
Mongolia's 'Dragon Prince' dinosaur was forerunner of T. rex
WASHINGTON: A newly identified mid-sized dinosaur from Mongolia dubbed the "Dragon Prince" has been identified as a pivotal forerunner of Tyrannosaurus rex in an illuminating discovery that has helped clarify the famous predator's complicated family history.
Named Khankhuuluu mongoliensis, it lived roughly 86 million years ago during the Cretaceous Period and was an immediate precursor to the dinosaur lineage called tyrannosaurs, which included some of the largest meat-eating land animals in Earth's history, among them T. rex. Khankhuuluu predated Tyrannosaurus by about 20 million years.
It was about 4 metres long, weighed about 750 kg, walked on two legs and had a lengthy snout with a mouthful of sharp teeth. More lightly built than T. rex, its body proportions indicate Khankhuuluu was fleet-footed, likely chasing down smaller prey such as bird-like dinosaurs called oviraptorosaurs and ornithomimosaurs. The largest-known T. rex specimen is 12.3 metres.
Khankhuuluu means "Dragon Prince" in the Mongolian language. Tyrannosaurus rex means "tyrant king of the lizards."
"In the name, we wanted to capture that Khankhuuluu was a small, early form that had not evolved into a king. It was still a prince," said paleontologist Darla Zelenitsky of the University of Calgary in Canada, co-author of the study published on Wednesday in the journal Nature.
Tyrannosaurs and all other meat-eating dinosaurs are part of a group called theropods. Tyrannosaurs appeared late in the age of dinosaurs, roaming Asia and North America.
Khankhuuluu shared many anatomical traits with tyrannosaurs but lacked certain defining characteristics, showing it was a predecessor and not a true member of the lineage.
"Khankhuuluu was almost a tyrannosaur, but not quite. For example, the bone along the top of the snout and the bones around the eye are somewhat different from what we see in tyrannosaurs. The snout bone was hollow and the bones around the eye didn't have all the horns and bumps seen in tyrannosaurs," Zelenitsky said.
"Khankhuuluu had teeth like steak knives, with serrations along both the front and back edges. Large tyrannosaurs had conical teeth and massive jaws that allowed them to bite with extreme force then hold in order to subdue very large prey. Khankhuuluu's more slender teeth and jaws show this animal took slashing bites to take down smaller prey," Zelenitsky added.
The researchers figured out its anatomy based on fossils of two Khankhuuluu individuals dug up in the 1970s but only now fully studied. These included parts of its skull, arms, legs, tail and back bones.
The Khankhuuluu remains, more complete than fossils of other known tyrannosaur forerunners, helped the researchers untangle this lineage's evolutionary history. They concluded that Khankhuuluu was the link between smaller forerunners of tyrannosaurs and later true tyrannosaurs, a transitional animal that reveals how these meat-eaters evolved from speedy and modestly sized species into giant apex predators.
"What started as the discovery of a new species ended up with us rewriting the family history of tyrannosaurs," said University of Calgary doctoral student and study lead author Jared Voris. "Before this, there was a lot of confusion about who was related to who when it came to tyrannosaur species."
Some scientists had hypothesized that smaller tyrannosaurs like China's Qianzhousaurus - dubbed "Pinnochio-rexes" because of their characteristic long snouts - reflected the lineage's ancestral form. That notion was contradicted by the fact that tyrannosaur forerunner Khankhuuluu differed from them in important ways.
"The tyrannosaur family didn't follow a straightforward path where they evolved from small size in early species to larger and larger sizes in later species," Zelenitsky said.
Voris noted that Khankhuuluu demonstrates that the ancestors to the tyrannosaurs lived in Asia.
"Around 85 million years ago, these tyrannosaur ancestors crossed a land bridge connecting Siberia and Alaska and evolved in North America into the apex predatory tyrannosaurs," Voris said.
One line of North American tyrannosaurs later trekked back to Asia and split into two branches - the "Pinnochio-rexes" and massive forms like Tarbosaurus, the researchers said. These apex predators then spread back to North America, they said, paving the way for the appearance of T. rex. Tyrannosaurus ruled western North America at the end of the age of dinosaurs when an asteroid struck Earth 66 million years ago.
"Khankhuuluu was where it all started but it was still only a distant ancestor of T. rex, at nearly 20 million years older," Zelenitsky said. "Over a dozen tyrannosaur species evolved in the time between them. It was a great-great-great uncle, sort of." - Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
5 days ago
- The Star
Ethiopian fossils reveal new species in human evolutionary lineage
(Reuters) -Researchers have unearthed tooth fossils in Ethiopia dating to about 2.65 million years ago of a previously unknown species in the human evolutionary lineage, one that lived in the same time and place as the earliest-known member of the genus Homo to which our own species belongs. The scientists discovered in the Ledi-Geraru research project area of northeastern Ethiopia's Afar Region 10 teeth - six molars, two incisors, one premolar and one canine - that they concluded belonged to a new Australopithecus species. The teeth came from two individuals. Until now, six species of the genus Australopithecus, an important early human ancestor that displayed a mix of ape-like and human-like traits, were known from fossils at various African sites. The researchers said the newly found teeth bore traits indicating they belonged to a seventh species. A genus is a group of closely related species that share similar characteristics. For example, lions and tigers are from the same genus but represent different species. The scientists also discovered three other teeth dating to 2.59 million years ago that had traits showing they belonged to the oldest-known species of Homo, one that was first revealed by a jawbone unearthed in the same vicinity in 2013. Scientists have not yet assigned names to the Australopithecus and Homo species represented by these 13 teeth because of the incomplete nature of the fossil remains. Our species Homo sapiens is the most recent member of the Homo genus, first appearing roughly 300,000 years ago in Africa before later spreading worldwide. The new dental fossils provide insight into a poorly understood period in human evolution. The close age of the teeth suggests that this newly identified Australopithecus species coexisted in this region with the early Homo species, raising questions about whether they competed for the same resources. The teeth also indicate that there were four hominins - as species in the human evolutionary lineage are known - that inhabited East Africa at the time. Previous fossils showed that another Australopithecus species and a species of Paranthropus, a hominin possessing a specialized skull adapted for heavy chewing, lived in East Africa during this time. An additional Australopithecus species also inhabited southern Africa, bringing the number of hominins then on the continent to five. The presence of these contemporaneous hominins illustrates the complicated nature of the human evolutionary process. "This reinforces theidea that the story of human evolution is not of a single lineage changing slowly through time," said University of Nevada, Las Vegas paleoanthropologist Brian Villmoare, lead author of the research published on Wednesday in the journal Nature. "Rather, the pattern of humanevolution is similar to that of other organisms, repeatedly branching into multiple species throughout the fossil record, many of whom lived at the same time," Villmoare added. The researchers are seeking clues about the nature of any interaction between the Australopithecus and Homo species represented by the 13 teeth. "We are currently analyzing teeth to see if we can tell if they ate the same thing," said Arizona State University paleoecologist and project co-director Kaye Reed. If so, they may have fought over resources, Reed said. Crude stone tools dating to about the same time were previously discovered nearby, Reed said, probably made by the Homo species. The researchers determined the age of the teeth using a technique that dated feldspar crystals contained in volcanic ash in the sediments where they were discovered based on radioactive decay of the element argon. The Afar Region, one of Earth's hottest and lowest places, is an arid expanse of badlands. But at the time of these species, rivers flowed across a vegetated landscape into shallow lakes in a landscape populated by a splendid array of animals. These included giraffes, horses, pigs, elephants, hippos and antelopes as well as predators such as saber-toothed cats and hyenas. Homo is generally thought to have descended from a species of Australopithecus, though the exact species and the timing have been a matter of debate. Australopithecus eventually died out. Australopithecus includes the famous fossil Lucy, who was a member of the species Australopithecus afarensis who lived approximately 3.18 million years ago. Lucy's remains were discovered in 1974, also in the Afar Region. The newly discovered teeth had characteristics that showed they did not belong to Lucy's species, the researchers said. "This new Australopithecus species is in no way some 'missing link,' and we actually don't think that it was necessarily ancestral to any known species," Villmoare said. "Species arose and many went extinct," Reed said. "Each find is a piece of the puzzle that puts human evolution into a twiggy tree, rather than a linear graphic." (Reporting by Will Dunham in Washington, Editing by Rosalba O'Brien)


The Star
6 days ago
- The Star
Hidden inside our electronics, tiny doodles from another era
In 2020, Kenton Smith, an engineer, was peering through a microscope at electronic devices, admiring the intricate designs. As he studied something called a voltage comparator, he saw a face staring back. In one corner of the chip was a crude microscopic smiley face, about .004 inches wide, etched onto the surface. Smith had made a hobby of examining silicon chips to study their layouts but had never come across such a personal touch. Smith had stumbled upon a relic of another era. The images, commonly known as silicon doodles, were used around the 1970s and after as a form of expression and to protect against technological theft. The doodles could be tame – the designer's initials – or elaborate and whimsical, like a Tyrannosaurus rex driving a convertible. Although well documented, the doodles are a rarity, and the practice has largely been phased out. The hunt for them requires time, money for parts and an archaeologist's spirit as collectors search flea markets and online auctions for the chance to unscrew hardware casings, whittle down chip caps and train their eyes to catch a glimpse of magic. An undated photo provided by CPU Duke shows a space shuttle doodle. Decades ago, designers etched microscopic doodles onto silicon chips to leave their marks and now, techno-archaeologists search for the tiny fossils. — CPU Duke via The New York Times 'It blew me away,' said Smith, 36, who is from Madison, Wisconsin. He now works in digital design, but from a young age, he was interested in electronics and computers. He was especially drawn to the 'hidden beauty' of integrated circuits, he said. He once spotted the tiny image of a pyramid on a chip and shrugged it off as a simple marker, but the smiley face opened a flood of questions. Through his research, he discovered a Florida State University website, the Silicon Zoo, which in the 1990s began cataloging the images made by chip designers. 'There's so many different things that designers have left behind to leave their mark, and they don't display it,' Smith said. 'It's just sort of hidden there, and no one's ever going to see it.' The main motivation for Smith, he said, is to archive the doodles before the interfaces they sit on are inevitably scrapped for the gold they contain. 'It's a race against time to find the chips while they still exist.' When designers began to leave their marks on chips for devices like Intel processors and Nokia phones, they never intended for the world to find out. Teams at companies including AMD, Hewlett-Packard and Qualcomm would imprint the illustrations, many thinner than a human hair, onto unused interface real estate. An undated photo provided by CPU Duke shows a Road Runner doodle. Decades ago, designers etched microscopic doodles onto silicon chips to leave their marks and now, techno-archaeologists search for the tiny fossils. — CPU Duke via The New York Times Many of the doodles alluded to a company's heritage, like the Texas state flag on an AMD chip, or a mountain on one produced in Colorado. Others were inside jokes or calling cards. And designers appeared to have come up with the concept independently across companies and the country. In the early 1990s, Deepu John had never heard of a silicon doodle, but he did have a very human desire to sign his work. He was earning a master's in electrical engineering at the University of Michigan, and he added his initials to stamp his mark on a chip for an LCD display. When he joined Qualcomm in 1994 as an engineer, he was surprised to see that many on his team added personal emblems onto chips. 'They were the maverick days, like the early days of flying,' John said. 'At that time, it could do no harm to the chip, so it was purely creative expression.' John tried, with mixed results, to re-create a yacht from the period's Old Spice advertisements. Another colleague who was thin drew elaborate muscles. The doodles were drawn with a chip design tool. The most important reason behind the covert graffiti, John added, was for the doodles to say, 'I'm signing my name on this chip, so it's got to mean something.' A small but passionate group of collectors tend to agree. After Smith discovered the smiley face, he tried to track down more, buying scrap materials on eBay and posting the findings to social media, under the handle evilmonkeyzdesignz. Not every chip has a doodle – far from it. Smith said he spends thousands of dollars a year searching for the elusive Easter eggs. Near Frankfurt, Germany, another doodle hunter searches the Internet and scours flea markets for parts that contain the images. Cedric, who posts under the handle CPU_Duke, has spent months searching for a particular doodle, but unearthing the silicon fossils is a reward in itself. Kenton Smith finds 'Where's Waldo' doodles on a silicon wafers in Madison, Wisconsin, July 11, 2025. — Lyndon French/The New York Times The thrill can lie in connections made over months between manufacturing locations and numerical codes on the casings and the chips themselves. After searching for a year for a Playboy bunny doodle he had seen on the Silicon Zoo, Cedric, who declined to share his last name, began to put the pieces together with number codes on integrated chips, or ICs. 'If you don't find something, you just need to be lucky,' Cedric said. 'I was just dismantling,' buying random hardware and looking, he added. But then he found a clue: An IC did not have a doodle, but it did have an identification number similar to one he was looking for. Soon after, he was able to cross-reference the digits and find the diamond in the rough. He and Smith have put their heads together, too, for the more elusive doodles. Smith was searching far and wide for a 'moose boy' chip – a cheery child with antlers – and had originally looked through a Nokia 5190 cellphone but had come up mooseless. Cedric later posted a similar doodle that was on a Motorola chip to Smith's Discord channel. It was similar to the kind used in the Nokia, and the hunt was reignited. Smith compared several boards for the Nokia model and noticed that the older versions had taller oscillator components. Inside one, he was finally able to dig up the hidden image. 'It's a bit like archaeology,' Cedric said. 'Hardware archaeology.' The search can involve weeks or months of futile efforts, but the actual excavation of a silicon chip usually takes a matter of minutes. As he studied something called a voltage comparator, Kenton Smith saw a face staring back, in Madison, Wisconsin, July 11, 2025. Smith is an engineer who's made a hobby of examining silicon chips to study their layouts. — Lyndon French/The New York Times If the lid over the chip is soldered on, a heat gun quickly melts the material, making the cover easy to flick off. Heat is also used on plastic epoxy packaging, but occasionally the plastic isn't easy to separate from the silicon chip. In that case, Smith will put the casing in boiling pine gum rosin for 30 minutes to an hour to dissolve the remaining plastic. Some hunters use stronger acids, which require better safety measures like ventilation. Using rosins and acids, though, runs the risk of discoloring doodles. When Smith uses a rosin, he does so in his garage with the door open while wearing a respirator mask. A scalpel is usually used to get to the chip itself, which is then tweezed out and put under a microscope. In 2025, it's hard to imagine a doodle being made on an integrated circuit. The slightest deviation can be registered and potentially lead to a nearly imperceptible difference in a chip's performance, leaving designers without the creative freedom they once enjoyed. Still, as the technology they worked on evolved into smartphones and the current digital world, the doodles are simple reminders of the human behind the machine. 'I felt I got to work on a small piece of history at Qualcomm,' John said. And reminiscing about the art that he created, he added, 'brings a smile to my face.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

The Star
7 days ago
- The Star
Possible artefacts of oldest known Wallacean hominids surface
Fascinating relic: Stone tools pictured at the archaeological site in Soppeng, South Sulawesi province. — Reuters Scientists have found a series of stone tools on Sulawesi island they say may be evidence of humans living 1.5 million years ago on islands between Asia and Australia, the earliest known humans in the Wallacea region. Archaeologists from Australia and Indonesia found the small, chipped tools, used to cut little animals and carve rocks, under the soil in the region of Soppeng in South Sulawesi. Radioactive tracing of these tools and the teeth of animals found around the site were dated at up to 1.48 million years ago. The findings could transform theories of early human migrations, according to an article the archaeologists published in the journal Nature in August. The earliest Wallacean humans, pre-historic persons known as Homo Erectus, were thought to have only settled in Indonesia's Flores island and Philippines' Luzon island around 1.02 million years ago, as they were thought to be incapable of distant sea travel, proving the significance of the Sulawesi findings in theories of migration. 'These were artefacts made by ancient humans who lived on the earth long before the evolution of our species, Homo Sapiens,' said Adam Brumm, lead archaeologist from Griffith University in Queensland, Australia. 'We think Homo Erectus somehow got from the Asian mainland across a significant ocean gap to this island, Sulawesi, at least one million years ago,' Brumm said. Wallacea is a region in Eastern Indonesia including several islands such as Sulawesi, Lombok, Flores, Timor and Sumbawa that lie between Borneo and Java and Australia and New Guinea. The region is named after the naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace who studied the fauna and flora of the area. — Reuters