President JD Vance also attended the event with his wife, Usha Vance, and joked on X that he had no idea what the iconic musical was about. Trump, too, appeared to lack knowledge of the plot when he couldn't say whether he identified more with the protagonist or antagonist.