logo
Did Warren Buffett Make a Mistake Selling This High-Yield Dividend Stock? Wall Street Thinks So.

Did Warren Buffett Make a Mistake Selling This High-Yield Dividend Stock? Wall Street Thinks So.

Warren Buffett became a legend for his investing prowess. These days, though, the 94-year-old billionaire is disinvesting more than he's investing. Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has been a net seller of stocks for 10 consecutive quarters.
In the first quarter of 2025, Buffett & team reduced Berkshire Hathaway's holdings in six stocks. They also completely exited the conglomerate's positions in two stocks. Citigroup (NYSE: C) was one of them.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
But did Buffett make a mistake selling this high-yield dividend stock? Wall Street thinks so.
Buffett's about-face on a turnaround play
Buffett first initiated a position in Citigroup in the first quarter of 2022, buying around 55.2 million shares. Although bank stocks seemed to have lost some of their luster in the eyes of the Oracle of Omaha, Citigroup probably looked like a good turnaround play to him.
Shares of the financial services giant had fallen sharply in early 2022, and Citigroup was the only large U.S. bank that traded below its book value. CEO Jane Fraser faced a steep challenge to right the ship.
But Buffett likes solid underlying businesses available at attractive valuations. He scooped up shares of Citigroup and waited for the comeback. At first, the decision to buy the struggling bank stock might have seemed unwise, as Citigroup's shares continued to decline throughout much of 2022 and 2023. Buffett didn't flinch, though. Berkshire even bought another 89,000 or so shares of Citigroup in the first quarter of 2023.
Buffett's patience was rewarded beginning in late 2023. Citigroup, along with the overall stock market, gained momentum that lasted throughout 2024 and into early 2025. Buffett sold most of Berkshire's stake in the big bank in the fourth quarter of 2024 and fully exited the position in the following quarter.
Why did he bail out on Citigroup? We don't know for sure. It could be that Buffett thought Citigroup's turnaround was complete. Whatever his reasoning, Buffett almost certainly locked in a tidy profit for Berkshire by selling the stock when he did.
Analysts overwhelmingly disagree with Buffett's move
However, Wall Street seems to think Buffett & team made a mistake by selling all of Berkshire Hathaway's Citigroup shares. Of the 22 analysts surveyed by LSEG in May, 16 rate the bank stock as a buy or strong buy. The others recommended holding Citigroup.
This overwhelmingly bullish take on Citigroup isn't new, either. Throughout the first quarter of 2025, at least 75% of analysts surveyed by LSEG viewed the stock as a buy or a strong buy with no analysts recommending selling.
Wall Street's consensus 12-month price target for Citigroup reflects an upside potential of nearly 12%. The most optimistic analyst surveyed by LSEG thinks the stock can soar almost 46% over the next 12 months. Even the most pessimist analyst only sees a downside of around 7%.
Who's right about Citigroup: Buffett or Wall Street?
Was Buffett right to sell Citigroup, or are the majority of Wall Street analysts right about buying the stock? My answer is... both are probably right.
Let's first look at Wall Street's perspective. Analysts see a solid financial services company with rising revenue and profits. They see a stock that trades at only 10.3 times forward earnings estimates. They see a share price that's still more than 25% below book value. And analysts recognize how attractive Citigroup's forward dividend yield of nearly 3% is.
When we take these factors into account, it's easy to understand why so many Wall Street analysts recommend buying Citigroup stock. The optimistic consensus 12-month price target also makes sense.
However, let's try to see things from Buffett's eyes. The investing icon isn't as big a fan of bank stocks as he has been in the past. He's likely concerned about the impact of tariffs on the U.S. economy. As previously mentioned, Buffett probably made a nice profit for Berkshire on its Citigroup investment. It's not hard to appreciate why he and his team might have chosen to sell the stock when they did.
The bottom line is that it can be the right move for one investor to buy a stock while simultaneously being the right move for another investor to sell the same stock. Should you buy Citigroup stock? Or should you sell it? It depends on your personal circumstances, investing goals, and risk tolerance.
Should you invest $1,000 in Citigroup right now?
Before you buy stock in Citigroup, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Citigroup wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,761!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $826,263!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is978% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to170%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DELL Stock Slides despite Praise from Wall Street
DELL Stock Slides despite Praise from Wall Street

Globe and Mail

time28 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

DELL Stock Slides despite Praise from Wall Street

Yesterday, Dell Technologies (DELL) reported strong revenue results and provided a positive outlook, which suggests that the company is handling tariff issues effectively and increasing its share of the AI market. However, shares of the tech company are down at the time of writing. This is despite also receiving analyst praise for its performance and ability to benefit from increased AI spending in a tough economic environment. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Indeed, five-star Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani, who rates Dell as Outperform with a $140 price target, said that Dell managed to limit the impact of tariffs and kept prices stable, unlike some of its competitors. He also pointed out that Dell's AI server business is growing fast, as its backlog increased by $5 billion from the previous quarter to $14.4 billion. As a result, he believes that customers are willing to pay more for Dell's strong supply chain and better execution, which should help the company gain market share even as a premium provider. Separately, five-star Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers also kept an Overweight rating and a $150 price target on the stock. He said that Dell's results and outlook support the idea that the company is well-positioned for Nvidia's (NVDA) upcoming Blackwell chip cycle. Rakers also noted that Dell is handling its supply chain well, benefiting from a wave of commercial PC upgrades, and generating healthy free cash flow, which it is using to give money back to shareholders. Is DELL Stock a Buy? Overall, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on DELL stock based on 10 Buys, one Hold, and zero Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average DELL price target of $134.55 per share implies 20% upside potential.

Meta, Amazon and Microsoft Shareholders All Overwhelmingly Reject Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
Meta, Amazon and Microsoft Shareholders All Overwhelmingly Reject Strategic Bitcoin Reserve

Globe and Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Meta, Amazon and Microsoft Shareholders All Overwhelmingly Reject Strategic Bitcoin Reserve

In the latest blow to Bitcoin maximalists, Meta Platforms (META) shareholders have delivered a decisive rebuke to the idea of adding Bitcoin (BTCUSD) to the company's treasury, with more than 99% voting against a proposal to even assess such a move. This landslide rejection stands in stark contrast to the high-profile strategies of firms like MicroStrategy (MSTR), Trump Media (DJT), and GameStop (GME), and raises critical questions about the prevailing narrative that U.S. corporations are eager to adopt Bitcoin as a reserve asset. Meta's Bitcoin Proposal: The Details and the Vote At Meta's 2025 annual shareholder meeting, a resolution was introduced by Ethan Peck of the National Center for Public Policy Research, urging the company to consider converting part of its $72 billion cash pile into Bitcoin. Proponents argued that Bitcoin's fixed supply and outperformance of bonds in recent years made it a superior long-term store of value, especially amid concerns about inflation and declining bond yields. Despite vocal support from some Bitcoin advocates — including public lobbying from Strive Asset Management CEO Matt Cole at the Bitcoin 2025 conference — the proposal received less than 0.1% support, with 4.98 billion shares voted against and just 3.9 million in favor. The initiative was a very deep last among 14 proposals on Meta's ballot, and the board had already recommended against it, citing robust existing treasury management practices and no compelling reason to consider Bitcoin at this time. MicroStrategy's Outlier Approach The result at Meta highlights just how much of an outlier MicroStrategy remains in the corporate world. Led by Michael Saylor, MicroStrategy has aggressively accumulated Bitcoin as a primary treasury asset, often touting it as a superior alternative to cash and bonds. This approach has attracted significant media attention and inspired a narrative that other major corporations might soon follow suit. Don't Miss: Think it's too late to invest in the booming AI sector? This one's still under the radar How This Startup is Disrupting the $4.83 Trillion Wealth Engine That's Been Hidden From Everyday Investors for Over 93 Years However, the Meta vote — and similar rejections at Microsoft (MSFT) and Amazon (AMZN) — suggests that such a strategy is far from mainstream among large U.S. blue-chip companies. While MicroStrategy's Bitcoin-centric approach has been profitable and headline-grabbing, it is not representative of broader corporate sentiment. Why the Pushback? Several factors help explain why Meta's shareholders and board were so firmly opposed: Volatility and Risk: Bitcoin remains highly volatile compared to traditional treasury assets. For companies with massive cash reserves and global operations, this unpredictability is a major deterrent. Regulatory Uncertainty: The lack of clear, consistent regulation around digital assets adds another layer of risk for public companies. While it has improved in 2025, uncertainty still remains. Core Business Focus: Shareholders and boards of major tech firms like Meta prioritize stability and predictability, especially in a rapidly evolving industry. Diverting attention and resources to speculative assets is seen as a distraction from core business objectives. Shareholder Conservatism: The overwhelming vote against the proposal reflects a broader preference among institutional investors for traditional, proven treasury management practices. The Bigger Picture: Bitcoin Treasuries Remain the Exception, Not the Rule Meta's resounding rejection means that, despite the vocal advocacy from some corners of the crypto world, the idea of widespread corporate Bitcoin treasuries is more hype than reality. The narrative that U.S. tech giants are on the verge of following MicroStrategy's lead is not supported by shareholder sentiment or boardroom decision-making at the largest firms. While some companies may continue to experiment at the margins, the overwhelming trend among major corporations is to stick with conservative, traditional treasury strategies—at least until regulatory clarity improves and digital assets demonstrate a more stable risk profile. Conclusion Meta's shareholder vote is a clear signal: for now, the world's largest corporations are not rushing to adopt Bitcoin as a core treasury asset. The MicroStrategy playbook remains an outlier, and the narrative of a corporate Bitcoin gold rush is, at best, premature. Instead, blue-chip companies are prioritizing stability, regulatory compliance, and their core business missions over speculative crypto bets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store