Bill Lee's $25M Tennessee farm preservation push squeaks through key Senate committee
A $25 million bill from Gov. Bill Lee aimed at preserving Tennessee farmland squeaked through its first Senate committee on Wednesday ― a narrow but significant step forward for a proposal that stalled in the same committee last year.
In an effort to counteract Tennessee's rapid farmland loss, Lee's proposal would offer financial incentives for farmers who wish to voluntarily place their land into a privately-managed conservation easement. Tennessee loses about 10 acres of workable farmland every hour.
Members of the Senate Committee on Energy, Agriculture and Natural Resources approved Senate Bill 207 in 5-4 vote, with bipartisan opposition. Sens. Janice Bowling, R-Tullahoma, and Mark Pody, R-Lebanon, joined Sens. Charlane Oliver, D-Nashville, and Heidi Campbell, D-Nashville, in opposing the bill.
While House members easily approved a similar farmland preservation bill last year, the Senate agriculture committee proved insurmountable. Now, despite the narrow committee margin, the path to Senate passage is open.
Former committee Chair Steve Southerland, R-Morristown, who led the Senate panel last year, was replaced in the top post by Sen. Shane Reeves, R-Murfreesboro ― though Senate leaders have declined to say publicly that defeat of the governor's bill was the specific reason for Southerland's ouster.
While the state incentives would not pay nearly what developers can offer farmers to sell outright, Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson R-Franklin, said the bill could help make maintaining farmland a more viable financial option as farmers face ever-increasing pressure to sell their land.
'For many of these hardworking Tennessee farm families, money is an issue, and having access to a grant pool that the governor is proposing could make the difference in being economically viable for those families to place their land into a conservancy,' Johnson said.
More: Tennessee farmers continue struggling to keep land intact: 'Can we keep doing this?'
Any property owner can already choose to place a conservation easement on their property. Under Lee's proposal, ownership of the land and related property rights would remain with the land owners, and easements would be managed by private entities such as the Appalachian Highlands Conservancy or the Wolf River Conservancy – not the state.
Presenting the bill, Johnson said since 1997 Tennessee has lost the equivalent of six counties in farmland.
'That's a good thing people are moving here, but we need to be cognizant of the fact that as people move in, farmland gets bought, it gets developed, it gets turned into subdivisions – it gets turned into strip centers,' Johnson said. 'And we should slow that as best we can.'
Johnson did not mention the vast efforts – and funding – state officials have poured into economic development that have contributed to farmland loss.
Sen. Page Walley, R-Savannah, who represents a rural district in southwest Tennessee, called the measure 'a step in the right direction,' but said the state should work to 'get farther upstream' to empower farmers as they make long term decisions about what to do with their land.
'But this isn't the solution in whole,' Walley said. 'I think we are really going to have to do more.'
Vivian Jones covers state government and politics for The Tennessean. Reach her at vjones@tennessean.com.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Tennessee farm preservation push squeaks through key Senate committee
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
House Republicans tee up tweaks to Trump megabill
House Republican leaders on Tuesday teed up changes to the 'big, beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that are slated to come up for a vote of the full chamber this week. The tweaks come after the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the sprawling package and identified provisions that do not comply with the upper chamber's procedural requirements for using the budget reconciliation process, which allows Republicans to circumvent a Democratic filibuster and approve the legislation by simple majority. Leaving the language in the bill risks losing the ability to pass the bill under budget reconciliation. The parliamentarian's process is known as the 'Byrd bath.' One House Republican described the House tweaks as preventing 'fatalities' from remaining in the bill when it hits the Senate. 'There are a small number, I mean, could count them on one hand, of fatalities that have been identified by the parliamentarian,' the GOP lawmaker said. 'Of course we can't transmit the bill with fatalities so those fatalities will be cured through a rule this week.' While the lower chamber is planning to strip those terms from the bill, party leaders are not giving up on the policy: House Minority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) said Senate Republicans will fight for the provisions when the bill hits the floor. 'We disagree; ultimately we're gonna try it again on the Senate floor,' Scalise told reporters. 'We disagree with the parliamentarian… but you can't take the risk on any of them. You cannot take the risk because if any one of them is ruled on the Senate floor to be fatal, it's a 60-vote bill. The whole bill is a 60-vote bill — you can't take that risk.' The full House will vote on approving those changes this week, with the adjustments tacked on to a 'rule' resolution — a procedural measure that governs debate for legislation. The rule making the fixes to the megabill will also tee up the terms of debate for unrelated legislation to claw back $9.4 billion in funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting. It advanced out of the Rules Committee on a party-line, 8-4 vote Tuesday evening. Rule resolutions are typically passed along party lines and are tests of party loyalty, but Republicans sometimes buck leadership and vote against the procedural rules in protest of process or policy. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — one of two House Republicans who voted no on the bill when it passed the Hoise last month — voiced his disapproval of making the changes to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' via a rule in a post on X. 'Nancy Pelosi once said the House needed to vote for a bill to find out what was in it. Today @SpeakerJohnson said 'hold my beer.' He just announced he's using the Rules Committee to change the text of the Big Beautiful Bill a week after we voted on it!' Massie said. While House Republicans have already passed the bill in the lower chamber they have not officially transmitted it to the Senate — enabling them to make the fixes via the rule mechanism. Republicans are using the special budget reconciliation to push the megabill through Congress while avoiding the Senate's 60-vote cloture rule, enabling them to pass the bill on party lines without support from Democrats. The tweaks in the House come as party leaders are holding out hope that they can enact the package by July 4, which was their self-imposed deadline. Trump, however, opened the door to the process blowing past that timeline, saying 'if takes a little longer, that's okay.'
Hamilton Spectator
31 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Despite falling cottage prices, this Muskoka small-business owner still can't buy in her hometown
Melissa Johnson has lived in Bracebridge her whole life, but her family's future in her hometown has never felt so out of reach. For the past several years Johnson has closely monitored the housing market and is currently working with a mortgage agent to get a mortgage pre-approval — but what should feel like an exciting new chapter is turning into a stressful experience. 'Before the pandemic, housing was attainable,' Johnson said. 'People with an individual income of $50,000 could buy a home themselves. Now you have to earn $100,000 to $150,000 just to purchase a home.' Johnson recently separated from her husband, who bought their riverfront home on half an acre of land. Johnson moved out and now rents a three-bedroom duplex for $3,000 a month. She's working with a realtor to find a new home to move into with her little kids, but as each day marches on it's not looking hopeful. Home prices in Muskoka skyrocketed during the pandemic, as once interest rates hit historic lows city dwellers and investors wanted a slice of the cottage industry gem. In 2020, the average non-waterfront property sales price was $409,000. In 2022, it shot up to $730,000, according to OnePoint Association of Realtors, which represents 3,000 real estate professionals across the regions of Huron, Perth, Grey, Bruce, Wellington, Georgian Bay, Simcoe, Parry Sound, Haliburton and Muskoka. A view of Manitoba Street in downtown Bracebridge. While prices have dropped since the pandemic peak — with some pandemic buyers seeing declines of as much as $365,000 when selling — on average, prices are still significantly higher than pre-pandemic, including in Muskoka where the average is now just under $700,000. That's hurting local residents who want to buy housing in their hometown. Johnson remembers in 2018 you could buy a townhouse for around $300,000. Now, it's more than $600,000. During the pandemic she saw dozens of buyers pile into the market either hoping to move to quieter pastures with ample green space or cash in on the cottage rental market. Johnson said homes were getting snatched up, with many on the market for just one day — unheard of before 2020. 'When I lived on the Muskoka River I counted 422 short-term rentals in the area based on what I could find on Airbnb alone,' she said. 'And then there are people in my community struggling to find a home.' Others cottage properties are sitting with no offers, as experts say the market is stagnant and While home prices in Muskoka, as with many other regions in Canada, increased significantly, Muskoka incomes have lagged far behind, said John O'Rourke, broker, Royal LePage Lakes of Muskoka. 'The average price for a home last year was around $730,000 but the average household income in the area is $108,000,' he said. 'To qualify you need an income of $145,000.' The work in Muskoka is seasonal, dominated by service-oriented jobs that don't pay as much as in urban centres. 'People who came and bought here (during the pandemic) had higher paying jobs, and had the benefit of that income,' he said. 'Locals in smaller communities just couldn't compete.' For locals looking to buy, if a home goes on the market in the low $600,000 range, there will be a lot of activity, he said. People's choices now are driven by price instead of the qualities and amenities of the home. Agents and brokers are expecting a 1.8 per cent increase in average price, according to a new 'Ten years ago you could get a really nice home for $200,000 and that doesn't exist anymore,' O'Rourke said. 'It's not a good situation.' Some locals are moving out of Huntsville and Bracebridge proper and commuting in for work, but it impacts the vibrancy of the local communities, he added. As a small-business owner of a micro flower farm and private early education services, Johnson has thought of moving but her business, children, family, and lifelong friends are in Bracebridge. She's often in conversation with many local residents, and says that everyone is struggling — her friends in real estate tell her many people are leaving because they can't afford to live in the town anymore. 'It's just devastating, they have to leave their families, they have to leave everything.' Johnson acknowledges that tourism helps support the local business, including her own. 'Part of my business is dependent on seasonal occupants and I love our tourism, there are pros and cons to everything,' she said. 'It's just the imbalance in our community and real estate market. Not enough housing and affordable housing is being built and we're paying the price.'
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says FEMA will ‘give out less money'
The Big Story President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem detailed changes they hope to make to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), indicating they intend to eliminate the agency 'as it exists today' and dole out less money to states that are hit by disasters. © Greg Nash 'We want to wean off of FEMA and we want to bring it down to the state level…we're moving it back to the state so the governors can handle it,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday. 'We're going to give out less money…It's going to be from the president's office,' Trump said. 'As an example, I just gave out $71 million to a certain state. They were looking to do about 120 [million], they were very happy with the $71 million.' Trump also indicated that changes could come after the current hurricane season, which lasts from June through November. Both Trump and Noem have called for axing the disaster agency, which helps coordinate responses to hurricanes, wildfires and more. Noem reiterated those calls on Tuesday, telling Trump 'You've been very clear that you want to see FEMA eliminated as it exists today, so I'm preparing all of these governors that they will have more control over the decisions on how they respond to their communities so that it can happen faster.' She added that the administration was 'building communication and mutual aid agreements among states to respond to each other so that they can stand on their own two feet with the federal government coming in in catastrophic circumstances with funding.' Read more at Welcome to The Hill's Energy & Environment newsletter, I'm Rachel Frazin — keeping you up to speed on the policies impacting everything from oil and gas to new supply chains. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect the energy and environment sectors now and in the future: Granholm: Democrats would 'welcome' Musk 'helping us out' Former Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said Tuesday that Democrats would 'welcome' tech billionaire Elon Musk 'helping us out' after an intense clash between Musk and President Trump last week. Hardline House conservatives swing for fences in asks to Senate GOP on megabill Hardline conservatives in the House are making a broad swath of recommendations to make the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities even more conservative. High Seas Treaty gains momentum as 18 new countries pledge support NICE, France (AP) — Eighteen countries ratified the High Seas Treaty on Monday, bringing the total to 49 — just 11 short of the 60 needed for the ocean agreement to enter into force. The surge in support, occurring during the U.N. Ocean Conference in Nice, France, adds momentum to what could become a historic shift in how the world governs the open ocean. What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets touching on energy issues, the environment and other topics: White House looks to freeze more agency funds — and expand executive power (E&E News) Offshore wind power company asks to cancel its New Jersey project (Asbury Park Press) EPA Drops Legal Case Against the GEO Group, a Major Trump Donor, Over Its Misuse of Harmful Chemicals in ICE Facilities (ProPublica) On Tap Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: Vote of Note What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Judge declines to block Trump's Corporation for Public Broadcasting firings but allows board members to stay Correction: A previous version of this article gave incorrect names of the fired CPB board members. They are Laura Ross, Diane Kaplan and Thomas Rothman. Read more Stephen Miller wages war on the GOP's libertarians The Movement is a weekly newsletter tracking the influence and debates steering politics on the right. Sign up here or in the box below. Read more You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
