Poland eyes 1 million landmines for borders with Belarus, Russia
Polish Deputy Defence Minister Paweł Bejda said the country would launch production of the weapons in a bid to safeguard the country's eastern borders with Russia and Belarus.
'We want these mines to be produced in Poland, we have such capacities. The issue at hand is to increase such capacities … and we treat equally the private defense industry and the state-owned one,' Bejda told local radio broadcaster RMF FM in an interview.
The Polish military needs landmines 'in the range of several hundred thousand, even up to 1 million' units, he said.
Polish Deputy Prime Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz has stated the process of withdrawing from the convention will involve the country's Cabinet, parliament and president, and end with a notification to the United Nations. Following the notification, the withdrawal procedure could take around six months, he said.
Asked for details on which companies could produce landmines, the deputy defense minister said that Poland's state-run defense group PGZ will be involved in the manufacturing.
Meanwhile, Latvia is 'looking into all possible options when it comes to strengthening Latvia's deterrence and defense capabilities,' Latvian Defence Minister Andris Sprūds said in a statement.
The Baltic nation 'must prepare as Russia continues to pose a serious threat to the region, regardless of how hostilities in Ukraine develop. Withdrawing from the Ottawa Convention has the potential to ensure the production of anti-personnel mines,' Sprūds said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Palestinian State Recognition Backed by Nearly 6 in 10 Americans: Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nearly six in 10 Americans believe members of the United Nations should recognize a Palestinian state, according to a new poll. Newsweek reached out to the State Department for comment via email on Wednesday. Why It Matters The poll comes amid ongoing concerns about the humanitarian conditions in Gaza. On October 7, 2023, Hamas led an attack against Israel, killing 1,200 and abducting 251 people. Israel has said 58 hostages remain in Gaza, and that only about 20 are believed to be alive. Israel has since launched a massive counteroffensive in Gaza, killing more than 62,000 people, according to the Associated Press, citing Gaza's Health Ministry. Critics have sounded the alarm on Israel's military operation, with worries over the number of civilians killed or displaced. In recent weeks, more countries have moved to recognize a Palestinian state amid fears of the potential starvation of civilians in Gaza, an accusation denied by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. What To Know A majority of Americans—58 percent—believe every country should recognize Palestinian territory as an independent nation, according to a poll from Reuters and Ipsos released on Wednesday. Only 33 percent said they do not believe U.N. members should recognize a Palestinian state, while 9 percent did not answer the question, found the poll, which surveyed 4,446 adults across the U.S. and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. A Palestinian flag is waved as people walk along Gaza's al-Rashid Street on January 26. A Palestinian flag is waved as people walk along Gaza's al-Rashid Street on January 26. OMAR AL-QATTAA/AFP via Getty Images Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced earlier in August that Australia would recognize the Palestinian state as a nation in September. "Australia will recognize the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own, predicated on the commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority," he said in a video posted to X. France in July also said it would recognize a Palestinian nation. The United Kingdom said the same, if conditions are not met by Israel. But it has been U.S. policy across Democratic and Republican administrations to not recognize a Palestinian state. The administration of President Donald Trump has not signaled any shift from the status quo on the matter. Polling over recent months has shown a decline in American compassion for Israel. A Quinnipiac University poll released in June found that sympathies for Israel dipped to a record low, with only 37 percent of Americans saying they feel more sympathetic toward Israel. What People Are Saying U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in July: "I have always said that we will recognize a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution. I can confirm the U.K. will recognize the State of Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly in September, unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term sustainable peace reviving the prospect of a two-state solution." U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, after France announced it would recognize a Palestinian state: "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th." Netanyahu, on X July 24: "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel—not to live in peace beside it. Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel." What Happens Next Starmer will wait until September to render a formal decision on recognizing a Palestinian state. Israel continues facing international pressure over its military operations in Gaza, while Hamas has been pressed to return the remaining hostages. There have been recent attempts at peace talks to achieve a lasting ceasefire, but they have stalled.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump, 79, Sparks More Health Concerns With Surprise New ‘Heaven' Declaration
Questions about President Donald Trump's health spiked again after he said his desire to bring peace to Ukraine and Russia is driven by the hope it will improve his chances of making it to heaven. Trump, 79, admitted to Fox News on Tuesday that he feels he is 'at the bottom of the totem pole' regarding his odds of making it to the promised land, leading many to ponder: Why is the president suddenly so hell-bent on making it to the pearly gates? 'I just want to end it,' Trump said of the Russia-Ukraine war. 'If I can save 7,000 people a week from getting killed, that's pretty good. I want to get to heaven if possible. I'm hearing [that] I'm not doing well. I hear I'm at the bottom of the totem pole. If I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.' Trump has invoked religion more often in his second term, including him notably mentioning God repeatedly after announcing the U.S. bombed nuclear facilities in Iran. 'I want to just thank everybody, in particular, God,' he said in June. 'I want to just say, we love you, God, and we love our great military—protect them. God bless the Middle East, God bless Israel, and God bless America.' A growing rumor for Trump's turn to the theological—or worry, depending on who you ask—is that the president's health may be slipping. The Lincoln Project, a Super PAC founded by anti-Trump Republicans, reacted to the president's remarks about heaven on Tuesday by posting, 'His health can't be right if this is top of mind for him.' That viral post's comments were filled with theories that Trump's health may secretly be in decline. 'I was thinking the same thing. He's seemed low-energy lately,' wrote one user. 'So maybe he got some bad news.' Another wrote, 'He is s--tting his pants about dying. Which tells me he's dying.' Kelsie Taggart, the media director at the progressive Super PAC American Bridge 21st Century, also questioned whether Trump is dealing with private health struggles. 'I feel like we should all be deeply concerned that Trump is having health crises we don't know about,' she posted on X. 'Like, dude has never been afraid of not getting into heaven before...' Reached for comment, a White House spokesperson noted Trump has had a packed schedule as he pushes for peace between Russia and Ukraine. That included him flying 7,000 miles round-trip to and from Alaska on Friday, with Fox News interviews in transit both ways, as well as a day of meetings with European leaders on Monday. Still, Trump has been showing his age more in the past week. On Aug. 12, he twice said that he was traveling to Russia to meet with its president, Vladimir Putin, despite the meeting scheduled to take place in Alaska. The following day, he referred to the Russian city of St. Petersburg as 'Leningrad,' a name that has been retired since 1991. Trump then struggled to walk in a straight line just before greeting Putin on Friday, was described as appearing incredibly 'tired' after the summit, and then failed to recognize Finnish President Alexander Stubb—who was seated right in front of him—at the White House on Monday. The White House has not released any information about serious health concerns for Trump. It was announced in July that he suffers from chronic venous insufficiency, but the condition causes blood circulation issues and is not tied to cognitive decline.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration's anti-woke campaign targets seven flagship museums
Amid the Donald Trump administration's heavy-handed review of Smithsonian museums, the Guardian has seen a document compiled by the White House that details examples of how the widely visited cultural institutions have overly negative portrayals of US history. The document, based on public submissions shared with the administration, points to what it says are problematic exhibits at seven different museums, including a Benjamin Franklin exhibit that links his scientific achievements to his ownership of enslaved people and a film about George Floyd's murder that it says mischaracterizes the police. 'President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable,' a White House official said. 'Until we get info from the Smithsonian in response to our letter, we can't verify the numbers of artifacts that have been removed because the Smithsonian has removed them on their own.' Trump announced the initiative on Truth Social earlier this week, writing: 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been.' The seven museums that have so far been flagged for review include the National Museum of American History, National Museum of the American Latino, National Museum of Natural History, National Museum of African Art, National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian American Art Museum and National Museum of Asian Art. The administration argues exhibits at these museums focus excessively on oppression rather than American achievements. At the National Museum of American History, the document flagged the ¡Presente! Latino history exhibition for allegedly promoting an 'anti-American agenda' by examining colonization effects and depicting the US as stealing territory from Mexico in 1848. Examples from the document also shames the museum's Benjamin Franklin exhibit for linking his scientific achievements to his ownership of enslaved people, and the Star-Spangled Banner display for focusing on American historical failures and controversies rather than celebrating national achievements. The National Portrait Gallery is being singled out for focusing on how the Chinese Exclusion Act and other racist immigration laws contradicted the Statue of Liberty's welcoming message. The African art museum is targeted over the George Floyd film. And the Asian art museum is flagged for exhibitions for claiming to impose western gender ideology on traditional cultures. Last week, the White House budget director, Russ Vought, sent letters to eight museums demanding information about exhibits within 30 days and instructing officials to implement 'content corrections' including replacing 'divisive' language. The review follows similar Trump administration pressure on universities, which resulted in institutions paying hundreds of millions to the government and walking back diversity initiatives. Separately, the Smithsonian has already made changes to exhibits referencing Trump, removing all mention of his impeachments from a presidential power display at the American history museum in July, leaving only generic references to three presidents facing potential removal from office. The Smithsonian Institution did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
