Daniel Penny hired by prestigious venture capital firm
(NewsNation) — Daniel Penny, the Marine who was acquitted in the death of a fellow New York subway passenger he put in a chokehold, has been hired by a prestigious Silicon Valley venture capital firm weeks after he was set free.
The firm, Andreessen Horowitz, announced Penny's position saying he will join their 'American Dynamism team.'
'Daniel is a Marine Corps veteran who served his country, and in a frightening moment in a crowded New York City subway car, did a courageous thing,' Andreessen Horowitz partner David Ulevitch said in a statement.
Neely family attorney: Daniel Penny verdict sends apathetic message
Penny is expected to work on a team that supports 'national interests' including the aerospace, defense and manufacturing sectors, according to the company.
In an internal email to staff, Ulevitch said 'He was acquitted of all charges. Beyond that, it has always been our policy to evaluate the entire person and not judge them for the worst moment in their entire life,' according to The Free Press, which first reported the news.
Penny was charged in 2023 by the Manhattan district attorney's office with manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide after a video of him fatally choking another passenger, Jordan Neely, on the subway for six minutes circulated online.
Neely, an agitated but unarmed homeless man, did not touch any passengers. One said he made lunging movements that alarmed her enough that she shielded her 5-year-old from him, which caused Penny to intervene.
A jury found Penny not guilty in Neely's death in December.
Vice President JD Vace had invited Penny to be his guest at the Army-Navy college football game days after he was acquitted.
In a post on X, Vance called Penny's hiring, 'Incredible news.'
Andreessen Horowitz has about $45 billion in assets under management and its co-founder Marc Andreessen has been a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump and has served as an adviser to the incoming administration, reported Bloomberg.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
28 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Veterans are divided over the Army's big parade, being held on Trump's birthday
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — James McDonough served in the U.S. Army for 27 years, fighting in Vietnam and delivering humanitarian aid to Rwanda. For him, Saturday's military parade in Washington for the Army's 250th anniversary — coinciding with President Donald Trump's birthday — is about the resilience of a vital institution and the nation it serves. 'The soldiers marching that day represent all of that history,' said McDonough, 78, of Crofton, Maryland. 'They don't represent a single day. They don't represent a single person. It's the American Army still standing straight, walking tall, ready to defend our country.' Christopher Purdy, an Army veteran who served in Iraq, called the parade a facade that paints over some of the Republican president's policies that have targeted military veterans and current service members, including cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs and a ban on transgender troops. Purdy said the parade, long sought by Trump, will needlessly display U.S. military might on the president's 79th birthday. 'It's embarrassing,' said Purdy, 40, of Atlanta. 'It's expensive. And whatever his reasons are for doing it, I think it's entirely unnecessary.' Until recently, the Army's long-planned birthday celebration did not include a big parade. Added under the Trump administration, the event, featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, has divided veterans. Some liken it to the military chest-pounding commonly seen in North Korea, a step toward authoritarianism or a perverse birthday party for Trump. Others see it as a once-in-a-lifetime accounting of the Army's achievements and the military service of millions of soldiers over centuries. The parade is not about Trump, they say, but the public seeing the faces of soldiers when so few Americans serve. The Army expects up to 200,000 people could attend and says the parade will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Trump, speaking at Fort Bragg this week, said Saturday would be 'a big day' and noted 'we want to show off a little bit.' 'We're going to celebrate our greatness and our achievements,' he said. 'This week, we honor 250 years of valor and glory and triumph by the greatest fighting force ever to walk the face of the Earth: the United States Army.' 'Divisive politics have ruined it' For Edmundo Eugenio Martinez Jr., an Army veteran who fought in Iraq, the parade is a missed opportunity to honor generations of veterans, many of whom paid a steep price and came home to little fanfare. 'Sadly, the timing and the optics and divisive politics have ruined it,' said Martinez, 48, of Katy, Texas. 'And I'm not picking one side or the other. Both sides are guilty.' 'It's just suspicious' Joe Plenzler, a retired Marine who fought in Iraq, said Trump wants to see troops saluting him on his birthday as tanks roll past. 'It's just suspicious,' the 53-year-old from Middletown, Virginia, said of the timing. 'I absolutely love the Army from the bottom of my cold black Marine heart,' he said. 'But if the Army's birthday was a day later, we probably wouldn't be doing it. I'd rather see that $50 million take care of the men and women who went off to war and came back with missing arms, legs and eyeballs, and with damaged brains.' 'Part of American culture' Joe Kmiech, who served in the Army and Minnesota National Guard from 1989 to 1998, supports the parade because the Army is 'part of American culture and our fabric.' He notes the Army's pioneering contributions to engineering and medicine, from dams to new surgical techniques. Like many veterans, he has a strong familial connection: His father served in the Army, and so did his maternal grandfather, who fought in World War II. 'I didn't vote for President Trump, but the commander in chief is going to be part of that celebration,' said Kmiech, 54, of Roberts, Wisconsin. 'The distinction needs to be made that the parade is a celebration of our Army, not of a person.' 'Stroking Trump's ego' For Gulf War Army veteran Paul Sullivan, Trump and the parade are inextricably linked. 'This Trump tank travesty is all about stroking Trump's ego,' said Sullivan, 62, who lives outside Charlottesville, Virginia. 'If Trump truly cared about our service members, he would sit down with them quietly and say, 'What can we do with $50 million or $100 million to make your lives better?' He's not.' 'We are a great nation' McDonough, the veteran from Crofton, Maryland, disagrees that the parade is about Trump or too costly. He said the U.S. held a grand celebration in New York after World War II when the nation was deeply in debt. 'We certainly need to bring our debt down, and we certainly need to take care of our veterans,' he said. 'But it's a false dichotomy. It's like saying if we bought two less aircraft carriers, we could do so much better to take care of our poor.' And McDonough said soldiers' oath is to the Constitution, not to Trump. The president 'understands the importance of doing this, not only for the Army, but for the nation,' McDonough said. 'A real dark turn'Purdy, the veteran from Atlanta, said the parade's brazen flex of military strength is not an American tradition, particularly absent a recent victory. 'I'm not saying we shouldn't celebrate the country,' he said. 'But for us to be projecting this type of hard power, in such a real in-your-face way, that's just not who we are.' Trump is brushing aside old alliances and foreign aid that have helped maintain peace for decades, Purdy asserted. 'It signals a real dark turn if we're just going to roll out the tanks,' Purdy said. 'People are the Army' Michael Nardotti, an Army veteran who served in Vietnam, said military hardware has long been in American parades, which can help recruitment. More important, he said, is the tremendous value in the public seeing soldiers' faces in a parade when active-duty troops make up less than 1% of the population. ''People are the Army,'' said Nardotti, 78, of Aldie, Virginia, quoting a former Army chief of staff. Nardotti said he'll listen carefully to Trump's speech. 'I hope it sends the right message,' he said.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From Los Angeles to Washington, Trump leans in as commander in chief
President Donald Trump loves displays of military force. He's parading two very different kinds this week. On one coast, military forces are arriving by the thousands to defend federal buildings and agents, facing off with civilians protesting the president's immigration agenda. On the other, they're readying a celebration of American military might in a parade held on the Army's — and Trump's — birthday. The scenes in Los Angeles and Washington underscore how Trump is leveraging his role as commander-in-chief in a much clearer and more urgent way than he did during his first term — embodying the image of a strong military commander that he has long admired in other foreign leaders, allies and adversaries alike. Trump has long seen the military and his command of it as a sign of his own strength and even expressed a sense of ownership over it. During the first term he referred to John Kelly and James Mattis, the retired four-star Marine generals who served in his Cabinet, as 'my generals.' Trump allies say time has reinforced that sense and removed any inhibitions, allowing him to expand his role as commander-in-chief even further, whether that's showing off the military in a parade or using it to quell protests. 'When you have four years out of office, you really have an opportunity to reflect on how you would do the job differently — and I think you see that manifesting itself in countless ways,' said Sean Spicer, who was press secretary during Trump's first term. 'He is much more confident in command.' And, Spicer added: 'He does love being commander in chief.' In recent days, Trump has mobilized thousands of California's National Guardsmen and deployed hundreds of Marines — in defiance of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom — to stamp out protests in Los Angeles over his deportation agenda. It comes as he prepares to preside over a very different show of force on Saturday with the kind of Americana-drenched military parade he has long dreamed of in celebration of the Army's 250th birthday. More than 100 military vehicles and thousands of soldiers are set to participate, with M1A2 Abrams tanks rolling down Constitution Avenue in front of the White House and Black Hawk, Apache and Chinook helicopters and World War II- and Vietnam-era planes circling overhead. The price tag, which could range anywhere from $25 million to $50 million, will dwarf any other military parade in recent memory, according to the Army. As of Tuesday afternoon, at least a dozen military vehicles, including humvees, were staged in a Pentagon parking lot. In addition, several dozen tanks and other military vehicles were sitting in West Potomac Park. Trump has wanted to hold a military parade in Washington since he accompanied French President Emmanuel Macron to a 2017 Bastille Day parade, where troops marched down the Champs-Élysées while fighter jets flew overhead, leaving trails of red, white, and blue smoke behind them. Trump later called it 'one of the greatest parades I've ever seen,' but aides advised him against throwing a similar affair. Trump has also heaped praise on military displays from adversaries. During a 2017 state visit to China, Trump called a military parade 'magnificent,' and after North Korea toned down its military parade in 2018 to reportedly exclude nuclear weapons, he praised the country for making a 'big and very positive statement.' Marc Short, who served as Trump's legislative affairs director and Vice President Mike Pence's chief of staff during the president's first term, said the timing of the Washington parade and the Los Angeles protests was coincidental, but acknowledged the two events offer a sharp contrast. 'He always wanted a military parade the first administration,' he said. 'There's no doubt there's some things that the second go-around he feels like he learned from the first administration the way he wants to do a second time.' One former Trump official, who like others in this story was granted anonymity to speak freely, called both the administration's response to the Los Angeles protests and the military parade a 'holistic approach to national security using all elements of state power as needed.' 'This administration understands that civil unrest and social cohesion is integral to our overall security,' the official said. 'You can't be a secure and prosperous country when rioters waving foreign flags are rampaging in a major country.' White House spokesperson Anny Kelly said in a statement that 'America is respected again' with Trump as commander in chief. 'Thanks to this President's leadership, our homeland is secure, military recruitment is up, our warfighters are prioritized, and the U.S. Army is getting the grand celebration it deserves for 250 years of honor, courage, and sacrifice,' Kelly said. Trump's response to the unrest in Los Angeles offered an opportunity to accomplish something he didn't in his first term. His decision to mobilize the first tranche of those troops, just 24 hours after the protests began, without the support of Newsom offered a stark contrast to his response to the protests after the killing of George Floyd in 2020, when he instead waited for governors to deploy their guardsmen. Steve Cortes, a longtime Trump adviser and conservative commentator, said that Trump's response then 'was just not forceful enough, early enough.' 'Trump seems super intent on a very different path now, with a serious show of righteous force to protect American lives and property,' Cortes said. The displays of military force also speak to another theme of his second administration — his desire to bring American institutions to heel, from elite universities and cultural centers to the federal bureaucracy and the military. In a recent address to West Point graduates, the president touted his elimination of the military's diversity, equity and inclusion policies — and that he had 'rebuilt the military.' 'Second term, I think he's really become what I call a unilateralist, which is he wants to do things that he can do on his own — that people can't stop him from doing,' said Tevi Troy, a former White House official under President George W. Bush turned presidential historian. But, Troy noted, that for as much as Trump likes displays of military power and is willing to deploy military resources at home to curb civil unrest, secure the border or assist with deportations, he's been much more reluctant to send soldiers into large-scale combat overseas. Trump has in some ways been more demanding on the military in the first five months of his administration than in his first term, deploying 10,000 active duty and Guard troops to the southern border, using dozens of military transport aircraft to fly migrants around the world, and the deployment of 4,700 troops to Los Angeles. Military parades are a regular occurrence for many branches of the armed forces. The Marines host a small-scale parade at their Washington Barracks near Capitol Hill almost every week of the summer, and the Navy hosts 'Fleet Week' where ships park in city docks. But those do not come at the behest of the president. The scale and optics of Saturday's parade and Trump's expansive deployments of U.S. troops on their own soil have split the Pentagon's traditionally apolitical bureaucracy along party lines, one defense official said. Pro-Trump officials in the Pentagon have defended the event as an Army birthday celebration, while anti-Trump officials have likened it to a North Korean military demonstration. "The U.S. military has always been his flex," one former defense official said of the recent events. "He loves threatening the world with its power. And now he threatens his domestic enemies — which are anyone he casts as liberal or democrat, and anyone who speaks against him."
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
The American war too few talk about
The U.S. military is bombing extremist groups in the Horn of Africa, executing at least 32 strikes in Somalia this year alone. That's more than double the previous year's tally, according to Africa Command, and is a sign of enduring extremism concerns back in Washington. Why it matters: This is a war too few in the U.S. are discussing — or even realize is happening. By the numbers: American forces, in cooperation with local government, targeted ISIS-Somalia 20 times and al-Shabab 12 times between Feb. 1 and June 4. The strike cadence has surged in recent months, with roughly twice as many attacks in April and May (19 in total) as in the previous two months, AFRICOM announcements and posts on social media show. The command reported three strikes this month, all on ISIS-Somalia. The operations often target areas southeast of Bosaso, a coastal town on the Gulf of Aden, and areas northwest of Kismayo, a port near the Kenyan border. The intrigue: Acting Chief of Naval Operations Adm. James Kilby at a Council on Foreign Relations event in May said the Harry S. Truman carrier strike group "launched the largest airstrike in the history of the world: 125,000 pounds from a single aircraft carrier into Somalia." The Trump administration loosened rules for airstrikes and other raids earlier this year. Washington has released few details on casualties, civilian or militant. An early February strike reportedly killed 14 ISIS-Somalia operatives, including a recruiter and financier. The latest: AFRICOM boss Gen. Michael Langley, a Marine, on Tuesday told Congress that Africa "remains a nexus theater from which the United States cannot afford to shift its gaze." "It is home to terrorists who take advantage of conditions in Africa to grow and export their ideology," he added. "ISIS controls their global network from Somalia." Context: Several U.S. administrations have become entangled in the region. Perhaps the most infamous instance — the Battle of Mogadishu, associated with "Black Hawk Down" — occurred under President Clinton. Zoom out: While this contemporary campaign is limited to Somalia, the threat from ISIS, al-Shabab and other extremist groups is not. It's particularly acute across the Sahel, where violence and worsening weather fuels political instability. U.S. forces withdrew from Niger last year, following a coup. France also dramatically reduced its military presence in West Africa under pressure from local leaders. Russia has entrenched its own influence in several states in West and Central Africa, via its Wagner mercenaries. On Monday, the Kremlin reiterated its desire to step up cooperation with African countries in "such sensitive areas as defense and security," Reuters reported. The bottom line: The fight "in Africa is the least understood or covered," Alex Plitsas, a counterterrorism expert at the Atlantic Council, told Axios.
