
Decision October 3 on 40pc case: High Court
Published on: Wed, Aug 13, 2025
By: Jo Ann Mool Text Size: On Nov 11, 2022, the High Court granted SLS leave to proceed with the judicial review, while the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), acting for the Federal Government, later secured a stay order to halt the High Court from hearing the merits of the case, pending appeal. Kota Kinabalu: The High Court will deliver on Oct 3 its decision on the Sabah Law Society's (SLS) substantive judicial review over Sabah's 40 per cent special grant. According to SLS counsel Dr David Fung, Judge Datuk Celestina Stuel Galid informed this during a Zoom hearing Tuesday. The decision will be delivered at 9am in open court. The court had, on July 7, heard oral arguments by the parties on the substantive merits of the judicial review and fixed Aug 7 for an e-review of the matter. The SLS filed a judicial review leave application on June 8, 2022, after the Federal Government announced on April 14, 2022 that an agreement had been reached with the State Government, and named the Federal and State governments as the first and second respondents. On Nov 11, 2022, the High Court granted SLS leave to proceed with the judicial review, while the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), acting for the Federal Government, later secured a stay order to halt the High Court from hearing the merits of the case, pending appeal. On June 18, 2024, the Court of Appeal dismissed the Federal Government's appeal against the leave granted to SLS and directed the High Court to fix a date for the full hearing. The Federal Government then applied for leave to appeal the ruling to the Federal Court, but on Oct 17, 2024, the Federal Court dismissed the application. The SLS is seeking a declaration, among others, that the Federal Government's failure to hold a second review in 1974 with the State Government was a breach and contravention of its constitutional duty stipulated under Article 112D, Clauses (1), (3) and (4) of the Federal Constitution. It said the 40 per cent entitlement remained due and payable by the Federal Government to the State Government for each consecutive financial year for the period of 1974 to 2021, in which a failure to pay the entitlement was a breach of the fundamental right to property of the Sabah Government and ultimately, of the people of Sabah, as enshrined under Article 13 of the Federal Constitution. SLS also sought an order of mandamus directed to the respondent to hold another review with the State Government under the provisions of Article 112D of the Federal Constitution, to give effect to the payment of the 40 per cent entitlement for each consecutive financial year from 1974 to 2021 within 30 days, and to reach a decision within 90 days from the date of the order, and that the respondent pays the entitlement to the State Government or as constitutional damages for breach of Article 13 of the Federal Constitution, or both. Counsel Dr David Fung and Jeyan Marimuttu represented SLS, Senior Federal Counsel (SFC) Ahmad Hanir Hambaly @ Arwi represented the Federal Government and Sabah State Attorney-General Datuk Brenndon Soh represented the State Government. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
PM Anwar's 2018 royal pardon cleared all disqualifications, says law expert
KUALA LUMPUR: The royal pardon granted to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in 2018 fully restored his eligibility to contest elections and hold office, according to constitutional law expert Emeritus Prof Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi. He stated that the pardon under Article 42(1) of the Federal Constitution erased all legal consequences from Anwar's previous conviction. 'Once there was a free pardon under Article 42(1), all disqualifications under Article 48(1) were removed and there was absolutely no need for His Majesty to issue a new, second order to lift the disqualification,' he explained in an op-ed to Bernama. Shad Saleem addressed recent claims by opposition leaders questioning Anwar's eligibility under Articles 48(1)(e) and 48(3) of the Federal Constitution. He clarified that a full pardon not only releases a person from serving a sentence but also removes legal disqualifications. 'It includes those that would otherwise bar the individual from contesting or holding office as a Member of Parliament (MP). Once there is a free pardon, all disqualifications under Article 48(1) are removed,' he said. He cited case law from Malaysia and other Commonwealth countries, including Anwar Ibrahim (2018) and Jeyaratnam v AG (1990) from Singapore. A free pardon 'wipes the slate clean,' restoring the individual's full legal standing, he noted. Shad Saleem also referenced the 1969 case of DAP veteran Lim Kit Siang, where a royal pardon reinstated his MP position after disqualification due to a technical breach. 'If this view is correct, that a free pardon wipes the conviction off the slate, then the Article 48(3) removal of disqualification order is absolutely unnecessary,' he concluded. - Bernama

Barnama
12 hours ago
- Barnama
PM Anwar's 2018 Royal Pardon Nullifies All Disqualifications, Wipes The Slate Clean
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 16 (Bernama) -- The royal pardon granted to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in 2018 fully restored his eligibility to contest in elections and to hold the office of Prime Minister, said constitutional law expert Emeritus Prof Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi. He said the royal pardon under Article 42 (1) of the Federal Constitution effectively removed all legal consequences arising from Anwar's previous conviction. 'Once there was a free pardon under Article 42(1), all disqualifications under Article 48(1) were removed and there was absolutely no need for His Majesty to issue a new, second order to lift the disqualification,' he stated in an op-ed to Bernama. Shad Saleem was responding to recent claims by several opposition leaders questioning Anwar's eligibility to contest elections under Articles 48(1)(e) and 48(3) of the Federal Constitution. He highlighted that a free or full pardon not only releases a person from serving the sentence but also removes any legal disqualifications. 'It includes those that would otherwise bar the individual from contesting or holding office as a Member of Parliament (MP). Once there is a free pardon, all disqualifications under Article 48(1) are removed. 'There was absolutely no need for His Majesty to issue a second order under Article 48(3),' he said. He was also citing case law from Malaysia and other Commonwealth countries, including Anwar Ibrahim (2018) and Jeyaratnam v AG (1990) from Singapore and pointed out that a free pardon 'wipes the slate clean,' restoring the individual's full legal standing. Shad Saleem also referred to the 1969 case of DAP veteran Lim Kit Siang, where a royal pardon reinstated his position as an MP after disqualification due to a technical breach by his election agent.


Focus Malaysia
12 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
UMNO man urges swift enforcement of Royal addendum in SRC case
THE Federal Court's confirmation of the existence of a Titah Adendum (Addendum Decree) linked to former premier Datuk Seri Najib Razak has reignited debate over his prison sentence, with calls for its immediate enforcement. According to UMNO Tumpat information chief Che Muhammad Redzuan Jihad, a lawyer, the matter should no longer be brought to the High Court, as the highest court had already ruled on its existence. 'The Titah Adendum is an order from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, not a political document. Prolonged debate only wastes time and confuses the people,' he said, stressing that swift implementation would uphold the dignity of the Malay Rulers. UMNO deputy president Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan echoed the view, saying there was no need for further litigation after the Federal Court ruling. Nevertheless, lawyer Haniff Khatri Abdulla told a Malay-language online portal that Najib could begin serving his sentence under house arrest as early as November if the High Court affirms the decree's validity. He noted administrative matters would not hinder enforcement once the court confirms it. Najib is currently serving a 12-year prison sentence for corruption involving SRC International, partially reduced through a royal pardon. Meanwhile, SRC International Sdn Bhd and its subsidiary Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd have filed a RM42mil civil suit against Najib. They alleged the funds, intended to secure Malaysia's energy future and benefit pensioners, were diverted into Najib's personal accounts. The High Court trial, before Judge Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah, resumes on Sept 8. 'The facts are stark: the RM42mil of public money, funds meant to secure Malaysia's energy future and intended for the benefit of civil service pensioners, ended up in the personal bank accounts of our former prime minister, the defendants. 'The evidence tells a simple yet damning story: public power was abused and misused,' Kwan Will Sen, company lawyer, said. — Aug 16, 2025 Main photo credit: The Guardian