Thyssenkrupp steel, workers agree on site closures, less working hours in revamp
The accord with steel workers marks a major step in Thyssenkrupp's restructuring, under which the former German industrial icon is planning to turn into a holding company, and comes after renewed tension between management and labour representatives.
Implementation of the new collective bargaining agreement, which runs until September 30, 2030, must be approved by IG Metall members at Thyssenkrupp's steel unit TKSE and is pending an agreement on the division's future financing, they said.
The agreement follows Thyssenkrupp's announcement that up to 11,000 jobs at the steel unit, TKSE, had to be cut or outsourced and that annual production capacity would be lowered to 8.7-9.0 million tons from 11.5 million tons.
"We went to the pain threshold and only made concessions where it was really necessary in order to secure jobs and locations," said Tekin Nasikkol, head of Thyssenkrupp's works council and member of the group's supervisory board.
"We have now created the conditions for the company to emerge from the difficult situation out of its own strength," Nasikkol said in a statement.
Thyssenkrupp had wanted to reach a deal regarding the restructuring by summer and both sides aim to finalise the current agreement by the end of September.
Reaching a wage deal has been seen as a key hurdle to be cleared before Thyssenkrupp can sell an additional 30% stake in TKSE to Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky, as planned. The investor already owns a 20% stake via a holding company.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man United splashing cash on new strikers adds pressure on Amorim to deliver
After their worst season in 51 years last term, the only way is up for Manchester United. Complete with a new £200 million (€230 million) strike force, coach Ruben Amorim has the backing of fans to bring about lasting change. Now he must deliver. From the start, Amorim has always said, given the choice, he would not have taken on the monumental task of awakening English football's most successful club from its slumber when he did, mid-season. Advertisement The Portuguese coach insisted he was given a "now or never" ultimatum before succeeding Erik ten Hag last November, taking an underperforming side to plentiful lows – worst finish, most defeats, fewest points and fewest goals in their Premier League history. Amorim asked supporters to judge him after he had a full pre-season to instil his ideas properly. Three new forwards gives him greater tools to succeed. Such spending comes as a surprise. New co-owner Jim Ratcliffe insisted only in March that the club were so low on cash when his company Ineos bought a minority stake in late 2023 they faced going "bust by Christmas". RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko is expected to be confirmed as a United player this weekend and could be flanked for next week's season opener against Arsenal by exciting forwards Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo, who both have something United attackers of late have lacked – Premier League goalscoring pedigree. Advertisement As United slumped to an unfathomable 15th last term, the concession of 54 goals was their joint-third worst defensive record in Premier League history. It was their inability to score that proved more damaging, however. They mustered a record-low 44 league strikes, five fewer than in any Premier League season. "The hardest part of last season was to go to the games and know that we are not going to be competitive,' Amorim told reporters on the club's pre-season tour of the United States. "Nowadays I'm better, I'm more excited. I also think I learned a lot. We will be a better team. Not just because I truly believe that we can be better, but I truly believe that I will be better at managing this season. Advertisement "Now we are in a better place, but we are just beginning. We have to perform. And I really like the pressure. If I have the feeling that before the game we are going to be competitive, we'll be OK. I just don't want to return to that feeling that we are thinking it's not a 50-50 game.' Supporters have been buoyed that new signings have not been put off by the fact United will not be competing in any European competition this season for the first time in 11 years. Mbeumo and Sesko especially had plenty of other clubs reportedly interested in them, but the pull of United, despite being without a league title since 2013, remains. "From the start, I wanted to join this massive club," Mbeumo said after signing. "Now I'm here, I'm just really happy. For me, it's the biggest club in the world. The fans are crazy, the stadium is amazing. Every player wants to play here." Advertisement More new signings are needed across the team for any major improvement this season, however. Skipper Bruno Fernandes labelled the last US tour performance in a 2-2 draw with Everton as "lazy" and called on the club to make more additions before the transfer window shuts at the end of the month. Otherwise, their trip across the Atlantic was unanimously positive. With a starting line-up retaining nine of the team that performed so poorly in their Europa League final loss to Tottenham Hotspur, United looked energised and, at times, entertaining in a 4-1 win over Bournemouth, while also beating West Ham to finish unbeaten in their three-match series. Amorim faces some daunting early fixtures, with Arsenal, Manchester City and Chelsea in their opening five games. Nonetheless, he needs to harness some rare positivity gleaned from scoring some goals over pre-season to at least start setting United back on the right path.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Inherited wealth risks eroding ambition': how much would you leave to your children?
This week, Telegraph Money's article about inheritance ignited a debate among hundreds of our readers, many of whom were shocked by the decision of a millionaire entrepreneur and philanthropist, who will not leave his inheritance to his children. Barrie Wells, 85, sold his insurance company, Premierline, for several million pounds in 2008. His children, now 48 and 50, have both come to accept they won't receive his wealth. 'Why does anybody need £100m to be left to them? I think it's far better off being used for things in society,' Mr Wells says. Following this, we asked our readers in an exclusive Telegraph poll: How much money will you leave to your children? Well, a sizeable 70pc of over 7,000 readers said they would leave as much as they can. This prompted further discussion in the comments section about what was the 'right' and the 'wrong' thing to do. What is your view? Vote in our poll below, and read on for the best of the debate. 'Make our children's lives easier' The majority of readers disagreed with Mr Wells and celebrities such as Gordon Ramsay on the principle of not spoiling their children. Telegraph reader Ian Paterson argues, 'nice principles, but most of us want to make our kids' lives easier'. He reasons: 'Perhaps if you are worth millions, you can leave some, but not all, to your kids. But for most of us, we want to leave whatever we're able to.' Another reader, Alex Wong, says: 'If your children can't respect what you leave for them and put it to good use, it says more about either them or you than it does about wealth.' The reader 'inherited a lot' and knows he will leave a large amount to his children. 'I hope when the time comes, I will have done enough to ensure they do the same for their kids.' And Eddie Fagg suggests it's 'all very well' not overindulging your children, 'but if they don't make the grade in work or have financial success of their own, you have needlessly committed them to a miserable existence after you have gone.' 'At least give them something to keep them comfortable,' he concludes. 'What have my children done for me?' Out of the readers who responded to our poll, 13pc revealed they would leave some of their inheritance to their children, but use the rest themselves while still alive, or leave it to good causes. An anonymous reader shares: 'If I had £100m to bequeath, I wouldn't leave it all to my children. 'However, along with most average people, I will be leaving them with a decent amount that certainly won't be enough to spoil or encourage a life of decadence!' Meanwhile, Raymond Jones, says: 'I blow hot and cold on this one. Some days I ask myself what have my children ever done for me? And other days I feel a duty to make their lives easier.' The reader ponders: 'I guess the best approach is to be generous to yourself, and the kids can have what's left.' 'It's not an act of love' Finally, several readers sided with Barrie Wells' view, in the hope it would encourage their children to make their own way in life. Martin Hughes is 'already worth over £150m, and I'm not yet 50'. He says he built his wealth 'through a mix of luck, hard work, and timing'. The reader, who has four children, says 'they will all benefit' if he has wealth when he dies, from no more than 5pc of his wealth, split evenly. Mr Hughes believes that his children 'will be grateful that they were left a decent inheritance, but not robbed of their ambitions'. He explains: 'I don't believe passing it all on to my children would be an act of love. Beyond a certain point, inherited wealth risks eroding ambition, independence, and resilience. 'I want to give them the tools to thrive, not the illusion that life owes them something. The rest of my estate will go to causes that I believe will make a long-term difference in the world.' Meanwhile, Thelma Bee always 'had this weird plan that if I came into loads of money, I'd get a personal investigator to find all the people in my past who helped 'shape' me, or been very kind to a family member, and get a lawyer to give money to them anonymously.' She says it's 'probably quite a narcissistic approach, but it's sort of a thank you, and they'll have a lovely surprise and never know why'. And an anonymous reader advocates: 'Give it to local volunteer charities like food banks or support a hospice or ten. If you don't want to give it to your privileged children, give it to underprivileged ones.'
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Advertising mogul Sorrell approached about S4 Capital deal
Sir Martin Sorrell, the advertising mogul, has received a number of merger approaches for S4 Capital, the London-listed marketing services group he founded seven years ago. Sky News can reveal that Sir Martin has been contacted in recent weeks by potential suitors including One Equity Partners, a US-based private equity firm which focuses on acquiring companies in the healthcare, industrials, and technology sectors. This weekend, analysts suggested that One Equity would seek to combine S4 Capital with MSQ, a creative and technology agency group it bought in 2023. Further details of the possible tie-up were unclear on Saturday, including whether a formal proposal had been made or whether S4 Capital might remain listed on the London Stock Exchange if a deal were to be completed. S4 Capital is also understood to have attracted recent interest from other parties, the identities of which could not be immediately established. In March 2024, the Wall Street Journal reported that Sir Martin had rebuffed several offers from Stagwell, an advertising group led by Mark Penn, a former adviser to President Bill Clinton. New Mountain Capital, another American private equity firm, was also said at the time to have held talks about buying parts or all of S4 Capital. News of One Equity's approach puts the venture founded by one of Britain's most prominent business figures firmly in play after a torrid period in which it has been buffeted by macroeconomic headwinds and a number of accounting issues. Sir Martin founded S4 Capital in 2018, months after his unexpected and acrimonious departure from WPP, the group he transformed from a manufacturer of wire baskets into the world's largest provider of marketing services. The businessman, who has voting control at S4 Capital, used his deep network of institutional relationships to raise money for an acquisition spree at S4, which included technology-focused agencies such as MediaMonks and MightyHive. S4's clients now include Alphabet, Amazon, General Motors, Meta, T-Mobile, and Walmart. Sir Martin's decision to target acquisitions in the digital content and programmatic media arenas reflected the priorities of what he described as a marketing services group for a new era. At WPP, he was the architect of a now-widely replicated strategy to assemble hundreds of agency brands under one holding company. By the time he stepped down, WPP was the owner of creative agency networks such as JWT and Ogilvy, while its media-buying muscle was channelled through the global subsidiary GroupM. The latest approaches for S4 Capital come during a period of profound change in the global marketing services industry, as artificial intelligence dismantles practices and creative processes that had evolved over decades. Sir Martin has spurned few opportunities to criticise his successor at WPP, Mark Read, as well as the wider advertising industry, in the seven years since he established S4 Capital. Last month, WPP announced that Mr Read would be replaced by Cindy Rose, a senior Microsoft executive who has sat on the company's board as a non-executive director since 2019. "Cindy has supported the digital transformation of large enterprises around the world - including embracing AI to create new customer experiences, business models and revenue streams," the WPP chairman, Philip Jansen, said. "Her expertise in this landscape will be hugely valuable to WPP as the industry navigates fundamental changes and macroeconomic uncertainty." WPP has also forfeited its status as the world's largest marketing services empire to Publicis, and will be shunted even further behind the sector's biggest players once Omnicom Group's $13.25bn (£9.85bn) takeover of Interpublic Group is completed. At the time of Sir Martin's exit from WPP in April 2018, the company had a market capitalisation of more than £16bn. On Friday, its market value at its closing share price of 367.5p was just £4.23bn. Last month, the advertising industry news outlet Campaign reported that WPP had held tentative discussions with the consulting firm Accenture about a potential combination or partnership, underscoring the pressure on legacy marketing services groups. This weekend, it remained unclear how likely it was that Sir Martin would consummate a deal to combine S4 Capital with another industry player such as One Equity-owned MSQ. Shares in S4 Capital closed on Friday at 21.2p, giving the company a market capitalisation of £140m. The stock has fallen by nearly 60% during the last 12 months, and is more than 90% lower than its peak in 2022. At one point, Sir Martin's stake in S4 Capital was valued at close to £500m.
