Trump administration may rescind mental health parity rule, filing says
May 12 - The Trump administration will not enforce a federal rule meant to ensure Americans with private health insurance have access to affordable mental health services and is considering rescinding it altogether, the U.S. Justice Department said in a court filing on Friday.
The filing in U.S. District Court for Washington, D.C., was in response to a lawsuit brought in January by the ERISA Industry Committee, which is representing large employers challenging the so-called mental health parity rule. The group says the rule limits their ability to provide affordable health benefits for workers. The parity rule became final in September.
The DOJ requested U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly hold the lawsuit in abeyance while the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, and U.S. Department of Labor reconsider the rule.
A spokesperson for HHS said the agency doesn't comment on pending litigation. Representatives for the other agencies did not immediately respond to requests for comment, nor did representatives for the ERISA Industry Committee.
In the filing, the DOJ noted that the ERISA Industry Committee consented to putting the lawsuit on hold as long as it can restart at any point.
The 2008 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act requires insurers and corporate-backed health plans, which cover more than 175 million Americans, to provide access and payment structures for mental health care services on par with other medical services.
But in practice that is often not the case, with less than half of U.S. adults with mental illness able to access care in 2020, according to former President Joe Biden's administration, which backed the regulation aimed at closing the gaps.
The ERISA Industry Committee, whose members are generally companies with more than 10,000 employees, sued to challenge the rule in January, just days before President Donald Trump took office. It said the mandate could lead some plan sponsors to decide not to cover mental health conditions and substance abuse disorders at all.
Ahead of a Monday deadline to respond to the lawsuit, the Trump administration provided the ERISA Industry Committee with a document outlining its plans to stop enforcing the rule. The agencies plan to reconsider the regulation as well, and may issue a notice of their plans to rescind or modify it, the DOJ said in the filing.
The Labor Department regulates company-sponsored health plans under the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA.
The case is ERISA Industry Committee v U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 25-00136.
For the government: Erika Oblea
For the ERISA Industry Committee: Eugene Scalia, Matthew Rozen, Rebecca Smith, Robert Batista and Aaron Gyde of Gibson Dunn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump to merge wildland firefighting forces, despite warning of chaos
Donald Trump has ordered the US government to consolidate its wildland firefighting force into a single program, despite warnings from former federal officials that it could be costly and increase the risk of catastrophic blazes in the middle of peak wildfire season. The order aims to centralize firefighting efforts, which are now split among five agencies and two cabinet departments. Trump's proposed budget for next year calls for the creation of a new Federal Wildland Fire Service under the US interior department. That would mean shifting thousands of personnel from the US Department of Agriculture's Forest Service – where most federal firefighters now work – with fire season already under way. The administration has not disclosed how much money the change could cost or save. In his order, Trump cited the devastating Los Angeles wildfires in January as highlighting a need for a quicker response to wildfires. 'Wildfires threaten every region, yet many local government entities continue to disregard commonsense preventive measures,' the order said. The order also directed the defense secretary to prioritize the sale of excess aircraft and aircraft parts to support wildfire mitigation and response, according to the White House. The Trump administration in its first months temporarily cut off money for wildfire prevention work and reduced the ranks of federal government firefighters through layoffs and retirement. The order makes no mention of climate change, which Trump has downplayed even as global heating helps stoke bigger and more destructive wildfires that churn out massive amounts of harmful pollution. More than 65,000 wildfires across the US burned almost 9m acres (3.6m hectares) last year. Organizations representing firefighters and former forest service officials say it would be costly to restructure firefighting efforts and cause major disruptions in the middle of fire season. A group that includes several former forest service chiefs said in a recent letter to lawmakers that consolidation of firefighting work could 'actually increase the likelihood of more large catastrophic fires, putting more communities, firefighters and resources at risk'. Another destructive fire season is expected this year, driven by above-normal temperatures for most of the country, according to federal officials. A prior proposal to merge the forest service and the interior department to improve firefighting was found to have significant drawbacks by the Congressional Research Service in a 2008 report. But the idea more recently got bipartisan support, with the California senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat, and the Montana senator Tim Sheehy, a Republican, sponsoring legislation that is similar to Trump's plan. Before his election last year, Sheehy founded an aerial firefighting company that relies heavily on federal contracts. The move follows a separate action last month, when the Trump administration rolled back environmental safeguards on future logging projects on more than half of US national forests. The emergency designation covers 176,000 sq miles (455,000 sq kilometers) of terrain primarily in the west but also in the south, around the Great Lakes and in New England. Most of those forests are considered to have high wildfire risk, and many are in decline because of insects and disease. The Associated Press contributed reporting
Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
After closed-door 'shouting match' with Trump aide, key GOP senator clears the air on THIS issue
Senator Ron Johnson set the record straight after allegations of a 'shouting match' between him and a top Trump aide emerged from a Thursday afternoon meeting. The Wisconsin Republican reportedly was involved in a 'shouting match' with President Donald Trump 's White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller over the border security funding number contained in the 'big,beautiful' GOP spending bill currently being worked on in the Senate. Johnson, a fiscal conservative who has voiced his concerns about the bill's impact on the towering national debt, is a critical vote that the White House wants to secure. Johnson cleared the air to the Daily Mail via a statement from his press office Thursday. He did not deny that the spat took place, but any hatchet that came out behind closed doors seemed to have been buried. 'Stephen didn't realize that we didn't have the detailed breakdown in cost, so he explained why the wall was going to be more expensive. Simple misunderstanding, quickly resolved,' Johnson noted. 'We are all huge supporters of Stephen and providing the administration the funding they need to clean up the enormous mess created by Biden and the Democrats,' Johnson added. The impetus of the reported 'shouting match' was when Johnson said Miller's border security numbers didn't add up. After the closed door meeting, Johnson told reporters that Miller's justification for additional border funding was enough to convince him, adding 'if anything, we maybe ought to need more' funding. In a May explainer published to his website titled 'The Ugly Truth About the 'Big Beautiful Bill'', Johnson outlined his opposition to the budget bill, primarily on the basis of the sheer cost of the proposed package. The explainer was published on May 12th, before the House of Representatives passed their version of the spending bill just before the Memorial Day recess. 'There's nothing now to justify this abnormal level of government spending. Pathetically, Congress is having a hard time agreeing on a reduction of even $1.5 trillion from that 10-year amount,' Johnson noted at the time. The Wisconsin senator isn't the only one opposed to the eye-popping cost of the House spending package. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has shared opposition to the legislation as well, due to the projected new additions to the national debt. While he wants to see the President's 2017 tax cuts extended, Paul has portrayed the current $5 trillion in new debt as 'Biden spending levels.'
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Israel strikes Iran, Axios reports
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - Israeli Air Force conducted a strike in Iran on Thursday, Axios reported, citing two sources with knowledge of the operation.
