Toppled Confederate statue in DC to be replaced in line with Trump's executive order
The National Park Service announced Monday that the statue of Albert Pike, a Confederate brigadier general and a revered figure among Freemasons, would resume its previous position in Washington's Judiciary Square, a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol. It was the only outdoor statue of a Confederate military leader in the nation's capital.
The statue was pulled down with ropes and chains on Juneteenth in 2020 as part of mass protests following the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police. Confederate statues around the country were toppled by similar protests while several military bases named for Confederate leaders were renamed.
The Pike statue restoration, which is targeted for October, 'aligns with federal responsibilities under historic preservation law as well as recent executive orders to beautify the nation's capital and reinstate pre-existing statues,' the park service said in a statement.
Restoration is part of a larger narrative
In March, Trump issued an executive order entitled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.' It decried post-Floyd efforts to reinterpret American history, stating, 'rather than fostering unity and a deeper understanding of our shared past, the widespread effort to rewrite history deepens societal divides and fosters a sense of national shame."
The order targeted the Smithsonian network of museums as having 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology.' It also instructed the Interior Department to restore any statue or display that was 'removed or changed to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology.'
Pike, who died in 1891, is more known for his decades-long stint as a senior leader of the Freemasons than for his Confederate military career. The Masons lobbied Congress for the right to erect the statue on NPS land in 1901 — provided that he be depicted in civilian, not military, garb.
But Pike did lead a regiment for the Confederacy during the Civil War. And as the only outdoor statue of a Confederate leader in Washington, D.C., it had been a source of controversy for decades. Even the brief Park Service page on the statue notes that it has 'stirred opposition since it was first planned.'
A long history of demands for its removal
The D.C. Council asked for its removal in 1992. In 2017, Mayor Muriel Bowser struck an agreement with congressional leaders to eventually remove it.
When protesters toppled the statue in 2020 while police officers looked on, Trump — then in his first term — called it 'a disgrace to our Country' on social media and called for their immediate arrests.
Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington's non-voting delegate in Congress, called the Park Service move 'odd and indefensible' in a statement Monday. Norton said she would introduce legislation to remove the statue permanently and place it in a museum.
'I've long believed Confederate statues should be placed in museums as historical artifacts," she said, 'not remain in parks and locations that imply honor.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin, crypto stocks rally ahead of Trump order opening 401(k)'s to alternative assets
Major cryptocurrencies and crypto-related stock were rallying early Thursday ahead of President Trump's expected signing of an executive order that would allow alternative assets like cryptocurrencies and private equity into the retirement amounts of millions of Americans. Bitcoin (BTC-USD) rose more than 2% near 9:00 a.m. ET trading on Thursday, while ether (ETH-USD) and XRP (XRP-USD) were both up more than 4%. Shares of Coinbase (COIN), the biggest publicly-traded crypto exchange, were up as much as 3%. Robinhood and Strategy shares each rose more than 1.5%. President Trump's executive order, expected to be signed around 12:00 p.m. ET on Thursday according to Reuters, will direct the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to facilitate the use of alternative assets in 401(k)s and other retirement accounts. The order would mark a major shift in retirement investments, opening up the traditionally staid industry to more speculative and, sometimes illiquid, investments. Typically, most 401(k) participants are offered a mix of stock or bond funds or index products in which to invest. Large-scale alternatives assets firms, including BlackRock and KKR, have expressed support for the move, which would open up the multi-trillion dollar retirement account industry to a broader mix of the alternative assets these firms manage. "Private assets like real estate and infrastructure can lift returns and protect investors during market downturns," BlackRock chairman Larry Fink wrote in his latest annual investor letter. "We need to make it clear: Private assets are legal in retirement accounts. They're beneficial. And they're becoming increasingly transparent." The executive order builds on recent crypto momentum in Washington coming off Congress' "Crypto Week" in July, where the two chambers worked to get the CLARITY, GENIUS and Anti-CBDC Acts past their respective votes. The GENIUS Act, signed into law by President Trump on July 18, establishes a regulatory framework for the use of stablecoins like Tether. The CLARITY Act, which seeks to define regulatory oversight of cryptocurrencies, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which seeks to block the Federal Reserve from establishing central bank cryptocurrencies, have both passed in the House of Representatives and are now awaiting votes in the Senate. Jake Conley is a breaking news reporter covering US equities for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X at @byjakeconley or email him at Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
FBI will help locate Texas Democrats who fled the state, Cornyn says
The FBI has agreed to cooperate with Texas state law enforcement to locate the 50 Democratic legislators who left the state to avoid a vote on redistricting, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said on Thursday. The big picture: For days, Texas Republicans have been threatening the state legislators with "legal consequences" for breaking the quorum, a sentiment that President Trump also echoed.
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom, Walz and Pritzker are scapegoating immigrants, cutting their health care
Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Tim Walz of Minnesota have been floated as potential 2028 Democratic presidential contenders. But in June, all three governors took a page out of President Trump's playbook by cutting or freezing health care coverage for undocumented immigrants in their states. Their moves aren't just cowardly — they're anti-immigrant, anti-poor and anti-public health. And they should be noted, in permanent ink, as moral and economic failures. These governors may be known for their sharp anti-Trump rhetoric, but their recent policy choices echo the very worst aspects of his administration: using immigrants — particularly those without the right to vote — as economic scapegoats. The idea is simple and cynical: Balance the books by cutting benefits to some of the most vulnerable residents, knowing they can't fight back at the ballot box. In Minnesota, as many as 15,000 people will lose their health insurance by the end of this year because Walz approved changes to state coverage for undocumented residents. In California, Newsom will prohibit new enrollment of undocumented immigrants in Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program, beginning in January. Californian adults ages 19 to 59 who are already enrolled will have to pay a new $30 monthly premium starting in 2027. Dental coverage will be eliminated for undocumented adults and other noncitizens by next July. And to make matters worse, Newsom slashed funding for nonprofit community health centers to serve immigrant families, leaving them nowhere to access health care. Meanwhile, Illinois has already shuttered a program that provided publicly funded health care to more than 30,000 non-U.S. citizens. These cuts are not just cruel — they are economically shortsighted. Public health officials and economists have shown for years that expanding health care access to undocumented immigrants isn't a burden — it's a boon. An ongoing University of Chicago study found that state-run programs extending health care coverage to noncitizens provided significant financial benefits for Illinois hospitals. When people can access primary and preventive care, they avoid costlier emergency room visits. When hospitals are reimbursed, they're less likely to shut down. When immigrants are healthy, they're more likely to keep working, paying taxes and contributing to their communities. So why did these governors do it? The answer is as cynical as it is familiar: political optics and budget math. Rather than face down the powerful interests who block progressive tax reform — such as raising corporate tax rates, enacting inheritance or wealth taxes or levying vacancy taxes on landlords who keep properties empty — these governors went after the lowest-hanging fruit. Instead of leading with moral clarity and economic foresight, they balanced their budgets on the backs of people who already face a daily onslaught of threats: Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, exploitation in the workplace, housing discrimination and hate-fueled violence. These governors acted against the interests, and wishes, of their own constituents. In California, over 120 organizations signed an open letter condemning Newsom's Medi-Cal cuts, calling them even more devastating than the health care changes in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill. In Minnesota, residents across the state organized protests denouncing Walz's decision. In Illinois, advocates rallied for 'health care for all,' arguing that these programs served as a lifeline for immigrant families. Let's be clear: There's a world of difference between the tone of these Democrats and that of Trump. But tone is not policy. We cannot let ourselves be distracted by surface-level distinctions while immigrants lose their health care — and potentially their lives — under supposedly progressive leadership. The consequences of stripping coverage aren't theoretical. They are real, measurable and deadly. Undocumented immigrants are taxpayers, workers and caregivers. Many live in mixed-status households. Many pay into public systems from which they receive little or no benefit. When they get sick or injured and can't get care, they lose jobs, homes and security — which ripples out into the broader economy. And when safety net providers like community health centers or rural hospitals lose revenue because fewer people are covered, entire communities suffer. At a moment when Trump's threat to civil rights grows more tangible by the day, we need Democratic governors to do more than be not-Trump at the surface level. We need them to lead. That means collaborative solutions that don't throw whole communities under the bus. It means raising revenue in bold and creative ways. It means centering human rights over political convenience. Newsom, Pritzker and Walz have proven they are willing to sacrifice the health and dignity of immigrants for short-term political gain. But it is not too late to reverse course. These governors can still choose to restore funding for immigrant health programs. They can propose tax reforms that ask more from corporations and the ultra-wealthy. They can govern with the moral clarity their speeches so often invoke. We need leaders who will fight to expand care — not slash it. We need leaders who will defend the undocumented — not discard them. Most of all, we need leaders with the courage to act on the values they claim to hold. The eyes of the nation are watching. We won't forget who showed up, and who sold us out.
