
Analysis: The Trump administration's non-denial denials on Emil Bove
Bove, a former personal lawyer to Donald Trump, has been central to a number of high-profile controversies in the early months of the president's second term. But the most significant one right now is a whistleblower's allegation that Bove suggested that the Justice Department might simply ignore court orders. Former Justice Department attorney Erez Reuveni has said Bove suggested at a March meeting that the department might need to tell the courts 'f**k you.'
That a soon-to-be appellate judge would say such a thing would obviously be problematic; Democrats have suggested Trump is trying to install a political 'henchman' in a powerful judgeship.
We might never know what happened.
But what's also clear is that the administration is offering some seemingly very carefully worded denials. You could even call them non-denial denials.
Often, they don't directly deny what Reuveni claimed. At other points, Bove has simply said he didn't recall certain things and declined to provide more detail.
It's all worth a parse.
The latest news Thursday was that the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee released contemporary messages, emails and documents produced by Reuveni that lend credence to his claims. They show DOJ officials repeatedly citing the concept of telling the courts 'f**k you' around the period in question. They don't prove Bove said what Reuveni claims, but they do suggest government lawyers were talking about that precise phrase after the meeting in question.
('Guess we are going to say f**k you to the court,' one text message says. 'This doesn't end with anything but a nationwide injunction,' another text says, 'and a decision point on f**k you.')
The top two officials at DOJ soon posted on social media their responses to the new disclosures.
Attorney General Pam Bondi said Reuveni was 'asserting false claims.' She added that 'no one was ever asked to defy a court order.'
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche added, 'No one was ever asked to defy a court order — because there was no court order to defy.'
But the thing is: Reuveni never said anyone was asked to defy a court order. He merely said that Bove floated the idea.
'Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f**k you' and ignore any such court order,' Reuveni stated in his whistleblower complaint.
Blanche has also vouched for Bove in another way: by citing his own presence at the March 14 meeting in question – the one where Reuveni alleges Bove made the remark.
'I was at the meeting described in the article, and at no time did anyone suggest a court order should not be followed,' Blanche said last month.
But a fast-emerging question is whether Blanche was actually at the entire meeting.
Reuveni said in an interview with The New York Times published Thursday that, in fact, Blanche was not. He said Blanche entered the conference room briefly and spoke privately with Bove, but then left and did not participate in the fuller meeting.
Reuveni said Bove's remark came after Blanche left.
Bove has also talked around this issue, according to written responses to Senate Judiciary Committee members obtained by CNN.
In questions for the record posed to Bove after last month's confirmation hearing, Bove was asked if Blanche was at the meeting.
'Mr. Blanche has stated publicly that he was at the meeting,' Bove said, merely referring to Blanche's public comments.
Then Bove was asked whether Blanche was 'present for the entire meeting.' Bove declined to answer. He said he didn't want to get into 'non-public specifics about particular topics' and says it would be 'inappropriate' to comment further, since Reuveni's complaint is involved in ongoing litigation.
Which brings us to Bove's own answers.
While his responses at last month's confirmation hearing seemed to deny Reuveni's claims, it's not so simple.
For one, Bove – like Bondi and Blanche – has seemed more willing to deny telling people to actually defy court orders, rather than to actually deny what Reuveni alleged – that he merely suggested it.
'I have never advised a Department of Justice attorney to violate a court order,' Bove said early in the hearing.
'I will reiterate, I did not advise any Justice Department attorney to violate court orders,' he said shortly thereafter.
But when Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California asked more specifically about Reuveni's allegation – whether Bove suggested such a thing – Bove didn't so firmly deny it. He instead said he didn't recall saying that.
'Senator, I have no recollection of saying anything of that kind,' Bove said.
When asked if he suggested telling the courts 'f**k you in any manner,' Bove responded, 'I don't recall.'
Pressed in the same exchange, Bove said, 'I did not suggest that there would be any need to consider ignoring court orders. At the point of that meeting, there were no court orders to discuss.'
Precisely what that means isn't totally clear. It would seem possible to suggest ignoring court orders without suggesting there would be a need to do so. Indeed, top DOJ officials have repeatedly cited how there was no actual court order at the time, as if that made the entire controversy moot. And Bove bookended this comment by saying twice that he didn't recall making such a suggestion.
Right now, it's clear as mud. The question before Senate Republicans is if they care to find out more and really drill down on this – say, by getting sworn statements from others present at the meeting, and/or the government lawyers who cited the 'f**k you' concept in the texts Reuveni produced.
But for now, this issue hasn't been put to bed. And it hasn't really been firmly denied either.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he wants Musk and his companies to thrive in US
(Reuters) -President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would not destroy Elon Musk's companies by taking away federal subsidies and that he wants the billionaire tech-entrepreneur's businesses to thrive. "Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tanya Simon to Lead CBS News' '60 Minutes'
CBS News named Tanya Simon the new executive producer of '60 Minutes,' making her just the fourth executive to lead the program in its nearly 60 years on air and the first woman to do so. She takes the reins of the show at a tumultuous time, when the venerable newsmagazine has been put in the crosshairs of the Trump administration and the fortunes of corporate parent Paramount Global. 'It is a privilege to lead '60 Minutes' and its formidable team of journalists,' Simon said in a prepared statement. ''60' is in a class of its own, upholding a legacy of extraordinary and thought-provoking journalism for more than half a century. I'm deeply committed to this level of excellence and I look forward to delivering an exciting season of signature '60' stories that cover a wide range of subjects for a broad audience and engage viewers with their world.' More from Variety 'South Park' to Get 50 New Episodes as Trey Parker, Matt Stone Reach Five-Year Deal With Paramount; Entire Series to Stream on Paramount+ Skydance Promises FCC It Will Appoint CBS News Ombudsman to Review 'Complaints of Bias,' Says Paramount Has Eliminated DEI Trump Makes Unconfirmed Claim Skydance Will Give Him $20 Million in 'Advertising, PSAs or Similar Programming' After Paramount Merger Goes Through She has been with CBS News since 1996, joining the news division as a researcher for '48 Hours.' Her father, Bob Simon, was a '60 Minutes' correspondent who was respected for his knowledge of foreign affairs. The newsmagazine has been generating headlines of its own in recent months. Paramount earlier this month agreed to pay $16 million to President Donald Trump to end what has been viewed in many legal circles as a flimsy lawsuit tied to a pre-Election Day interview between Bill Whitaker, a '60 Minutes' correspondent, and former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris. The decision has vexed supporters of the program and of journalism in general, who charge Paramount executives risk tarnishing a media brand that has long sought to hold power to account and to probe events with an independent lens. Paramount is in the midst of trying to push forward on a sale to Skydance Media, and Trump's lawsuit, and a separate probe by the Federal Communications Commission are seen as attempts to block that goal, or to squeeze payments out of the corporation in exchange for a path to the merger. People familiar with CBS News operations believe weeks of leaks about Paramount's legal machinations and of the '60 Minutes' staff's aversion to any kind of settlement have served to undermine the show.'60 Minutes' continues to generate some of TV's highest ratings. Simon has been overseeing the program since its previous EP, Bill Owens, stepped down, citing interference in the show's editorial processes by Paramount. Wendy McMahon, the CBS executive who ran CBS News and its local stations, left a few weeks afterwards, noting that she and the company had different views of how to run operations. Before taking on an interim executive producer role in April, Simone was the show's executive editor for six seasons. Prior to that, she was a senior producer whose responsibilities included overseeing digital content and supervising production of '60 Minutes Sports,' a monthly sports-focused edition of the program that ran on Showtime. She joined the staff in 2000, working with correspondent Ed Bradley on a variety of reports including the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, the Duke University lacrosse rape case and a rare interview with Bob Dylan. Simon went on to produce for nearly all the '60 Minutes' correspondents over the next decade, including Steve Kroft, Lesley Stahl, Scott Pelley, Anderson Cooper, and her father. 'Tanya Simon understands what makes '60 Minutes' tick. She is an innovative leader, an exceptional producer and someone who knows how to inspire people,' said Tom Cibrowski, recently named president and executive editor of CBS News, in a statement. 'Tanya knows that the success of today's '60 Minutes' depends on delivering a weekly mix of the most informative, impactful and entertaining stories and investigative journalism from around the world. This is the true essence and foundation of '60 Minutes'' More to come… Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Final Emmy Predictions: Talk Series and Scripted Variety - New Blood Looks to Tackle Late Night Staples
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Union Pacific in mega US railroad merger talks with rival Norfolk
(Reuters) -Union Pacific (UNP) said on Thursday it was in advanced discussions with rival Norfolk Southern (NSC) for a possible mega merger that would create a transcontinental railroad behemoth. Norfolk shares were up 3.5%, while Union Pacific fell 2.3% in premarket trading. A deal, if it goes through, will combine Union Pacific's dominant position in the Western two-thirds of the U.S. with Norfolk's 19,500-mile route predominantly spanning 22 eastern states. Norfolk has a market value of about $63.2 billion, while Union Pacific was valued at around $138 billion, according to LSEG data. There can be no assurances as to whether an agreement for a transaction will be reached or as to its terms, Union Pacific said. The North American railroad industry has struggled with volatile freight volumes, rising labor and fuel costs, and growing pressure from shippers over service reliability. If the two companies agree to a deal, it would be largest-ever buyout in the sector. It would also shape up as a key test of the Trump administration's appetite for big-ticket mergers and faces a plethora of regulatory hurdles. The first challenge would be securing approval from the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the federal agency that oversees railroads, currently led by Patrick Fuchs, a Trump appointee named to the post in January. It would also require the support of worker unions and might invite scrutiny from several other federal bodies. Major railroad unions have long pushed back against consolidation, warning that such deals threaten jobs and risk throwing rail service into disarray. The last major consolidation in the industry was the $31 billion merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern, which created the first and only single line rail network connecting Canada, the United States and Mexico. The deal, which closed in 2023, faced intense regulatory pushback over concerns it would stifle competition, eliminate jobs and disrupt service but was eventually approved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data