New Hampshire establishes Parental Bill of Rights, universal school vouchers
House Bill 10, which cites the 'fundamental liberty' parents have to take care of their children, creates a 'Parental Bill of Rights'. It allows parents to opt their children out of health or sex education, and to exempt them from vaccinations for religious reasons.
NH House passes bill to ban cell phones in schools
The bill also allows parents to view their children's records and any educational material being taught to them, along with affirming the right of parents to choose to enroll their children in private, religious, or home schooling.
Senate Bill 295 revises the requirements for school vouchers in the state. The state's Education Freedom Account (EFA) program offers grants to families who are home-schooling or enrolling their children in private school. Previously, these grants were only available to families with an income of less than 350 percent of the federal poverty level, or $112,525 a year for a family of 4 as of this year. SB 295 removes this limit so that families of all events are able to apply for the grant.
Hassan, Noem lock horns over habeas corpus
Each bill passed in a near-party line vote. Democrats in New Hampshire's legislature were unanimous in their opposition to SB 295, with the House Democratic Office calling the bill a handout for millionaires that will cost the state over $50 million dollars. But New Hampshire education commissioner Frank Edelblut said the EFA program 'has already transformed lives by giving families access to the educational pathways that best fit their children's needs'.
HB 10 also prompted criticism from House Democrats, who warned that the bill could make it harder to protect vulnerable children, while Ayotte said she was proud to sign the bill, saying it ensured 'parents are the central voice in their children's education.'
New Hampshire bakery wins free speech case over a painting of doughnuts, pastries
The parental bill of rights will take effect July 1, and the changes to the EFA program will be effective August 9.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
a minute ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
In his push for fairness in college admissions, Trump has been silent on legacy preferences
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump attempts to reshape college admissions, he's promising a new era of fairness, with an emphasis on merit and test scores and a blind eye toward diversity. Yet the Republican president's critics — and some allies — are questioning his silence on admissions policies that give applicants a boost because of their wealth or family ties. While he has pressed colleges to eliminate any possible consideration of a student's race, he has made no mention of legacy admissions, an edge given to the children of alumni, or similar preferences for the relatives of donors. Trump often rails against systems he describes as 'rigged,' but he has overlooked a glaring instance in higher education, said Richard Kahlenberg, a researcher at the Progressive Policy Institute think tank who has written about admissions. 'It's hard to think of a more flagrant way in which the system is rigged than legacy preferences,' Kahlenberg said. 'Rarely is a system of hereditary privilege so openly practiced without any sense of shame.' In recent weeks, Trump has taken several actions to scrub any vestiges of race from admissions decisions, suggesting that some schools are ignoring a 2023 Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action. His administration negotiated settlements with Brown and Columbia universities that included provisions to share admissions data. Last week, Trump issued a call for colleges nationwide to submit data to prove they do not consider race in admissions. Some are urging Trump to go further. Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., applauded the settlement with Brown requiring the university to turn a blind eye toward race — even in application essays. But 'restoring meritocracy warrants more,' said Young, who cosponsored legislation in 2023 aiming to end legacy admissions. 'Federally accredited institutions should eliminate ALL preferences grounded in arbitrary circumstances of ancestry that students have no control over, such as legacy status,' Young said on social media. Many selective colleges consider family ties Sometimes called 'affirmative action for the rich,' the practice of legacy admissions remains widespread among elite colleges even as it faces mounting bipartisan opposition. Virginia's Republican governor signed a bill last year barring legacy admissions at public institutions, following similar measures in Colorado, California and elsewhere. Some Republicans in Congress have worked with Democrats on proposals to end it nationwide. Roughly 500 universities consider legacy status when evaluating applicants, including more than half of the nation's 100 most selective U.S. schools, according to 2023 disclosures to the federal government. A few have abandoned the policy, but it remains in place at all eight Ivy League schools. Stanford University said in July it will continue considering legacy status, even after a California law barred it at institutions that receive state financial aid. Stanford opted to withdraw from the state's student financial aid program rather than end the practice. The university said it will replace the funding with internal money — even as it begins layoffs to close a $140 million budget deficit. Stanford officials declined to comment. Last year, as part of a state transparency law, the school reported that about 14% of its new students were relatives of alumni or donors. A push for merit, but no mention of legacy admissions The executive action signed by Trump last week requires universities to turn over more information about students who apply to and are accepted to their campuses. Taxpayers 'deserve confidence in the fairness and integrity' of decisions, his memorandum said, adding that more information is needed to ensure colleges are heeding the Supreme Court's decision. A week earlier, the Justice Department issued a memo clarifying what it considers illegal discrimination in admissions. It takes issue not only with overt racial considerations but also 'proxies' for race, including 'geographic targeting' or personal essays asking about obstacles applicants have overcome. Similar language requiring 'merit-based' admissions policies was included in the government's resolutions with Brown and Columbia universities. None of the actions made any mention of legacy admissions. Trump's silence caught the attention of the nonprofit Lawyers for Civil Rights, which has an open complaint with the Education Department alleging that Harvard University's use of donor and alumni preferences amounts to illegal racial discrimination. The group's 2023 complaint says the practice overwhelmingly benefits white students. If the Trump administration wants to make admissions a meritocracy, it should start by ending legacy preferences, said Oren Sellstrom, litigation director for the group. 'These deeply unmeritocratic preferences simply reward students based on who their parents are. It's hard to imagine anything more unfair or contrary to basic merit principles,' he said. Few Americans support legacy or donor preferences Colleges defend the practice by saying it builds community and encourages families to become donors. Some backers say it increasingly helps nonwhite students as campuses become more diverse. Then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, urged colleges to rethink legacy preferences in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, saying it expanded 'privilege instead of opportunity.' Some feared it would drive up white enrollment as affirmative action ended. Georgetown University reviewed the policy but kept it in place this year after concluding the pool of legacy applicants had a similar makeup to the wider admissions pool. An AP-NORC poll in 2023 found that most Americans have a dim view of legacy and donor preferences, with few saying either should play a strong role in decisions. Universities are required to tell the federal government whether they consider legacy status, but they don't have to divulge how far it tips the scale or how many legacy students they admit. Among the 20 most selective universities that say they employ the practice, none would tell The Associated Press what percentage of their incoming class has a family connection to alumni or donors. Trump's blitz to root out racial preferences has hinged on the argument that it undermines merit. New scrutiny is needed to ensure colleges are following the Supreme Court's order and 'recruiting and training capable future doctors, engineers, scientists' and other workers, he said in his executive action. That argument sends the message that minority students are 'intellectually suspect until proven otherwise,' said Justin Driver, a Yale law professor with a forthcoming book on affirmative action. He worries Trump's latest actions will intimidate colleges into limiting minority enrollment to avoid raising the suspicion of the government. 'I believe that the United States confronts a lot of problems today,' Driver said. 'Too many Black students on first-rate college campuses is not among them.'
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
DC mayor explains trip to Martha's Vineyard as Trump ramps up federal law enforcement presence
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) said she left her city on Thursday amid President Trump's crackdown and police takeover because she needed to pick her seven-year-old daughter up from camp, emphasizing she was in control the whole time. Bowser's exit, reportedly to Martha's Vineyard, had drawn widespread attention, including from the president, who posted on social media about her going to the island off Massachusetts now as a vacation hotspot and liberal enclave. 'I am in constant contact with my senior team and have been in constant consultation with our partners throughout a short swing out of the District,' Bowser said on social media, adding that she had already canceled a family vacation in order to manage the city's response. Bowser, who has not publicly discussed where she went, said she would return Friday. The White House has escalated its attempted federal takeover by attempting on Thursday to essentially install the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as the district's police chief. Bowser and other city officials have contended that the administration does not have that power. Federal law enforcement agents and National Guard personnel have ramped up their presence over the week, including in traffic-heavy areas like the National Mall and Union Station. The president's posture has been to combat crime in the city, but Democrats have characterized it as a test case for potential assertions of power in other blue urban areas in the future. Bowser is also seeking to avoid the kind of firestorms faced by other big-city mayors who were caught out of their cities during times of crisis. In January, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) faced sharp criticism for being in Ghana during the first days of what would become devastating wildfires in Pacific Palisades and Altadena.
The Hill
a minute ago
- The Hill
Newsom knocks Border Patrol presence at redistricting announcement: ‘Sick and pathetic'
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) criticized Border Patrol as 'sick and pathetic' after armed agents made a show of force outside the governor's Thursday press conference to announce retaliatory redistricting measures. 'It just said everything you need to know about the setting that we're under,' Newsom said after the event. ' That they chose the time, manner, and place to send their district director outside right when we're about to have this press conference.' He added, 'It's everything we know about Donald Trump's America.' Border Patrol agents made one arrest in the area near the presser, located at the Japanese American National Museum in Los Angeles. Gregory Bovino, the local Border Patrol chief, denied that there was any other motive in the agency's presence downtown. 'Breaking the law is not coincidental. Breaking the law is breaking the law,' he told local reporters. At the news conference, Newsom formally announced that he would seek a ballot measure to temporarily bypass the state's independent redistricting commission in favor of a partisan map meant to counter any GOP redistricting measures in Texas. The California governor, widely seen as a 2028 presidential hopeful, has sought to fashion himself as a policy foil to President Trump. On style, however, Newsom has more recently taken a leaf out of Trump's playbook. 'BORDER PATROL HAS SHOWED UP AT OUR BIG BEAUTIFUL PRESS CONFERENCE! WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED!' his press office wrote on social platform X in response to the agents. Redistricting battles have sprung up across the U.S. after Texas Democrats fled the Lone Star State to delay passage of a new Congressional map that would give Republicans at least five more House seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. Democratic states, including Illinois and New York, have also threatened to fight back with their own mid-decade redistricting plans.
