&w=3840&q=100)
Report says China a 'global mining mafia': At least 15 gold-rich nations complain about illegality
A growing network of Chinese-led syndicates is fueling an increase in illicit gold mining throughout Indonesia, turning small-scale, traditional operations into large-scale businesses and igniting concerns about corruption, environmental damage, and geopolitical risk.
Demand for gold has surged as a result of China increasing its gold reserves as part of a larger plan to lessen reliance on the US dollar. Illicit mining operations in nations like Indonesia, where oversight is frequently compromised and enforcement is lax, are now contributing to meeting that demand, according to a recent Washington Post investigation.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Local communities pushed aside
What were formerly unofficial, artisanal mining sites have evolved into highly mechanised areas controlled by Chinese investors and operators in areas like West Kalimantan and West Nusa Tenggara. These syndicates extract gold on a scale well beyond the law, frequently without the necessary permits or safety precautions, using imported heavy machinery, chemical leaching systems, and a large number of local workers.
In one instance, Chinese investors allegedly made over $5.5 million a month from illicit mining in Lombok's Sekotong district before local communities rebelled due to contaminated water and disappearing farmland. Only after villagers set fire to the mining site in August 2024, forcing authorities to step in, was the operation shut down.
Yu Hao, a Chinese national, was arrested in Ketapang, West Kalimantan, for running a gold mine without a license in another well-known case. According to the prosecution, his company used shell corporations and falsified documents to unlawfully extract more than $67 million worth of gold and silver. Despite being found guilty and given a prison sentence, a local court controversially reversed the decision; however, in response to public outcry, Indonesia's Supreme Court later upheld the verdict.
Environmental Damage and Global Supply Chain Risks
These mining mafias sometimes operate under dormant mining licenses, bribe local officials, and take advantage of legal grey areas. Investigators caution that the criminal networks responsible for them are cross-provincial and could be connected to international smuggling rings and money laundering schemes. According to analysts, the illicit gold trade now generates more than $30 billion a year worldwide.
The effects on the environment are dire. Gold processing uses cyanide and mercury, which have ruined crops, contaminated groundwater and rivers, and increased health problems in the communities around them. Due to corruption or the influence of well-funded foreign actors, local authorities frequently do nothing.
Despite international concerns, China has refused to engage in multinational efforts to regulate illegal gold flows, and its gold import practices remain opaque. Analysts warn that without coordinated global action, tainted gold will continue to enter legitimate markets, undermining supply chain integrity and fueling further environmental damage.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Angry Chinese media accuses 'America of turning chip trade into spying game' as reports claim that US is embedding trackers in Nvidia AI chips
US China Trade War China's state-run media outlet has Xinhua reportedly accused the United States of acting like a "surveillance empire" by allegedly installing location trackers in advanced chip shipments to detect diversions to China. In a commentary, titled "America turns chip trade into a surveillance game," Xinhua accused America of using AI chips for spying. The Xinhua editorial follows a recent Reuters report that U.S. authorities have secretly used tracking devices to monitor targeted chip shipments. The US has imposed export curbs on advanced chips to China as part of an ongoing competition for technological dominance between the two countries. Xinhua's commentary claimed that the U.S. operates "the world's most sprawling intelligence apparatus" and sees its trading partners as "rivals to be tripped up or taken down." The outlet warned that if U.S. chips are viewed as "Trojan horses for surveillance," customers will seek alternatives. This accusation comes after longstanding claims from the U.S. and its allies that certain Chinese products, like telecommunications equipment and vehicles, could be used for surveillance. In 2022, the U.S. banned the sale of new telecommunications equipment from several Chinese companies, including Huawei, due to national security concerns, and has since increased scrutiny on China-made cars and trucks. How America is embedding trackers in AI chips by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The 5 Books Warren Buffett Recommends You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo According to the Reuters report, the US authorities have secretly placed location tracking devices in targeted shipments of advanced chips they see as being at high risk of illegal diversion to China. The measures reportedly aim to detect AI chips being diverted to destinations which are under US export restrictions, and apply only to select shipments under investigation. Location trackers are a decades-old investigative tool said to be used by US law enforcement agencies to track products subject to export restrictions, such as airplane parts. They have reportedly been used to combat the illegal diversion of semiconductors in recent years. In a separate development, China's cyberspace watchdog recently asked U.S. chipmaker Nvidia to explain if its H20 chips had any security risks, a move that followed warnings to domestic tech companies about their use of these chips. China tells local companies not to use Nvidia's H20 chips Meanwhile, Chinese authorities have reportedly urged local companies to avoid using Nvidia's H20 chips, particularly for government-related purposes. According to a report in Bloomberg, a range of companies were sent official notices discouraging the use of Nvidia H20, a less-advanced chip, particularly for any government or national security-related work by state enterprises or private companies. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
It's only a matter of time before Trump blinks on tariff: Chris Wood
Christopher Wood suggests buying Indian equities despite US tariffs. He believes Trump will eventually reverse the tariffs. Wood highlights India's geopolitical importance and notes the unusual nature of the tariffs. He mentions India's underperformance in equities and links the second tariff tranche to India's Russian oil purchases. Wood also observes the US Federal Reserve's potential rate cut in September. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mumbai: Jefferies' global head of equity strategy, Christopher Wood, said the Trump administration's imposing a 50% tariff on Indian imports is not a reason to sell Indian equities. Instead, it's a reason to buy them since "it is only a matter of time before Trump backs off the stance, which is not in America's interest.""It is worth noting that the track record makes it clear that it pays to stand up to the Donald," said Wood in his latest 'Greed & Fear' said the Trump administration's decision to impose an additional 25% tariff, taking the total levy to 50%, on Indian goods is "somewhat unusual" given India's relatively small trade surplus with the US and its "very important geopolitical relationship" with second tranche of 25% tariffs appeared linked to New Delhi's purchase of Russian oil."China has been buying much more oil from Russia but has not been sanctioned in the same way," he said. "The singling out of India in this fashion is not what most people would have predicted."According to Wood, Donald Trump has succeeded in bringing China, Russia, India, and Brazil together like never before."Indeed, BRICS as a grouping has been regalvanised."Wood said India's equities had recorded the biggest underperformance relative to other markets in 15 years in the 12 months to July. He attributed the weakness to "very high valuations" and "a heavy schedule of equity issuance."According to him, it is too late to cut India with valuations now back near the 10-year average 63% Price to Earnings (PE) ratio premium over emerging market said the slightly better-than-anticipated July inflation data has marginally lifted expectations of the US Federal Reserve easing. The base case remains for a rate cut by the American central bank in September and for the US dollar to remain in a downtrend."Still, for a data-dependent Fed not willing to project forward, which is more or less where the Powell-led Fed has been of late, there is still an argument to stay on hold since the reality is that reported inflation is still well above the 2% YoY target," he said the prime driver of the Trump administration's criticism of Jerome Powell is not concerns about the state of the economy, but rather to get the cost of debt servicing down.


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Supreme court dismisses Pernod Ricard's plea against use of ‘Pride' by another distillery
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court recently dismissed Pernod Ricard India's appeal seeking to block a smaller rival from selling London Pride whisky, dealing a blow to the liquor giant's efforts to monopolise the word Pride in India's booming spirits market. The apex court upheld the decisions of two lower courts, refusing to grant an interim injunction against the rival whisky brand in a trademark infringement and passing off suit. The judgment, arising from Civil Appeal No. 10638 of 2025, stems from a legal battle initiated by Pernod Ricard against Karanveer Singh Chhabra. Pernod Ricard, the maker of popular brands Blenders Pride (₹1,700 crore annual sales) and Imperial Blue (₹2,700 crore), had alleged that the Chhabra's London Pride whisky was not only phonetically and visually similar to their registered marks, but also that its packaging and trade dress were a colourable imitation of their established brands. The company argued that the use of the word 'PRIDE' in London Pride was a deliberate attempt to piggyback on the immense goodwill and reputation of their brand Blenders Pride, which has been in extensive use since 1995. However, the Commercial Court in Indore and the High Court of Madhya Pradesh had both previously rejected Pernod Ricard's application for an interim injunction, a decision now affirmed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's detailed analysis found no grounds to interfere with the lower courts' concurrent findings. The court's reasoning centred on the core principle of trademark law: the likelihood of confusion in the mind of an average consumer. While acknowledging this principle, the court determined that the rival marks were not "deceptively similar." The judgment noted that the overall visual appearance, phonetic structure, and trade dress of the two products, despite sharing some generic elements like the colours blue and gold, were sufficiently distinct.