logo
ECB admits no evidence Hundred has attracted new fans to other forms of cricket

ECB admits no evidence Hundred has attracted new fans to other forms of cricket

The Guardian31-07-2025
Richard Gould, the ECB's chief executive, has admitted his organisation has no evidence that new fans attracted by the Hundred have gone on to attend other forms of the game. The governing body of cricket in England and Wales has long boasted that the tournament has attracted a different audience to existing formats.
'The Hundred is all about throwing cricket's doors open – and it's already delivering,' the ECB's then chief executive, Tom Harrison, said after the first tournament in 2021. 'We need to grow cricket, reach more people, and that's exactly what the Hundred does.' A report published last October stated that 31% of tickets for the Hundred have been bought by women, that 23% were bought for juniors and that 41% of buyers attended in family groups.
But on the day that counties received their first downpayment on the windfall generated by external investment into the eight Hundred franchises Gould said no work had been done into finding out if any of those new fans remain involved in the sport during the 11 months of the year when the tournament is out of action.
'That's probably a bit of work that we now need to do going forward,' Gould said. 'Just to check that when people do come in, where do they go? Because you might get some coming in to Test cricket [who] then go to the Hundred, and Hundred into Test cricket. We haven't done that work in any great detail.'
That lack of work is particularly surprising given that cross-pollination between formats is one of the ECB's primary goals.
'Fandom is really important for us, whether it's England, Leicestershire or London Spirit,' Gould said. 'That's the key. We've got a really dedicated core audience, which is relatively small compared to other sports. And then we've got lots of people that are very interested in cricket but perhaps don't come to it as often as we want. We know that the interest is there, we just need to get people to come more often for all formats, rather than just that 'I've been to the Test once a year' type of thing.'
This year's Hundred, which starts at Lord's next Tuesday, is likely to be the last before new owners start to push through significant changes, from team names and kits to the length of the format itself. 'That's the kind of conversation we're starting to get into now,' said Vikram Banerjee, the tournament's managing director. 'It would be slightly odd to bring all these great people in and then just leave it as it is.'
Deals for the sale of part or full stakes in six of the eight Hundred franchises were finalised this week, with the final two expected imminently. The total investment has been put at £520m of which an initial sum of 'just north of £400,000' has now been released to every county. In all host counties can expect to receive a minimum of £18m, and non-hosts around £25m.
Sign up to The Spin
Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action
after newsletter promotion
The possibility of adding a ninth team to the competition has already been discussed, but current non-hosts have been warned against spending their windfalls on unnecessary stadium upgrades as they jostle for position in the queue.
'When giving guidance as to what a future expansion team needs to look like in terms of facilities, we're not going to be setting huge capacities,' Gould said. 'What we don't want is a load of empty plastic seats around the place. We're not looking to see investment going into creating white elephants.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Bank of England's credibility is seeping away
The Bank of England's credibility is seeping away

Telegraph

time3 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The Bank of England's credibility is seeping away

The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) should not have lowered its main policy interest rate this month. That cut from 4.25pc to 4pc was a 'significant error', I wrote last week, that could 'come back to bite us'. Financial market movements over the last week have convinced me I was wrong. The MPC's latest move was in fact a very significant error. If officials at the Bank of England aren't alarmed about the growing gap between the MPC's policy rate and the cost global investors now charge the UK Government to borrow, they should be. And if ministers aren't concerned, not least Treasury ministers, I have to wonder if they really understand what is going on. My main objection to the MPC's latest rate cut is that UK inflation remains high and is rising. By lowering rates when inflation is still clearly a problem, besetting Britain to a greater extent than other comparable economies, the MPC undermines the Bank of England's credibility – at a time when such credibility is sorely needed. During the year to June, the consumer price index rose 3.6pc, up from 3.4pc the previous month. This is the highest headline inflation rate since January 2024, with CPI growth consistently above the 2pc inflation target since last October. Driven by elevated food, energy and transport costs, UK inflation is the highest in the G7 – and has been since June 2024. Britain also uniquely saw month-on-month CPI increases in April, May and June, so our inflation outlier status has become even more stark over recent months. Earlier this month, even the MPC upped its inflation forecast to 4pc this autumn – but raised rates regardless. And there were no compelling reasons in the minutes of the committee's latest deliberations why price pressures will ease any time soon, let alone fast enough to justify dropping rates when inflation, on the Bank's own reckoning, will be double the official target as early as next month. The seeping away of the Bank's credibility is now playing out in real time, not least since last weekend. Over the past year, as the policy rate has come down incrementally from 5.25pc to 4pc, the rate the Government pays to borrow long-term money has moved decisively in the opposition direction. This is a bad sign, signalling that financial markets – not least the global pensions funds and insurance companies that lend government's big money and dominate sovereign bond markets – have a different view of inflation to MPC policymakers. In competitive auctions to lend the Government money, these major institutional investors, even as the MPC has been cutting, have been demanding higher rates when lending to compensate for the elevated inflation they still think is coming. Since last August, as the policy rate has shifted down 1.25 percentage points, the UK's 30-year gilt yield has been pushed sharply up – from less than 4.5pc a year ago to 5.3pc on the morning of Thursday Aug 7, prior to the MPC's midday announcement, a rise of more than 0.8 percentage points in the opposite direction. By last weekend, that market-driven borrowing cost had gone up to 5.43pc, flying in the face of the Bank of England. Some mortgage providers even raised fixed-term lending rates following the MPC's cut – no doubt because they saw gilt yields reflecting investors' concerns the committee's view on inflation is wrong. Such rate-splitting, as I call it, when policy and market rates move against each other, is a sign of growing financial instability. It indicates that market expectations have become unanchored from policymaker preferences – and in the end the market always wins. I'm concerned that, over the past week, we've seen the 30-year rate rise even more, touching 5.57pc on Friday. So since the policy rate has been lowered 0.25 percentage points, the long-term cost of government borrowing has moved rightly the same amount in the opposite direction. I argued last week that by lowering rates when inflation was clearly not tamed, the MPC was in danger of 'rate-splitting' to an even greater extent. That is what has happened. Long-term bond yields are influenced by a multitude of factors, of course, and have lately been nudging up across the world. But the UK's outlier inflation status is matched by its outlier status when it comes to long-term borrowing costs too. Our 30-year yield is also easily the highest in the G7. Even the governments of Europe's previous 'debt-crisis' nations can now borrow long-term money a lot more cheaply than the UK – namely Italy (4.52pc), Greece (4.26pc) and Spain (4.18) at the time of writing. And those rising borrowing costs, of course, need to be paid by the British state – increasingly, it seems, by borrowing even more. In April 2024, the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated that the UK Government would borrow £85bn over the following 12 months. When the fiscal year ended this April, that total was actually £148bn, no less than £105bn of which was spent on debt interest. In June alone, borrowing was £20.7bn – no less than £16.4bn of which was spent servicing our existing national debt. This is utter madness. While the MPC should not have cut rates earlier this month, in the end those really at fault are government ministers – and, more generally, a political and media class that, for so many years, has dismissed the concerns of those of us who have constantly warned that nation states, while they can of course borrow, need to both borrow and spend responsibly. Successive UK governments have not been doing so – today's Labour administration to an increasingly reckless extent.

Last Pub Standing in Norwich applies for longer music hours
Last Pub Standing in Norwich applies for longer music hours

BBC News

time3 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Last Pub Standing in Norwich applies for longer music hours

The owners of a city centre pub hoped to host later outdoor music events despite previous noise complaints from Last Pub Standing, in Norwich, applied to the council for an amendment to its premises licence to permit the playing of music in the garden until King Street bar currently has to shut off entertainment in the garden at 22:00 BST, or 23:00 on Fridays and Saturdays, under an agreement made less than two years officials have raised concerns about the application, pointing to a history of noise complaints and enforcement action which previously troubled the venue. It will be discussed at a Norwich City Council meeting. A previous premises licence was lost when a company set up by the owner of the pub, Simon Peters, with a business colleague, went into to a split between the pair, a new company was formed by Mr Peters and the licence was an administrative mistake meant the venue was mistakenly operating without a licence for some time before it secured a new licence in January licence was currently in use, but Mr Peters said it was handed to him with "more onerous terms" than the original, including strict limits on the use of the garden and the shutting of windows. His new application sought to extend the hours permitted for the playing of recorded music in the back garden to 23:00, or midnight on Fridays and also hoped to secure permission to leave windows open when entertainment is playing, to prevent overheating inside the Peters was given temporary permission to trial these later hours over the Easter period and said no complaints were received during this application is set to be considered at a meeting of Norwich City Council's licensing sub-committee on of that decision, the authority's environmental protection team have objected on public nuisance grounds, with an officer saying it is "important to note that an abatement notice" is in place in relation to objection added that a revised noise impact assessment would be required. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Ex-Debenhams store in King's Lynn could become homes in £20m plan
Ex-Debenhams store in King's Lynn could become homes in £20m plan

BBC News

time3 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Ex-Debenhams store in King's Lynn could become homes in £20m plan

A town's former Debenhams could be turned into housing, according to the chair of a board developing plans for £20m of this year, the government confirmed King's Lynn, Norfolk, would receive the money to help with Etheridge, who heads the town's "neighbourhood board", said the funding could be spent on a wide range of areas, including health, skills, jobs, cutting crime and possibility was that some of it could be used on feasibility plans for disused, large buildings, such as the former department store which closed in 2020. "They're big and they're empty because they're costly to repurpose. We're not going to get John Lewis or Zara or a massive store taking over," she said."But we could look at turning some into housing, for example, or into other multi uses. Whether that might be leisure, dentists or NHS facilities."The neighbourhood board and King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council have to submit initial plans to the government later this the meantime, they said they were looking for local charities and community groups to help gather views from the wider community on how the investment could be BBC has spoken to some people in King's Lynn to see what they think the town needs. "King's Lynn is now starting to be rundown. It's full of charity shops, coffee shops – very few independent shops left – no markets left," said Robert wanted money to be used to help new local businesses open in the town centre, with facilities in other parts of the town also improved."The Fairstead and places like that – their play areas are looking rundown, so money could be spent on them," he said."Or the North Lynn community centre, that's rundown – I'd like to see money spent on them." Mother and daughter, Sharon and Danielle Bowman, said they "loved" King's Lynn – but Sharon was also disappointed with vacant units in town – blaming parking charges for a downturn in trade."That's a big thing when the shops start closing – I think it's very sad, [having] lived in the town all my life."The pair agreed that better health services were needed."We've got so many more houses being built, but you can't get doctor's appointments like you should be able to," said Danielle. "It was a real loss to King's Lynn when we lost our dental access centre," said former nurse Shaun Claxton."It helped an awful lot of people with their dentistry and was a real loss to the community."That helped people who couldn't get an NHS dentist, people who needed emergency work and it was a very good service."It would be lovely to see it return." Dominika Lukasevic, 20, said it was hard to develop skills locally."Either we're just too ignorant or there's not enough advertisement out there for experiences and opportunities for young [people] who just came out of school.""The big universities are [at least] an hour away," she Roper, who runs a cafe in the town centre, said better bus services could draw more people in."If they put a park and ride in, that'd help the community - use the bus lanes more and get a lot more footfall in," he said."One of the biggest things that people get frustrated about is – why go into town and struggle for parking when you can go to the [retail parks] and have an easier life with free parking?" Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store