logo
Sabah's 40% revenue claim: High Court decision Oct 3

Sabah's 40% revenue claim: High Court decision Oct 3

Borneo Posta day ago
Photo for illustration purposes only. – Photo from pexels.com
KOTA KINABALU (Aug 12): A High Court here fixed October 3 to deliver its verdict of a judicial review brought by Sabah Law Society (SLS) to get declaration on 40 percent net revenue grant for Sabah which allegedly had not been reviewed for 48 years since 1974.
The decision date was set through virtual hearing via Zoom on Tuesday.
On July 7, a full hearing for the substantive judicial review was heard before Justice Datuk Celestina Steul Galid.
Three years ago, SLS was granted a leave to commence their judicial review by a High Court here which was on November 11, 2022.
The federal government had appealed against the High Court's decision on May 16, 2024 which was dismissed on June 18, 2024, with no order as to costs.
SLS had named the government of the federation of Malaysia and the state government of Sabah as the first and second respondents respectively in their judicial review.
It sought from court a declaration that the failure of the first respondent to hold the second review in 1974 with the second respondent is a breach and contravention of its constitutional duty stipulated under Article 112D, Clauses (1), (3) and (4) of the Federal Constitution.
SLS also sought from court a declaration that 40 percent entitlement remains due and payable by the first respondent to the second respondent for each consecutive financial year for the period from the year 1974 to 2021.
Apart from that, SLS further sought from court a declaration that the failure to pay the 40 percent entitlement by the first respondent to the second respondent for each consecutive financial year for the period from 1974 to 2021 is a breach of the fundamental right to property of the second respondent and ultimately of the people of Sabah as enshrined under Article 13 of the Federal Constitution.
Further, they sought an order of mandamus directed to the first respondent to hold another review with the second respondent under the provisions of Article 112D of the Federal Constitution to give effect to payment of the 40 percent entitlement under Article 112C read with subsection (1) of Section 2 of Part IV of the Tenth Schedule of the Federal Constitution for each consecutive financial year for the period from 1974 to 2021 within 30 days and to reach a decision within 90 days from the date of this order.
Lastly, SLS is also seeking an order that the first respondent pays the entitlement as determined under paragraph 3 (a) above to the second respondent or as constitutional damages for breach of Article 13 of the Federal Constitution or both.
For this Zoom hearing, counsel Jeyan Marimuttu represented SLS, Senior Federal Counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly @ Arwi and Sabah State Attorney General Datuk Brenndon Keith Soh acted for the federal and state governments respectively.
SLS Immediate Past President Datuk Roger Chin emphasized the historic significance of the case, stating: 'This judicial review addresses Sabah's constitutional rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and the Federal Constitution. It has attracted substantial public interest as it concerns long-standing issues of revenue entitlement and fiscal autonomy for Sabah.'
He invited the public, civil society organizations, and media to attend the open-court proceedings, noting they 'reflect the principles of transparency and public accountability.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Magma completes RM379mil capital reduction, eyes long-term growth
Magma completes RM379mil capital reduction, eyes long-term growth

New Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Magma completes RM379mil capital reduction, eyes long-term growth

KUALA LUMPUR: Magma Group Bhd has completed its RM379.21 million capital reduction exercise, a move aimed at strengthening its balance sheet and boosting financial flexibility for long-term growth. This follows a special resolution passed at an extraordinary general meeting on March 21, with a High Court sealed order lodged with the Companies Commission on Aug 13. Through the exercise, Magma's issued share capital was reduced from RM669.15 million to RM289.94 million. The number of shares in issue remains at 1.68 billion, with no impact on shareholders' equity ownership. "This capital reduction marks an important step in our transformation journey," group managing director and group chief executive officer Datuk Seri Thomas Liang Chee Fong said in a statement. "With a stronger balance sheet, we can accelerate our CHAGEE joint venture rollout, unlock value from our Mont Kiara landbank, and pursue high-potential opportunities in hospitality and property, all with the goal of delivering sustainable returns to our shareholders." Magma said the exercise does not involve cancelling any shares or changing the shareholding structure. Instead, it streamlines the company's capital base, improves balance sheet efficiency, and enhances key financial ratios. Following the completion, the group aims to focus on expanding its lifestyle food and beverage business, enhancing its hospitality portfolio and unlocking value from its property assets

UMNO Youth should lead with reason, not ultimatums
UMNO Youth should lead with reason, not ultimatums

Focus Malaysia

time5 hours ago

  • Focus Malaysia

UMNO Youth should lead with reason, not ultimatums

DECISIONS to prosecute any individual should rest with the Attorney General and should be free from political pressure. Taking the law into one's own hands in whatever form, manner or posturing risks eroding trust in both the justice system as well as the image of both Barisan Nasional (BN) and UMNO. As a future top-ranking leader in UMNO and also BN, Akmal should show his statesmanship by being seen to be rational, rounded and responsible carrying out the duty of protecting the party's reputation among all Malaysians. UMNO have lost votes of these fair-minded majority who value peace, harmony, and the rule of law and alienated these middle educated group whose base have expanded as a result of being seen to be 'bullying, brutish and radical' in their political posturing especially towards the minority groups. This is not a good optic for UMNO and BN as even UMNO's support among Malay voters are dwindling and BN has been losing grounds. Of late even PAS and Bersatu have been more mindful to the sensitivities of the minorities. Is UMNO making the same mistake of alienating minorities thinking that their new partner, UMDAP have locked up these votes? Will UMNO potentially kill off DAP supporters the way they killed MCA and MIC with similar theatrics and antics? Under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution, decisions to prosecute lie solely with the Attorney General and must be free from political interference. Issuing deadlines or threats for legal action risks being seen as taking the law into one's own hands, which could damage public trust not only in our justice system but also in UMNO and BN. True statesmanship is shown through calm, reasoned leadership that allows due process to take its course, not by ultimatums that can be perceived as intimidation or selective bullying. After all, did Akmal forget that his party, too, recently made a flag blunder? While it was not an upside-down flag, it was recently pointed out that a poster on the Pemuda UMNO Negeri Terengganu Facebook page had carried a Jalur Gemilang with only 12 stripes, while it should be 14 of alternating red and white stripes. Welfare, as they say, starts from home—shouldn't the Merlimau exco educate his UMNO Youth wing first? We encourage Akmal to lead UMNO Youth as a voice for rational and solution-oriented politics, earning respect across the political spectrum and uniting rather than dividing Malaysians. Akmal's leadership should aim to put BN in better stead with fair-minded Malaysians and not pandering to a smaller or narrower group and in the process deepening the national divide due to stereotyping. The act of magnifying the issue and mobilising anger and hatred targeting a specific 'ethnic' and ignoring others who made similar mistakes is not an altruistic or patriotic act. Mobilising the public to 'teach the perpetrators a lesson' selectively is just a political gimmick that does not benefit national unity. Putting aside possible errors or mistakes, giving guidance and raising consciousness and awareness of the national flag is not the job of the Melaka state exco and can be done extensively and nationally by mobilising the party machinery if indeed the intention is bona fide and in good faith. ‒ Aug 13, 2025 Datuk Seri Ti Lian Ker is a former MCA vice-president and a former deputy youth and sports minister. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image : Malay Mail

Arutchelvan says misunderstanding led to brief scuffle at Parliament gates
Arutchelvan says misunderstanding led to brief scuffle at Parliament gates

New Straits Times

time8 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Arutchelvan says misunderstanding led to brief scuffle at Parliament gates

KUALA LUMPUR: A peaceful march to demand housing for plantation workers turned briefly chaotic today when Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) deputy chairman S. Arutchelvan got into a scuffle with police outside Parliament. Arutchelvan, who fell during the incident, was leading more than 100 plantation workers from Perak, Negri Sembilan, Selangor, Kedah and Johor to submit a draft bill making it compulsory for estates to provide homes for local workers. Police initially blocked the group from gathering at the Parliament gates, prompting shouts of "Don't push" from the demonstrators. They were later allowed to hand over the draft to Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M. Kulasegaran and opposition chief whip Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan. Arutchelvan said the brief clash was the result of a misunderstanding. "We already informed all MPs that we would be coming to the Parliament gates. We were not going to enter the compound, but they wanted us to stand further away from the gate," he said. "We saw the police trying to separate the plantation workers from Parliament and telling us not to gather near the gates. There was actually no issue – we only wanted to be right outside Parliament, not far away across the road." He added that the organisers had informed all relevant parties before the march. "We had notified the police, Parliament and MPs before the event. The problem is police need to assist peaceful assembly, but they cannot make it difficult because Parliament is the symbol of democracy, not a symbol of tyranny," he said. Arutchelvan also stressed that the public had the right to assemble peacefully outside Parliament, as provided for under the Federal Constitution. "They tried to stop us from coming closer… that is why we clashed – but eventually they let us in," he said. The 200-page draft bill presented by the group also traced the problem back to the time of former prime minister Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, who in 1973 introduced a scheme requiring plantation companies to build housing for estate workers. However, Arutchelvan said the scheme was never enshrined in law and has not been consistently followed by plantation companies. "We have drafted the proposed Act to make it easier for the government, and we have already submitted it to five state governments," he said. The march began in Taman Tugu, Kuala Lumpur, with workers carrying banners and chanting slogans calling for better living conditions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store