Victoria Police asked for tougher bail laws for arsonists, FOI documents show
Documents obtained by the ABC through Freedom of Information laws reveal that earlier this year, the Allan government was asked to tighten bail rules to help Victoria Police directly target players allegedly responsible for scores of firebombings.
But in the four months since the government received the advice, it ignored the majority of the police requests and removed the presumption of bail for only one arson-related offence, which requires a person's life to be endangered.
That change is unlikely to have an impact on the majority of tobacco-related firebombings, which typically occur in the dead of night at empty shops.
It comes as newly released figures from police revealed there have been eight tobacco-related arsons since the government's bail changes came into effect in March, including the firebombing of a victim's home that was so serious they were put into witness protection.
Since then, police have arrested 23 people and charged six offenders with arson but four were granted bail — two by the courts and the other two by police.
In a briefing note from February, Victoria Police urged the police minister to reclassify five serious arson-related offences in the Bail Act which would remove the presumption of bail.
Those offences were:
The changes would have forced alleged firebombers charged with serious arson offences to show a "compelling reason" for why they should be granted bail, whereas at the moment the courts presume they are entitled to bail.
But despite agreeing to advocate for the changes months ago, the government removed the presumption of bail solely for criminal damage by fire with the intent to endanger life.
A Victorian government spokeswoman defended the decision and said it was acting to "smoke out organised crime and crack down on the illicit tobacco trade".
"We have listened to police and have already changed the Bail Act by elevating serious arson offences to Schedule 2, meaning anyone charged will be subject to a tougher bail test under our new laws," the government spokeswoman said.
A Victoria Police spokeswoman said the force regularly gave advice to the government.
"It is ultimately a matter for government on whether they take that advice and any queries relating to legislation should be directed to them," she said.
Middle Eastern crime gangs have been behind 140 firebombings since the tobacco wars began in March 2023 as warring factions tried to seize control of Melbourne's illicit tobacco and vape market.
In February this year one of the city's most notorious underworld figures, Sam Abdulrahim, was gunned down in an apartment block car park after a contract was put out on his life.
Victoria Police has previously said it believed Kazem Hamad, a sworn enemy of Abdulrahim, is a key player in the tobacco wars who has orchestrated firebombings on his rivals or shop owners who refuse to pay exorbitant extortion fees.
Hamad was deported to Iraq after serving eight years behind bars for drug trafficking.
The tit-for-tat firebombings have dominated headlines, sucked up police resources and put pressure on the Victorian government to try and stem the tide of violent attacks.
It prompted Victoria Police to make the bail recommendations which the force said constituted a "legislative gap".
There is currently just one fire-related crime considered serious enough not to warrant the presumption of bail — arson causing death.
"This results in offenders of other serious arson offences … not being required to show a compelling reason for why they should be granted bail," Victoria Police said in the secret briefing documents.
"Victoria Police advises … it has also witnessed a continuing cycle of re-offending due to the time taken for matters to be brought before the courts and the high likelihood for suspects to receive bail following arson charges," the force said.
According to police, there have been at least three occasions where alleged offenders have received bail after firebombing tobacco shops, among them a mid-level organised crime figure.
In the documents released to the ABC police allege the man, who is accused of extortion, arson and blackmail, was bailed "despite evidence provided to the court which negated a defence to the charges and despite false assurances".
The force said the changes would have a "preventative and deterrent" effect.
"Victoria Police proposes these five additional offences be included … as a practical solution to the current issue of serious arson offenders receiving a presumption of bail regardless of their risk to the community," the force said.
The force's concerns were noted and agreed to by Police Minister Anthony Carbines but were missing when the Victorian government overhauled the Bail Act after facing mounting pressure to address rising crime rates.
The government's changes reclassified home invasions and carjackings as more serious offences and included tougher bail tests for serious child and adult offenders who commit a crime while already on bail for other offences.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
15 minutes ago
- ABC News
Teenager in stable condition after losing arm in jet ski incident on Sydney river
The classmates of a 15-year-old boy killed in a jet ski collision have gathered at the crash site in Sydney's south to pay tribute after the incident on Tuesday. The boy died and his 14-year-old friend was taken to hospital with a severed arm after their jet ski hit an "obstacle" near Tom Uglys Bridge in Sylvania about 6pm, police said. The younger boy was in a critical condition on Tuesday, but is now stable, according to Sydney Children's Hospital. Sutherland Shire Police Area Command Inspector Tim Carter said the pair were riding on the same jet ski at the time of the collision. "Police were able to quickly enter the water with the help of NSW Ambulance and remove [the 14-year-old] boy to safety, where he received further treatment on the boat ramp," he said. Inspector Carter said a further search identified the 15-year-old as dead at the scene, where he was removed from the water but unable to be revived. "At this stage, it would appear the jet ski has collided with an object or obstacle in the water, which has thrown these two boys from the jet ski," he said. The area around the bridge is heavily trafficked by boats and marine barges. Fred Nagi, a family friend of the injured 14-year-old, told ABC News he was a "beautiful boy" and experienced jet skier. Mr Nagi arrived at the scene shortly after the crash last night. He said there were major safety issues near the bridge that needed to be addressed. "When the sun is setting, it gets dark [under the bridge] — it's like a blind spot," he said. "All the barges have no lights on them." Police divers remain at the scene and spent Wednesday morning scouring the river near a marine barge.
ABC News
15 minutes ago
- ABC News
How Labor's new bill to strip unsafe childcare centres of funding would work
A proposal to strip childcare centres of federal funding has been introduced to parliament. It is one of the re-elected Albanese government's first items of legislation, accelerated in the wake of the shocking allegations against former childcare worker Joshua Brown. It could lead to the effective forced closure of childcare centres that cannot guarantee child safety. Here's how that would work. Like many sectors in Australia, responsibility for child care is split between federal and state governments. States are largely responsible for monitoring the quality and safety of centres, which are mostly run by for-profit companies and not-for-profit organisations. But the federal government provides the money via parents, in the form of the Child Care Subsidy — effectively a "voucher" parents can use on accredited providers. This bill does not propose a federal takeover of quality or safety regulation — that will continue to be done by state auditors in line with their own existing rules. But it does give the secretary of the Department of Education broad discretion to deny or revoke subsidy eligibility from providers if they fall short. Given the centres' business model relies on receiving the subsidy, that would effectively force them to close. For large providers, it could also prevent them from adding new centres. In making such a decision, the legislation would allow the secretary to consider past and present assessments from the states, including whether they meet national quality standards or are graded as "working towards" them. The secretary can also consider any serious incidents or allegations, complaints, or anything else deemed relevant. The legislation sets out a process involving warnings and infringement notices, leading up to suspension of funding. A similar process already exists to strip funding from centres for reasons like fraud, but not for quality and safety — although state regulators can currently shut centres when there are serious threats. The bill leaves significant room for discretion and does not detail the thresholds the secretary must use to make a decision or directly define circumstances where funding must be revoked. It does not specify whether multiple breaches or just one breach are required, and in fact leaves open the possibility a centre could be denied funding on the basis of potential harms rather than past breaches. Education Minister Jason Clare told the ABC's News Breakfast his intention was to focus on centres "that are repeatedly failing to meet [the] minimum standards" and that withholding funding would have significant consequences for non-compliant centres, but also said an action "could be as simple as one" breach. "It is the biggest weapon that we have got to wield here," he said. "Taxpayers provide about $16 billion to childcare centres every year. That represents about 70 per cent of the funding to run a centre … They cannot operate without [subsidies]." The bill also gives the secretary of education greater powers to order spot checks and unscheduled visits to childcare centres. Consistent with their current role, federal auditors visiting sites will focus on fraud rather than quality or safety, which remains the purview of state regulators, but the federal auditors will be able to pass on to the states any safety concerns they observe. Mr Clare said Labor had been working "really professionally and constructively" with the opposition and had also briefed the Greens, signalling hope for broad co-operation to pass the legislation.
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Barnaby Joyce defends splitting from Coalition on net zero ‘crusade'
Nationals maverick Barnaby Joyce has defended his backbench rebellion on net zero, decrying the opposition's embrace of the 2050 target as a 'singular crusade' that he never voted for. Mr Joyce will introduce a private member's bill to repeal net zero and has gained the support of fellow former party leader Michael McCormack. Both MPs were banished to the backbench after the Liberals and Nationals had their brief post-election split – a move Nationals leader David Littleproud at the time put down to 'generational change'. But up the back, neither of the heavyweights need to follow the party line, posing a real threat to Mr Littleproud's tenuous authority and Liberal leader Sussan Ley's efforts to project a modern, united opposition. Cornered by reporters in a press gallery hallway, Mr Joyce was asked on Wednesday why he was rehashing a conversation that Australians had already had at two federal elections. 'No one can dispute power prices are going through the roof,' he said. 'No one can dispute that the power grid is becoming unreliable.' He also said it is indisputable 'that the geopolitical times that we live in have become vastly more precarious'. 'No one can dispute that you need a strong economic base if you want to defend our nation,' Mr Joyce said. 'And we are trying to achieve net zero – something that neither Russia nor China nor the United States, nor Indonesia nor Brazil or the majority of African countries or Southeast Asian nations are part of. 'You're in the minority group here, the minority of people in the globe, the vast majority of the GDP of the globe.' He went on to say that 'even if you believe every chapter, verse of what net zero was going to achieve, it's not going to achieve it because the world's not participating in it'. 'So why are we on this sort of singular crusade by ourselves that has no effect on the climate but incredibly deleterious to the standard of living and the cost of living with the Australian people. 'It's insane.'
