logo
With moving day days away, Montreal calls on tenants without housing to seek help

With moving day days away, Montreal calls on tenants without housing to seek help

CTV News5 hours ago

As July 1 approaches, nearly 300 families have asked the City of Montreal for help finding housing.
With moving day only five days away, the City of Montreal is urging tenants who have yet to find a suitable apartment to contact 311 for access to resources and assistance.
According to city spokesperson Philippe Sabourin, around 270 families are currently being assisted by the city through the Office municipal d'habitation de Montréal's (OMHM).
Sabourin added that the situation is comparable to last year, although the numbers are slightly higher, as the housing vacancy rate in Montreal remains low.
'There is a housing crisis. The city took steps to help residents by doubling the budget,' Sabourin said during a press conference on Thursday.
According to data from the Société d'habitation du Québec (SHQ), approximately 1,990 people across the province are currently receiving assistance from about 40 housing organizations.
The spokesperson emphasized that the budget has increased from $1.5 million to $3.5 million over the last six years.
'What we are asking is for people who haven't found an apartment to contact us by calling 311. There is support for people in search for an apartment. There is temporary housing. We offer storage. We can assist people until their situation stabilizes,' he explained.
Sabourin said he was confident that there are enough resources and funding to help all Montrealers in need.
'No one will be without a roof come July 1,' the spokesperson said.
A recent Statistics Canada report shows that rent has increased by nearly 71 per cent since 2019, primarily affecting families and lower-income residents.
The average asking rent for a two-bedroom apartment was $1,930 in the first quarter of 2025, up from $1,130 six years ago.
'Searching for an apartment is very difficult. The market is very tight. So If you can stay in your apartment you should stay,' Sabourin said.
However, Catherine Lussie, a coordinator with the Montreal-based housing advocate group FRAPRU (Front d'action populaire en réaménagement urbain), said the situation had worsened.
She said that, as of Thursday, 283 households were being supported by the OMHM.
'It's definitely more then last year. Last year at the same time there were 268 household in the same situation. So, we see a little increase even though the vacancy rate has actually increased,' Lussie said in an interview.
Moreover, she said the Statistics Canada data comes as no surprise, given the lack of measures implemented since the start of the housing crisis in 2018.
'Nothing has been done to prevent rent increases that we are seeing right now,' she said.
The coordinator said she is worried about the situation as July 1 approaches, adding that some tenants will have to make difficult choices, such as temporarily staying with family, sleeping in their cars, or renting an apartment they cannot afford.
'You'll see after that. They need support from food banks because they are at the limit of what they can pay, Lussie continued.
'Also, what we see more is how long it takes after July 1 to find housing. So the numbers keep increasing after July 1 of tenants needing those services. For some it might takes weeks or even months to find a place that they can call a home.'
With files from Matt Grillo and The Canadian Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Debate rages at city hall over Oilers event-park funding in hearing on future of tax levy
Debate rages at city hall over Oilers event-park funding in hearing on future of tax levy

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Debate rages at city hall over Oilers event-park funding in hearing on future of tax levy

Edmonton city council is divided over a directive from the province to use money from a special tax levy on projects on land owned by the Oilers. It was the Edmonton Oilers arena debate all over again at city hall on Thursday with a slightly different flavour. Most city councillors and business leaders agree a special tax program in the core is vital for the future prosperity of downtown. The sticking point is a directive from the provincial government to spend tens of millions of public dollars to build projects on land owned by the Oilers. City councillor and mayoral candidate Andrew Knack wants to halt a $250-million event park beside Rogers Place, the home of the Edmonton Oilers. The Oilers Entertainment Group (OEG), which owns the site, is using it as their outdoor Fan Park. The event park is listed as one of the so-called catalyst projects city money would help fund through the downtown Community Revitalization Levy (CRL). 'I do support downtown revitalization, but I will not support a bad deal,' Knack, who represents the west-end Ward Nakota Isga, told media on Thursday morning. 'We don't even know if we need an event park yet ... there's just this assumption that something new and shiny will solve everything.' Event park rendering Conceptual rendering of the event park in downtown Edmonton. (Oilers Entertainment Group) The CRL was introduced in 2014 as part of the deal to build Rogers Place, which opened two years later with a final price tag of $613.7 million. The city paid $312 million of it in cash and through the levy, the team paid $165.5 million and the rest came via a ticket surcharge, the federal government and MacEwan University. The home arena of the Oilers opened in 2016, replacing Rexall Place, following years of debate and negotiation after Daryl Katz bought the National Hockey League team in 2008 from the Edmonton Investors Group for a reported $200 million. As the area within its boundary is redeveloped, the CRL is meant to reinvest that extra tax revenue into downtown. City staff have crunched the numbers and say extending the 20-year levy by an extra decade is worthwhile. Event park site The site of the proposed downtown Edmonton event park, right, that's currently being used by the Oilers Entertainment Group as its Fan Park, with Rogers Place in the background on June 26, 2025. (CTV News Edmonton) 'It is a comprehensive approach to developing downtown Edmonton, encompassing underground utilities, beautification of our streets and parks, creation and expansion of event spaces, improvement to transit stations and incentives for attainable housing,' Brett Latchford, the city's director of strategy and emerging economy, said at Thursday's public hearing. Kris Sims, the Alberta director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, drove to Edmonton from Lethbridge to express her concerns about the deal along with those from several others. 'That's fine, go ahead and revitalize the downtown … but why are you tying it to one element of corporate welfare?' Sims said. 'That is not fair, and it's not right.' The provincial government has final say over the CRL. Municipal Affairs Minister Dan Williams says it won't be approved unless it includes the event park and site servicing for the housing planned north of Rogers Place. The province said it would contribute more than $100 million for those projects. CRL hearing People in attendance for a public hearing at Edmonton city hall about the future of the downtown Community Revitalization Levy on June 26, 2025. (Jeremy Thompson/CTV News Edmonton) Mayor Amarjeet Sohi said he understands why Edmontonians are upset but believes the deal would fall apart without the event park, which he says would be a major missed opportunity for downtown. '(The province is) a major funder of this, a major enabler of this plan, so they're definitely going to have a say in this,' Sohi told media between hearing sessions. 'Anyone who believes that we can find $175 million of new revenue or $103 million of grant funding I think is not living in reality.' A representative of the Oilers Entertainment Group (OEG), which operates Rogers Place and the Ice District plaza as well as the NHL team among other sports and entertainment enterprises, said the corporation is proud of its contributions to the CRL. Edmonton Rogers Place downtown skyline spring/summer overcast An aerial image of Rogers Place in downtown Edmonton on June 17, 2025. (Cam Wiebe / CTV News Edmonton) 'It has been a powerful tool for revitalizing Edmonton's downtown core and helping to strengthen our education, arts, housing, and business districts,' Tim Shipton, OEG's executive vice-president of external affairs, said in a statement to CTV News Edmonton. 'The CRL has supported critical public infrastructure, attracted billions in private investment and created safer, more vibrant spaces for all Edmontonians. The MOU (memorandum of understanding) signed with the city and province represents a transformational city building opportunity, focused on additional housing when it's needed most, and a one-of-a-kind community event facility with vibrant public realm spaces — developments that will not just benefit downtown, but the city as a whole.' The public hearing is expected to be held all day Thursday and Friday. Edmonton city council Edmonton city council on June 26, 2025. (Jeremy Thompson/CTV News Edmonton) Michael Janz, the city councillor for south-side Ward papastew, told CTV News Edmonton he believes the deal isn't really about downtown, rather how a 'provincial tax grab' is going to be distributed, asking would it 'go back to Edmontonians, or is it going to go to one private business?' 'We don't even know the other options, because this was decided behind closed doors in a private negotiation between one business and our premier with the city of Edmonton along for the ride,' Janz said. 'When you can't walk away, when you're being told you have to accept this deal on terms acceptable to the OEG, that's not a negotiation.'

U.S. Republicans agree to drop retaliatory tax from Trump's big budget bill, citing G7 agreement
U.S. Republicans agree to drop retaliatory tax from Trump's big budget bill, citing G7 agreement

Globe and Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

U.S. Republicans agree to drop retaliatory tax from Trump's big budget bill, citing G7 agreement

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced Thursday that he had asked Republicans to pull what has been called the 'revenge tax' from President Donald Trump's signature tax bill, after an agreement among G7 countries. Republican Senators quickly agreed to remove the revenge tax, Section 899 of the legislation. The proposed tax measure was a major concern for a broad range of Canadian investors and had caused some on Wall Street to speculate that it could chase away foreign investment in the United States. The original version of the bill would have allowed the U.S. to impose levies in response to what it calls 'discriminatory or unfair taxes' in foreign countries, including Canada's digital services tax, which was introduced in 2024. The first DST payment is due just days from now, on June 30. It also took aim at a global minimum tax deal reached in 2021, in which many countries, including the U.S. under then-president Joe Biden, backed a push by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development to tax companies at a rate of at least 15 per cent no matter where they were headquartered. But the U.S. never implemented such a tax, and the idea was opposed by Republicans. 'After months of productive dialogue with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal, we will announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests,' Mr. Bessent said Thursday in a post on X, as he announced the decision to remove the revenge tax. Mr. Bessent did not make specific reference to the DST. He said G7 countries will work with countries in the G20 and the OECD to implement the agreement over the coming weeks and months. 'This understanding with our G7 partners provides greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond,' he said. The Associated Press reported that Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith said they would remove Section 899 from the bill. Canada's Finance Minister, François-Philippe Champagne, responded positively to Mr. Bessent's statement on X, but did not provide further detail as to what the change would mean for Canada. 'At our last G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting we agreed to work together to restore greater stability and predictability for the world economy. We welcome Sec. Bessent's work to have Section 899 removed from consideration in the bill before Congress,' he said. The G7 did not release a statement Thursday. Mr. Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, the sprawling piece of legislation that would extend his 2017 tax cuts and implement much of his domestic agenda, continues to be debated in Washington. What's in Trump's big budget bill? From cuts to taxes and Medicaid, here's what to know Mr. Trump has said that he wants the bill finalized for his approval by the fourth of July, a timeline that his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, repeated Thursday. In recent weeks, Canadian wealth managers have warned of potential U.S. tax hikes on foreign investors based on the provisions of Section 899. As originally worded, the provision would have increased the U.S. tax rate for Canadian companies and other international investors. It could have cost Canadian investors who own U.S. securities up to $81-billion in additional taxes over seven years, according to an estimate by the Securities and Investment Management Association. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce also warned that the bill could result in Canadians' retirement savings being withheld to pay U.S. taxes, as retaliation for Canada's digital services tax or other provisions related to undertaxed profits or a global minimum tax. That's because Section 899 could have imposed withholding taxes on hundreds of billions of dollars of U.S. investments held by government-sponsored pension-fund managers in Canada. David Pierce, the Chamber's vice-president of government relations, said it in a statement that the U.S. move was a positive one. 'Section 899 was bound to escalate the consequences of this trade war for consumers, investors, pensioners, and businesses. We are glad to see the U.S. administration de-escalating, and we hope this leads to further co-operation at the international level,' he said, adding that the chamber still believes Canada should drop its DST in response to the 'olive branch' from the U.S. Canada refuses to pause digital sales tax as trade talks with U.S. continue Friday Canadian tax experts say Mr. Bessent's comments leave many questions unanswered as to what exactly has been proposed. Canada and other members of the OECD have been negotiating for years about acting together on tax reform related to multinational corporations. The talks have been divided into two pillars. Pillar one has generally focused on issues such as digital services taxes, where a country would collect taxes on the profits of services provided by a multinational in that country. This would affect businesses such as Netflix, Disney and other streaming services. Pillar two has focused on the idea of a global minimum corporate tax in an effort to address concerns that countries are in a race to the bottom to compete with each other through lower taxes. Mr. Bessent's statement only referred to pillar two and did not mention pillar one. Canadian tax experts say it's unclear what this latest development means for the continuing tension between the U.S. and Canada over its DST. It is possible that the DST could be an issue for negotiation in the planned summer negotiations between the two countries on trade. Allison Christians, the H. Heward Stikeman Chair in Tax Law at McGill University, said more details need to emerge before the full implications can be understood. 'The original bill could have increased taxes Canadians pay on certain U.S. investments every year until Canada relinquished its digital services tax and its application of global minimum corporate taxes to U.S. companies,' she said. 'All I know is that they're saying that we've agreed to something that seems to exempt the U.S. companies from a global minimum corporate tax, and I don't understand whether that also means U.S. companies won't have to pay digital services taxes.' Prof. Christians said it was debatable whether the U.S. bill's provisions would have applied in Canada anyway. 'We're in such a state of flux,' she said. Brian Ernewein, a senior adviser at KPMG and a former senior tax official with the federal Finance Department, said many clients have been concerned about the potential implications of the revenge tax. 'It's a very positive result that 899 has come off,' he said in an interview. 'There was high anxiety about it.' Mr. Ernewein reviewed Mr. Bessent's statements, but said it is unclear what exactly the G7 agreement involves. 'There are a lot of questions as to what that means,' he said. With a report from Clare O'Hara in Toronto

More than 1K new homes included in affordable housing project in Waterloo
More than 1K new homes included in affordable housing project in Waterloo

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

More than 1K new homes included in affordable housing project in Waterloo

Waterloo says a new affordable housing project will include more than 1,000 homes. CTV's Heather Senoran has the details. The City of Waterloo has finalized the transfer of city-owned land for an ambitious affordable housing project said the be the only one of its kind in the country. The city hosted an event Thursday at the 25-acre piece of land at 2025 University Avenue East, near RIM Park, to celebrate the next step in the project. Habitat for Humanity Waterloo Region partnered with the city for the project that will include more than 1,000 homes from studio apartments to four-bedroom units for families. 'There's going to be a bit of everything. The idea here is to create a whole community so it's not what's normally being built. It's not patchwork,' said Philip Mills CEO of Habitat for Humanity Waterloo Region. 'Everything you'd need - daycares, a gym, health care, food.' Affordable Housing at 2025 University Avenue East Waterloo The future site of an affordable housing project at at 2025 University Avenue East was pictured on June 26, 2025. (Heather Senoran/CTV News) Waterloo's mayor, Dorothy McCabe, said it is a once-in-a-generation transformational project. 'About 30 per cent will be for deeply affordable [units]. Thirty per cent will be for affordable. And the rest will be attainable,' she said. It's expected to cost about half a billion dollars with $22 million in funding coming from the federal government's Housing Accelerator Fund. 'A huge portion of that is going into the work that's being done on this site and to provide some compensation to the city for the land itself,' McCabe said. It will be a mix of rented and owned homes. The price to rent or to own will depend on the size of the unit and other factors. The team said they will be among the most affordable homes on the market. The team hopes the project will have national impact. 'We're really hoping that other communities will take a look at this and see how this could be replicated across the country,' said McCabe. Shovels are expected to be in the ground by 2026. The goal is for it to be move-in ready sometime in 2027.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store