Smoked out! Villagers living next to a posh campsite claim they are being forced to sell their homes over 'excessive smoke' from trendy fire pits
Neighbours of a posh campsite have claimed trendy fire pits with 'excessive smoke' are forcing them to sell their homes.
Villagers in Frogham say Harry's Field in Hampshire's New Forest, which opened in 2015, is a fire hazard and 'intrusive' air pollution has even worsened their asthma.
Others have sold up and moved away after the site, which opened in 2015, became 'intolerable' and caused the area to 'stink', the council has been told.
The campsite, managed by a renowned hatmaker for the Royal Family, has a population of just over 340, with houses selling for an average price of more than £700,000 last year.
The uproar comes as earlier this month, homeowners won a planning battle to stop the site from increasing the number of days it is allowed to open from 28 to 52.
Vivien Sheriff - whose designs have been worn by the Duchess of Cambridge - argued the business would not be able to operate if what neighbours complained of was true.
The Sheriff family, owner of three campsites in the New Forest, made the application in December last year but were met with strong objections from more than 30 locals.
As part of his protest, Steve King, 63, said the fire pits provided by owners have caused a 'major inconvenience' to neighbours as it is 'impossible for people nearby to enjoy their own outdoor spaces during the summer'.
The training consultant added the smoke blowing over from the fires 'stinks' - and causes air pollution.
Fire pits are rented out to guests by the campsite, costing £15 for one night, £20 for two nights, £25 for three nights, and £30 for four nights.
Campers are provided with one 'load' of kiln dried wood, but are charged £8 a bucket afterwards.
Objecting publicly, Stephen Havelock said the campsite had brought 'misery, noise and nuisance to this quiet village'.
Mr Havelock spoke of the use of fire pits and said the campsite is 'extremely close' to open forest and gorse which is a 'tinderbox in summer'.
He said: 'Sparks could also burn and ignite the tents on site with disastrous consequences.
'This makes no sense at all. Just look at the fires in Los Angeles.
'In spite of what the current owners say, BBQs are commonplace.'
Harry's Field is home to the annual village fete - famous for its uphill wheelbarrow race - and Ms Sheriff's (pictured) family-run campsite business
The homeowner went on to claim Harry's Field is 'detested' by many locals, who 'dread the start of the campsite opening as it makes their lives a misery'.
He said: 'I believe that three residents have sold up and moved away largely because this campsite had made their lives intolerable.
'Noise, shouting, loud music, excessive smoke and antisocial behaviour being the main causes.'
Helen Taylor, who works as a vet and lives right next to Harry's Field said she has been 'plagued' by problems caused by the campsite, which was once voted in the Top 40 UK campsites.
She said open fires as well as gas and charcoal barbeques are used by campers on a 'daily basis'.
Dr Taylor added: 'Residents have suffered significant worsening of their asthmatic symptoms as a result of this smoke pollution.'
Harry's Field is a family-run business which describes itself as a 'small campsite run by campers for campers'.
The site provides facilities like 'proper flushing loos', shower blocks, communal freezers, a campsite shop, a coffee and drinks van, and a pizza oven at weekends.
Ms Sheriff, 60, said she was encouraged by planning chiefs at the council to apply for permission to extend their opening days and was under the impression issues over the campsite had quietened down.
She said: 'The main fact is nobody wants a quiet campsite more than we do.
'There is no way we would be able to run if what [neighbours] were saying is true.
'We were asked and encouraged to do this by the director of the national park planning team.
'This has been stormed up by a few people who have really got an axe to grind.'
But Ms Kerr - who lives in a thatched cottage - raised concerns for her health and home due to the fire pits in her objection.
She said she had to keep her windows shut in the summer, adding: 'We have smelt accelerant being used to light fire pits and we can see the flames through the hedge.
'My insurance company won't allow me to have any type of open fire, in my garden as my property has a thatched roof and yet I can watch ash and burning debris being blown towards our my property when the wind is in my direction.'
Michael and Theresa Mayes said living next to Harry's Field has been 'challenging and detrimental to health' for neighbours.
The couple said the site is in an 'unusual position' as it is situated in the heart of a small hamlet in fields surrounded by residential housing.
They said this has created a 'goldfish bowl effect' which has resulted in an 'extremely unpleasant environment for all those living in the village'.
Another resident said the' 'pungent fire pit smoke causes us to shut our windows and doors and retreat indoors on the days when we should be enjoying our gardens and warm weather'.
Locals concluded living next to the campsite has been an 'unpleasant, challenging and sometimes downright nasty experience for local people'.
They said they have seen campers feeding livestock foods like biscuits, doughnuts, and crisps - which is forbidden in the New Forest.
Some claimed while the site is only permitted to open for 28 days, there have been several occasions when the owners have 'illegally' extended this.
And they complained of 'anti-social behaviour' from campers, including incidents' of trespass, urinating in neighbours' hedges and feeding livestock.
Last week, New Forest Park Authority rejected the application for Harry's Field to open for 52 days per year.
The council said the proposed development would have an 'unacceptable adverse impact' on neighbouring properties.
Harry's Field is home to the annual village fete - famous for its uphill wheelbarrow race - and Ms Sheriff's family-run campsite business.
For over 20 years, Ms Sheriff has run Vivien Sheriff Ltd, a millinery business.
She is said to create 'exceptionally original, undeniably British, luxury headwear' which has been worn by the Duchess of Cambridge - including for her first Royal engagement in 2011 - as well as her sister Pippa Middleton.
A tent pitch at Harry's Field costs £21 per night with an additional cost of £11 per adult and £5 per child.
Campers can also stay in luxury glamping tents, which cost £730 for six nights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The curious case of the squatter archbishop
Justin Welby, former Archbishop of Canterbury, has finally left Lambeth Palace, I can disclose, months after formally standing down as Church of England primate. Welby resigned on January 6 over an alleged cover-up, but was allowed to stay at the palace as he did not own another home in the UK. He finally moved out last month. The two favourites to succeed him are Guli Francis-Dehqani, the Bishop of Chelmsford, and Graham Usher, the Bishop of Norwich. But we won't have a new 'ABC' until October, ahead of an enthronement in November. Catholics took a fortnight to choose a new Pope. Somerset showdown Are Brexiteers about to do battle in Somerset? A by-election is a possibility in North East Somerset. Former Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg is thought to be eyeing up the seat that he lost to Dan Norris at last July's election. But hold on! Arron Banks – the 'bad boy of Brexit' who funded Nigel Farage's 2016 referendum campaign – told me on GB News that he too is looking at standing (his home is five miles outside of the constituency). 'It will be a battle of the country house estates,' Bank tells me. Unless Rees-Mogg jumps ship to Reform, of course. Train to nowhere BBC political editor Chris Mason took the Caledonian Sleeper back from Glasgow after the Prime Minister's defence announcement this week, retiring to his bunk for the 400-mile journey after a dram in the buffet car. He tells me: 'In the small hours, drifting in and out of sleep, it did feel a remarkably smooth journey compared with my last nocturnal train odyssey'. He put it down to 'advances in rolling stock'. But he was awoken with a bang on the door at 5am. 'Morning gents,' said the guard. 'I'm afraid we are still in Glasgow. There's a tree down on the line.' Mason and his BBC team dashed to Edinburgh and made it back to Westminster for the late morning. 'It is all part of the rich tapestry of political reporting,' he says. 'And we got our money back.' Licence fee payers will be delighted. Swedish flag poles Reform UK wants Union flags to fly from its council flagpoles, but shouldn't the Foreign Office be doing its bit too? Whitehall credit card receipts show that David Lammy's department has just placed a £1,500 order for a new batch of miniature Union Jack flagpoles for official vehicles – from Gothenburg, Sweden. 'It is shocking,' says shadow foreign office minister Andrew Rosindell. 'Surely we should be supporting British flag manufacturers when it comes to purchasing flags of our own nation?' Farage's new limit The Spectator's resident magician Mark Mason hosted a quiz this week for the magazine's readers, asking: 'Nigel Farage has a self-imposed limit of how many pints, after which he won't let himself do live TV?' The answer, Mason said, is 'five'. But is that still the case? Farage, 60, tells me: 'Five was always the rule – but I was younger then!' Not even one for the road, Nigel? No queuing for Jezza Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was spotted last week marching past a queue waiting patiently for Left-wing senator Bernie Sanders at the Methodist Central Hall in Westminster. He entered by the hall's stage door. Was he queue-jumping? His aide tells: 'Bernie and his team invited him backstage beforehand.' Er, OK. Perhaps some Very Important Members of the Proletariat are more equal than others. Bookish popstar What do hard-living pop stars do when they enter they grow older? Nick Rhodes, 62, the perma-blond keyboardist in 1980s band Duran Duran, with Simon Le Bon and John Taylor, has accumulated a library of rare tomes. 'I collect fine antique books and have quite the collection,' he told me at Chelsea's Saatchi Gallery. 'It's not generally something I broadcast... With rare books I have my preferences but I'm not saying what they are. If the dealers know it's me they put the price up.' Imperial record Peterborough reader Jeremy Havard got in touch after I told how British Weights and Measures Association wants the Commonwealth Games to replace permanently the 1,500 metres with a mile-long race. Havard recounted how his late father John, president of the Cambridge University Athletics Club in the mid-1940s, broke the London University record for the 100 yards. He says. 'Three years later the decision was taken to change the event to 100 metres, which meant he remained the 'current record holder for 100 yards' in perpetuity.' Havard always included the record in his Who's Who entry. And why not? Peterborough, published every Friday at 7pm, is edited by Christopher Hope. You can reach him at peterborough@
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage ‘seeks less powerful chairman' after Yusuf quits
Nigel Farage is considering appointing a less powerful Reform UK chairman after the sudden departure of Zia Yusuf, The Telegraph understands. Senior party figures have discussed splitting the role into several positions when Mr Yusuf is replaced, following his dramatic resignation on Thursday. Reform sources told The Telegraph that the former chairman had 'rubbed some people up the wrong way', and that a key factor in his departure was high workload. 'He was on a mission, working 18 hours a day,' said one source. 'He was doing it all unpaid, and he expected everyone else to work equally hard.' Mr Farage and the party's officials are working out how to replace the 38-year-old businessman, who said he no longer thought it was 'a good use of his time' to work on getting Reform into government. It came after an apparent dispute between Mr Yusuf and other senior figures over whether the party should campaign to ban the burka, which was suggested by the newest Reform MP Sarah Pochin at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Mr Yusuf said later it was 'dumb' to suggest policies Reform did not support, but Lee Anderson, the Reform chief whip, said he backed a ban. Mr Farage and Richard Tice, the deputy leader, both said they thought there should be a 'debate' on face coverings, including burkas, in the UK. One party source said Mr Yusuf was 'unpopular' with other members of staff, and had become 'super stretched' in managing the day-to-day running of Reform and the party's new ' Doge ' efficiency drive in the ten councils it won in last month's local elections. That workload led him to become 'authoritarian' and a 'control freak', said another figure close to Reform. Mr Farage said on Thursday that Mr Yusuf brought a 'bit of a Goldman Sachs mentality' to the role, which others said was a coded reference to his high-pressure management style. But the Reform leader also said he was 'sad' his chairman was leaving, and that he had only ten minutes' notice that he intended to resign. The tipping point for Mr Yusuf came on Wednesday, when he learned of Ms Pochin's question about burkas to Sir Keir Starmer from reading about it online. Mr Yusuf, who is a Muslim, had been receiving abuse from far-Right trolls online, which Mr Farage said had become difficult for him to bear. He had also reportedly become frustrated that another staff member had taken control of the party's operations, and felt he had been isolated from conversations about policy. He said on Thursday: '11 months ago I became Chairman of Reform. I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30 per cent, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.' Multiple sources said Mr Yusuf had performed well in the job, but was not a popular figure within the team. 'He didn't do what a chairman is meant to do, which is to bring people in and bring them along with you,' said one Reform source, adding: 'He isolated a lot of the staff.' Another added: 'Everyone is very sad about it. He wasn't popular with the staff, but he did a good job in the role. It all happened very suddenly – he'd had enough.' The next chairman may be given a more traditional figurehead role within the party, rather than running its expansion, elections and financial affairs as Mr Yusuf did. Mr Farage could appoint a chief executive alongside a new chairman, using funds raised by Nick Candy, the Reform treasurer. Upcoming donations returns are expected to show that the party raised more than £2.5 million in the first quarter of this year – putting Reform in contention to be the biggest fundraiser among the Westminster parties. Both the Conservatives and Labour have suffered a cash crunch since last year's election, and have laid off staff members. Early contenders to replace Mr Yusuf include Andy Wigmore and Arron Banks, the ' bad boys of Brexit ' who worked with Mr Farage on the campaign in 2016. One figure close to the party said Mr Farage could approach Ann Widdecombe, the former Conservative MP and MEP who stood for Reform at the 2019 election. Ms Widdecombe, who said last month she disagreed with Reform's policy to expand access to the winter fuel allowance, told The Telegraph she had not been approached about the job. Mr Yusuf's departure is the latest in a series of internal disputes within Reform, including a public row between the chairman and Rupert Lowe, who was elected for the party last year but has since been ejected. Mr Yusuf did not respond to a request for comment.
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The middle-class student activists motivated by ‘privilege guilt'
From chants to 'Globalise the Intifada' on the leafy campuses of New England to anti-colonial vandalism in 700-year-old Oxbridge colleges, the more prestigious the university, the more amenable it seems to anti-West radicalism. Last week, Sciences Po – the Paris university that serves as a finishing school for France's elite – was accused of being 'ruined by woke radicals' in a book by a Le Figaro journalist. Similar accusations are made against Harvard, Yale and Columbia in the United States and Oxford and Cambridge in Britain. Trans rights, climate change, and Black Lives Matter have all been sources of fierce student protest in recent years. But nothing appears to have radicalised elite students more than the war in Gaza. Israel's response to the attack by Hamas on October 7 has emerged as the principal motivation for protests by some of the highest-status students in the world – those who supposedly work to the highest standards and expect to reap the rewards of their privilege as future, highly-paid leaders in business, politics, and law. A disproportionate number of students at elite universities are also from middle-class backgrounds. In 2023, one in three successful Oxford applicants and a quarter of successful Cambridge applicants came from private schools. 'There is a paradox at the heart of this,' says historian and former Oxford professor David Abulafia, who has criticised the excesses of woke ideology in our culture. 'The protesters are obsessed with entitlement and ideas like how evil whiteness is, but of course, most of them are entitled and the vast majority are white. The positions they take are full of contradictions.' It is not a coincidence that some of the most privileged students are adopting these positions, says Abulafia. 'There is an embarrassment about being in a privileged situation. People want to appear to reject characteristics they themselves have and the only way they seem to be able to deal with these characteristics is to side with those who are critical of them.' Columbia University in New York has become the epicentre of student radicalism over the Gaza conflict, with the tents of the 'Gaza Solidarity Encampment' appearing in April last year. This climaxed with the occupation of Hamilton Hall, brought to an end by riot police and the arrest of more than 100 people. Last month, police in helmets streamed into the university to remove a group of mask-clad protesters, some of whom had written 'Columbia will burn' across pictures. Four days after the Hamas attack on Israel, the Harvard Undergraduate Palestine Solidarity Committee released a statement that students 'hold the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence'. It was co-signed by 33 student groups. Protests have flared at Harvard and fellow Ivy League giant Yale ever since. In April this year at Yale, some 200 keffiyeh-wearing protesters chanted, 'We will honour all our martyrs.' With the protests have come complaints by Jewish students that they have been made to feel unsafe and intimidated by rising anti-Semitism. This pattern of radical protest by students at elite universities is mirrored in Britain. One of the Just Stop Oil activists accused of defacing Stonehenge last April, Niamh Lynch, 22, was an Oxford student. Lynch denies the charges against her and, at a hearing in January, asked for her trial not to clash with her university exams this summer. It has been set for October. In 2023, Daniel Knorr, a 21-year-old biochemistry undergraduate, allegedly sprayed the Radcliffe Camera Building in Oxford with orange paint in protest at the university's links with fossil fuel companies. He has pleaded not guilty and his trial will take place in August. Chiara Sarti, a PhD student at King's College, Cambridge, sprayed her own college building with orange paint in 2023 and in March last year, an unidentified member of Palestine Action (it's still not known whether they attended the university) knifed and defaced a painting of Lord Balfour in Trinity College, Cambridge, for his part in the creation of the state of Israel. In January, members of Oxford Action for Palestine seized the Radcliffe Camera Building. The group said it had renamed it the Khalida Jarrar Library, after the leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a proscribed terror group. Meanwhile, Phoebe Plummer – who was convicted of defacing Van Gogh's Sunflowers at the National Gallery in 2022 – studied at Manchester University having attended a £50,000-a-year boarding school in Ascot. Douglas Headley, a professor of philosophy of religion, has worked at Cambridge's divinity faculty for almost three decades, since 1996. In that time, the university has seen protests ranging from large-scale demonstrations on the Iraq War and student fees, to the recent acts of vandalism by Just Stop Oil and pro-Palestinian activists. In March, the High Court granted Cambridge an injunction preventing protesters from disrupting graduation events. On Friday Trinity and St John's Colleges sought fresh injunctions against pro-Palestinian demonstrators as a result of an encampment set up on their land over the previous weekend. 'For young people, a cocktail of radicalism within a secure environment is unbelievably attractive,' says Hedley. 'The ideologically driven self-hatred and hatred of the country is the core of this problem.' Is it possible that the privilege actually increases the students' urge to be more radical? What motivates their keenness to rubbish the heritage from which they have benefitted more than anyone, and where does their moral certainty come from? 'Some privileged young people understand they have had access to things that others do not,' explains Paul Glynn, clinical director at Klearminds therapy group, who has worked with students on issues of privilege. 'The key emotions are guilt and shame. Guilt is an activating emotion – it's about making amends or a correction. Shame can be isolating. A student can often deny or avoid exposing their privilege to others.' 'Privilege can result in 'overcompensation', where students experiencing guilt align themselves with causes that make them feel like they have a less privileged identity,' adds Glynn. When students chant 'Globalise the Intifada' on campus, it's an expression of an overtly binary view of the world, an expression that can be linked to their privilege. 'Certainty is attractive,' says Glynn. 'Most of these issues are complex, but we don't like that so let's make it good or evil.' 'What strikes me is the lack of knowledge among students,' says Abulafia. 'With the Gaza/Israel example there is a complete ignorance about the historical context. They don't really seem to be interested.' The anti-Vietnam marches of the 1960s were an attempt to stop a war which had direct consequences for American students, with a chance that you, your friends or family members could be drafted to fight and die on the other side of the world. The current protests have grown in a hothouse of identity politics – in which protesters' views on Gaza are part of a broader world view that tends to encompass critical race theory, extreme trans rights and anti-capitalist activism. Through this lens, Israel is perceived to be a white colonising state and therefore bears the sins of all colonialists, with its associations of racism, apartheid and exploitation. As Abulafia highlights, in many cases, the students appear to be rejecting the world that got them to such colleges in the first place. If they are told the system is bad, they must be bad too. Assumptions about colonialism in higher education that sprang from Edward Said's 1978 book Orientalism and the influence of French intellectuals such as Michel Foucault have contributed to the notion of a hierarchy of oppression, from which students can judge who and what deserves the most sympathy. Katharine Birbalsingh, a leading headteacher who advocates for freedom of speech, suggests that the problem starts at school – specifically private school classrooms – where the connection between privilege and guilt is first made. 'It seems obvious there is a relationship between what you might call 'woke' culture and privilege,' says Birbalsingh. 'By that I include mainly white, middle-class people. Woke ideas like 'decolonisation' and criticism of Western values are everywhere in the most exclusive private school classrooms and that feeds into universities. 'One example is outside speakers who come into private schools and imply that there is something wrong with being privileged and they point towards absolving themselves by embracing Black Lives Matter or the trans movement.' Birbalsingh recently claimed that transgender children are more likely to be 'white and privileged' and that many were searching for 'victimhood narratives', which are 'admired' in modern society. Deferring to your less privileged peers A key part of the dynamic between privilege and protest is how some students react to their less socially advantaged peers. Psychologists suggest students who are perceived to be 'marginalised' are more likely to be listened to, especially when it comes to theories around race and history. 'We have found that students from less privileged backgrounds are deferred to by more privileged ones, because the privileged students believe that the opinions and beliefs of others must be more authentic,' says Dr Helena Bunn, a member of the British Psychological Society and a director of a doctorate programme that explores social justice, oppression and privilege with students at the University of East London. 'The privileged students feel compelled to become advocates for a cause they have little personal connection to. If there is guilt about privilege, that can lead to less critical thinking. 'There can also be a sense of 'I feel I have to do something' so they follow the opinions of others who are seen to be less privileged. It can be as simple as just thinking 'something is wrong here' like a war for example, but the emotional priority is to belong to the cause.' Perhaps the most infamous example of student entitlement was recorded during the Columbia tent encampment, with the appearance of Johannah King-Slutzky as its spokesperson. King-Slutzky, a PhD English student and the daughter of psychologists, warned that students illegally occupying university property could 'die of dehydration and starvation' if they were not given supplies. The protests have raised the ire of the Trump administration, which sees the demonstrations as evidence that universities such as Columbia and Harvard are gripped by a 'woke' elite complicit in the radicalisation of their students. The US president threatened to redirect $3 billion in Harvard research grants last week, following a decision to suspend foreign students from enrolling. 'Harvard is treating our country with great disrespect,' he said. 'Globalise the Intifada' may be cosplay rebellion for some privileged students and a way of expiating guilt for others, but sceptics argue the increasing prevalence of the chant has real-world consequences. The former New York Times columnist Bari Weiss pointed to recent attacks on Jews in New York and Colorado, saying: 'It was dismissed as a metaphor and not what it always was: a demand for open season on Jewish people worldwide.' 'The elite institutions have been ideologically captured,' says Hedley. 'When I worked in the US, I noticed the universities you would assume to be the best weren't because their departments and academics were taken over by a gender and race ideology. Once you turn a university into an ideological arena, it encourages the students to express their outrage and their virtue in ways the average person outside is not going to be very impressed with.'
