ONS admits April inflation figure was too high after vehicle tax data error
Official data published last month showed Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rose to 3.5% in April, up from 2.6% in March.
But the ONS said on Thursday that it has since spotted an error in the vehicle excise duty data provided to the ONS by the Department for Transport, which is part of the information used to calculate inflation.
The number of vehicles subject to the tax in the first year of registration was too high in the data given, according to the statisticians.
This meant CPI, as well as Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation, were overstated by 0.1 percentage points in April.
The ONS said it would not be revising the official published figures and no other periods were affected by the error.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Millions of homeowners could be paying far too much for their mortgages
Homeowners may be paying too much on their mortgages because of unreliable data from the UK's main statistics body. Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey told MPs that the Bank's lack of trust in number crunchers at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) 'does have a bearing' on its decisions on interest rates, which in turn affect mortgage payments. The Governor did not spell out the implications – but if doubts about the data are delaying interest rate cuts, then millions of borrowers may be paying the price. Problems have been plaguing the ONS figures on jobs and wages for the past couple of years. These include difficulty finding enough people to respond to surveys since the pandemic. Smaller sample sizes increase the risk of inaccurate data. The state of the labour market is a key element in the Bank's deliberations on interest rates. Its aim is to keep inflation near a target rate of 2 per cent. A strong jobs market and robust growth in wages are normally seen as a factor that would push up inflation and therefore make it less likely the Bank will cut interest rates – and vice versa. But given the uncertainty around the ONS's key Labour Force Survey (LFS), which tracks this information, members of the Bank's rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee are instead having to make their own judgments by piecing together data from elsewhere. At a Treasury Select Committee hearing last week, Bailey said efforts by the ONS to improve the reliability of its figures are 'a work in progress' and there was a 'very severe health warning' on the data. Sarah Breeden, the Bank's deputy governor, said other data sources, such as figures from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) were being used to help the Bank make its decisions. However, the HMRC data does not cover self-employed people, a key part of the labour market, which is included in the LFS. Bailey has previously described unreliable labour market figures as a 'substantial problem' for the Bank. His latest comments go further, by saying that the issue is directly affecting decisions on interest rates. Poor data could affect Britain's 8.4 million mortgage holders, particularly the 1.1 million whose borrowing rates vary as the Bank changes interest rates. The last rate cut in May – even though it was just a quarter of a percentage point – lopped hundreds of pounds off the average annual mortgage bill. A typical tracker mortgage saw its annual payments reduced by nearly £350, while the average borrower with a standard variable rate saved £166, according to trade body UK Finance. The ONS suffered a fresh embarrassment on Thursday when it admitted that the UK's inflation reading in April of 3.5 per cent had been overstated by 0.1 of a percentage point because of an error in how it calculated data related to vehicle tax. The statistics body has been shaken by changes at the top after its boss Sir Ian Diamond stepped down last month for health reasons. Some experts have said the problems mean the Bank of England is effectively 'flying blind'.
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
Inside UK's new £189,000,000 revolutionary ‘very light' transport system
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The motor capital of the UK has received a transport makeover – and it's already going to be expanded. Coventry has spearheaded the Very Light Rail network, which has been described as being like a tram, but better. The vehicles, which can carry 60 passengers, are cheaper and more flexible than traditional railways, and passengers started using the vehicles last month. But it's now been announced that the project, currently in use on two streets in the city centre, is set to be expanded to six new areas. The Department for Transport has released £12million to expand the project into 'growth areas' across the city, including the Coventry Gigafactory at Coventry Airport. Speaking to CoventryLive, Cllr Jim O'Boyle said: 'Coventry passengers deserve a choice of how they travel around our city. 'Sheffield, Manchester, Nottingham, Birmingham, London, Glasgow, Edinburgh, all of those have choice, so we should have that choice as well.' The transport system, currently in place along Queen Victoria Road and Greyfriars Road, could also expand to Coventry Railway Station, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Antsy Park, the University of Warwick, and Coventry University. The expansion should be completed by the end of next year, and it's hoped this will bring new jobs to the city centre. Local father and son Graham and Joe Dibbins are train drivers at RailAdventure UK and were among the first to drive the new vehicles. Graham said: 'It's an extraordinary feeling to be involved in such an innovative project and at the same time to be working with my son for the first time in a professional capacity as train drivers.' Joe added: 'It seems unbelievable that I am working with the one person I respect more than anyone else – my dad. The fact that Coventry Very Light Rail is so technologically advanced is simply the icing on the cake.' Cllr O'Boyle, cabinet member for jobs, regeneration and climate change at the city council, said the 'green' CVLR system will 'revolutionise transport in Coventry.' He said: 'Very Light Rail is just the beginning of our plans to revolutionise transport in our city, tackle climate change, improve air quality, and provide a reliable and accessible travel option.' The cost of construction is the first thing that sets it apart from traditional trams. The estimated cost per kilometre (0.6 miles) is £10million, compared to £30million for the same distance for tram tracks. The new track sits just under 11 inches (30cm) within the road surface, minimising expensive and time-consuming works to relocate pipes and cables. The VLR system is powered by batteries, meaning that, unlike trams, there is no need for overhead wires. The electric, very light rail system has been touted as a way to bring disused railway lines back into action. There are no definite plans to build ultra-light rail systems in London, but TfL and the London Assembly have discussed and reviewed the option over the years. Major rail operators are said to have shown interest in the very light rail systems, and further trials are planned to start in 2026. In London, the closest to the new train system is the tram network, which still runs across the southern boroughs. The history of London trams goes back to more than 200 years, but there were times it almost disappeared for good. The very light rail bears some similarity to the Docklands Light Railway (DLR), a driverless train operating in London since the 1980s on a 24-mile track. DLR is a light metro train, which uses purpose-built tracks, which run mostly outdoors, connecting Canary Wharf, the City, Stratford, Lewisham and Woolwich. Whereas very light rail uses batteries, the DLR gets its power from a bottom-contact third rail system underneath the train. Self-driving vehicles are expected to be on the UK roads by 2026, the government has said, opening the door for more autonomous rail systems. More Trending The Coventry very light rail has been developed to allow autonomous operation in the future. Pedestrians, cyclists and disabled passengers will have 'sufficient provision' on the new routes when they open, the council confirmed. A version of this article was first published on May 7, 2025 Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Inside the new £2,500,000,000 Leeds tram system with airport connection MORE: Donald Trump's travel ban doesn't make sense – here's why MORE: Double decker bus roof ripped off after crashing into railway bridge in South Norwood
North Wales Chronicle
a day ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Sir Sadiq Khan urged to seek higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs
London Assembly Members agreed a motion calling on the mayor to take action because of fears that the increasing size of cars is damaging road surfaces, causing congestion and putting other road users at greater risk of death and serious injury. The London Assembly called on Sir Sadiq to ask the Treasury to amend vehicle excise duty to include a tax based on vehicle weight. It also wants the mayor to request that councils in the capital consider charging more for parking larger cars, and to call on the Department for Transport to introduce tighter limits on the size and bonnet height of passenger vehicles. The motion was agreed by 14 votes in favour and eight votes against. SUVs have grown in popularity in recent years, with many drivers favouring their higher seating position. They accounted for a third of all new car registrations in the UK last year, compared with just 12% a decade earlier. SUVs are generally taller, wider and heavier than traditional cars, and less fuel-efficient. The increase in the size of cars has been described as carspreading. Labour London Assembly Member Elly Baker, who proposed the motion, said the capital's streets 'weren't designed for larger vehicles like SUVs'. She went on: 'Their greater size, weight, and higher bonnets put vulnerable road users at greater risk, reduce available parking spaces, and cause more wear and tear on our roads. 'It's time we took sensible steps to manage the impact of oversized cars and ensure our streets remain safe and accessible for everyone.' But AA president Edmund King insisted it is 'up to Londoners to choose the type of vehicle that best fulfils their needs'. He added: 'It is not really the role of the London Assembly to dictate what cars individuals should drive. 'Some larger families may well need bigger vehicles with more passenger seats, whereas a driver conducting most trips alone may well choose a city car. 'London's streets were developed around the horse and cart, so of course our infrastructure needs modernising to keep up with change.' A recent study found pedestrians and cyclists are 44% more likely to die if they are hit by an SUV or similar-sized vehicle rather than a traditional car. The analysis produced by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and Imperial College London stated that the figure rises to 82% for children.
